Loading…

The Effect of Intraoperative Patient Positioning on the Success of Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery in Older Patients

The incidence of hip fractures in people of advanced ages is increasing due to our aging society. Patient positioning for the intertrochanteric fractures of the femur can be performed in various ways. The aim of this study is to clinically and radiologically compare the use of the supine hemilithoto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Lithuania), 2024-04, Vol.60 (4), p.646
Main Authors: Kaya, Onur, Kundakçı, Buğra, Önder, Cem, Kurt, Vahap, Atmaca, Emre, Tunç, Fatih
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-f367d18c15f554c4f92f060f5542b4aee684ce452688a34da63dc564b90e85333
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 646
container_title Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)
container_volume 60
creator Kaya, Onur
Kundakçı, Buğra
Önder, Cem
Kurt, Vahap
Atmaca, Emre
Tunç, Fatih
description The incidence of hip fractures in people of advanced ages is increasing due to our aging society. Patient positioning for the intertrochanteric fractures of the femur can be performed in various ways. The aim of this study is to clinically and radiologically compare the use of the supine hemilithotomy position, the lateral decubitus position, and the traction table when performing proximal femoral nail (PFN) surgery for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the geriatric age group. A total of 170 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were included in this cross-sectional study. The patients were divided into three groups (the supine hemilithotomy group, the lateral decubitus group, and the fracture table group). For the postoperative period, complications, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of stay in hospital were examined, while in postoperative radiographs, tip-apex distances (TADs), collodiaphyseal angles (CDAs), and Cleveland-Bosworth quadrants were examined to evaluate the placement of the lag screw in the femoral head. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated according to the modified Baumgaertner criteria. The mean age of the patients was 77.8 ± 8.8; 57.6% of patients were female. According to the modified Baumgaertner criteria, it was determined that patients with 'poor' reduction quality had an approximately ten times higher risk of cut-out than those with 'good' reduction quality (OR = 10.111, = 0.002, 95% confidence interval; 2.313-44.207). The operative time for patients in the fracture table group was longer than that of the other groups Additionally, the CDA in the supine hemilithotomy position group was longer. Although PFN surgery using the traction table is longer in terms of surgical time compared to surgery performed in the lateral decubitus position and the supine hemilitotomy position, it is advantageous in terms of better TAD and CDA values and lower complication rates.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/medicina60040646
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d1b817bb16744034a52056341a96c0ff</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A793560598</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d1b817bb16744034a52056341a96c0ff</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A793560598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-f367d18c15f554c4f92f060f5542b4aee684ce452688a34da63dc564b90e85333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks9PHCEUxydNG7W2954akl56WQvDj4GjMdpuYqJJ7ZkwzGNlMwtbYDT-9zLd1VrTcHiPx-f7BV5e03wi-IRShb9tYPDWByMwZlgw8aY5IoLJhSKMvX2RHzbvc15jTFvetQfNIZWiY61qj5r7m1tA586BLSg6tAwlmbiFZIq_A3RdA4SCrmP2xcfgwwrFgErV_JyshZz3IkglRXtr5sxbdJGMLVOaqbSC9IB8QFfjAOnJMX9o3jkzZvi4j8fNr4vzm7Mfi8ur78uz08uFZZyXhaOiG4i0hDvOmWVOtQ4LPG_anhkAIZkFxlshpaFsMIIOlgvWKwySU0qPm-XOd4hmrbfJb0x60NF4_acQ00qbVLwdQQ-kl6Tre1J7wzBlhreYC8qIUcJi56rX153XNsXfE-SiNz5bGEcTIE5ZU8w6xYkUbUW_vELXcUqh_nSmhBId6bq_1MrU-31wsXbfzqb6tFOUC8yVrNTJf6i6Bth4GwM4X-v_CPBOYFPMOYF7_jfBep4b_XpuquTz_r1TXw-fBU-DQh8BilO9iQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3046967177</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Intraoperative Patient Positioning on the Success of Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery in Older Patients</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kaya, Onur ; Kundakçı, Buğra ; Önder, Cem ; Kurt, Vahap ; Atmaca, Emre ; Tunç, Fatih</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Onur ; Kundakçı, Buğra ; Önder, Cem ; Kurt, Vahap ; Atmaca, Emre ; Tunç, Fatih</creatorcontrib><description>The incidence of hip fractures in people of advanced ages is increasing due to our aging society. Patient positioning for the intertrochanteric fractures of the femur can be performed in various ways. The aim of this study is to clinically and radiologically compare the use of the supine hemilithotomy position, the lateral decubitus position, and the traction table when performing proximal femoral nail (PFN) surgery for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the geriatric age group. A total of 170 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were included in this cross-sectional study. The patients were divided into three groups (the supine hemilithotomy group, the lateral decubitus group, and the fracture table group). For the postoperative period, complications, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of stay in hospital were examined, while in postoperative radiographs, tip-apex distances (TADs), collodiaphyseal angles (CDAs), and Cleveland-Bosworth quadrants were examined to evaluate the placement of the lag screw in the femoral head. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated according to the modified Baumgaertner criteria. The mean age of the patients was 77.8 ± 8.8; 57.6% of patients were female. According to the modified Baumgaertner criteria, it was determined that patients with 'poor' reduction quality had an approximately ten times higher risk of cut-out than those with 'good' reduction quality (OR = 10.111, = 0.002, 95% confidence interval; 2.313-44.207). The operative time for patients in the fracture table group was longer than that of the other groups Additionally, the CDA in the supine hemilithotomy position group was longer. Although PFN surgery using the traction table is longer in terms of surgical time compared to surgery performed in the lateral decubitus position and the supine hemilitotomy position, it is advantageous in terms of better TAD and CDA values and lower complication rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1648-9144</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1010-660X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1648-9144</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040646</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38674292</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged patients ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia ; Cardiovascular disease ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Classification ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods ; Fractures ; Geriatrics ; Heart failure ; Hip Fractures - surgery ; Hip joint ; Humans ; Internal fixation in fractures ; intertrochanteric fracture ; lateral decubitus ; Length of stay ; Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Orthopedics ; Patient positioning ; Patient Positioning - methods ; PFN ; Postoperative period ; Statistical analysis ; supine hemilithotomy ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; traction table ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Treatment Outcome ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024-04, Vol.60 (4), p.646</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-f367d18c15f554c4f92f060f5542b4aee684ce452688a34da63dc564b90e85333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7164-3156 ; 0000-0002-8343-5506 ; 0009-0000-1569-3610 ; 0000-0002-8289-8867 ; 0000-0001-9344-4265 ; 0000-0003-0532-4357</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3046967177/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3046967177?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,74997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38674292$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Onur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundakçı, Buğra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Önder, Cem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Vahap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atmaca, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunç, Fatih</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Intraoperative Patient Positioning on the Success of Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery in Older Patients</title><title>Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)</title><addtitle>Medicina (Kaunas)</addtitle><description>The incidence of hip fractures in people of advanced ages is increasing due to our aging society. Patient positioning for the intertrochanteric fractures of the femur can be performed in various ways. The aim of this study is to clinically and radiologically compare the use of the supine hemilithotomy position, the lateral decubitus position, and the traction table when performing proximal femoral nail (PFN) surgery for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the geriatric age group. A total of 170 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were included in this cross-sectional study. The patients were divided into three groups (the supine hemilithotomy group, the lateral decubitus group, and the fracture table group). For the postoperative period, complications, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of stay in hospital were examined, while in postoperative radiographs, tip-apex distances (TADs), collodiaphyseal angles (CDAs), and Cleveland-Bosworth quadrants were examined to evaluate the placement of the lag screw in the femoral head. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated according to the modified Baumgaertner criteria. The mean age of the patients was 77.8 ± 8.8; 57.6% of patients were female. According to the modified Baumgaertner criteria, it was determined that patients with 'poor' reduction quality had an approximately ten times higher risk of cut-out than those with 'good' reduction quality (OR = 10.111, = 0.002, 95% confidence interval; 2.313-44.207). The operative time for patients in the fracture table group was longer than that of the other groups Additionally, the CDA in the supine hemilithotomy position group was longer. Although PFN surgery using the traction table is longer in terms of surgical time compared to surgery performed in the lateral decubitus position and the supine hemilitotomy position, it is advantageous in terms of better TAD and CDA values and lower complication rates.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged patients</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Hip joint</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal fixation in fractures</subject><subject>intertrochanteric fracture</subject><subject>lateral decubitus</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patient positioning</subject><subject>Patient Positioning - methods</subject><subject>PFN</subject><subject>Postoperative period</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>supine hemilithotomy</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>traction table</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1648-9144</issn><issn>1010-660X</issn><issn>1648-9144</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptks9PHCEUxydNG7W2954akl56WQvDj4GjMdpuYqJJ7ZkwzGNlMwtbYDT-9zLd1VrTcHiPx-f7BV5e03wi-IRShb9tYPDWByMwZlgw8aY5IoLJhSKMvX2RHzbvc15jTFvetQfNIZWiY61qj5r7m1tA586BLSg6tAwlmbiFZIq_A3RdA4SCrmP2xcfgwwrFgErV_JyshZz3IkglRXtr5sxbdJGMLVOaqbSC9IB8QFfjAOnJMX9o3jkzZvi4j8fNr4vzm7Mfi8ur78uz08uFZZyXhaOiG4i0hDvOmWVOtQ4LPG_anhkAIZkFxlshpaFsMIIOlgvWKwySU0qPm-XOd4hmrbfJb0x60NF4_acQ00qbVLwdQQ-kl6Tre1J7wzBlhreYC8qIUcJi56rX153XNsXfE-SiNz5bGEcTIE5ZU8w6xYkUbUW_vELXcUqh_nSmhBId6bq_1MrU-31wsXbfzqb6tFOUC8yVrNTJf6i6Bth4GwM4X-v_CPBOYFPMOYF7_jfBep4b_XpuquTz_r1TXw-fBU-DQh8BilO9iQ</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Kaya, Onur</creator><creator>Kundakçı, Buğra</creator><creator>Önder, Cem</creator><creator>Kurt, Vahap</creator><creator>Atmaca, Emre</creator><creator>Tunç, Fatih</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7164-3156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8343-5506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1569-3610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8289-8867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9344-4265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0532-4357</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>The Effect of Intraoperative Patient Positioning on the Success of Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery in Older Patients</title><author>Kaya, Onur ; Kundakçı, Buğra ; Önder, Cem ; Kurt, Vahap ; Atmaca, Emre ; Tunç, Fatih</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-f367d18c15f554c4f92f060f5542b4aee684ce452688a34da63dc564b90e85333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged patients</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Hip joint</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal fixation in fractures</topic><topic>intertrochanteric fracture</topic><topic>lateral decubitus</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patient positioning</topic><topic>Patient Positioning - methods</topic><topic>PFN</topic><topic>Postoperative period</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>supine hemilithotomy</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>traction table</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Onur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundakçı, Buğra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Önder, Cem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Vahap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atmaca, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunç, Fatih</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaya, Onur</au><au>Kundakçı, Buğra</au><au>Önder, Cem</au><au>Kurt, Vahap</au><au>Atmaca, Emre</au><au>Tunç, Fatih</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Intraoperative Patient Positioning on the Success of Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery in Older Patients</atitle><jtitle>Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicina (Kaunas)</addtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>646</spage><pages>646-</pages><issn>1648-9144</issn><issn>1010-660X</issn><eissn>1648-9144</eissn><abstract>The incidence of hip fractures in people of advanced ages is increasing due to our aging society. Patient positioning for the intertrochanteric fractures of the femur can be performed in various ways. The aim of this study is to clinically and radiologically compare the use of the supine hemilithotomy position, the lateral decubitus position, and the traction table when performing proximal femoral nail (PFN) surgery for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the geriatric age group. A total of 170 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were included in this cross-sectional study. The patients were divided into three groups (the supine hemilithotomy group, the lateral decubitus group, and the fracture table group). For the postoperative period, complications, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of stay in hospital were examined, while in postoperative radiographs, tip-apex distances (TADs), collodiaphyseal angles (CDAs), and Cleveland-Bosworth quadrants were examined to evaluate the placement of the lag screw in the femoral head. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated according to the modified Baumgaertner criteria. The mean age of the patients was 77.8 ± 8.8; 57.6% of patients were female. According to the modified Baumgaertner criteria, it was determined that patients with 'poor' reduction quality had an approximately ten times higher risk of cut-out than those with 'good' reduction quality (OR = 10.111, = 0.002, 95% confidence interval; 2.313-44.207). The operative time for patients in the fracture table group was longer than that of the other groups Additionally, the CDA in the supine hemilithotomy position group was longer. Although PFN surgery using the traction table is longer in terms of surgical time compared to surgery performed in the lateral decubitus position and the supine hemilitotomy position, it is advantageous in terms of better TAD and CDA values and lower complication rates.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>38674292</pmid><doi>10.3390/medicina60040646</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7164-3156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8343-5506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1569-3610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8289-8867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9344-4265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0532-4357</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1648-9144
ispartof Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024-04, Vol.60 (4), p.646
issn 1648-9144
1010-660X
1648-9144
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d1b817bb16744034a52056341a96c0ff
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central
subjects Aged
Aged patients
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesia
Cardiovascular disease
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Classification
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods
Fractures
Geriatrics
Heart failure
Hip Fractures - surgery
Hip joint
Humans
Internal fixation in fractures
intertrochanteric fracture
lateral decubitus
Length of stay
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Male
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Orthopedics
Patient positioning
Patient Positioning - methods
PFN
Postoperative period
Statistical analysis
supine hemilithotomy
Surgeons
Surgery
traction table
Transplants & implants
Treatment Outcome
Variance analysis
title The Effect of Intraoperative Patient Positioning on the Success of Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery in Older Patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A06%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Intraoperative%20Patient%20Positioning%20on%20the%20Success%20of%20Intertrochanteric%20Fracture%20Surgery%20in%20Older%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Medicina%20(Kaunas,%20Lithuania)&rft.au=Kaya,%20Onur&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=646&rft.pages=646-&rft.issn=1648-9144&rft.eissn=1648-9144&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/medicina60040646&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA793560598%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-f367d18c15f554c4f92f060f5542b4aee684ce452688a34da63dc564b90e85333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3046967177&rft_id=info:pmid/38674292&rft_galeid=A793560598&rfr_iscdi=true