Making an unknown unknown a known unknown: Missing data in longitudinal neuroimaging studies

The analysis of longitudinal neuroimaging data within the massively univariate framework provides the opportunity to study empirical questions about neurodevelopment. Missing outcome data are an all-to-common feature of any longitudinal study, a feature that, if handled improperly, can reduce statis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Developmental cognitive neuroscience 2018-10, Vol.33, p.83-98
Main Authors: Matta, Tyler H., Flournoy, John C., Byrne, Michelle L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Humans
Likelihood
Likelihood Functions
Longitudinal data
Longitudinal Studies
Missing data
Neuroimaging
Neuroimaging - methods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The analysis of longitudinal neuroimaging data within the massively univariate framework provides the opportunity to study empirical questions about neurodevelopment. Missing outcome data are an all-to-common feature of any longitudinal study, a feature that, if handled improperly, can reduce statistical power and lead to biased parameter estimates. The goal of this paper is to provide conceptual clarity of the issues and non-issues that arise from analyzing incomplete data in longitudinal studies with particular focus on neuroimaging data. This paper begins with a review of the hierarchy of missing data mechanisms and their relationship to likelihood-based methods, a review that is necessary not just for likelihood-based methods, but also for multiple-imputation methods. Next, the paper provides a series of simulation studies with designs common in longitudinal neuroimaging studies to help illustrate missing data concepts regardless of interpretation. Finally, two applied examples are used to demonstrate the sensitivity of inferences under different missing data assumptions and how this may change the substantive interpretation. The paper concludes with a set of guidelines for analyzing incomplete longitudinal data that can improve the validity of research findings in developmental neuroimaging research.
ISSN:1878-9293
1878-9307
DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.10.001