Apgar scores in puppies following the induction of etomidate compared with alfaxalone or propofol for cesarean section

• Published in: Veterinary World 2024-03, Vol.17 (3), p.527-534
• Main Authors: Srithunyarat, Thanikul, Jitpean, Supranee, Wipoosak, Piyasak, Nonthakotr, Chalermkwan, Boonbal, Nitaya, Kunkitti, Panisara, Seesupa, Suvaluk
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anesthesia; apgar; Cesarean section; Comparative analysis; Dogs; Etomidate; Infants (Newborn); Phenols; puppies; viability; vigorous
• ISSN: 0972-8988; 2231-0916
• DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.527-534

The Apgar score is a useful assessment of neonatal viability in dogs. The Apgar score in puppies born by cesarean section can be lower than vaginal delivery because all anesthetic drugs can cross the placenta. Therefore, anesthetic drugs with minimal cardiorespiratory effect and rapid elimination are recommended for cesarean section. The present study aimed to compare Apgar scores in puppies born after the induction of etomidate, alfaxalone or propofol, and those maintained with isoflurane inhalation during cesarean section. Thirty-six bitches were equally divided in the three anesthetic drug groups. Modified Apgar scores were assessed at 5, 15, and 60 min after delivery. Intraoperative vital signs and Apgar scores were compared using a linear mixed model and adjusted pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni analysis. A total of 125 puppies were included in this study. Age, body weight, litter size, type of surgery, delivery time, anesthetic and surgical duration, and intraoperative vital signs did not significantly differ between the groups. Puppies in the alfaxalone and propofol groups had significantly higher Apgar scores than the etomidate group in both elective and emergency surgery. In elective surgery, Apgar scores at 5 min after delivery did not differ significantly between groups. At 15 and 60 min after delivery, Apgar scores in the etomidate group were significantly lower than those in the other groups. In emergency surgery, Apgar scores were significantly lower in the etomidate group than in the alfaxalone group at all time points. Induction with alfaxalone and propofol resulted in better outcomes with higher Apgar scores and neonatal viability than etomidate. Therefore, alfaxalone and propofol should be used as anesthetic induction drugs in both elective and emergency cesarean sections.