Investigation of membranes-electrodes assemblies in anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs): Influence of ionomer ratio in catalyst layers

• Published in: Heliyon 2024-04, Vol.10 (8), p.e29622-e29622, Article e29622
• Main Authors: Turtayeva, Zarina, Xu, Feina, Dillet, Jérôme, Mozet, Kévin, Peignier, Régis, Celzard, Alain, Maranzana, Gaël
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: AEMFCs (Anion exchange membrane fuel cells); alternative fuels; anion exchange; anion-exchange membranes; anodes; Catalyst inks; catalysts; CCMs (Catalyst-coated membranes); deformation; electrochemistry; Engineering Sciences; fuel cells; GDEs (Gas-diffusion electrodes); Polarization curves; voltammetry; Water management
• ISSN: 2405-8440; 2405-8440
• DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29622

Anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs) have recently attracted significant attention as low-cost alternative fuel cells to traditional proton exchange membrane fuel cells because of the possible use of platinum-group metal-free electrocatalysts. Over the past decade, new materials dedicated to the alkaline medium, such as anion exchange membranes (AEMs) and anion exchange ionomers (AEIs), have been developed and studied in AEMFCs. However, only a few AEMs and AEIs are commercially available, and there are no ready-to-use membrane electrodes assemblies (MEAs) with the desired AEMs and AEIs. Consequently, the need to manufacture in-house CCMs or GDEs becomes a reality that we must face. This work deals with the influence of ionomer content on the prepared MEAs with the commercial anion exchange membrane and ionomer from Aemion™ Ionomr Innovations AF1–HNN8–2 and AP1–ENN8/HNN8 respectively and by varying the support (gas diffusion layer or membrane). The prepared MEAs were characterized morphologically by SEM and profilometry, as well as electrochemically by AEMFC polarization curves and cyclic voltammetry. In addition, an attempt to investigate water management was made with and without a reference electrode in the cell to understand the behavior of water in an operating AEMFC. Our results show that CCM-based MEAs can undergo deformation during the anion conversion step, leading to weakening of the membrane and hence faster degradation in the fuel cell. On the contrary, no deformation was observed for the GDEs during the anionic conversion, although the results are poorer due to (i) poor interface contact between membrane and GDE that depends on ionomer ratio in the ink and (ii) a high overpotential at the anode due to the production of water that cannot be effectively evacuated. •The optimum ink composition is different for GDE – MEAs and CCM – MEAs.•Higher the ionomer content – lower the OCV of CCM – MEAs.•The higher the amount of ionomer, the greater the segregation in the electrode.•The thickness of the Teflon gasket can stabilize water management.