Loading…
Faecal examination and PCR to detect Strongyloides venezuelensis in experimentally infected Lewis rats
More sensitive methodologies are necessary to improve strongyloidiasis diagnosis. This study compared the sensitivities of the McMaster modified technique and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, both performed in faecal samples. Lewis rats were subcutaneously infected with 4,000, 400 or 40 infec...
Saved in:
Published in: | Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 2010-02, Vol.105 (1), p.57-61 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | More sensitive methodologies are necessary to improve strongyloidiasis
diagnosis. This study compared the sensitivities of the McMaster
modified technique and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, both
performed in faecal samples. Lewis rats were subcutaneously infected
with 4,000, 400 or 40 infective third-stage larvae, considered as high,
moderate or low infection, respectively. Seven days later, they were
euthanized to count adult nematodes recovered from the small intestine.
Stool samples were used to count the number of eggs per gram (EPG) of
faeces and to detect parasite DNA by PCR performed with a species and a
genus primer pair. The sensitivity of these assays depended upon
parasite burden and the primer specificity. All assays presented 100%
sensitivity at the highest parasite load. In the moderate infection,
EPG and PCR with the genus primer maintained 100% specificity, whereas
PCR sensitivity with the species primer decreased to 77.7%. In low
infection, the sensitivity was 60% for EPG, 0% for PCR with the species
primer and 90% for PCR done with the genus primer. Together, these
results suggest that PCR with a genus primer can be a very sensitive
methodology to detect Strongyloides venezuelensis in faeces of Lewis
rats infected with very low parasite burden. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1678-8060 0074-0276 1678-8060 0074-0276 |
DOI: | 10.1590/S0074-02762010000100008 |