Loading…

Laboratory parameters in lean NAFLD: comparison of subjects with lean NAFLD with obese subjects without hepatic steatosis

Search for meaningful laboratory and anthropometric parameters in lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (lean NAFLD) in the general population. Out of 2445 subjects in a random population sample, we compared those who had a body mass index (BMI)  30 but no fatty liver [non-NAFLD (NN), n = 27] in a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC research notes 2018-02, Vol.11 (1), p.101-101, Article 101
Main Authors: Bernhardt, Philipp, Kratzer, Wolfgang, Schmidberger, Julian, Graeter, Tilmann, Gruener, Beate
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-6781316f99888338afb45a47ce9ee2b774421ffbad8bfed33bbcbafe12c8768c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-6781316f99888338afb45a47ce9ee2b774421ffbad8bfed33bbcbafe12c8768c3
container_end_page 101
container_issue 1
container_start_page 101
container_title BMC research notes
container_volume 11
creator Bernhardt, Philipp
Kratzer, Wolfgang
Schmidberger, Julian
Graeter, Tilmann
Gruener, Beate
description Search for meaningful laboratory and anthropometric parameters in lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (lean NAFLD) in the general population. Out of 2445 subjects in a random population sample, we compared those who had a body mass index (BMI)  30 but no fatty liver [non-NAFLD (NN), n = 27] in a follow-up examination. Ultrasonic, anthropometric and laboratory parameters were collected. There were significant differences (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13104-018-3212-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d3d352850bff4e4aa1af2be1c838a363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A546075952</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d3d352850bff4e4aa1af2be1c838a363</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A546075952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-6781316f99888338afb45a47ce9ee2b774421ffbad8bfed33bbcbafe12c8768c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk2P0zAQhiMEYpeFH8AFReIChyz-iBObw0rVwkKlir0AV8t2xq2rJC62A_Tf49JlaRDywV_PvDMev0XxHKNLjHnzJmKKUV0hzCtKMKnwg-Ict6ypEEPo4cn6rHgS4xahBnOOHxdnRNRIMMrPi_1KaR9U8mFf7lRQAyQIsXRj2YMay0-Lm9W7t6XxQ7500Y-lt2Wc9BZMiuUPlzYn3HHvNUSYM35K5QZ2KjlTxgQ5W3TxafHIqj7Cs7v5ovhy8_7z9cdqdftheb1YVYYhgaum5fmVjRWCc04pV1bXTNWtAQFAdNvWNcHWatVxbaGjVGujlQVMDG8bbuhFsTzqdl5t5S64QYW99MrJ3wc-rKUKubIeZEc7yghnSFtbQ60UVpZowIbnvLShWevqqLWb9ACdgTEF1c9E5zej28i1_y4ZR_kzDgKv7gSC_zZBTHJw0UDfqxH8FCUWQmDRMtJm9OU_6NZPYcytkqQVmBLWEPyXWqv8ADdan_Oag6hcsLpBLROMZOryP1QeHQzO-BGsy-ezgNezgMwk-JnWaopRLm-_zll8ZE3wMQaw9_3ASB58Ko8-ldmn8uBTeSj7xWkj7yP-GJP-Aj1h4qM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791325621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laboratory parameters in lean NAFLD: comparison of subjects with lean NAFLD with obese subjects without hepatic steatosis</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bernhardt, Philipp ; Kratzer, Wolfgang ; Schmidberger, Julian ; Graeter, Tilmann ; Gruener, Beate</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Philipp ; Kratzer, Wolfgang ; Schmidberger, Julian ; Graeter, Tilmann ; Gruener, Beate ; EMIL Study Group ; for the EMIL Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Search for meaningful laboratory and anthropometric parameters in lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (lean NAFLD) in the general population. Out of 2445 subjects in a random population sample, we compared those who had a body mass index (BMI) &lt; 25 and a fatty liver [lean NAFLD (LN), n = 5] with obese subjects who had a BMI &gt; 30 but no fatty liver [non-NAFLD (NN), n = 27] in a follow-up examination. Ultrasonic, anthropometric and laboratory parameters were collected. There were significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) between the LN and the NN groups with respect to serum ferritin (199.2 ± 72.1 LN vs 106.0 ± 89.6 NN), haemoglobin (14.9 ± 0.8 LN vs 13.5 ± 1.2 NN), haematocrit (0.438 ± 0.019 LN vs 0.407 ± 0.035 NN) and Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (34 ± 0.6 LN vs 33.2 ± 0.8 NN). Significantly lower values of soluble transferrin receptor were measured in the LN group (2.8 ± 0.4 LN vs 3.8 ± 1.5 NN). In both groups, the measured HOMA-IR index (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index) (2.3; normal range ≤ 1) was abnormal. Mean cholesterol (6.2 ± 1.4 LN and 5.6 ± 1.1 NN) and low-density lipoprotein levels (3.8 ± 1.0 LN 3.4 ± 0.9 NN) were above the upper limit of normal in both groups, as was the mean triglycerides level in the LN group (2.6 ± 2.0). In summary, there are differences in parameters of iron and fat metabolism between subjects with LN and overweight subjects without fatty liver infiltration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-0500</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-0500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3212-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29409538</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Alcohol ; Body mass index ; Body weight ; Cholesterol ; Development and progression ; Fat metabolism ; Fatty liver ; Ferritin ; Haematocrit ; Haemoglobin ; Health aspects ; Hematocrit ; Hemoglobin ; Hemoglobins ; Insulin ; Insulin resistance ; Iron ; lean NAFLD ; Liver diseases ; Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration ; Measurement ; Metabolism ; Obesity ; Overweight ; Research Note ; Steatosis ; Thyroid gland ; Triglycerides ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Waist-to-hip ratio ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>BMC research notes, 2018-02, Vol.11 (1), p.101-101, Article 101</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-6781316f99888338afb45a47ce9ee2b774421ffbad8bfed33bbcbafe12c8768c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-6781316f99888338afb45a47ce9ee2b774421ffbad8bfed33bbcbafe12c8768c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801753/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2791325621?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29409538$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kratzer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidberger, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graeter, Tilmann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruener, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EMIL Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the EMIL Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Laboratory parameters in lean NAFLD: comparison of subjects with lean NAFLD with obese subjects without hepatic steatosis</title><title>BMC research notes</title><addtitle>BMC Res Notes</addtitle><description>Search for meaningful laboratory and anthropometric parameters in lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (lean NAFLD) in the general population. Out of 2445 subjects in a random population sample, we compared those who had a body mass index (BMI) &lt; 25 and a fatty liver [lean NAFLD (LN), n = 5] with obese subjects who had a BMI &gt; 30 but no fatty liver [non-NAFLD (NN), n = 27] in a follow-up examination. Ultrasonic, anthropometric and laboratory parameters were collected. There were significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) between the LN and the NN groups with respect to serum ferritin (199.2 ± 72.1 LN vs 106.0 ± 89.6 NN), haemoglobin (14.9 ± 0.8 LN vs 13.5 ± 1.2 NN), haematocrit (0.438 ± 0.019 LN vs 0.407 ± 0.035 NN) and Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (34 ± 0.6 LN vs 33.2 ± 0.8 NN). Significantly lower values of soluble transferrin receptor were measured in the LN group (2.8 ± 0.4 LN vs 3.8 ± 1.5 NN). In both groups, the measured HOMA-IR index (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index) (2.3; normal range ≤ 1) was abnormal. Mean cholesterol (6.2 ± 1.4 LN and 5.6 ± 1.1 NN) and low-density lipoprotein levels (3.8 ± 1.0 LN 3.4 ± 0.9 NN) were above the upper limit of normal in both groups, as was the mean triglycerides level in the LN group (2.6 ± 2.0). In summary, there are differences in parameters of iron and fat metabolism between subjects with LN and overweight subjects without fatty liver infiltration.</description><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Cholesterol</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Fat metabolism</subject><subject>Fatty liver</subject><subject>Ferritin</subject><subject>Haematocrit</subject><subject>Haemoglobin</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hematocrit</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Hemoglobins</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Insulin resistance</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>lean NAFLD</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Overweight</subject><subject>Research Note</subject><subject>Steatosis</subject><subject>Thyroid gland</subject><subject>Triglycerides</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Waist-to-hip ratio</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1756-0500</issn><issn>1756-0500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk2P0zAQhiMEYpeFH8AFReIChyz-iBObw0rVwkKlir0AV8t2xq2rJC62A_Tf49JlaRDywV_PvDMev0XxHKNLjHnzJmKKUV0hzCtKMKnwg-Ict6ypEEPo4cn6rHgS4xahBnOOHxdnRNRIMMrPi_1KaR9U8mFf7lRQAyQIsXRj2YMay0-Lm9W7t6XxQ7500Y-lt2Wc9BZMiuUPlzYn3HHvNUSYM35K5QZ2KjlTxgQ5W3TxafHIqj7Cs7v5ovhy8_7z9cdqdftheb1YVYYhgaum5fmVjRWCc04pV1bXTNWtAQFAdNvWNcHWatVxbaGjVGujlQVMDG8bbuhFsTzqdl5t5S64QYW99MrJ3wc-rKUKubIeZEc7yghnSFtbQ60UVpZowIbnvLShWevqqLWb9ACdgTEF1c9E5zej28i1_y4ZR_kzDgKv7gSC_zZBTHJw0UDfqxH8FCUWQmDRMtJm9OU_6NZPYcytkqQVmBLWEPyXWqv8ADdan_Oag6hcsLpBLROMZOryP1QeHQzO-BGsy-ezgNezgMwk-JnWaopRLm-_zll8ZE3wMQaw9_3ASB58Ko8-ldmn8uBTeSj7xWkj7yP-GJP-Aj1h4qM</recordid><startdate>20180206</startdate><enddate>20180206</enddate><creator>Bernhardt, Philipp</creator><creator>Kratzer, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Schmidberger, Julian</creator><creator>Graeter, Tilmann</creator><creator>Gruener, Beate</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180206</creationdate><title>Laboratory parameters in lean NAFLD: comparison of subjects with lean NAFLD with obese subjects without hepatic steatosis</title><author>Bernhardt, Philipp ; Kratzer, Wolfgang ; Schmidberger, Julian ; Graeter, Tilmann ; Gruener, Beate</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-6781316f99888338afb45a47ce9ee2b774421ffbad8bfed33bbcbafe12c8768c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Cholesterol</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Fat metabolism</topic><topic>Fatty liver</topic><topic>Ferritin</topic><topic>Haematocrit</topic><topic>Haemoglobin</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hematocrit</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Hemoglobins</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Insulin resistance</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>lean NAFLD</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Overweight</topic><topic>Research Note</topic><topic>Steatosis</topic><topic>Thyroid gland</topic><topic>Triglycerides</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Waist-to-hip ratio</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kratzer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidberger, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graeter, Tilmann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruener, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EMIL Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the EMIL Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC research notes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernhardt, Philipp</au><au>Kratzer, Wolfgang</au><au>Schmidberger, Julian</au><au>Graeter, Tilmann</au><au>Gruener, Beate</au><aucorp>EMIL Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>for the EMIL Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laboratory parameters in lean NAFLD: comparison of subjects with lean NAFLD with obese subjects without hepatic steatosis</atitle><jtitle>BMC research notes</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Res Notes</addtitle><date>2018-02-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>101-101</pages><artnum>101</artnum><issn>1756-0500</issn><eissn>1756-0500</eissn><abstract>Search for meaningful laboratory and anthropometric parameters in lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (lean NAFLD) in the general population. Out of 2445 subjects in a random population sample, we compared those who had a body mass index (BMI) &lt; 25 and a fatty liver [lean NAFLD (LN), n = 5] with obese subjects who had a BMI &gt; 30 but no fatty liver [non-NAFLD (NN), n = 27] in a follow-up examination. Ultrasonic, anthropometric and laboratory parameters were collected. There were significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) between the LN and the NN groups with respect to serum ferritin (199.2 ± 72.1 LN vs 106.0 ± 89.6 NN), haemoglobin (14.9 ± 0.8 LN vs 13.5 ± 1.2 NN), haematocrit (0.438 ± 0.019 LN vs 0.407 ± 0.035 NN) and Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (34 ± 0.6 LN vs 33.2 ± 0.8 NN). Significantly lower values of soluble transferrin receptor were measured in the LN group (2.8 ± 0.4 LN vs 3.8 ± 1.5 NN). In both groups, the measured HOMA-IR index (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index) (2.3; normal range ≤ 1) was abnormal. Mean cholesterol (6.2 ± 1.4 LN and 5.6 ± 1.1 NN) and low-density lipoprotein levels (3.8 ± 1.0 LN 3.4 ± 0.9 NN) were above the upper limit of normal in both groups, as was the mean triglycerides level in the LN group (2.6 ± 2.0). In summary, there are differences in parameters of iron and fat metabolism between subjects with LN and overweight subjects without fatty liver infiltration.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>29409538</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13104-018-3212-1</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1756-0500
ispartof BMC research notes, 2018-02, Vol.11 (1), p.101-101, Article 101
issn 1756-0500
1756-0500
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d3d352850bff4e4aa1af2be1c838a363
source Access via ProQuest (Open Access); PubMed Central
subjects Alcohol
Body mass index
Body weight
Cholesterol
Development and progression
Fat metabolism
Fatty liver
Ferritin
Haematocrit
Haemoglobin
Health aspects
Hematocrit
Hemoglobin
Hemoglobins
Insulin
Insulin resistance
Iron
lean NAFLD
Liver diseases
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration
Measurement
Metabolism
Obesity
Overweight
Research Note
Steatosis
Thyroid gland
Triglycerides
Ultrasonic imaging
Waist-to-hip ratio
Womens health
title Laboratory parameters in lean NAFLD: comparison of subjects with lean NAFLD with obese subjects without hepatic steatosis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T00%3A03%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laboratory%20parameters%20in%20lean%20NAFLD:%20comparison%20of%20subjects%20with%20lean%20NAFLD%20with%20obese%20subjects%20without%20hepatic%20steatosis&rft.jtitle=BMC%20research%20notes&rft.au=Bernhardt,%20Philipp&rft.aucorp=EMIL%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2018-02-06&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=101-101&rft.artnum=101&rft.issn=1756-0500&rft.eissn=1756-0500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13104-018-3212-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA546075952%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-6781316f99888338afb45a47ce9ee2b774421ffbad8bfed33bbcbafe12c8768c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791325621&rft_id=info:pmid/29409538&rft_galeid=A546075952&rfr_iscdi=true