Loading…
Laboratory parameters in lean NAFLD: comparison of subjects with lean NAFLD with obese subjects without hepatic steatosis
Search for meaningful laboratory and anthropometric parameters in lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (lean NAFLD) in the general population. Out of 2445 subjects in a random population sample, we compared those who had a body mass index (BMI) 30 but no fatty liver [non-NAFLD (NN), n = 27] in a...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC research notes 2018-02, Vol.11 (1), p.101-101, Article 101 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-6781316f99888338afb45a47ce9ee2b774421ffbad8bfed33bbcbafe12c8768c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-6781316f99888338afb45a47ce9ee2b774421ffbad8bfed33bbcbafe12c8768c3 |
container_end_page | 101 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 101 |
container_title | BMC research notes |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Bernhardt, Philipp Kratzer, Wolfgang Schmidberger, Julian Graeter, Tilmann Gruener, Beate |
description | Search for meaningful laboratory and anthropometric parameters in lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (lean NAFLD) in the general population. Out of 2445 subjects in a random population sample, we compared those who had a body mass index (BMI) 30 but no fatty liver [non-NAFLD (NN), n = 27] in a follow-up examination. Ultrasonic, anthropometric and laboratory parameters were collected.
There were significant differences (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13104-018-3212-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d3d352850bff4e4aa1af2be1c838a363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A546075952</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d3d352850bff4e4aa1af2be1c838a363</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A546075952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-6781316f99888338afb45a47ce9ee2b774421ffbad8bfed33bbcbafe12c8768c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk2P0zAQhiMEYpeFH8AFReIChyz-iBObw0rVwkKlir0AV8t2xq2rJC62A_Tf49JlaRDywV_PvDMev0XxHKNLjHnzJmKKUV0hzCtKMKnwg-Ict6ypEEPo4cn6rHgS4xahBnOOHxdnRNRIMMrPi_1KaR9U8mFf7lRQAyQIsXRj2YMay0-Lm9W7t6XxQ7500Y-lt2Wc9BZMiuUPlzYn3HHvNUSYM35K5QZ2KjlTxgQ5W3TxafHIqj7Cs7v5ovhy8_7z9cdqdftheb1YVYYhgaum5fmVjRWCc04pV1bXTNWtAQFAdNvWNcHWatVxbaGjVGujlQVMDG8bbuhFsTzqdl5t5S64QYW99MrJ3wc-rKUKubIeZEc7yghnSFtbQ60UVpZowIbnvLShWevqqLWb9ACdgTEF1c9E5zej28i1_y4ZR_kzDgKv7gSC_zZBTHJw0UDfqxH8FCUWQmDRMtJm9OU_6NZPYcytkqQVmBLWEPyXWqv8ADdan_Oag6hcsLpBLROMZOryP1QeHQzO-BGsy-ezgNezgMwk-JnWaopRLm-_zll8ZE3wMQaw9_3ASB58Ko8-ldmn8uBTeSj7xWkj7yP-GJP-Aj1h4qM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791325621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laboratory parameters in lean NAFLD: comparison of subjects with lean NAFLD with obese subjects without hepatic steatosis</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bernhardt, Philipp ; Kratzer, Wolfgang ; Schmidberger, Julian ; Graeter, Tilmann ; Gruener, Beate</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Philipp ; Kratzer, Wolfgang ; Schmidberger, Julian ; Graeter, Tilmann ; Gruener, Beate ; EMIL Study Group ; for the EMIL Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Search for meaningful laboratory and anthropometric parameters in lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (lean NAFLD) in the general population. Out of 2445 subjects in a random population sample, we compared those who had a body mass index (BMI) < 25 and a fatty liver [lean NAFLD (LN), n = 5] with obese subjects who had a BMI > 30 but no fatty liver [non-NAFLD (NN), n = 27] in a follow-up examination. Ultrasonic, anthropometric and laboratory parameters were collected.
There were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the LN and the NN groups with respect to serum ferritin (199.2 ± 72.1 LN vs 106.0 ± 89.6 NN), haemoglobin (14.9 ± 0.8 LN vs 13.5 ± 1.2 NN), haematocrit (0.438 ± 0.019 LN vs 0.407 ± 0.035 NN) and Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (34 ± 0.6 LN vs 33.2 ± 0.8 NN). Significantly lower values of soluble transferrin receptor were measured in the LN group (2.8 ± 0.4 LN vs 3.8 ± 1.5 NN). In both groups, the measured HOMA-IR index (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index) (2.3; normal range ≤ 1) was abnormal. Mean cholesterol (6.2 ± 1.4 LN and 5.6 ± 1.1 NN) and low-density lipoprotein levels (3.8 ± 1.0 LN 3.4 ± 0.9 NN) were above the upper limit of normal in both groups, as was the mean triglycerides level in the LN group (2.6 ± 2.0). In summary, there are differences in parameters of iron and fat metabolism between subjects with LN and overweight subjects without fatty liver infiltration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-0500</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-0500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3212-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29409538</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Alcohol ; Body mass index ; Body weight ; Cholesterol ; Development and progression ; Fat metabolism ; Fatty liver ; Ferritin ; Haematocrit ; Haemoglobin ; Health aspects ; Hematocrit ; Hemoglobin ; Hemoglobins ; Insulin ; Insulin resistance ; Iron ; lean NAFLD ; Liver diseases ; Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration ; Measurement ; Metabolism ; Obesity ; Overweight ; Research Note ; Steatosis ; Thyroid gland ; Triglycerides ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Waist-to-hip ratio ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>BMC research notes, 2018-02, Vol.11 (1), p.101-101, Article 101</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-6781316f99888338afb45a47ce9ee2b774421ffbad8bfed33bbcbafe12c8768c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-6781316f99888338afb45a47ce9ee2b774421ffbad8bfed33bbcbafe12c8768c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801753/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2791325621?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29409538$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kratzer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidberger, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graeter, Tilmann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruener, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EMIL Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the EMIL Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Laboratory parameters in lean NAFLD: comparison of subjects with lean NAFLD with obese subjects without hepatic steatosis</title><title>BMC research notes</title><addtitle>BMC Res Notes</addtitle><description>Search for meaningful laboratory and anthropometric parameters in lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (lean NAFLD) in the general population. Out of 2445 subjects in a random population sample, we compared those who had a body mass index (BMI) < 25 and a fatty liver [lean NAFLD (LN), n = 5] with obese subjects who had a BMI > 30 but no fatty liver [non-NAFLD (NN), n = 27] in a follow-up examination. Ultrasonic, anthropometric and laboratory parameters were collected.
There were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the LN and the NN groups with respect to serum ferritin (199.2 ± 72.1 LN vs 106.0 ± 89.6 NN), haemoglobin (14.9 ± 0.8 LN vs 13.5 ± 1.2 NN), haematocrit (0.438 ± 0.019 LN vs 0.407 ± 0.035 NN) and Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (34 ± 0.6 LN vs 33.2 ± 0.8 NN). Significantly lower values of soluble transferrin receptor were measured in the LN group (2.8 ± 0.4 LN vs 3.8 ± 1.5 NN). In both groups, the measured HOMA-IR index (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index) (2.3; normal range ≤ 1) was abnormal. Mean cholesterol (6.2 ± 1.4 LN and 5.6 ± 1.1 NN) and low-density lipoprotein levels (3.8 ± 1.0 LN 3.4 ± 0.9 NN) were above the upper limit of normal in both groups, as was the mean triglycerides level in the LN group (2.6 ± 2.0). In summary, there are differences in parameters of iron and fat metabolism between subjects with LN and overweight subjects without fatty liver infiltration.</description><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Cholesterol</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Fat metabolism</subject><subject>Fatty liver</subject><subject>Ferritin</subject><subject>Haematocrit</subject><subject>Haemoglobin</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hematocrit</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Hemoglobins</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Insulin resistance</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>lean NAFLD</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Overweight</subject><subject>Research Note</subject><subject>Steatosis</subject><subject>Thyroid gland</subject><subject>Triglycerides</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Waist-to-hip ratio</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1756-0500</issn><issn>1756-0500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk2P0zAQhiMEYpeFH8AFReIChyz-iBObw0rVwkKlir0AV8t2xq2rJC62A_Tf49JlaRDywV_PvDMev0XxHKNLjHnzJmKKUV0hzCtKMKnwg-Ict6ypEEPo4cn6rHgS4xahBnOOHxdnRNRIMMrPi_1KaR9U8mFf7lRQAyQIsXRj2YMay0-Lm9W7t6XxQ7500Y-lt2Wc9BZMiuUPlzYn3HHvNUSYM35K5QZ2KjlTxgQ5W3TxafHIqj7Cs7v5ovhy8_7z9cdqdftheb1YVYYhgaum5fmVjRWCc04pV1bXTNWtAQFAdNvWNcHWatVxbaGjVGujlQVMDG8bbuhFsTzqdl5t5S64QYW99MrJ3wc-rKUKubIeZEc7yghnSFtbQ60UVpZowIbnvLShWevqqLWb9ACdgTEF1c9E5zej28i1_y4ZR_kzDgKv7gSC_zZBTHJw0UDfqxH8FCUWQmDRMtJm9OU_6NZPYcytkqQVmBLWEPyXWqv8ADdan_Oag6hcsLpBLROMZOryP1QeHQzO-BGsy-ezgNezgMwk-JnWaopRLm-_zll8ZE3wMQaw9_3ASB58Ko8-ldmn8uBTeSj7xWkj7yP-GJP-Aj1h4qM</recordid><startdate>20180206</startdate><enddate>20180206</enddate><creator>Bernhardt, Philipp</creator><creator>Kratzer, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Schmidberger, Julian</creator><creator>Graeter, Tilmann</creator><creator>Gruener, Beate</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180206</creationdate><title>Laboratory parameters in lean NAFLD: comparison of subjects with lean NAFLD with obese subjects without hepatic steatosis</title><author>Bernhardt, Philipp ; Kratzer, Wolfgang ; Schmidberger, Julian ; Graeter, Tilmann ; Gruener, Beate</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-6781316f99888338afb45a47ce9ee2b774421ffbad8bfed33bbcbafe12c8768c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Cholesterol</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Fat metabolism</topic><topic>Fatty liver</topic><topic>Ferritin</topic><topic>Haematocrit</topic><topic>Haemoglobin</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hematocrit</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Hemoglobins</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Insulin resistance</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>lean NAFLD</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Overweight</topic><topic>Research Note</topic><topic>Steatosis</topic><topic>Thyroid gland</topic><topic>Triglycerides</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Waist-to-hip ratio</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kratzer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidberger, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graeter, Tilmann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruener, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EMIL Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the EMIL Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC research notes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernhardt, Philipp</au><au>Kratzer, Wolfgang</au><au>Schmidberger, Julian</au><au>Graeter, Tilmann</au><au>Gruener, Beate</au><aucorp>EMIL Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>for the EMIL Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laboratory parameters in lean NAFLD: comparison of subjects with lean NAFLD with obese subjects without hepatic steatosis</atitle><jtitle>BMC research notes</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Res Notes</addtitle><date>2018-02-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>101-101</pages><artnum>101</artnum><issn>1756-0500</issn><eissn>1756-0500</eissn><abstract>Search for meaningful laboratory and anthropometric parameters in lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (lean NAFLD) in the general population. Out of 2445 subjects in a random population sample, we compared those who had a body mass index (BMI) < 25 and a fatty liver [lean NAFLD (LN), n = 5] with obese subjects who had a BMI > 30 but no fatty liver [non-NAFLD (NN), n = 27] in a follow-up examination. Ultrasonic, anthropometric and laboratory parameters were collected.
There were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the LN and the NN groups with respect to serum ferritin (199.2 ± 72.1 LN vs 106.0 ± 89.6 NN), haemoglobin (14.9 ± 0.8 LN vs 13.5 ± 1.2 NN), haematocrit (0.438 ± 0.019 LN vs 0.407 ± 0.035 NN) and Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (34 ± 0.6 LN vs 33.2 ± 0.8 NN). Significantly lower values of soluble transferrin receptor were measured in the LN group (2.8 ± 0.4 LN vs 3.8 ± 1.5 NN). In both groups, the measured HOMA-IR index (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index) (2.3; normal range ≤ 1) was abnormal. Mean cholesterol (6.2 ± 1.4 LN and 5.6 ± 1.1 NN) and low-density lipoprotein levels (3.8 ± 1.0 LN 3.4 ± 0.9 NN) were above the upper limit of normal in both groups, as was the mean triglycerides level in the LN group (2.6 ± 2.0). In summary, there are differences in parameters of iron and fat metabolism between subjects with LN and overweight subjects without fatty liver infiltration.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>29409538</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13104-018-3212-1</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1756-0500 |
ispartof | BMC research notes, 2018-02, Vol.11 (1), p.101-101, Article 101 |
issn | 1756-0500 1756-0500 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d3d352850bff4e4aa1af2be1c838a363 |
source | Access via ProQuest (Open Access); PubMed Central |
subjects | Alcohol Body mass index Body weight Cholesterol Development and progression Fat metabolism Fatty liver Ferritin Haematocrit Haemoglobin Health aspects Hematocrit Hemoglobin Hemoglobins Insulin Insulin resistance Iron lean NAFLD Liver diseases Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration Measurement Metabolism Obesity Overweight Research Note Steatosis Thyroid gland Triglycerides Ultrasonic imaging Waist-to-hip ratio Womens health |
title | Laboratory parameters in lean NAFLD: comparison of subjects with lean NAFLD with obese subjects without hepatic steatosis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T00%3A03%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laboratory%20parameters%20in%20lean%20NAFLD:%20comparison%20of%20subjects%20with%20lean%20NAFLD%20with%20obese%20subjects%20without%20hepatic%20steatosis&rft.jtitle=BMC%20research%20notes&rft.au=Bernhardt,%20Philipp&rft.aucorp=EMIL%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2018-02-06&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=101-101&rft.artnum=101&rft.issn=1756-0500&rft.eissn=1756-0500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13104-018-3212-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA546075952%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-6781316f99888338afb45a47ce9ee2b774421ffbad8bfed33bbcbafe12c8768c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791325621&rft_id=info:pmid/29409538&rft_galeid=A546075952&rfr_iscdi=true |