Characterisation of Laser System Power Draws in Materials Processing

• Published in: Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 2020-06, Vol.4 (2), p.48
• Main Authors: Goffin, Nicholas, Jones, Lewis C. R., Tyrer, John, Ouyang, Jinglei, Mativenga, Paul, Woolley, Elliot
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ecological footprint; emissions; Energy conservation; energy consumption; Energy use; environmental impact; laser processing; Laser welding; Management; manufacturing process; Methods; sustainability; United Kingdom
• ISSN: 2504-4494; 2504-4494
• DOI: 10.3390/jmmp4020048

Due to their high speed and versatility, laser processing systems are now commonplace in many industrial production lines. However, as the need to reduce the environmental impact from the manufacturing industry becomes more urgent, there is the opportunity to evaluate laser processing systems to identify opportunities to improve energy efficiencies and thus reduce their carbon footprint. While other researchers have studied laser processing, the majority of previous work on laser systems has focused on the beam–material interaction, overlooking the whole system viewpoint and the significance of support equipment. In this work, a methodical approach is taken to design a set of energy modelling terminologies and develop a structured power metering system for laser systems. A 300 W fibre laser welding system is used to demonstrate the application of the power characterization system by utilizing a purpose-built power meter. The laser is broken down according to sub-system, with each part analysed separately to give a complete overall power analysis, including all auxiliary units. The results show that the greatest opportunities for efficiency improvements lie in the auxiliary units that support the laser devices as these were responsible for a majority of the electrical draw; 63.1% when the laser was operated at 240 W, and increasing as the beam power reduced. The remaining power draw was largely apportioned to electrical supply inefficiencies. In this work, the laser device delivered a maximum of 6% of the total system power. The implications of these results on laser processing system design are then discussed as is the suitability of the characterization process for use by industry on a range of specific laser processing systems.