Online Health Communities in Controversy over ME/CFS and Long Covid

• Published in: European journal of health communication 2023-03, Vol.4 (2), p.49-72
• Main Author: Jackson, Sally
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: argumentation; chronic fatigue syndrome; controversy; Long Covid; myalgic encephalomyelitis
• ISSN: 2673-5903; 2673-5903
• DOI: 10.47368/ejhc.2023.203

The condition known variously as myalgic encephalomyelitis, chronic fatigue syndrome, or ME/CFS has been steeped in controversy for 40 years or more. Long Covid, first noticed and named in 2020, has become entangled with the ME/CFS controversy because of striking similarities in the experiences of patients suffering from the two illnesses. Online health communities (OHCs) have played central roles in both controversies, but these are not the kinds of roles that have been so well-documented in prior literature. While prior research has established many ways in which participation in an OHC may benefit or otherwise affect community members themselves, this essay focuses on how OHCs contribute to positional shifts in health controversies that involve other communities as well. Using a framework for understanding health controversies as argumentative polylogues, I show that OHCs arguing with other players have made contributions that are both effective in gaining ground for the OHCs' own goals and in elevating the overall quality of the debate. Further, in some cases these contributions have been so innovative as to suggest surprising future trajectories for OHCs.