Loading…

Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States

Clinical practice guidelines recommend colonoscopies at regular intervals for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Using data from a large, multi-regional, population-based cohort, we describe the rate of surveillance colonoscopy and its association with geographic, sociodemographic, clinical, and hea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC health services research 2010-09, Vol.10 (1), p.256-256, Article 256
Main Authors: Salz, Talya, Weinberger, Morris, Ayanian, John Z, Brewer, Noel T, Earle, Craig C, Elston Lafata, Jennifer, Fisher, Deborah A, Weiner, Bryan J, Sandler, Robert S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-32ddafd4b8a66455a7d5e904cd16f0225d48263059fc348729e912803297aede3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-32ddafd4b8a66455a7d5e904cd16f0225d48263059fc348729e912803297aede3
container_end_page 256
container_issue 1
container_start_page 256
container_title BMC health services research
container_volume 10
creator Salz, Talya
Weinberger, Morris
Ayanian, John Z
Brewer, Noel T
Earle, Craig C
Elston Lafata, Jennifer
Fisher, Deborah A
Weiner, Bryan J
Sandler, Robert S
description Clinical practice guidelines recommend colonoscopies at regular intervals for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Using data from a large, multi-regional, population-based cohort, we describe the rate of surveillance colonoscopy and its association with geographic, sociodemographic, clinical, and health services characteristics. We studied CRC survivors enrolled in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study. Eligible survivors were diagnosed between 2003 and 2005, had curative surgery for CRC, and were alive without recurrences 14 months after surgery with curative intent. Data came from patient interviews and medical record abstraction. We used a multivariate logit model to identify predictors of colonoscopy use. Despite guidelines recommending surveillance, only 49% of the 1423 eligible survivors received a colonoscopy within 14 months after surgery. We observed large regional differences (38% to 57%) across regions. Survivors who received screening colonoscopy were more likely to: have colon cancer than rectal cancer (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05-1.90); have visited a primary care physician (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14-1.82); and received adjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.27-2.41). Compared to survivors with no comorbidities, survivors with moderate or severe comorbidities were less likely to receive surveillance colonoscopy (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.98 and OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.66, respectively). Despite guidelines, more than half of CRC survivors did not receive surveillance colonoscopy within 14 months of surgery, with substantial variation by site of care. The association of primary care visits and adjuvant chemotherapy use suggests that access to care following surgery affects cancer surveillance.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1472-6963-10-256
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d466f56fde70483899fe9b5f34717c27</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A237318448</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d466f56fde70483899fe9b5f34717c27</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A237318448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-32ddafd4b8a66455a7d5e904cd16f0225d48263059fc348729e912803297aede3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw54QieugpxXb8eUGqVhQqVeIA5Wp57fHWqyRe7GSl_nuc3bLqoiIfbL3zzmPPjKvqPUaXGEv-CVNBGq5422DUEMZfVKcH6eWT80n1Juc1QlhIIl5XJwRJpBTnp5X9ZVIwY4hDHYZ6ylBHX-cpbSF0nRks1DZ2cYjZxs1Dbfo4rHZKAjuarrazJe0SwjamPEPGe6jvhjCCq3-MZoT8tnrlTZfh3eN-Vt1df_m5-Nbcfv96s7i6bZYcs7FpiXPGO7qUhnPKmBGOgULUOsw9IoQ5KglvEVPetlQKokBhIlFLlDDgoD2rbvZcF81ab1LoTXrQ0QS9E2JaaZPGYDvQjnLuGfcOBKKylUp5UEvmWyqwsEQU1uc9azMte3AWhjGZ7gh6HBnCvV7FrSaKYqpYASz2gGWI_wEcR2zs9TwwPQ9MY6TLPAvl4vEZKf6eII-6D9nCPBqIU9aCMSwwIao4P_7jXMcpDaXfWpXmESyZLKbzvWllShPC4GO52s5IfUVa0WJJ6ey6fMZVloM-2DiAD0U_SkD7BJtizgn8ocxSxvxRnyvsw9P-HhL-_sz2Dwjh4wI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902221858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Salz, Talya ; Weinberger, Morris ; Ayanian, John Z ; Brewer, Noel T ; Earle, Craig C ; Elston Lafata, Jennifer ; Fisher, Deborah A ; Weiner, Bryan J ; Sandler, Robert S</creator><creatorcontrib>Salz, Talya ; Weinberger, Morris ; Ayanian, John Z ; Brewer, Noel T ; Earle, Craig C ; Elston Lafata, Jennifer ; Fisher, Deborah A ; Weiner, Bryan J ; Sandler, Robert S</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical practice guidelines recommend colonoscopies at regular intervals for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Using data from a large, multi-regional, population-based cohort, we describe the rate of surveillance colonoscopy and its association with geographic, sociodemographic, clinical, and health services characteristics. We studied CRC survivors enrolled in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study. Eligible survivors were diagnosed between 2003 and 2005, had curative surgery for CRC, and were alive without recurrences 14 months after surgery with curative intent. Data came from patient interviews and medical record abstraction. We used a multivariate logit model to identify predictors of colonoscopy use. Despite guidelines recommending surveillance, only 49% of the 1423 eligible survivors received a colonoscopy within 14 months after surgery. We observed large regional differences (38% to 57%) across regions. Survivors who received screening colonoscopy were more likely to: have colon cancer than rectal cancer (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05-1.90); have visited a primary care physician (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14-1.82); and received adjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.27-2.41). Compared to survivors with no comorbidities, survivors with moderate or severe comorbidities were less likely to receive surveillance colonoscopy (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.98 and OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.66, respectively). Despite guidelines, more than half of CRC survivors did not receive surveillance colonoscopy within 14 months of surgery, with substantial variation by site of care. The association of primary care visits and adjuvant chemotherapy use suggests that access to care following surgery affects cancer surveillance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-256</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20809966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Cancer research ; Cancer therapies ; Clinical medicine ; Colectomy - methods ; Colon cancer ; Colonoscopy ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Colonoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Comorbidity ; Confidence Intervals ; Continuity of Patient Care - standards ; Continuity of Patient Care - trends ; Data collection ; Diagnosis ; Ethnicity ; Evaluation ; Expected values ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Guideline Adherence ; Health care access ; Health care policy ; Health sciences ; Health services ; Health surveillance ; Hepatology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Marital status ; Medical records ; Medical research ; Medical screening ; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods ; Mortality ; Odds Ratio ; Patient Compliance ; Practice guidelines (Medicine) ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prognosis ; Public health ; Risk Assessment ; Studies ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surveillance ; Survivors ; Task forces ; Time Factors ; United States ; Variables</subject><ispartof>BMC health services research, 2010-09, Vol.10 (1), p.256-256, Article 256</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2010 Salz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright ©2010 Salz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010 Salz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-32ddafd4b8a66455a7d5e904cd16f0225d48263059fc348729e912803297aede3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-32ddafd4b8a66455a7d5e904cd16f0225d48263059fc348729e912803297aede3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2941495/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/902221858?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11687,25752,27923,27924,36059,36060,37011,37012,44362,44589,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20809966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salz, Talya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberger, Morris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayanian, John Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Noel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earle, Craig C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elston Lafata, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Bryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandler, Robert S</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States</title><title>BMC health services research</title><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><description>Clinical practice guidelines recommend colonoscopies at regular intervals for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Using data from a large, multi-regional, population-based cohort, we describe the rate of surveillance colonoscopy and its association with geographic, sociodemographic, clinical, and health services characteristics. We studied CRC survivors enrolled in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study. Eligible survivors were diagnosed between 2003 and 2005, had curative surgery for CRC, and were alive without recurrences 14 months after surgery with curative intent. Data came from patient interviews and medical record abstraction. We used a multivariate logit model to identify predictors of colonoscopy use. Despite guidelines recommending surveillance, only 49% of the 1423 eligible survivors received a colonoscopy within 14 months after surgery. We observed large regional differences (38% to 57%) across regions. Survivors who received screening colonoscopy were more likely to: have colon cancer than rectal cancer (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05-1.90); have visited a primary care physician (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14-1.82); and received adjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.27-2.41). Compared to survivors with no comorbidities, survivors with moderate or severe comorbidities were less likely to receive surveillance colonoscopy (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.98 and OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.66, respectively). Despite guidelines, more than half of CRC survivors did not receive surveillance colonoscopy within 14 months of surgery, with substantial variation by site of care. The association of primary care visits and adjuvant chemotherapy use suggests that access to care following surgery affects cancer surveillance.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colon cancer</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - trends</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Expected values</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health surveillance</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marital status</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Survivors</subject><subject>Task forces</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1472-6963</issn><issn>1472-6963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw54QieugpxXb8eUGqVhQqVeIA5Wp57fHWqyRe7GSl_nuc3bLqoiIfbL3zzmPPjKvqPUaXGEv-CVNBGq5422DUEMZfVKcH6eWT80n1Juc1QlhIIl5XJwRJpBTnp5X9ZVIwY4hDHYZ6ylBHX-cpbSF0nRks1DZ2cYjZxs1Dbfo4rHZKAjuarrazJe0SwjamPEPGe6jvhjCCq3-MZoT8tnrlTZfh3eN-Vt1df_m5-Nbcfv96s7i6bZYcs7FpiXPGO7qUhnPKmBGOgULUOsw9IoQ5KglvEVPetlQKokBhIlFLlDDgoD2rbvZcF81ab1LoTXrQ0QS9E2JaaZPGYDvQjnLuGfcOBKKylUp5UEvmWyqwsEQU1uc9azMte3AWhjGZ7gh6HBnCvV7FrSaKYqpYASz2gGWI_wEcR2zs9TwwPQ9MY6TLPAvl4vEZKf6eII-6D9nCPBqIU9aCMSwwIao4P_7jXMcpDaXfWpXmESyZLKbzvWllShPC4GO52s5IfUVa0WJJ6ey6fMZVloM-2DiAD0U_SkD7BJtizgn8ocxSxvxRnyvsw9P-HhL-_sz2Dwjh4wI</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Salz, Talya</creator><creator>Weinberger, Morris</creator><creator>Ayanian, John Z</creator><creator>Brewer, Noel T</creator><creator>Earle, Craig C</creator><creator>Elston Lafata, Jennifer</creator><creator>Fisher, Deborah A</creator><creator>Weiner, Bryan J</creator><creator>Sandler, Robert S</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States</title><author>Salz, Talya ; Weinberger, Morris ; Ayanian, John Z ; Brewer, Noel T ; Earle, Craig C ; Elston Lafata, Jennifer ; Fisher, Deborah A ; Weiner, Bryan J ; Sandler, Robert S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-32ddafd4b8a66455a7d5e904cd16f0225d48263059fc348729e912803297aede3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colon cancer</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - trends</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Expected values</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health surveillance</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marital status</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Survivors</topic><topic>Task forces</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salz, Talya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberger, Morris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayanian, John Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Noel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earle, Craig C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elston Lafata, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Bryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandler, Robert S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salz, Talya</au><au>Weinberger, Morris</au><au>Ayanian, John Z</au><au>Brewer, Noel T</au><au>Earle, Craig C</au><au>Elston Lafata, Jennifer</au><au>Fisher, Deborah A</au><au>Weiner, Bryan J</au><au>Sandler, Robert S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States</atitle><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>256</spage><epage>256</epage><pages>256-256</pages><artnum>256</artnum><issn>1472-6963</issn><eissn>1472-6963</eissn><abstract>Clinical practice guidelines recommend colonoscopies at regular intervals for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Using data from a large, multi-regional, population-based cohort, we describe the rate of surveillance colonoscopy and its association with geographic, sociodemographic, clinical, and health services characteristics. We studied CRC survivors enrolled in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study. Eligible survivors were diagnosed between 2003 and 2005, had curative surgery for CRC, and were alive without recurrences 14 months after surgery with curative intent. Data came from patient interviews and medical record abstraction. We used a multivariate logit model to identify predictors of colonoscopy use. Despite guidelines recommending surveillance, only 49% of the 1423 eligible survivors received a colonoscopy within 14 months after surgery. We observed large regional differences (38% to 57%) across regions. Survivors who received screening colonoscopy were more likely to: have colon cancer than rectal cancer (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05-1.90); have visited a primary care physician (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14-1.82); and received adjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.27-2.41). Compared to survivors with no comorbidities, survivors with moderate or severe comorbidities were less likely to receive surveillance colonoscopy (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.98 and OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.66, respectively). Despite guidelines, more than half of CRC survivors did not receive surveillance colonoscopy within 14 months of surgery, with substantial variation by site of care. The association of primary care visits and adjuvant chemotherapy use suggests that access to care following surgery affects cancer surveillance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>20809966</pmid><doi>10.1186/1472-6963-10-256</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-6963
ispartof BMC health services research, 2010-09, Vol.10 (1), p.256-256, Article 256
issn 1472-6963
1472-6963
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d466f56fde70483899fe9b5f34717c27
source PMC (PubMed Central); ABI/INFORM Global; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Cancer research
Cancer therapies
Clinical medicine
Colectomy - methods
Colon cancer
Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy - methods
Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery
Comorbidity
Confidence Intervals
Continuity of Patient Care - standards
Continuity of Patient Care - trends
Data collection
Diagnosis
Ethnicity
Evaluation
Expected values
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Guideline Adherence
Health care access
Health care policy
Health sciences
Health services
Health surveillance
Hepatology
Hospitals
Humans
Incidence
Male
Marital status
Medical records
Medical research
Medical screening
Monitoring, Physiologic - methods
Mortality
Odds Ratio
Patient Compliance
Practice guidelines (Medicine)
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prognosis
Public health
Risk Assessment
Studies
Surgeons
Surgery
Surveillance
Survivors
Task forces
Time Factors
United States
Variables
title Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T02%3A30%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20use%20of%20surveillance%20colonoscopy%20among%20colorectal%20cancer%20survivors%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=BMC%20health%20services%20research&rft.au=Salz,%20Talya&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=256&rft.epage=256&rft.pages=256-256&rft.artnum=256&rft.issn=1472-6963&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1472-6963-10-256&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA237318448%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-32ddafd4b8a66455a7d5e904cd16f0225d48263059fc348729e912803297aede3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902221858&rft_id=info:pmid/20809966&rft_galeid=A237318448&rfr_iscdi=true