Loading…
Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States
Clinical practice guidelines recommend colonoscopies at regular intervals for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Using data from a large, multi-regional, population-based cohort, we describe the rate of surveillance colonoscopy and its association with geographic, sociodemographic, clinical, and hea...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC health services research 2010-09, Vol.10 (1), p.256-256, Article 256 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-32ddafd4b8a66455a7d5e904cd16f0225d48263059fc348729e912803297aede3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-32ddafd4b8a66455a7d5e904cd16f0225d48263059fc348729e912803297aede3 |
container_end_page | 256 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 256 |
container_title | BMC health services research |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Salz, Talya Weinberger, Morris Ayanian, John Z Brewer, Noel T Earle, Craig C Elston Lafata, Jennifer Fisher, Deborah A Weiner, Bryan J Sandler, Robert S |
description | Clinical practice guidelines recommend colonoscopies at regular intervals for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Using data from a large, multi-regional, population-based cohort, we describe the rate of surveillance colonoscopy and its association with geographic, sociodemographic, clinical, and health services characteristics.
We studied CRC survivors enrolled in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study. Eligible survivors were diagnosed between 2003 and 2005, had curative surgery for CRC, and were alive without recurrences 14 months after surgery with curative intent. Data came from patient interviews and medical record abstraction. We used a multivariate logit model to identify predictors of colonoscopy use.
Despite guidelines recommending surveillance, only 49% of the 1423 eligible survivors received a colonoscopy within 14 months after surgery. We observed large regional differences (38% to 57%) across regions. Survivors who received screening colonoscopy were more likely to: have colon cancer than rectal cancer (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05-1.90); have visited a primary care physician (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14-1.82); and received adjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.27-2.41). Compared to survivors with no comorbidities, survivors with moderate or severe comorbidities were less likely to receive surveillance colonoscopy (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.98 and OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.66, respectively).
Despite guidelines, more than half of CRC survivors did not receive surveillance colonoscopy within 14 months of surgery, with substantial variation by site of care. The association of primary care visits and adjuvant chemotherapy use suggests that access to care following surgery affects cancer surveillance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-256 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d466f56fde70483899fe9b5f34717c27</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A237318448</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d466f56fde70483899fe9b5f34717c27</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A237318448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-32ddafd4b8a66455a7d5e904cd16f0225d48263059fc348729e912803297aede3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw54QieugpxXb8eUGqVhQqVeIA5Wp57fHWqyRe7GSl_nuc3bLqoiIfbL3zzmPPjKvqPUaXGEv-CVNBGq5422DUEMZfVKcH6eWT80n1Juc1QlhIIl5XJwRJpBTnp5X9ZVIwY4hDHYZ6ylBHX-cpbSF0nRks1DZ2cYjZxs1Dbfo4rHZKAjuarrazJe0SwjamPEPGe6jvhjCCq3-MZoT8tnrlTZfh3eN-Vt1df_m5-Nbcfv96s7i6bZYcs7FpiXPGO7qUhnPKmBGOgULUOsw9IoQ5KglvEVPetlQKokBhIlFLlDDgoD2rbvZcF81ab1LoTXrQ0QS9E2JaaZPGYDvQjnLuGfcOBKKylUp5UEvmWyqwsEQU1uc9azMte3AWhjGZ7gh6HBnCvV7FrSaKYqpYASz2gGWI_wEcR2zs9TwwPQ9MY6TLPAvl4vEZKf6eII-6D9nCPBqIU9aCMSwwIao4P_7jXMcpDaXfWpXmESyZLKbzvWllShPC4GO52s5IfUVa0WJJ6ey6fMZVloM-2DiAD0U_SkD7BJtizgn8ocxSxvxRnyvsw9P-HhL-_sz2Dwjh4wI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902221858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Salz, Talya ; Weinberger, Morris ; Ayanian, John Z ; Brewer, Noel T ; Earle, Craig C ; Elston Lafata, Jennifer ; Fisher, Deborah A ; Weiner, Bryan J ; Sandler, Robert S</creator><creatorcontrib>Salz, Talya ; Weinberger, Morris ; Ayanian, John Z ; Brewer, Noel T ; Earle, Craig C ; Elston Lafata, Jennifer ; Fisher, Deborah A ; Weiner, Bryan J ; Sandler, Robert S</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical practice guidelines recommend colonoscopies at regular intervals for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Using data from a large, multi-regional, population-based cohort, we describe the rate of surveillance colonoscopy and its association with geographic, sociodemographic, clinical, and health services characteristics.
We studied CRC survivors enrolled in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study. Eligible survivors were diagnosed between 2003 and 2005, had curative surgery for CRC, and were alive without recurrences 14 months after surgery with curative intent. Data came from patient interviews and medical record abstraction. We used a multivariate logit model to identify predictors of colonoscopy use.
Despite guidelines recommending surveillance, only 49% of the 1423 eligible survivors received a colonoscopy within 14 months after surgery. We observed large regional differences (38% to 57%) across regions. Survivors who received screening colonoscopy were more likely to: have colon cancer than rectal cancer (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05-1.90); have visited a primary care physician (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14-1.82); and received adjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.27-2.41). Compared to survivors with no comorbidities, survivors with moderate or severe comorbidities were less likely to receive surveillance colonoscopy (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.98 and OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.66, respectively).
Despite guidelines, more than half of CRC survivors did not receive surveillance colonoscopy within 14 months of surgery, with substantial variation by site of care. The association of primary care visits and adjuvant chemotherapy use suggests that access to care following surgery affects cancer surveillance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-256</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20809966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Cancer research ; Cancer therapies ; Clinical medicine ; Colectomy - methods ; Colon cancer ; Colonoscopy ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Comorbidity ; Confidence Intervals ; Continuity of Patient Care - standards ; Continuity of Patient Care - trends ; Data collection ; Diagnosis ; Ethnicity ; Evaluation ; Expected values ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Guideline Adherence ; Health care access ; Health care policy ; Health sciences ; Health services ; Health surveillance ; Hepatology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Marital status ; Medical records ; Medical research ; Medical screening ; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods ; Mortality ; Odds Ratio ; Patient Compliance ; Practice guidelines (Medicine) ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prognosis ; Public health ; Risk Assessment ; Studies ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surveillance ; Survivors ; Task forces ; Time Factors ; United States ; Variables</subject><ispartof>BMC health services research, 2010-09, Vol.10 (1), p.256-256, Article 256</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2010 Salz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright ©2010 Salz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010 Salz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-32ddafd4b8a66455a7d5e904cd16f0225d48263059fc348729e912803297aede3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-32ddafd4b8a66455a7d5e904cd16f0225d48263059fc348729e912803297aede3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2941495/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/902221858?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11687,25752,27923,27924,36059,36060,37011,37012,44362,44589,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20809966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salz, Talya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberger, Morris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayanian, John Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Noel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earle, Craig C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elston Lafata, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Bryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandler, Robert S</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States</title><title>BMC health services research</title><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><description>Clinical practice guidelines recommend colonoscopies at regular intervals for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Using data from a large, multi-regional, population-based cohort, we describe the rate of surveillance colonoscopy and its association with geographic, sociodemographic, clinical, and health services characteristics.
We studied CRC survivors enrolled in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study. Eligible survivors were diagnosed between 2003 and 2005, had curative surgery for CRC, and were alive without recurrences 14 months after surgery with curative intent. Data came from patient interviews and medical record abstraction. We used a multivariate logit model to identify predictors of colonoscopy use.
Despite guidelines recommending surveillance, only 49% of the 1423 eligible survivors received a colonoscopy within 14 months after surgery. We observed large regional differences (38% to 57%) across regions. Survivors who received screening colonoscopy were more likely to: have colon cancer than rectal cancer (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05-1.90); have visited a primary care physician (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14-1.82); and received adjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.27-2.41). Compared to survivors with no comorbidities, survivors with moderate or severe comorbidities were less likely to receive surveillance colonoscopy (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.98 and OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.66, respectively).
Despite guidelines, more than half of CRC survivors did not receive surveillance colonoscopy within 14 months of surgery, with substantial variation by site of care. The association of primary care visits and adjuvant chemotherapy use suggests that access to care following surgery affects cancer surveillance.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colon cancer</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - trends</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Expected values</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health surveillance</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marital status</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Survivors</subject><subject>Task forces</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1472-6963</issn><issn>1472-6963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw54QieugpxXb8eUGqVhQqVeIA5Wp57fHWqyRe7GSl_nuc3bLqoiIfbL3zzmPPjKvqPUaXGEv-CVNBGq5422DUEMZfVKcH6eWT80n1Juc1QlhIIl5XJwRJpBTnp5X9ZVIwY4hDHYZ6ylBHX-cpbSF0nRks1DZ2cYjZxs1Dbfo4rHZKAjuarrazJe0SwjamPEPGe6jvhjCCq3-MZoT8tnrlTZfh3eN-Vt1df_m5-Nbcfv96s7i6bZYcs7FpiXPGO7qUhnPKmBGOgULUOsw9IoQ5KglvEVPetlQKokBhIlFLlDDgoD2rbvZcF81ab1LoTXrQ0QS9E2JaaZPGYDvQjnLuGfcOBKKylUp5UEvmWyqwsEQU1uc9azMte3AWhjGZ7gh6HBnCvV7FrSaKYqpYASz2gGWI_wEcR2zs9TwwPQ9MY6TLPAvl4vEZKf6eII-6D9nCPBqIU9aCMSwwIao4P_7jXMcpDaXfWpXmESyZLKbzvWllShPC4GO52s5IfUVa0WJJ6ey6fMZVloM-2DiAD0U_SkD7BJtizgn8ocxSxvxRnyvsw9P-HhL-_sz2Dwjh4wI</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Salz, Talya</creator><creator>Weinberger, Morris</creator><creator>Ayanian, John Z</creator><creator>Brewer, Noel T</creator><creator>Earle, Craig C</creator><creator>Elston Lafata, Jennifer</creator><creator>Fisher, Deborah A</creator><creator>Weiner, Bryan J</creator><creator>Sandler, Robert S</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States</title><author>Salz, Talya ; Weinberger, Morris ; Ayanian, John Z ; Brewer, Noel T ; Earle, Craig C ; Elston Lafata, Jennifer ; Fisher, Deborah A ; Weiner, Bryan J ; Sandler, Robert S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-32ddafd4b8a66455a7d5e904cd16f0225d48263059fc348729e912803297aede3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colon cancer</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - trends</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Expected values</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health surveillance</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marital status</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Survivors</topic><topic>Task forces</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salz, Talya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberger, Morris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayanian, John Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Noel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earle, Craig C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elston Lafata, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Bryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandler, Robert S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salz, Talya</au><au>Weinberger, Morris</au><au>Ayanian, John Z</au><au>Brewer, Noel T</au><au>Earle, Craig C</au><au>Elston Lafata, Jennifer</au><au>Fisher, Deborah A</au><au>Weiner, Bryan J</au><au>Sandler, Robert S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States</atitle><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>256</spage><epage>256</epage><pages>256-256</pages><artnum>256</artnum><issn>1472-6963</issn><eissn>1472-6963</eissn><abstract>Clinical practice guidelines recommend colonoscopies at regular intervals for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Using data from a large, multi-regional, population-based cohort, we describe the rate of surveillance colonoscopy and its association with geographic, sociodemographic, clinical, and health services characteristics.
We studied CRC survivors enrolled in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study. Eligible survivors were diagnosed between 2003 and 2005, had curative surgery for CRC, and were alive without recurrences 14 months after surgery with curative intent. Data came from patient interviews and medical record abstraction. We used a multivariate logit model to identify predictors of colonoscopy use.
Despite guidelines recommending surveillance, only 49% of the 1423 eligible survivors received a colonoscopy within 14 months after surgery. We observed large regional differences (38% to 57%) across regions. Survivors who received screening colonoscopy were more likely to: have colon cancer than rectal cancer (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05-1.90); have visited a primary care physician (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14-1.82); and received adjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.27-2.41). Compared to survivors with no comorbidities, survivors with moderate or severe comorbidities were less likely to receive surveillance colonoscopy (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.98 and OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.66, respectively).
Despite guidelines, more than half of CRC survivors did not receive surveillance colonoscopy within 14 months of surgery, with substantial variation by site of care. The association of primary care visits and adjuvant chemotherapy use suggests that access to care following surgery affects cancer surveillance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>20809966</pmid><doi>10.1186/1472-6963-10-256</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-6963 |
ispartof | BMC health services research, 2010-09, Vol.10 (1), p.256-256, Article 256 |
issn | 1472-6963 1472-6963 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d466f56fde70483899fe9b5f34717c27 |
source | PMC (PubMed Central); ABI/INFORM Global; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Cancer research Cancer therapies Clinical medicine Colectomy - methods Colon cancer Colonoscopy Colonoscopy - methods Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data Colorectal cancer Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery Comorbidity Confidence Intervals Continuity of Patient Care - standards Continuity of Patient Care - trends Data collection Diagnosis Ethnicity Evaluation Expected values Female Follow-Up Studies Guideline Adherence Health care access Health care policy Health sciences Health services Health surveillance Hepatology Hospitals Humans Incidence Male Marital status Medical records Medical research Medical screening Monitoring, Physiologic - methods Mortality Odds Ratio Patient Compliance Practice guidelines (Medicine) Practice Guidelines as Topic Prognosis Public health Risk Assessment Studies Surgeons Surgery Surveillance Survivors Task forces Time Factors United States Variables |
title | Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T02%3A30%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20use%20of%20surveillance%20colonoscopy%20among%20colorectal%20cancer%20survivors%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=BMC%20health%20services%20research&rft.au=Salz,%20Talya&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=256&rft.epage=256&rft.pages=256-256&rft.artnum=256&rft.issn=1472-6963&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1472-6963-10-256&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA237318448%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b615t-32ddafd4b8a66455a7d5e904cd16f0225d48263059fc348729e912803297aede3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902221858&rft_id=info:pmid/20809966&rft_galeid=A237318448&rfr_iscdi=true |