Loading…
Cost-Effectiveness in Alternative Treatment Options for Pancreatic Pseudocysts
Background and Objectives: Pancreatic pseudocysts often arise as complications of pancreatitis and present unique challenges in clinical management, encompassing considerations for both technical aspects and financial implications. Before the advancements of invasive gastroenterology, pancreatic pse...
Saved in:
Published in: | Reports (MDPI) 2024-06, Vol.7 (2), p.38 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-8f518fef51f165bb705daba394e6477a8e7f6b581069d6ff6ebc9f24f8c9a9443 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 38 |
container_title | Reports (MDPI) |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Boyanov, Nikola Milinich, Nikol Shtereva, Katina Madzharova, Katerina Tufkova, Stoilka Penkova-Radicheva, Mariana Radicheva, Daniela Shopov, Neno |
description | Background and Objectives: Pancreatic pseudocysts often arise as complications of pancreatitis and present unique challenges in clinical management, encompassing considerations for both technical aspects and financial implications. Before the advancements of invasive gastroenterology, pancreatic pseudocysts have been drained surgically for many years. Nowadays, we have less invasive techniques with higher efficiency and lower mortality rates, however, they remain cost-challenging for most countries. Materials and Methods: We present four patients (two males and two females) with pancreatic pseudocysts who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided transgastric drainage using plastic stents accompanied by a standard lavage protocol using a nasocystic catheter. Results: All four patients had successful outcomes, and a follow-up at 6 months revealed no traces of the pseudocysts or any significant long-term complications. One acute complication (arterial bleeding) and one late complication (stent migration) were observed. As the study aimed to present a cheaper option for draining pancreatic pseudocysts, we investigated and compared costs for the materials we utilized and those associated with lumen-apposing metal stents. Upon compiling the data, a notable advantage was evident in favour of our method. Conclusions: While EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) represents a high-end strategy for treating pancreatic pseudocysts, our method demonstrates better cost-effectiveness without compromising efficacy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/reports7020038 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d4697bca9201447bb4b9e0961313781e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d4697bca9201447bb4b9e0961313781e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3072669887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-8f518fef51f165bb705daba394e6477a8e7f6b581069d6ff6ebc9f24f8c9a9443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1LAzEQDaJg0V49L3jemmyy-TiWUrVQbA8VvIUkO5Et201NUqH_3q0V0cvM8Obx3gwPoTuCJ5Qq_BBhH2JOAlcYU3mBRlUtSCkZebv8M1-jcUpbjHElFGWyHqGXWUi5nHsPLref0ENKRdsX0y5D7M0JKjYRTN5Bn4vVPrehT4UPsVib3p0WrSvWCQ5NcMeU0y268qZLMP7pN-j1cb6ZPZfL1dNiNl2WrqplLqWvifQwVE94ba3AdWOsoYoBZ0IYCcJzW0uCuWq49xysU75iXjplFGP0Bi3Ouk0wW72P7c7Eow6m1d9AiO_axOG2DnTDuBLWGVVhwpiwllkFWHFCCRWSwKB1f9bax_BxgJT1NhyG57ukKRYV50pKMbAmZ5aLIaUI_teVYH2KQP-PgH4BkKd7Ww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072669887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-Effectiveness in Alternative Treatment Options for Pancreatic Pseudocysts</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Boyanov, Nikola ; Milinich, Nikol ; Shtereva, Katina ; Madzharova, Katerina ; Tufkova, Stoilka ; Penkova-Radicheva, Mariana ; Radicheva, Daniela ; Shopov, Neno</creator><creatorcontrib>Boyanov, Nikola ; Milinich, Nikol ; Shtereva, Katina ; Madzharova, Katerina ; Tufkova, Stoilka ; Penkova-Radicheva, Mariana ; Radicheva, Daniela ; Shopov, Neno</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives: Pancreatic pseudocysts often arise as complications of pancreatitis and present unique challenges in clinical management, encompassing considerations for both technical aspects and financial implications. Before the advancements of invasive gastroenterology, pancreatic pseudocysts have been drained surgically for many years. Nowadays, we have less invasive techniques with higher efficiency and lower mortality rates, however, they remain cost-challenging for most countries. Materials and Methods: We present four patients (two males and two females) with pancreatic pseudocysts who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided transgastric drainage using plastic stents accompanied by a standard lavage protocol using a nasocystic catheter. Results: All four patients had successful outcomes, and a follow-up at 6 months revealed no traces of the pseudocysts or any significant long-term complications. One acute complication (arterial bleeding) and one late complication (stent migration) were observed. As the study aimed to present a cheaper option for draining pancreatic pseudocysts, we investigated and compared costs for the materials we utilized and those associated with lumen-apposing metal stents. Upon compiling the data, a notable advantage was evident in favour of our method. Conclusions: While EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) represents a high-end strategy for treating pancreatic pseudocysts, our method demonstrates better cost-effectiveness without compromising efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2571-841X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2571-841X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/reports7020038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Catheters ; cold LAMS ; Cysts ; endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage ; Endoscopy ; EUS ; EUS-guided drainage ; hot LAMS ; low cost ; Pancreas ; Pancreatitis ; Patients ; Stents ; Success ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Reports (MDPI), 2024-06, Vol.7 (2), p.38</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-8f518fef51f165bb705daba394e6477a8e7f6b581069d6ff6ebc9f24f8c9a9443</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1520-5813 ; 0009-0000-1058-5098</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3072669887/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3072669887?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boyanov, Nikola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milinich, Nikol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shtereva, Katina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madzharova, Katerina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tufkova, Stoilka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penkova-Radicheva, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radicheva, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shopov, Neno</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-Effectiveness in Alternative Treatment Options for Pancreatic Pseudocysts</title><title>Reports (MDPI)</title><description>Background and Objectives: Pancreatic pseudocysts often arise as complications of pancreatitis and present unique challenges in clinical management, encompassing considerations for both technical aspects and financial implications. Before the advancements of invasive gastroenterology, pancreatic pseudocysts have been drained surgically for many years. Nowadays, we have less invasive techniques with higher efficiency and lower mortality rates, however, they remain cost-challenging for most countries. Materials and Methods: We present four patients (two males and two females) with pancreatic pseudocysts who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided transgastric drainage using plastic stents accompanied by a standard lavage protocol using a nasocystic catheter. Results: All four patients had successful outcomes, and a follow-up at 6 months revealed no traces of the pseudocysts or any significant long-term complications. One acute complication (arterial bleeding) and one late complication (stent migration) were observed. As the study aimed to present a cheaper option for draining pancreatic pseudocysts, we investigated and compared costs for the materials we utilized and those associated with lumen-apposing metal stents. Upon compiling the data, a notable advantage was evident in favour of our method. Conclusions: While EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) represents a high-end strategy for treating pancreatic pseudocysts, our method demonstrates better cost-effectiveness without compromising efficacy.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>cold LAMS</subject><subject>Cysts</subject><subject>endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>EUS</subject><subject>EUS-guided drainage</subject><subject>hot LAMS</subject><subject>low cost</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Pancreatitis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>2571-841X</issn><issn>2571-841X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1LAzEQDaJg0V49L3jemmyy-TiWUrVQbA8VvIUkO5Et201NUqH_3q0V0cvM8Obx3gwPoTuCJ5Qq_BBhH2JOAlcYU3mBRlUtSCkZebv8M1-jcUpbjHElFGWyHqGXWUi5nHsPLref0ENKRdsX0y5D7M0JKjYRTN5Bn4vVPrehT4UPsVib3p0WrSvWCQ5NcMeU0y268qZLMP7pN-j1cb6ZPZfL1dNiNl2WrqplLqWvifQwVE94ba3AdWOsoYoBZ0IYCcJzW0uCuWq49xysU75iXjplFGP0Bi3Ouk0wW72P7c7Eow6m1d9AiO_axOG2DnTDuBLWGVVhwpiwllkFWHFCCRWSwKB1f9bax_BxgJT1NhyG57ukKRYV50pKMbAmZ5aLIaUI_teVYH2KQP-PgH4BkKd7Ww</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Boyanov, Nikola</creator><creator>Milinich, Nikol</creator><creator>Shtereva, Katina</creator><creator>Madzharova, Katerina</creator><creator>Tufkova, Stoilka</creator><creator>Penkova-Radicheva, Mariana</creator><creator>Radicheva, Daniela</creator><creator>Shopov, Neno</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1520-5813</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1058-5098</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Cost-Effectiveness in Alternative Treatment Options for Pancreatic Pseudocysts</title><author>Boyanov, Nikola ; Milinich, Nikol ; Shtereva, Katina ; Madzharova, Katerina ; Tufkova, Stoilka ; Penkova-Radicheva, Mariana ; Radicheva, Daniela ; Shopov, Neno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-8f518fef51f165bb705daba394e6477a8e7f6b581069d6ff6ebc9f24f8c9a9443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>cold LAMS</topic><topic>Cysts</topic><topic>endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>EUS</topic><topic>EUS-guided drainage</topic><topic>hot LAMS</topic><topic>low cost</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Pancreatitis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boyanov, Nikola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milinich, Nikol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shtereva, Katina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madzharova, Katerina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tufkova, Stoilka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penkova-Radicheva, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radicheva, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shopov, Neno</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Reports (MDPI)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boyanov, Nikola</au><au>Milinich, Nikol</au><au>Shtereva, Katina</au><au>Madzharova, Katerina</au><au>Tufkova, Stoilka</au><au>Penkova-Radicheva, Mariana</au><au>Radicheva, Daniela</au><au>Shopov, Neno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-Effectiveness in Alternative Treatment Options for Pancreatic Pseudocysts</atitle><jtitle>Reports (MDPI)</jtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>38</spage><pages>38-</pages><issn>2571-841X</issn><eissn>2571-841X</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives: Pancreatic pseudocysts often arise as complications of pancreatitis and present unique challenges in clinical management, encompassing considerations for both technical aspects and financial implications. Before the advancements of invasive gastroenterology, pancreatic pseudocysts have been drained surgically for many years. Nowadays, we have less invasive techniques with higher efficiency and lower mortality rates, however, they remain cost-challenging for most countries. Materials and Methods: We present four patients (two males and two females) with pancreatic pseudocysts who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided transgastric drainage using plastic stents accompanied by a standard lavage protocol using a nasocystic catheter. Results: All four patients had successful outcomes, and a follow-up at 6 months revealed no traces of the pseudocysts or any significant long-term complications. One acute complication (arterial bleeding) and one late complication (stent migration) were observed. As the study aimed to present a cheaper option for draining pancreatic pseudocysts, we investigated and compared costs for the materials we utilized and those associated with lumen-apposing metal stents. Upon compiling the data, a notable advantage was evident in favour of our method. Conclusions: While EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) represents a high-end strategy for treating pancreatic pseudocysts, our method demonstrates better cost-effectiveness without compromising efficacy.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/reports7020038</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1520-5813</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1058-5098</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2571-841X |
ispartof | Reports (MDPI), 2024-06, Vol.7 (2), p.38 |
issn | 2571-841X 2571-841X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d4697bca9201447bb4b9e0961313781e |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Abdomen Catheters cold LAMS Cysts endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage Endoscopy EUS EUS-guided drainage hot LAMS low cost Pancreas Pancreatitis Patients Stents Success Ultrasonic imaging |
title | Cost-Effectiveness in Alternative Treatment Options for Pancreatic Pseudocysts |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T18%3A13%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-Effectiveness%20in%20Alternative%20Treatment%20Options%20for%20Pancreatic%20Pseudocysts&rft.jtitle=Reports%20(MDPI)&rft.au=Boyanov,%20Nikola&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=38&rft.pages=38-&rft.issn=2571-841X&rft.eissn=2571-841X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/reports7020038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3072669887%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-8f518fef51f165bb705daba394e6477a8e7f6b581069d6ff6ebc9f24f8c9a9443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072669887&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |