Loading…
Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast; clinicopathologic profile and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy over a 15-year period
Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 5–15% of invasive breast cancers. Typical ILC is oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative. Atypical biomarker profiles (ER- and HER2+, ER+ and HER2+ or triple negative) appear to differ from typical IL...
Saved in:
Published in: | Breast (Edinburgh) 2024-08, Vol.76, p.103739, Article 103739 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-712c0ee785b8b24806a4d651b5e493e9685c7742a61eb1b7482b25f61dfd645a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-712c0ee785b8b24806a4d651b5e493e9685c7742a61eb1b7482b25f61dfd645a3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 103739 |
container_title | Breast (Edinburgh) |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Quirke, N.P. Cullinane, C. Turk, M.A. Shafique, N. Evoy, D. Geraghty, J. McCartan, D. Quinn, C. Walshe, J.M. McDermott, E. Rutherford, C. Prichard, R.S. |
description | Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 5–15% of invasive breast cancers. Typical ILC is oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative. Atypical biomarker profiles (ER- and HER2+, ER+ and HER2+ or triple negative) appear to differ from typical ILCs. This study compared subtypes of ILC in terms of clinical and pathological parameters, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) according to biomarker profile.
All patients with ILC treated in a single centre from January 2005 to December 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic and outcome data was collected and analysed according to tumour biomarker profile.
A total of 582 patients with ILC were treated. Typical ILC was observed in 89.2% (n = 519) and atypical in 10.8% (n = 63). Atypical ILCs were of a higher grade (35% grade 3 vs 9.6% grade 3, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103739 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d4ce1749f6524f5b865c548323a5adc4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960977624000705</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d4ce1749f6524f5b865c548323a5adc4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3056668572</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-712c0ee785b8b24806a4d651b5e493e9685c7742a61eb1b7482b25f61dfd645a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2L1TAUxYsoznP0PxDJ0k2f-U6LIMjgx4MBN7oOt8ntvJS2qUnfg7edv9yMHWfpKnA59_xyz6mqt4zuGWX6w7DvEkJe95xyWUbCiPZZtWNK8FrQhj6vdrTVtG6N0VfVq5wHSmkrdPOyuhKNUZJJuqvuD_MZcjgjGWN3GiERB8mFOU5AYk_WI5IN85G4MczBxQXWYxzjXXBkSbEPIxKYPUmYlzhnJGskM0bww-kM80rcEadYbBIsFxLPmAgQpuoLFtSCKUT_unrRw5jxzeN7Xf36-uXnzff69se3w83n29pJI9faMO4oomlU13RcNlSD9FqxTqFsBba6Uc4YyUEz7FhnZMM7rnrNfO-1VCCuq8Pm6yMMdklhgnSxEYL9O4jpzkJagxvReumQGdn2WnHZF6BWTslGcAEKvJPF6_3mVSL4fcK82ilkh-MI5fZTtoIqrcuPDC9SuUldijkn7J_QjNqHJu1gt4jtQ5N2a7KsvXsknLoJ_dPSv-qK4NMmwJLZOWCy2QWcHfqQ0K3lqPB_wh8FhrIZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3056668572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast; clinicopathologic profile and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy over a 15-year period</title><source>PubMed Central (Open access)</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Quirke, N.P. ; Cullinane, C. ; Turk, M.A. ; Shafique, N. ; Evoy, D. ; Geraghty, J. ; McCartan, D. ; Quinn, C. ; Walshe, J.M. ; McDermott, E. ; Rutherford, C. ; Prichard, R.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Quirke, N.P. ; Cullinane, C. ; Turk, M.A. ; Shafique, N. ; Evoy, D. ; Geraghty, J. ; McCartan, D. ; Quinn, C. ; Walshe, J.M. ; McDermott, E. ; Rutherford, C. ; Prichard, R.S.</creatorcontrib><description>Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 5–15% of invasive breast cancers. Typical ILC is oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative. Atypical biomarker profiles (ER- and HER2+, ER+ and HER2+ or triple negative) appear to differ from typical ILCs. This study compared subtypes of ILC in terms of clinical and pathological parameters, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) according to biomarker profile.
All patients with ILC treated in a single centre from January 2005 to December 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic and outcome data was collected and analysed according to tumour biomarker profile.
A total of 582 patients with ILC were treated. Typical ILC was observed in 89.2% (n = 519) and atypical in 10.8% (n = 63). Atypical ILCs were of a higher grade (35% grade 3 vs 9.6% grade 3, p < 0.001).
A larger proportion of atypical ILC received NACT (31.7% vs 6.9% p < 0.001). Atypical ILCs showed a greater response to NACT (mean RCB (Residual Cancer Burden Score) 2.46 vs mean RCB 3.41, p = 0.0365), and higher pathological complete response rates (15% vs 0% p = 0.017). Despite this, overall 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in patients with typical ILC (91% vs 83%, p = 0.001).
Atypical ILCs have distinct characteristics. They are more frequently of a higher grade and demonstrate a superior response to NACT. Despite the latter, atypical ILCs have a worse 5-year DFS which should be taken into consideration in terms of prognostication and may assist patient selection for NACT.
•ILC is a unique clinical entity and should be considered separately to IBS-NST for research and treatment purposes.•Biomarker profile influences ILC disease behaviour and may have an effect on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.•Tumour size and lymph node status are independent predictors of recurrence free survival in ILC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-9776</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-3080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103739</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38754140</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Breast ; Cancer ; Lobular ; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy</subject><ispartof>Breast (Edinburgh), 2024-08, Vol.76, p.103739, Article 103739</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-712c0ee785b8b24806a4d651b5e493e9685c7742a61eb1b7482b25f61dfd645a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-712c0ee785b8b24806a4d651b5e493e9685c7742a61eb1b7482b25f61dfd645a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8131-8472</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38754140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quirke, N.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullinane, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turk, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shafique, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evoy, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geraghty, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCartan, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walshe, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prichard, R.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast; clinicopathologic profile and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy over a 15-year period</title><title>Breast (Edinburgh)</title><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><description>Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 5–15% of invasive breast cancers. Typical ILC is oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative. Atypical biomarker profiles (ER- and HER2+, ER+ and HER2+ or triple negative) appear to differ from typical ILCs. This study compared subtypes of ILC in terms of clinical and pathological parameters, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) according to biomarker profile.
All patients with ILC treated in a single centre from January 2005 to December 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic and outcome data was collected and analysed according to tumour biomarker profile.
A total of 582 patients with ILC were treated. Typical ILC was observed in 89.2% (n = 519) and atypical in 10.8% (n = 63). Atypical ILCs were of a higher grade (35% grade 3 vs 9.6% grade 3, p < 0.001).
A larger proportion of atypical ILC received NACT (31.7% vs 6.9% p < 0.001). Atypical ILCs showed a greater response to NACT (mean RCB (Residual Cancer Burden Score) 2.46 vs mean RCB 3.41, p = 0.0365), and higher pathological complete response rates (15% vs 0% p = 0.017). Despite this, overall 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in patients with typical ILC (91% vs 83%, p = 0.001).
Atypical ILCs have distinct characteristics. They are more frequently of a higher grade and demonstrate a superior response to NACT. Despite the latter, atypical ILCs have a worse 5-year DFS which should be taken into consideration in terms of prognostication and may assist patient selection for NACT.
•ILC is a unique clinical entity and should be considered separately to IBS-NST for research and treatment purposes.•Biomarker profile influences ILC disease behaviour and may have an effect on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.•Tumour size and lymph node status are independent predictors of recurrence free survival in ILC.</description><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Lobular</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy</subject><issn>0960-9776</issn><issn>1532-3080</issn><issn>1532-3080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2L1TAUxYsoznP0PxDJ0k2f-U6LIMjgx4MBN7oOt8ntvJS2qUnfg7edv9yMHWfpKnA59_xyz6mqt4zuGWX6w7DvEkJe95xyWUbCiPZZtWNK8FrQhj6vdrTVtG6N0VfVq5wHSmkrdPOyuhKNUZJJuqvuD_MZcjgjGWN3GiERB8mFOU5AYk_WI5IN85G4MczBxQXWYxzjXXBkSbEPIxKYPUmYlzhnJGskM0bww-kM80rcEadYbBIsFxLPmAgQpuoLFtSCKUT_unrRw5jxzeN7Xf36-uXnzff69se3w83n29pJI9faMO4oomlU13RcNlSD9FqxTqFsBba6Uc4YyUEz7FhnZMM7rnrNfO-1VCCuq8Pm6yMMdklhgnSxEYL9O4jpzkJagxvReumQGdn2WnHZF6BWTslGcAEKvJPF6_3mVSL4fcK82ilkh-MI5fZTtoIqrcuPDC9SuUldijkn7J_QjNqHJu1gt4jtQ5N2a7KsvXsknLoJ_dPSv-qK4NMmwJLZOWCy2QWcHfqQ0K3lqPB_wh8FhrIZ</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Quirke, N.P.</creator><creator>Cullinane, C.</creator><creator>Turk, M.A.</creator><creator>Shafique, N.</creator><creator>Evoy, D.</creator><creator>Geraghty, J.</creator><creator>McCartan, D.</creator><creator>Quinn, C.</creator><creator>Walshe, J.M.</creator><creator>McDermott, E.</creator><creator>Rutherford, C.</creator><creator>Prichard, R.S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8131-8472</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast; clinicopathologic profile and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy over a 15-year period</title><author>Quirke, N.P. ; Cullinane, C. ; Turk, M.A. ; Shafique, N. ; Evoy, D. ; Geraghty, J. ; McCartan, D. ; Quinn, C. ; Walshe, J.M. ; McDermott, E. ; Rutherford, C. ; Prichard, R.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-712c0ee785b8b24806a4d651b5e493e9685c7742a61eb1b7482b25f61dfd645a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Lobular</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quirke, N.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullinane, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turk, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shafique, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evoy, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geraghty, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCartan, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walshe, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prichard, R.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quirke, N.P.</au><au>Cullinane, C.</au><au>Turk, M.A.</au><au>Shafique, N.</au><au>Evoy, D.</au><au>Geraghty, J.</au><au>McCartan, D.</au><au>Quinn, C.</au><au>Walshe, J.M.</au><au>McDermott, E.</au><au>Rutherford, C.</au><au>Prichard, R.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast; clinicopathologic profile and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy over a 15-year period</atitle><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>76</volume><spage>103739</spage><pages>103739-</pages><artnum>103739</artnum><issn>0960-9776</issn><issn>1532-3080</issn><eissn>1532-3080</eissn><abstract>Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 5–15% of invasive breast cancers. Typical ILC is oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative. Atypical biomarker profiles (ER- and HER2+, ER+ and HER2+ or triple negative) appear to differ from typical ILCs. This study compared subtypes of ILC in terms of clinical and pathological parameters, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) according to biomarker profile.
All patients with ILC treated in a single centre from January 2005 to December 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic and outcome data was collected and analysed according to tumour biomarker profile.
A total of 582 patients with ILC were treated. Typical ILC was observed in 89.2% (n = 519) and atypical in 10.8% (n = 63). Atypical ILCs were of a higher grade (35% grade 3 vs 9.6% grade 3, p < 0.001).
A larger proportion of atypical ILC received NACT (31.7% vs 6.9% p < 0.001). Atypical ILCs showed a greater response to NACT (mean RCB (Residual Cancer Burden Score) 2.46 vs mean RCB 3.41, p = 0.0365), and higher pathological complete response rates (15% vs 0% p = 0.017). Despite this, overall 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in patients with typical ILC (91% vs 83%, p = 0.001).
Atypical ILCs have distinct characteristics. They are more frequently of a higher grade and demonstrate a superior response to NACT. Despite the latter, atypical ILCs have a worse 5-year DFS which should be taken into consideration in terms of prognostication and may assist patient selection for NACT.
•ILC is a unique clinical entity and should be considered separately to IBS-NST for research and treatment purposes.•Biomarker profile influences ILC disease behaviour and may have an effect on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.•Tumour size and lymph node status are independent predictors of recurrence free survival in ILC.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38754140</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.breast.2024.103739</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8131-8472</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-9776 |
ispartof | Breast (Edinburgh), 2024-08, Vol.76, p.103739, Article 103739 |
issn | 0960-9776 1532-3080 1532-3080 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d4ce1749f6524f5b865c548323a5adc4 |
source | PubMed Central (Open access); Elsevier |
subjects | Breast Cancer Lobular Neoadjuvant chemotherapy |
title | Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast; clinicopathologic profile and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy over a 15-year period |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A45%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Invasive%20lobular%20carcinoma%20of%20the%20breast;%20clinicopathologic%20profile%20and%20response%20to%20neoadjuvant%20chemotherapy%20over%20a%2015-year%20period&rft.jtitle=Breast%20(Edinburgh)&rft.au=Quirke,%20N.P.&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=76&rft.spage=103739&rft.pages=103739-&rft.artnum=103739&rft.issn=0960-9776&rft.eissn=1532-3080&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.breast.2024.103739&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3056668572%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-712c0ee785b8b24806a4d651b5e493e9685c7742a61eb1b7482b25f61dfd645a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3056668572&rft_id=info:pmid/38754140&rfr_iscdi=true |