Loading…

Assessing the utility of artificial intelligence throughout the triage outpatients: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study

Currently, there are still many patients who require outpatient triage assistance. ChatGPT, a natural language processing tool powered by artificial intelligence technology, is increasingly utilized in medicine. To facilitate and expedite patients' navigation to the appropriate department, we c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in public health 2024-05, Vol.12, p.1391906
Main Authors: Liu, Xiaoni, Lai, Rui, Wu, Chaoling, Yan, Changjian, Gan, Zhe, Yang, Yaru, Zeng, Xiangtai, Liu, Jin, Liao, Liangliang, Lin, Yuansheng, Jing, Hongmei, Zhang, Weilong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-3ebda96d2f6ab80e4e78694135ae598bb0c255649dceb1d625a17c67e7314403
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 1391906
container_title Frontiers in public health
container_volume 12
creator Liu, Xiaoni
Lai, Rui
Wu, Chaoling
Yan, Changjian
Gan, Zhe
Yang, Yaru
Zeng, Xiangtai
Liu, Jin
Liao, Liangliang
Lin, Yuansheng
Jing, Hongmei
Zhang, Weilong
description Currently, there are still many patients who require outpatient triage assistance. ChatGPT, a natural language processing tool powered by artificial intelligence technology, is increasingly utilized in medicine. To facilitate and expedite patients' navigation to the appropriate department, we conducted an outpatient triage evaluation of ChatGPT. For this evaluation, we posed 30 highly representative and common outpatient questions to ChatGPT and scored its responses using a panel of five experienced doctors. The consistency of manual triage and ChatGPT triage was assessed by five experienced doctors, and statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test. The expert ratings of ChatGPT's answers to these 30 frequently asked questions revealed 17 responses earning very high scores (10 and 9.5 points), 7 earning high scores (9 points), and 6 receiving low scores (8 and 7 points). Additionally, we conducted a prospective cohort study in which 45 patients completed forms detailing gender, age, and symptoms. Triage was then performed by outpatient triage staff and ChatGPT. Among the 45 patients, we found a high level of agreement between manual triage and ChatGPT triage (consistency: 93.3-100%,
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1391906
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d53f292c8df446dc8983ccc0757b1c5b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d53f292c8df446dc8983ccc0757b1c5b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3068756090</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-3ebda96d2f6ab80e4e78694135ae598bb0c255649dceb1d625a17c67e7314403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUstu3CAUtapWTZTmB7qoWHYzEx4GTDdVFPURKVI22SMM1x4ixkwBR5p-QL67eGYaJWLBvXDPua_TNJ8JXjPWqathN_ebNcW0XROmiMLiXXNOqRIrygV__8o-ay5zfsQYE8xaTMnH5ox1nWQMy_Pm-TpnyNlPIyobQHPxwZc9igMyqfjBW28C8lOBEPwIk4UaluI8buJcDoiSvBkBVXdnioep5G_IoF2KeQe2-CdAyUwubv1fcMjGqaQYwmIGP3lbyXOZ3f5T82EwIcPl6b5oHn7-eLj5vbq7_3V7c323sozjsmLQO6OEo4MwfYehBdkJ1RLGDXDV9T22lHPRKmehJ05Qboi0QoJkpG0xu2huj7Qumke9S35r0l5H4_XhIaZRL23bANpxNlBFbeeGthXOdqpj1losueyJ5X3l-n7kqovYQk1YWzPhDenbn8lv9BifNCFE1rNU8_XEkOKfGXLRW59tnbSZIM5ZMyw6yQVWSyg9hto62JxgeMlDsF70oA960Ise9EkPFfTldYUvkP_bZ_8AhCC27g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068756090</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the utility of artificial intelligence throughout the triage outpatients: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Liu, Xiaoni ; Lai, Rui ; Wu, Chaoling ; Yan, Changjian ; Gan, Zhe ; Yang, Yaru ; Zeng, Xiangtai ; Liu, Jin ; Liao, Liangliang ; Lin, Yuansheng ; Jing, Hongmei ; Zhang, Weilong</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoni ; Lai, Rui ; Wu, Chaoling ; Yan, Changjian ; Gan, Zhe ; Yang, Yaru ; Zeng, Xiangtai ; Liu, Jin ; Liao, Liangliang ; Lin, Yuansheng ; Jing, Hongmei ; Zhang, Weilong</creatorcontrib><description>Currently, there are still many patients who require outpatient triage assistance. ChatGPT, a natural language processing tool powered by artificial intelligence technology, is increasingly utilized in medicine. To facilitate and expedite patients' navigation to the appropriate department, we conducted an outpatient triage evaluation of ChatGPT. For this evaluation, we posed 30 highly representative and common outpatient questions to ChatGPT and scored its responses using a panel of five experienced doctors. The consistency of manual triage and ChatGPT triage was assessed by five experienced doctors, and statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test. The expert ratings of ChatGPT's answers to these 30 frequently asked questions revealed 17 responses earning very high scores (10 and 9.5 points), 7 earning high scores (9 points), and 6 receiving low scores (8 and 7 points). Additionally, we conducted a prospective cohort study in which 45 patients completed forms detailing gender, age, and symptoms. Triage was then performed by outpatient triage staff and ChatGPT. Among the 45 patients, we found a high level of agreement between manual triage and ChatGPT triage (consistency: 93.3-100%, &lt;0.0001). We were pleasantly surprised to observe that ChatGPT's responses were highly professional, comprehensive, and humanized. This innovation can help patients win more treatment time, improve patient diagnosis and cure rates, and alleviate the pressure of medical staff shortage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2296-2565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2296-2565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1391906</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38873307</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Artificial Intelligence ; ChatGPT ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Natural Language Processing ; Outpatients - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Prospective Studies ; Public Health ; Triage ; triage outpatients</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in public health, 2024-05, Vol.12, p.1391906</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Liu, Lai, Wu, Yan, Gan, Yang, Zeng, Liu, Liao, Lin, Jing and Zhang.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Liu, Lai, Wu, Yan, Gan, Yang, Zeng, Liu, Liao, Lin, Jing and Zhang. 2024 Liu, Lai, Wu, Yan, Gan, Yang, Zeng, Liu, Liao, Lin, Jing and Zhang</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-3ebda96d2f6ab80e4e78694135ae598bb0c255649dceb1d625a17c67e7314403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11171710/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11171710/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38873307$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Changjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Zhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xiangtai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Liangliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yuansheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jing, Hongmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Weilong</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the utility of artificial intelligence throughout the triage outpatients: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study</title><title>Frontiers in public health</title><addtitle>Front Public Health</addtitle><description>Currently, there are still many patients who require outpatient triage assistance. ChatGPT, a natural language processing tool powered by artificial intelligence technology, is increasingly utilized in medicine. To facilitate and expedite patients' navigation to the appropriate department, we conducted an outpatient triage evaluation of ChatGPT. For this evaluation, we posed 30 highly representative and common outpatient questions to ChatGPT and scored its responses using a panel of five experienced doctors. The consistency of manual triage and ChatGPT triage was assessed by five experienced doctors, and statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test. The expert ratings of ChatGPT's answers to these 30 frequently asked questions revealed 17 responses earning very high scores (10 and 9.5 points), 7 earning high scores (9 points), and 6 receiving low scores (8 and 7 points). Additionally, we conducted a prospective cohort study in which 45 patients completed forms detailing gender, age, and symptoms. Triage was then performed by outpatient triage staff and ChatGPT. Among the 45 patients, we found a high level of agreement between manual triage and ChatGPT triage (consistency: 93.3-100%, &lt;0.0001). We were pleasantly surprised to observe that ChatGPT's responses were highly professional, comprehensive, and humanized. This innovation can help patients win more treatment time, improve patient diagnosis and cure rates, and alleviate the pressure of medical staff shortage.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>ChatGPT</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Natural Language Processing</subject><subject>Outpatients - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Triage</subject><subject>triage outpatients</subject><issn>2296-2565</issn><issn>2296-2565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUstu3CAUtapWTZTmB7qoWHYzEx4GTDdVFPURKVI22SMM1x4ixkwBR5p-QL67eGYaJWLBvXDPua_TNJ8JXjPWqathN_ebNcW0XROmiMLiXXNOqRIrygV__8o-ay5zfsQYE8xaTMnH5ox1nWQMy_Pm-TpnyNlPIyobQHPxwZc9igMyqfjBW28C8lOBEPwIk4UaluI8buJcDoiSvBkBVXdnioep5G_IoF2KeQe2-CdAyUwubv1fcMjGqaQYwmIGP3lbyXOZ3f5T82EwIcPl6b5oHn7-eLj5vbq7_3V7c323sozjsmLQO6OEo4MwfYehBdkJ1RLGDXDV9T22lHPRKmehJ05Qboi0QoJkpG0xu2huj7Qumke9S35r0l5H4_XhIaZRL23bANpxNlBFbeeGthXOdqpj1losueyJ5X3l-n7kqovYQk1YWzPhDenbn8lv9BifNCFE1rNU8_XEkOKfGXLRW59tnbSZIM5ZMyw6yQVWSyg9hto62JxgeMlDsF70oA960Ise9EkPFfTldYUvkP_bZ_8AhCC27g</recordid><startdate>20240530</startdate><enddate>20240530</enddate><creator>Liu, Xiaoni</creator><creator>Lai, Rui</creator><creator>Wu, Chaoling</creator><creator>Yan, Changjian</creator><creator>Gan, Zhe</creator><creator>Yang, Yaru</creator><creator>Zeng, Xiangtai</creator><creator>Liu, Jin</creator><creator>Liao, Liangliang</creator><creator>Lin, Yuansheng</creator><creator>Jing, Hongmei</creator><creator>Zhang, Weilong</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240530</creationdate><title>Assessing the utility of artificial intelligence throughout the triage outpatients: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study</title><author>Liu, Xiaoni ; Lai, Rui ; Wu, Chaoling ; Yan, Changjian ; Gan, Zhe ; Yang, Yaru ; Zeng, Xiangtai ; Liu, Jin ; Liao, Liangliang ; Lin, Yuansheng ; Jing, Hongmei ; Zhang, Weilong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-3ebda96d2f6ab80e4e78694135ae598bb0c255649dceb1d625a17c67e7314403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>ChatGPT</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Natural Language Processing</topic><topic>Outpatients - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Triage</topic><topic>triage outpatients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Changjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Zhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xiangtai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Liangliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yuansheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jing, Hongmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Weilong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Xiaoni</au><au>Lai, Rui</au><au>Wu, Chaoling</au><au>Yan, Changjian</au><au>Gan, Zhe</au><au>Yang, Yaru</au><au>Zeng, Xiangtai</au><au>Liu, Jin</au><au>Liao, Liangliang</au><au>Lin, Yuansheng</au><au>Jing, Hongmei</au><au>Zhang, Weilong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the utility of artificial intelligence throughout the triage outpatients: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in public health</jtitle><addtitle>Front Public Health</addtitle><date>2024-05-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>1391906</spage><pages>1391906-</pages><issn>2296-2565</issn><eissn>2296-2565</eissn><abstract>Currently, there are still many patients who require outpatient triage assistance. ChatGPT, a natural language processing tool powered by artificial intelligence technology, is increasingly utilized in medicine. To facilitate and expedite patients' navigation to the appropriate department, we conducted an outpatient triage evaluation of ChatGPT. For this evaluation, we posed 30 highly representative and common outpatient questions to ChatGPT and scored its responses using a panel of five experienced doctors. The consistency of manual triage and ChatGPT triage was assessed by five experienced doctors, and statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test. The expert ratings of ChatGPT's answers to these 30 frequently asked questions revealed 17 responses earning very high scores (10 and 9.5 points), 7 earning high scores (9 points), and 6 receiving low scores (8 and 7 points). Additionally, we conducted a prospective cohort study in which 45 patients completed forms detailing gender, age, and symptoms. Triage was then performed by outpatient triage staff and ChatGPT. Among the 45 patients, we found a high level of agreement between manual triage and ChatGPT triage (consistency: 93.3-100%, &lt;0.0001). We were pleasantly surprised to observe that ChatGPT's responses were highly professional, comprehensive, and humanized. This innovation can help patients win more treatment time, improve patient diagnosis and cure rates, and alleviate the pressure of medical staff shortage.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>38873307</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpubh.2024.1391906</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2296-2565
ispartof Frontiers in public health, 2024-05, Vol.12, p.1391906
issn 2296-2565
2296-2565
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d53f292c8df446dc8983ccc0757b1c5b
source PubMed Central Free
subjects Adult
Aged
Artificial Intelligence
ChatGPT
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Natural Language Processing
Outpatients - statistics & numerical data
Prospective Studies
Public Health
Triage
triage outpatients
title Assessing the utility of artificial intelligence throughout the triage outpatients: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T16%3A52%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20utility%20of%20artificial%20intelligence%20throughout%20the%20triage%20outpatients:%20a%20prospective%20randomized%20controlled%20clinical%20study&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20public%20health&rft.au=Liu,%20Xiaoni&rft.date=2024-05-30&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=1391906&rft.pages=1391906-&rft.issn=2296-2565&rft.eissn=2296-2565&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1391906&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3068756090%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-3ebda96d2f6ab80e4e78694135ae598bb0c255649dceb1d625a17c67e7314403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068756090&rft_id=info:pmid/38873307&rfr_iscdi=true