Ancient DNA extraction methods for herbarium specimens: When is it worth the effort?

Premise Herbaria harbor a tremendous number of plant specimens that are rarely used for molecular systematic studies, largely due to the difficulty in extracting sufficient amounts of high‐quality DNA from the preserved plant material. Methods We compared the standard Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applications in plant sciences 2022-05, Vol.10 (3), p.e11477-n/a
Main Authors: Marinček, Pia, Wagner, Natascha D., Tomasello, Salvatore
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Application
archival DNA
Biodiversity
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Dithiothreitol
DNA
Genetic testing
genome skimming
herbarium genomics
Plant sciences
Salix
Success
target enrichment
Xanthium
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Premise Herbaria harbor a tremendous number of plant specimens that are rarely used for molecular systematic studies, largely due to the difficulty in extracting sufficient amounts of high‐quality DNA from the preserved plant material. Methods We compared the standard Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit and a specific protocol for extracting ancient DNA (aDNA) (the N‐phenacylthiazolium bromide and dithiothreitol [PTB–DTT] extraction method) from two different plant genera (Xanthium and Salix). The included herbarium materials covered about two centuries of plant collections. To analyze the success of DNA extraction using each method, a subset of samples was subjected to a standard library preparation as well as target‐enrichment approaches. Results The PTB–DTT method produced a higher DNA yield of better quality than the Qiagen kit; however, extracts from the Qiagen kit over a certain DNA yield and quality threshold produced comparable sequencing results. The sequencing resulted in high proportions of endogenous reads. We were able to successfully sequence 200‐year‐old samples. Discussion This method comparison revealed that, for younger specimens, DNA extraction using a standard kit might be sufficient. For old and precious herbarium specimens, aDNA extraction methods are better suited to meet the requirements for next‐generation sequencing.
ISSN:2168-0450
2168-0450
DOI:10.1002/aps3.11477