Correction for the Partial Volume Effects (PVE) in Nuclear Medicine Imaging: A Post-Reconstruction Analytic Method

• Published in: Applied sciences 2021-07, Vol.11 (14), p.6460
• Main Authors: Di Martino, Fabio, Barca, Patrizio, Bortoli, Eleonora, Giuliano, Alessia, Volterrani, Duccio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Computed tomography; Data recovery; Evaluation; Image processing; Medical imaging; Medicine; Nuclear medicine; partial volume effect; point spread function; Positron emission; Post-production processing; post-reconstruction-correction-method; Quantitative analysis; Radioactivity; Reconstruction; Statistical analysis; Therapeutic applications; Tomography
• ISSN: 2076-3417; 2076-3417
• DOI: 10.3390/app11146460

Quantitative analyses in nuclear medicine are increasingly used, both for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The Partial Volume Effect (PVE) is the most important factor of loss of quantification in Nuclear Medicine, especially for evaluation in Region of Interest (ROI) smaller than the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of the PSF. The aim of this work is to present a new approach for the correction of PVE, using a post-reconstruction process starting from a mathematical expression, which only requires the knowledge of the FWHM of the final PSF of the imaging system used. After the presentation of the theoretical derivation, the experimental evaluation of this method is performed using a PET/CT hybrid system and acquiring the IEC NEMA phantom with six spherical “hot” ROIs (with diameters of 10, 13, 17, 22, 28, and 37 mm) and a homogeneous “colder” background. In order to evaluate the recovery of quantitative data, the effect of statistical noise (different acquisition times), tomographic reconstruction algorithm with and without time-of-flight (TOF) and different signal-to-background activity concentration ratio (3:1 and 10:1) was studied. The application of the corrective method allows recovering the loss of quantification due to PVE for all sizes of spheres acquired, with a final accuracy less than 17%, for lesion dimensions larger than two FWHM and for acquisition times equal to or greater than two minutes.