Loading…
Object focus marking in Spanish: An investigation using three tasks
The literature on focus in Spanish contains a divide between theoretical claims and quantitative empirical evidence: While Spanish is often regarded as resorting to syntactic movement to mark focus, quantitative and/or experimental data often do not support this claim. Research focusing on non-final...
Saved in:
Published in: | Glossa (London) 2020-07, Vol.5 (1) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-e728f088cff94d022f3292d159c94530115d571957a73f99f6a7f874c8ffe7743 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-e728f088cff94d022f3292d159c94530115d571957a73f99f6a7f874c8ffe7743 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Glossa (London) |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Hoot, Bradley Leal, Tania Destruel, Emilie |
description | The literature on focus in Spanish contains a divide between theoretical claims and quantitative empirical evidence: While Spanish is often regarded as resorting to syntactic movement to mark focus, quantitative and/or experimental data often do not support this claim. Research focusing on non-final objects within the VP can provide valuable clarity to the empirical picture, especially when evidence is gathered using multiple methods, a practice known as triangulation. In this article, we use three different tasks (judgments, sentence processing, and production) to provide evidence of object focus marking in Spanish. We found that: (i) canonical orders (object in-situ) were preferred overall; (ii) marking object focus via movement strategies is possible—we find a relationship between object-focus marking and non-canonical (S)VPPO order, as predicted by mainstream syntactic accounts; and (iii) Spanish focus is not marked asymmetrically by position (subjects vs. non-subjects). Overall, results show canonical orders (i.e., SVOPP) can be used to realize focus on any constituent, while their non-canonical counterparts are contextually restricted. This finding suggests mainstream syntactic accounts in which information structure triggers syntactic movement may need to be revised to include alternative focus-marking mechanisms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5334/gjgl.1160 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d5a7dcaab9954bf4a091176cb355d63b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d5a7dcaab9954bf4a091176cb355d63b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_d5a7dcaab9954bf4a091176cb355d63b</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-e728f088cff94d022f3292d159c94530115d571957a73f99f6a7f874c8ffe7743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhoMoWGoP_oNcPWzNJJvNxlspfhQKPajnMJtNttnW3ZJsBf-9XSviad4ZhoeXh5BbYHMpRH7ftM1-DlCwCzLhQqsMSiEv_-VrMkupZYyB5gAlTMhyU7XODtT39pjoB8Zd6BoaOvp6wC6k7QNddKf106UhNDiEvqPHNL4M2-gcHTDt0g258rhPbvY7p-T96fFt-ZKtN8-r5WKdWVHoIXOKl56VpfVe5zXj3AuueQ1SW51LwQBkLRVoqVAJr7UvUPlS5bb03imViylZnbl1j605xHCq-2V6DObn0MfGYByC3TtTS1S1Ray0lnnlc2QaQBW2ElLWhahOrLszy8Y-pej8Hw-YGWWaUaYZZYpvYkFmlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Object focus marking in Spanish: An investigation using three tasks</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><creator>Hoot, Bradley ; Leal, Tania ; Destruel, Emilie</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoot, Bradley ; Leal, Tania ; Destruel, Emilie</creatorcontrib><description>The literature on focus in Spanish contains a divide between theoretical claims and quantitative empirical evidence: While Spanish is often regarded as resorting to syntactic movement to mark focus, quantitative and/or experimental data often do not support this claim. Research focusing on non-final objects within the VP can provide valuable clarity to the empirical picture, especially when evidence is gathered using multiple methods, a practice known as triangulation. In this article, we use three different tasks (judgments, sentence processing, and production) to provide evidence of object focus marking in Spanish. We found that: (i) canonical orders (object in-situ) were preferred overall; (ii) marking object focus via movement strategies is possible—we find a relationship between object-focus marking and non-canonical (S)VPPO order, as predicted by mainstream syntactic accounts; and (iii) Spanish focus is not marked asymmetrically by position (subjects vs. non-subjects). Overall, results show canonical orders (i.e., SVOPP) can be used to realize focus on any constituent, while their non-canonical counterparts are contextually restricted. This finding suggests mainstream syntactic accounts in which information structure triggers syntactic movement may need to be revised to include alternative focus-marking mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2397-1835</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2397-1835</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.1160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Open Library of Humanities</publisher><subject>Focus Marking ; Information Focus ; Information Structure ; Processing ; Spanish ; Triangulation</subject><ispartof>Glossa (London), 2020-07, Vol.5 (1)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-e728f088cff94d022f3292d159c94530115d571957a73f99f6a7f874c8ffe7743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-e728f088cff94d022f3292d159c94530115d571957a73f99f6a7f874c8ffe7743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoot, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leal, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Destruel, Emilie</creatorcontrib><title>Object focus marking in Spanish: An investigation using three tasks</title><title>Glossa (London)</title><description>The literature on focus in Spanish contains a divide between theoretical claims and quantitative empirical evidence: While Spanish is often regarded as resorting to syntactic movement to mark focus, quantitative and/or experimental data often do not support this claim. Research focusing on non-final objects within the VP can provide valuable clarity to the empirical picture, especially when evidence is gathered using multiple methods, a practice known as triangulation. In this article, we use three different tasks (judgments, sentence processing, and production) to provide evidence of object focus marking in Spanish. We found that: (i) canonical orders (object in-situ) were preferred overall; (ii) marking object focus via movement strategies is possible—we find a relationship between object-focus marking and non-canonical (S)VPPO order, as predicted by mainstream syntactic accounts; and (iii) Spanish focus is not marked asymmetrically by position (subjects vs. non-subjects). Overall, results show canonical orders (i.e., SVOPP) can be used to realize focus on any constituent, while their non-canonical counterparts are contextually restricted. This finding suggests mainstream syntactic accounts in which information structure triggers syntactic movement may need to be revised to include alternative focus-marking mechanisms.</description><subject>Focus Marking</subject><subject>Information Focus</subject><subject>Information Structure</subject><subject>Processing</subject><subject>Spanish</subject><subject>Triangulation</subject><issn>2397-1835</issn><issn>2397-1835</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhoMoWGoP_oNcPWzNJJvNxlspfhQKPajnMJtNttnW3ZJsBf-9XSviad4ZhoeXh5BbYHMpRH7ftM1-DlCwCzLhQqsMSiEv_-VrMkupZYyB5gAlTMhyU7XODtT39pjoB8Zd6BoaOvp6wC6k7QNddKf106UhNDiEvqPHNL4M2-gcHTDt0g258rhPbvY7p-T96fFt-ZKtN8-r5WKdWVHoIXOKl56VpfVe5zXj3AuueQ1SW51LwQBkLRVoqVAJr7UvUPlS5bb03imViylZnbl1j605xHCq-2V6DObn0MfGYByC3TtTS1S1Ray0lnnlc2QaQBW2ElLWhahOrLszy8Y-pej8Hw-YGWWaUaYZZYpvYkFmlA</recordid><startdate>20200717</startdate><enddate>20200717</enddate><creator>Hoot, Bradley</creator><creator>Leal, Tania</creator><creator>Destruel, Emilie</creator><general>Open Library of Humanities</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200717</creationdate><title>Object focus marking in Spanish: An investigation using three tasks</title><author>Hoot, Bradley ; Leal, Tania ; Destruel, Emilie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-e728f088cff94d022f3292d159c94530115d571957a73f99f6a7f874c8ffe7743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Focus Marking</topic><topic>Information Focus</topic><topic>Information Structure</topic><topic>Processing</topic><topic>Spanish</topic><topic>Triangulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoot, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leal, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Destruel, Emilie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Glossa (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoot, Bradley</au><au>Leal, Tania</au><au>Destruel, Emilie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Object focus marking in Spanish: An investigation using three tasks</atitle><jtitle>Glossa (London)</jtitle><date>2020-07-17</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>2397-1835</issn><eissn>2397-1835</eissn><abstract>The literature on focus in Spanish contains a divide between theoretical claims and quantitative empirical evidence: While Spanish is often regarded as resorting to syntactic movement to mark focus, quantitative and/or experimental data often do not support this claim. Research focusing on non-final objects within the VP can provide valuable clarity to the empirical picture, especially when evidence is gathered using multiple methods, a practice known as triangulation. In this article, we use three different tasks (judgments, sentence processing, and production) to provide evidence of object focus marking in Spanish. We found that: (i) canonical orders (object in-situ) were preferred overall; (ii) marking object focus via movement strategies is possible—we find a relationship between object-focus marking and non-canonical (S)VPPO order, as predicted by mainstream syntactic accounts; and (iii) Spanish focus is not marked asymmetrically by position (subjects vs. non-subjects). Overall, results show canonical orders (i.e., SVOPP) can be used to realize focus on any constituent, while their non-canonical counterparts are contextually restricted. This finding suggests mainstream syntactic accounts in which information structure triggers syntactic movement may need to be revised to include alternative focus-marking mechanisms.</abstract><pub>Open Library of Humanities</pub><doi>10.5334/gjgl.1160</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2397-1835 |
ispartof | Glossa (London), 2020-07, Vol.5 (1) |
issn | 2397-1835 2397-1835 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d5a7dcaab9954bf4a091176cb355d63b |
source | EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection; Linguistics Collection; ProQuest One Literature |
subjects | Focus Marking Information Focus Information Structure Processing Spanish Triangulation |
title | Object focus marking in Spanish: An investigation using three tasks |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A03%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Object%20focus%20marking%20in%20Spanish:%20An%20investigation%20using%20three%20tasks&rft.jtitle=Glossa%20(London)&rft.au=Hoot,%20Bradley&rft.date=2020-07-17&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=2397-1835&rft.eissn=2397-1835&rft_id=info:doi/10.5334/gjgl.1160&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_d5a7dcaab9954bf4a091176cb355d63b%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-e728f088cff94d022f3292d159c94530115d571957a73f99f6a7f874c8ffe7743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |