Ethical considerations during Mpox Outbreak: a scoping review

• Published in: BMC medical ethics 2024-07, Vol.25 (1), p.79-14, Article 79
• Main Authors: El Dine, Fatma Badr, Gebreal, Assem, Samhouri, Dalia, Estifanos, Haimanot, Kourampi, Islam, Abdelrhem, Hasnaa, Mostafa, Hamed Abdelma'aboud, Elshaar, Ahmed Gamal, Suvvari, Tarun Kumar, Ghazy, Ramy Mohamed
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Citations; Clinical trials; Confidentiality; Confidentiality - ethics; Discrimination; Disease Outbreaks - ethics; Disease prevention; Epidemics; Ethics; False information; Humans; Infections; Infectious diseases; LGBTQ people; Medical ethics; Monkeypox; Moral issues; Morals; Mpox; Mpox (monkeypox) - epidemiology; Privacy; Professional ethics; Public health; Social Stigma; Stigma
• ISSN: 1472-6939; 1472-6939
• DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01078-0

Historically, epidemics have been accompanied by the concurrent emergence of stigma, prejudice, and xenophobia. This scoping review aimed to describe and map published research targeting ethical values concerning monkeypox (mpox). In addition, it aimed to understand the research gaps related to mpox associated stigma. We comprehensively searched databases (PubMed Central, PubMed Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, and Google Scholar) to identify published literature concerning mpox ethical issues and stigma from May 6, 2022, to February 15, 2023. The key search terms used were "monkeypox", "ethics", "morals", "social stigma", "privacy", "confidentiality", "secrecy", "privilege", "egoism", and "metaethics". This scoping review followed the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley in 2005 and was further improved by the recommendations of Levac et al. in 2010. The search strategies employed in the scoping review yielded a total of 454 articles. We analyzed the sources, types, and topics of the retrieved articles/studies. The authors were able to identify 32 studies that met inclusion criteria. Six of the 32 included studies were primary research. The study revealed that the ongoing mpox outbreak is contending with a notable surge in misinformation and societal stigma. It highlights the adverse impacts of stigma and ethical concerns associated with mpox, which can negatively affect people with the disease. The study's findings underscore the imperative need to enhance public awareness; involve civil society; and promote collaboration among policymakers, medical communities, and social media platforms. These collective endeavors are crucial for mitigating stigma, averting human-to-human transmission, tackling racism, and dispelling misconceptions associated with the outbreak.