Loading…
Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open ? A randomized controlled trial
Sharing data and code are important components of reproducible research. Data sharing in research is widely discussed in the literature; however, there are no well-established evidence-based incentives that reward data sharing, nor randomized studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of data sharin...
Saved in:
Published in: | Royal Society open science 2020-03, Vol.7 (3), p.191818-191818 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-ab3f740c0118320b0fad668979a2a231541fa165e6c181af89a241107e6d63ca3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-ab3f740c0118320b0fad668979a2a231541fa165e6c181af89a241107e6d63ca3 |
container_end_page | 191818 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 191818 |
container_title | Royal Society open science |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Rowhani-Farid, Anisa Aldcroft, Adrian Barnett, Adrian G |
description | Sharing data and code are important components of reproducible research. Data sharing in research is widely discussed in the literature; however, there are no well-established evidence-based incentives that reward data sharing, nor randomized studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of data sharing policies at increasing data sharing. A simple incentive, such as an Open Data Badge, might provide the change needed to increase data sharing in health and medical research. This study was a parallel group randomized controlled trial (protocol registration: doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/PXWZQ) with two groups, control and intervention, with 80 research articles published in
per group, with a total of 160 research articles. The intervention group received an email offer for an Open Data Badge if they shared their data along with their final publication and the control group received an email with no offer of a badge if they shared their data with their final publication. The primary outcome was the data sharing rate. Badges did not noticeably motivate researchers who published in
to share their data; the odds of awarding badges were nearly equal in the intervention and control groups (odds ratio = 0.9, 95% CI [0.1, 9.0]). Data sharing rates were low in both groups, with just two datasets shared in each of the intervention and control groups. The global movement towards open science has made significant gains with the development of numerous data sharing policies and tools. What remains to be established is an effective incentive that motivates researchers to take up such tools to share their data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rsos.191818 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d666a33adbee430ea4484131538774a4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d666a33adbee430ea4484131538774a4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2388004680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-ab3f740c0118320b0fad668979a2a231541fa165e6c181af89a241107e6d63ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1PHDEMxaOqqCDg1HuVY6VqqTPJJJlLK6BfVCAucI48iWcJmp1sk9lW7V_fbJciONnye_rZ1mPstYATAZ19n0sqJ6ITVtgX7KCBVi1aA_Llk36fHZdyDwCiBWm0ecX2ZdPozoI6YLefYuD4C3OI05L3GJZUeJx8JizEA87Iyx3mrRgnfnb1nV-vaeIf-SnPOIW0in8ocJ-mOadxrO2cI45HbG_AsdDxQz1kt18-35x_W1xef704P71c-FbBvMBeDkaBByGsbKCHAYPWtjMdNthI0SoxoNAtaV8fxMHWuRICDOmgpUd5yC523JDw3q1zXGH-7RJG92-Q8tJhnqMfyVWwRikx9ERKAqFSVom6Q1pjFKrK-rBjrTf9ioKn-hKOz6DPlSneuWX66YyQplO2At4-AHL6saEyu1UsnsYRJ0qb4hppLYDSFqr13c7qcyol0_C4RoDb5uq2ubpdrtX95ullj97_Kcq_vYGdGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2388004680</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open ? A randomized controlled trial</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Royal Society Open Access Journals</source><creator>Rowhani-Farid, Anisa ; Aldcroft, Adrian ; Barnett, Adrian G</creator><creatorcontrib>Rowhani-Farid, Anisa ; Aldcroft, Adrian ; Barnett, Adrian G</creatorcontrib><description>Sharing data and code are important components of reproducible research. Data sharing in research is widely discussed in the literature; however, there are no well-established evidence-based incentives that reward data sharing, nor randomized studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of data sharing policies at increasing data sharing. A simple incentive, such as an Open Data Badge, might provide the change needed to increase data sharing in health and medical research. This study was a parallel group randomized controlled trial (protocol registration: doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/PXWZQ) with two groups, control and intervention, with 80 research articles published in
per group, with a total of 160 research articles. The intervention group received an email offer for an Open Data Badge if they shared their data along with their final publication and the control group received an email with no offer of a badge if they shared their data with their final publication. The primary outcome was the data sharing rate. Badges did not noticeably motivate researchers who published in
to share their data; the odds of awarding badges were nearly equal in the intervention and control groups (odds ratio = 0.9, 95% CI [0.1, 9.0]). Data sharing rates were low in both groups, with just two datasets shared in each of the intervention and control groups. The global movement towards open science has made significant gains with the development of numerous data sharing policies and tools. What remains to be established is an effective incentive that motivates researchers to take up such tools to share their data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2054-5703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-5703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191818</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32269804</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>data sharing ; incentives ; open science ; policy ; Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience ; randomized controlled trial ; reproducibility</subject><ispartof>Royal Society open science, 2020-03, Vol.7 (3), p.191818-191818</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors.</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-ab3f740c0118320b0fad668979a2a231541fa165e6c181af89a241107e6d63ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-ab3f740c0118320b0fad668979a2a231541fa165e6c181af89a241107e6d63ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3637-2423 ; 0000-0001-6339-0374 ; 0000-0003-0106-720X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137948/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137948/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3309,27900,27901,53765,53767</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269804$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rowhani-Farid, Anisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldcroft, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnett, Adrian G</creatorcontrib><title>Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open ? A randomized controlled trial</title><title>Royal Society open science</title><addtitle>R Soc Open Sci</addtitle><description>Sharing data and code are important components of reproducible research. Data sharing in research is widely discussed in the literature; however, there are no well-established evidence-based incentives that reward data sharing, nor randomized studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of data sharing policies at increasing data sharing. A simple incentive, such as an Open Data Badge, might provide the change needed to increase data sharing in health and medical research. This study was a parallel group randomized controlled trial (protocol registration: doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/PXWZQ) with two groups, control and intervention, with 80 research articles published in
per group, with a total of 160 research articles. The intervention group received an email offer for an Open Data Badge if they shared their data along with their final publication and the control group received an email with no offer of a badge if they shared their data with their final publication. The primary outcome was the data sharing rate. Badges did not noticeably motivate researchers who published in
to share their data; the odds of awarding badges were nearly equal in the intervention and control groups (odds ratio = 0.9, 95% CI [0.1, 9.0]). Data sharing rates were low in both groups, with just two datasets shared in each of the intervention and control groups. The global movement towards open science has made significant gains with the development of numerous data sharing policies and tools. What remains to be established is an effective incentive that motivates researchers to take up such tools to share their data.</description><subject>data sharing</subject><subject>incentives</subject><subject>open science</subject><subject>policy</subject><subject>Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience</subject><subject>randomized controlled trial</subject><subject>reproducibility</subject><issn>2054-5703</issn><issn>2054-5703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1PHDEMxaOqqCDg1HuVY6VqqTPJJJlLK6BfVCAucI48iWcJmp1sk9lW7V_fbJciONnye_rZ1mPstYATAZ19n0sqJ6ITVtgX7KCBVi1aA_Llk36fHZdyDwCiBWm0ecX2ZdPozoI6YLefYuD4C3OI05L3GJZUeJx8JizEA87Iyx3mrRgnfnb1nV-vaeIf-SnPOIW0in8ocJ-mOadxrO2cI45HbG_AsdDxQz1kt18-35x_W1xef704P71c-FbBvMBeDkaBByGsbKCHAYPWtjMdNthI0SoxoNAtaV8fxMHWuRICDOmgpUd5yC523JDw3q1zXGH-7RJG92-Q8tJhnqMfyVWwRikx9ERKAqFSVom6Q1pjFKrK-rBjrTf9ioKn-hKOz6DPlSneuWX66YyQplO2At4-AHL6saEyu1UsnsYRJ0qb4hppLYDSFqr13c7qcyol0_C4RoDb5uq2ubpdrtX95ullj97_Kcq_vYGdGA</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Rowhani-Farid, Anisa</creator><creator>Aldcroft, Adrian</creator><creator>Barnett, Adrian G</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-2423</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6339-0374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0106-720X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open ? A randomized controlled trial</title><author>Rowhani-Farid, Anisa ; Aldcroft, Adrian ; Barnett, Adrian G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-ab3f740c0118320b0fad668979a2a231541fa165e6c181af89a241107e6d63ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>data sharing</topic><topic>incentives</topic><topic>open science</topic><topic>policy</topic><topic>Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience</topic><topic>randomized controlled trial</topic><topic>reproducibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rowhani-Farid, Anisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldcroft, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnett, Adrian G</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJÂ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Royal Society open science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rowhani-Farid, Anisa</au><au>Aldcroft, Adrian</au><au>Barnett, Adrian G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open ? A randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Royal Society open science</jtitle><addtitle>R Soc Open Sci</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>191818</spage><epage>191818</epage><pages>191818-191818</pages><issn>2054-5703</issn><eissn>2054-5703</eissn><abstract>Sharing data and code are important components of reproducible research. Data sharing in research is widely discussed in the literature; however, there are no well-established evidence-based incentives that reward data sharing, nor randomized studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of data sharing policies at increasing data sharing. A simple incentive, such as an Open Data Badge, might provide the change needed to increase data sharing in health and medical research. This study was a parallel group randomized controlled trial (protocol registration: doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/PXWZQ) with two groups, control and intervention, with 80 research articles published in
per group, with a total of 160 research articles. The intervention group received an email offer for an Open Data Badge if they shared their data along with their final publication and the control group received an email with no offer of a badge if they shared their data with their final publication. The primary outcome was the data sharing rate. Badges did not noticeably motivate researchers who published in
to share their data; the odds of awarding badges were nearly equal in the intervention and control groups (odds ratio = 0.9, 95% CI [0.1, 9.0]). Data sharing rates were low in both groups, with just two datasets shared in each of the intervention and control groups. The global movement towards open science has made significant gains with the development of numerous data sharing policies and tools. What remains to be established is an effective incentive that motivates researchers to take up such tools to share their data.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>32269804</pmid><doi>10.1098/rsos.191818</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-2423</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6339-0374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0106-720X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2054-5703 |
ispartof | Royal Society open science, 2020-03, Vol.7 (3), p.191818-191818 |
issn | 2054-5703 2054-5703 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d666a33adbee430ea4484131538774a4 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Royal Society Open Access Journals |
subjects | data sharing incentives open science policy Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience randomized controlled trial reproducibility |
title | Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open ? A randomized controlled trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T07%3A36%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Did%20awarding%20badges%20increase%20data%20sharing%20in%20BMJ%20Open%20?%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Royal%20Society%20open%20science&rft.au=Rowhani-Farid,%20Anisa&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=191818&rft.epage=191818&rft.pages=191818-191818&rft.issn=2054-5703&rft.eissn=2054-5703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsos.191818&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2388004680%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-ab3f740c0118320b0fad668979a2a231541fa165e6c181af89a241107e6d63ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2388004680&rft_id=info:pmid/32269804&rfr_iscdi=true |