Loading…

Ego mechanisms of defense are associated with patients rsquo; preference of treatment modality independent of psychological distress in end-stage renal disease

Thomas Hyphantis1, Spiros Katsoudas2, Sonia Voudiclari31Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece; 2Nephrologist, Renal Clinic, Hippocration General Hospital, Athens, Greece; 3Department of Nephrology, University of Athens,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Patient preference and adherence 2010-02, Vol.2010 (default), p.25-32
Main Authors: Thomas Hyphantis, Spiros Katsoudas, Sonia Voudiclari
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 32
container_issue default
container_start_page 25
container_title Patient preference and adherence
container_volume 2010
creator Thomas Hyphantis
Spiros Katsoudas
Sonia Voudiclari
description Thomas Hyphantis1, Spiros Katsoudas2, Sonia Voudiclari31Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece; 2Nephrologist, Renal Clinic, Hippocration General Hospital, Athens, Greece; 3Department of Nephrology, University of Athens, GreeceAbstract: Several parameters mediate the selection of treatment modality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The nephrology community suggests that patient preference should be the prime determinant of modality choice. We aimed to test whether ego mechanisms of defense are associated with patients’ treatment modality preferences, independent of psychological distress. In 58 eligible ESRD patients who had themselves chosen their treatment modality, we administered the Symptom Distress Checklist-90-R and the Defense Style Questionnaire. Thirtyseven patients (53.4%) had chosen hemodialysis and 21 (46.6%) peritoneal dialysis. Patients who preferred peritoneal dialysis were younger (odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.804–0.988), had received more education (OR, 8.84; 95% CI: 1.301–60.161), and were twice as likely to adopt an adaptive defense style as compared to patients who preferred hemodialysis (57.1% vs 27.0%, respectively; P < 0.033). On the contrary, the latter were more likely to adopt an image-distorting defense style (35.1% vs 14.3%; P = 0.038) and passive–aggressive defenses (OR, 0.73: 95% CI: 0.504–1.006). These results were independent of psychological distress. Our findings indicate that the patient’s personality should be taken into account, if we are to better define which modalities are best suited to which patients. Also, physicians should bear in mind passive–aggressive behaviors that warrant attention and intervention in patients who preferred hemodialysis.Keywords: end-stage renal disease, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, ego mechanisms of defense, DSQ, psychopathology
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d7ab7acc0de845ce8606b558740d2dfe</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d7ab7acc0de845ce8606b558740d2dfe</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_d7ab7acc0de845ce8606b558740d2dfe</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d7ab7acc0de845ce8606b558740d2dfe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqtjE1OwzAQhSMEEqX0DnOBSEnbxK5YoiLYs2AXTe1JMlUcG48Rymm4KuZnwQFYzI_e-967KFZ1rVSp9eHl8s9_XdyInKuq3bXbelV8HAcPjsyIM4sT8D1Y6mkWAox5RLxhTGThndMIARPTnASivL75Owgxw5FmQ1_JFAmTyz44b3HitADPlgLllcVMBFnM6Cc_sMEJLEuOiGQKMlNKwoEg1_14hEK3xVWPk9Dm966Lp4fj8_1jaT2euxDZYVw6j9x9Cz4OHcbEZqLOKjwpNKaypPeNId1W7alptNpXdmt72v1n1ydBUnpy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ego mechanisms of defense are associated with patients rsquo; preference of treatment modality independent of psychological distress in end-stage renal disease</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed</source><creator>Thomas Hyphantis ; Spiros Katsoudas ; Sonia Voudiclari</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas Hyphantis ; Spiros Katsoudas ; Sonia Voudiclari</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Thomas Hyphantis1, Spiros Katsoudas2, Sonia Voudiclari31Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece; 2Nephrologist, Renal Clinic, Hippocration General Hospital, Athens, Greece; 3Department of Nephrology, University of Athens, GreeceAbstract: Several parameters mediate the selection of treatment modality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The nephrology community suggests that patient preference should be the prime determinant of modality choice. We aimed to test whether ego mechanisms of defense are associated with patients&rsquo; treatment modality preferences, independent of psychological distress. In 58 eligible ESRD patients who had themselves chosen their treatment modality, we administered the Symptom Distress Checklist-90-R and the Defense Style Questionnaire. Thirtyseven patients (53.4%) had chosen hemodialysis and 21 (46.6%) peritoneal dialysis. Patients who preferred peritoneal dialysis were younger (odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.804&ndash;0.988), had received more education (OR, 8.84; 95% CI: 1.301&ndash;60.161), and were twice as likely to adopt an adaptive defense style as compared to patients who preferred hemodialysis (57.1% vs 27.0%, respectively; P &lt; 0.033). On the contrary, the latter were more likely to adopt an image-distorting defense style (35.1% vs 14.3%; P = 0.038) and passive&ndash;aggressive defenses (OR, 0.73: 95% CI: 0.504&ndash;1.006). These results were independent of psychological distress. Our findings indicate that the patient&rsquo;s personality should be taken into account, if we are to better define which modalities are best suited to which patients. Also, physicians should bear in mind passive&ndash;aggressive behaviors that warrant attention and intervention in patients who preferred hemodialysis.Keywords: end-stage renal disease, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, ego mechanisms of defense, DSQ, psychopathology]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1177-889X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1177-889X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dove Medical Press</publisher><ispartof>Patient preference and adherence, 2010-02, Vol.2010 (default), p.25-32</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas Hyphantis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiros Katsoudas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonia Voudiclari</creatorcontrib><title>Ego mechanisms of defense are associated with patients rsquo; preference of treatment modality independent of psychological distress in end-stage renal disease</title><title>Patient preference and adherence</title><description><![CDATA[Thomas Hyphantis1, Spiros Katsoudas2, Sonia Voudiclari31Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece; 2Nephrologist, Renal Clinic, Hippocration General Hospital, Athens, Greece; 3Department of Nephrology, University of Athens, GreeceAbstract: Several parameters mediate the selection of treatment modality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The nephrology community suggests that patient preference should be the prime determinant of modality choice. We aimed to test whether ego mechanisms of defense are associated with patients&rsquo; treatment modality preferences, independent of psychological distress. In 58 eligible ESRD patients who had themselves chosen their treatment modality, we administered the Symptom Distress Checklist-90-R and the Defense Style Questionnaire. Thirtyseven patients (53.4%) had chosen hemodialysis and 21 (46.6%) peritoneal dialysis. Patients who preferred peritoneal dialysis were younger (odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.804&ndash;0.988), had received more education (OR, 8.84; 95% CI: 1.301&ndash;60.161), and were twice as likely to adopt an adaptive defense style as compared to patients who preferred hemodialysis (57.1% vs 27.0%, respectively; P &lt; 0.033). On the contrary, the latter were more likely to adopt an image-distorting defense style (35.1% vs 14.3%; P = 0.038) and passive&ndash;aggressive defenses (OR, 0.73: 95% CI: 0.504&ndash;1.006). These results were independent of psychological distress. Our findings indicate that the patient&rsquo;s personality should be taken into account, if we are to better define which modalities are best suited to which patients. Also, physicians should bear in mind passive&ndash;aggressive behaviors that warrant attention and intervention in patients who preferred hemodialysis.Keywords: end-stage renal disease, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, ego mechanisms of defense, DSQ, psychopathology]]></description><issn>1177-889X</issn><issn>1177-889X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqtjE1OwzAQhSMEEqX0DnOBSEnbxK5YoiLYs2AXTe1JMlUcG48Rymm4KuZnwQFYzI_e-967KFZ1rVSp9eHl8s9_XdyInKuq3bXbelV8HAcPjsyIM4sT8D1Y6mkWAox5RLxhTGThndMIARPTnASivL75Owgxw5FmQ1_JFAmTyz44b3HitADPlgLllcVMBFnM6Cc_sMEJLEuOiGQKMlNKwoEg1_14hEK3xVWPk9Dm966Lp4fj8_1jaT2euxDZYVw6j9x9Cz4OHcbEZqLOKjwpNKaypPeNId1W7alptNpXdmt72v1n1ydBUnpy</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Thomas Hyphantis</creator><creator>Spiros Katsoudas</creator><creator>Sonia Voudiclari</creator><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Ego mechanisms of defense are associated with patients rsquo; preference of treatment modality independent of psychological distress in end-stage renal disease</title><author>Thomas Hyphantis ; Spiros Katsoudas ; Sonia Voudiclari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d7ab7acc0de845ce8606b558740d2dfe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas Hyphantis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiros Katsoudas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonia Voudiclari</creatorcontrib><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Patient preference and adherence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas Hyphantis</au><au>Spiros Katsoudas</au><au>Sonia Voudiclari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ego mechanisms of defense are associated with patients rsquo; preference of treatment modality independent of psychological distress in end-stage renal disease</atitle><jtitle>Patient preference and adherence</jtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>2010</volume><issue>default</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>25-32</pages><issn>1177-889X</issn><eissn>1177-889X</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Thomas Hyphantis1, Spiros Katsoudas2, Sonia Voudiclari31Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece; 2Nephrologist, Renal Clinic, Hippocration General Hospital, Athens, Greece; 3Department of Nephrology, University of Athens, GreeceAbstract: Several parameters mediate the selection of treatment modality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The nephrology community suggests that patient preference should be the prime determinant of modality choice. We aimed to test whether ego mechanisms of defense are associated with patients&rsquo; treatment modality preferences, independent of psychological distress. In 58 eligible ESRD patients who had themselves chosen their treatment modality, we administered the Symptom Distress Checklist-90-R and the Defense Style Questionnaire. Thirtyseven patients (53.4%) had chosen hemodialysis and 21 (46.6%) peritoneal dialysis. Patients who preferred peritoneal dialysis were younger (odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.804&ndash;0.988), had received more education (OR, 8.84; 95% CI: 1.301&ndash;60.161), and were twice as likely to adopt an adaptive defense style as compared to patients who preferred hemodialysis (57.1% vs 27.0%, respectively; P &lt; 0.033). On the contrary, the latter were more likely to adopt an image-distorting defense style (35.1% vs 14.3%; P = 0.038) and passive&ndash;aggressive defenses (OR, 0.73: 95% CI: 0.504&ndash;1.006). These results were independent of psychological distress. Our findings indicate that the patient&rsquo;s personality should be taken into account, if we are to better define which modalities are best suited to which patients. Also, physicians should bear in mind passive&ndash;aggressive behaviors that warrant attention and intervention in patients who preferred hemodialysis.Keywords: end-stage renal disease, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, ego mechanisms of defense, DSQ, psychopathology]]></abstract><pub>Dove Medical Press</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1177-889X
ispartof Patient preference and adherence, 2010-02, Vol.2010 (default), p.25-32
issn 1177-889X
1177-889X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d7ab7acc0de845ce8606b558740d2dfe
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed
title Ego mechanisms of defense are associated with patients rsquo; preference of treatment modality independent of psychological distress in end-stage renal disease
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A20%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ego%20mechanisms%20of%20defense%20are%20associated%20with%20patients%20rsquo;%20preference%20of%20treatment%20modality%20independent%20of%20psychological%20distress%20in%20end-stage%20renal%20disease&rft.jtitle=Patient%20preference%20and%20adherence&rft.au=Thomas%20Hyphantis&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=2010&rft.issue=default&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=25-32&rft.issn=1177-889X&rft.eissn=1177-889X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_d7ab7acc0de845ce8606b558740d2dfe%3C/doaj%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d7ab7acc0de845ce8606b558740d2dfe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true