Loading…

Piloting of WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist using a modified version in Sri Lanka

Data was gathered to study the impact of a context-specific modified WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (mSCC) at two tertiary care settings in Sri Lanka, as a part of an implementation program. We provide data sets of a prospective observational study which was conducted in the University Obstetrics Uni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC research notes 2018-12, Vol.11 (1), p.896-896, Article 896
Main Authors: Senanayake, H M, Patabendige, M, Ramachandran, R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509y-f0034e67315863559212f9f6e60adfb6c6066190a8f1d8e250724164995184563
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509y-f0034e67315863559212f9f6e60adfb6c6066190a8f1d8e250724164995184563
container_end_page 896
container_issue 1
container_start_page 896
container_title BMC research notes
container_volume 11
creator Senanayake, H M
Patabendige, M
Ramachandran, R
description Data was gathered to study the impact of a context-specific modified WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (mSCC) at two tertiary care settings in Sri Lanka, as a part of an implementation program. We provide data sets of a prospective observational study which was conducted in the University Obstetrics Unit at De Soysa Hospital for Women (DSHW), Colombo and two Obstetric Units at Teaching Hospital, Mahamodara, Galle (THMG), Sri Lanka. These consist of demographic and checklist implementation details and data on the level of acceptance. The study was conducted over 8 weeks at DSHW and over 4 weeks at THMG. Checklists were kept attached to clinical records at admission and collected on discharge. Level of acceptance was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. Outcome measures were adoption rate (percentage of deliveries where mSCC was used), adherence to practices (mean percentage of items checked in each checklist), response rate (percentage of staff members who responded to questionnaire) and level of acceptance (percentage of "strongly agree/agree" in Likert scale to five questions regarding acceptance of modified SCC).
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13104-018-4009-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d892322a6618493d9bfb7ca340fa5130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A569036323</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d892322a6618493d9bfb7ca340fa5130</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A569036323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509y-f0034e67315863559212f9f6e60adfb6c6066190a8f1d8e250724164995184563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v3CAQhq2qVZOm_QG9VEi9NAengzEYLpWiVdOstNJWSj-OCGPwsvGaFOyo---Ls9sorioOjIZnXobhzbK3GC4w5uxjxARDmQPmeQkg8v2z7BRXlOVAAZ4_iU-yVzFuARjmHL_MTgjQsuKEn2brr67zg-tb5C36eb1GN8oatNi4rqldGDYpNPq2c3FAY5wwhXa-cdaZBt2bEJ3vkevRTXBopfpb9Tp7YVUXzZvjfpZ9v_r8bXGdr9ZflovLVa4piH1uAUhpWEUw5YxQKgpcWGGZYaAaWzPNgDEsQHGLG24KClVRYlYKQTEvKSNn2fKg23i1lXfB7VTYS6-cfEj40EoVBqc7IxsuClIUKgnyUpBG1LautCIlWEUxgaT16aB1N9Y702jTD0F1M9H5Se82svX3khWCQjk18-EoEPyv0cRB7lzUputUb_wYZYFpxRgpgCf0_T_o1o-hT6OaqPQlgj90dKRalR7geuvTvXoSlZeUCSBJjCTq4j9UWo3ZOe17Y13KzwrOZwWJGczvoVVjjHK5_jFn8YHVwccYjH2cBwY5uU8e3CeT--TkPrlPNe-eDvKx4q_dyB-G9M-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2158389830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Piloting of WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist using a modified version in Sri Lanka</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Senanayake, H M ; Patabendige, M ; Ramachandran, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Senanayake, H M ; Patabendige, M ; Ramachandran, R</creatorcontrib><description>Data was gathered to study the impact of a context-specific modified WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (mSCC) at two tertiary care settings in Sri Lanka, as a part of an implementation program. We provide data sets of a prospective observational study which was conducted in the University Obstetrics Unit at De Soysa Hospital for Women (DSHW), Colombo and two Obstetric Units at Teaching Hospital, Mahamodara, Galle (THMG), Sri Lanka. These consist of demographic and checklist implementation details and data on the level of acceptance. The study was conducted over 8 weeks at DSHW and over 4 weeks at THMG. Checklists were kept attached to clinical records at admission and collected on discharge. Level of acceptance was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. Outcome measures were adoption rate (percentage of deliveries where mSCC was used), adherence to practices (mean percentage of items checked in each checklist), response rate (percentage of staff members who responded to questionnaire) and level of acceptance (percentage of "strongly agree/agree" in Likert scale to five questions regarding acceptance of modified SCC).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-0500</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-0500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-4009-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30547838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Check lists ; Checklist ; Checklist - standards ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; Data Note ; Delivery (Childbirth) ; Demographic aspects ; Developing countries ; Ethics ; Female ; Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Implementation ; LDCs ; Maternal mortality ; Obstetrics ; Obstetrics - standards ; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Parturition ; Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; Questionnaires ; Response rates ; Safe childbirth ; Safety and security measures ; Sri Lanka ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Trends ; WHO ; Womens health ; World Health Organization</subject><ispartof>BMC research notes, 2018-12, Vol.11 (1), p.896-896, Article 896</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509y-f0034e67315863559212f9f6e60adfb6c6066190a8f1d8e250724164995184563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509y-f0034e67315863559212f9f6e60adfb6c6066190a8f1d8e250724164995184563</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4092-7092</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6295046/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2158389830?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30547838$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Senanayake, H M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patabendige, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramachandran, R</creatorcontrib><title>Piloting of WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist using a modified version in Sri Lanka</title><title>BMC research notes</title><addtitle>BMC Res Notes</addtitle><description>Data was gathered to study the impact of a context-specific modified WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (mSCC) at two tertiary care settings in Sri Lanka, as a part of an implementation program. We provide data sets of a prospective observational study which was conducted in the University Obstetrics Unit at De Soysa Hospital for Women (DSHW), Colombo and two Obstetric Units at Teaching Hospital, Mahamodara, Galle (THMG), Sri Lanka. These consist of demographic and checklist implementation details and data on the level of acceptance. The study was conducted over 8 weeks at DSHW and over 4 weeks at THMG. Checklists were kept attached to clinical records at admission and collected on discharge. Level of acceptance was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. Outcome measures were adoption rate (percentage of deliveries where mSCC was used), adherence to practices (mean percentage of items checked in each checklist), response rate (percentage of staff members who responded to questionnaire) and level of acceptance (percentage of "strongly agree/agree" in Likert scale to five questions regarding acceptance of modified SCC).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Check lists</subject><subject>Checklist</subject><subject>Checklist - standards</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Data Note</subject><subject>Delivery (Childbirth)</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Maternal mortality</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Obstetrics - standards</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Parturition</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Safe childbirth</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Sri Lanka</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>WHO</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>World Health Organization</subject><issn>1756-0500</issn><issn>1756-0500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v3CAQhq2qVZOm_QG9VEi9NAengzEYLpWiVdOstNJWSj-OCGPwsvGaFOyo---Ls9sorioOjIZnXobhzbK3GC4w5uxjxARDmQPmeQkg8v2z7BRXlOVAAZ4_iU-yVzFuARjmHL_MTgjQsuKEn2brr67zg-tb5C36eb1GN8oatNi4rqldGDYpNPq2c3FAY5wwhXa-cdaZBt2bEJ3vkevRTXBopfpb9Tp7YVUXzZvjfpZ9v_r8bXGdr9ZflovLVa4piH1uAUhpWEUw5YxQKgpcWGGZYaAaWzPNgDEsQHGLG24KClVRYlYKQTEvKSNn2fKg23i1lXfB7VTYS6-cfEj40EoVBqc7IxsuClIUKgnyUpBG1LautCIlWEUxgaT16aB1N9Y702jTD0F1M9H5Se82svX3khWCQjk18-EoEPyv0cRB7lzUputUb_wYZYFpxRgpgCf0_T_o1o-hT6OaqPQlgj90dKRalR7geuvTvXoSlZeUCSBJjCTq4j9UWo3ZOe17Y13KzwrOZwWJGczvoVVjjHK5_jFn8YHVwccYjH2cBwY5uU8e3CeT--TkPrlPNe-eDvKx4q_dyB-G9M-c</recordid><startdate>20181214</startdate><enddate>20181214</enddate><creator>Senanayake, H M</creator><creator>Patabendige, M</creator><creator>Ramachandran, R</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4092-7092</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181214</creationdate><title>Piloting of WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist using a modified version in Sri Lanka</title><author>Senanayake, H M ; Patabendige, M ; Ramachandran, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509y-f0034e67315863559212f9f6e60adfb6c6066190a8f1d8e250724164995184563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Check lists</topic><topic>Checklist</topic><topic>Checklist - standards</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Data Note</topic><topic>Delivery (Childbirth)</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Maternal mortality</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Obstetrics - standards</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Parturition</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Safe childbirth</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Sri Lanka</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>WHO</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>World Health Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Senanayake, H M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patabendige, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramachandran, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC research notes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Senanayake, H M</au><au>Patabendige, M</au><au>Ramachandran, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Piloting of WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist using a modified version in Sri Lanka</atitle><jtitle>BMC research notes</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Res Notes</addtitle><date>2018-12-14</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>896</spage><epage>896</epage><pages>896-896</pages><artnum>896</artnum><issn>1756-0500</issn><eissn>1756-0500</eissn><abstract>Data was gathered to study the impact of a context-specific modified WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (mSCC) at two tertiary care settings in Sri Lanka, as a part of an implementation program. We provide data sets of a prospective observational study which was conducted in the University Obstetrics Unit at De Soysa Hospital for Women (DSHW), Colombo and two Obstetric Units at Teaching Hospital, Mahamodara, Galle (THMG), Sri Lanka. These consist of demographic and checklist implementation details and data on the level of acceptance. The study was conducted over 8 weeks at DSHW and over 4 weeks at THMG. Checklists were kept attached to clinical records at admission and collected on discharge. Level of acceptance was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. Outcome measures were adoption rate (percentage of deliveries where mSCC was used), adherence to practices (mean percentage of items checked in each checklist), response rate (percentage of staff members who responded to questionnaire) and level of acceptance (percentage of "strongly agree/agree" in Likert scale to five questions regarding acceptance of modified SCC).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>30547838</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13104-018-4009-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4092-7092</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1756-0500
ispartof BMC research notes, 2018-12, Vol.11 (1), p.896-896, Article 896
issn 1756-0500
1756-0500
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d892322a6618493d9bfb7ca340fa5130
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Check lists
Checklist
Checklist - standards
Childbirth & labor
Data Note
Delivery (Childbirth)
Demographic aspects
Developing countries
Ethics
Female
Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Implementation
LDCs
Maternal mortality
Obstetrics
Obstetrics - standards
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Parturition
Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Questionnaires
Response rates
Safe childbirth
Safety and security measures
Sri Lanka
Tertiary Care Centers
Trends
WHO
Womens health
World Health Organization
title Piloting of WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist using a modified version in Sri Lanka
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A02%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Piloting%20of%20WHO%20Safe%20Childbirth%20Checklist%20using%20a%20modified%20version%20in%20Sri%20Lanka&rft.jtitle=BMC%20research%20notes&rft.au=Senanayake,%20H%20M&rft.date=2018-12-14&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=896&rft.epage=896&rft.pages=896-896&rft.artnum=896&rft.issn=1756-0500&rft.eissn=1756-0500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13104-018-4009-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA569036323%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509y-f0034e67315863559212f9f6e60adfb6c6066190a8f1d8e250724164995184563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2158389830&rft_id=info:pmid/30547838&rft_galeid=A569036323&rfr_iscdi=true