Loading…
Piloting of WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist using a modified version in Sri Lanka
Data was gathered to study the impact of a context-specific modified WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (mSCC) at two tertiary care settings in Sri Lanka, as a part of an implementation program. We provide data sets of a prospective observational study which was conducted in the University Obstetrics Uni...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC research notes 2018-12, Vol.11 (1), p.896-896, Article 896 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509y-f0034e67315863559212f9f6e60adfb6c6066190a8f1d8e250724164995184563 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509y-f0034e67315863559212f9f6e60adfb6c6066190a8f1d8e250724164995184563 |
container_end_page | 896 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 896 |
container_title | BMC research notes |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Senanayake, H M Patabendige, M Ramachandran, R |
description | Data was gathered to study the impact of a context-specific modified WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (mSCC) at two tertiary care settings in Sri Lanka, as a part of an implementation program.
We provide data sets of a prospective observational study which was conducted in the University Obstetrics Unit at De Soysa Hospital for Women (DSHW), Colombo and two Obstetric Units at Teaching Hospital, Mahamodara, Galle (THMG), Sri Lanka. These consist of demographic and checklist implementation details and data on the level of acceptance. The study was conducted over 8 weeks at DSHW and over 4 weeks at THMG. Checklists were kept attached to clinical records at admission and collected on discharge. Level of acceptance was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. Outcome measures were adoption rate (percentage of deliveries where mSCC was used), adherence to practices (mean percentage of items checked in each checklist), response rate (percentage of staff members who responded to questionnaire) and level of acceptance (percentage of "strongly agree/agree" in Likert scale to five questions regarding acceptance of modified SCC). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13104-018-4009-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d892322a6618493d9bfb7ca340fa5130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A569036323</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d892322a6618493d9bfb7ca340fa5130</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A569036323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509y-f0034e67315863559212f9f6e60adfb6c6066190a8f1d8e250724164995184563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v3CAQhq2qVZOm_QG9VEi9NAengzEYLpWiVdOstNJWSj-OCGPwsvGaFOyo---Ls9sorioOjIZnXobhzbK3GC4w5uxjxARDmQPmeQkg8v2z7BRXlOVAAZ4_iU-yVzFuARjmHL_MTgjQsuKEn2brr67zg-tb5C36eb1GN8oatNi4rqldGDYpNPq2c3FAY5wwhXa-cdaZBt2bEJ3vkevRTXBopfpb9Tp7YVUXzZvjfpZ9v_r8bXGdr9ZflovLVa4piH1uAUhpWEUw5YxQKgpcWGGZYaAaWzPNgDEsQHGLG24KClVRYlYKQTEvKSNn2fKg23i1lXfB7VTYS6-cfEj40EoVBqc7IxsuClIUKgnyUpBG1LautCIlWEUxgaT16aB1N9Y702jTD0F1M9H5Se82svX3khWCQjk18-EoEPyv0cRB7lzUputUb_wYZYFpxRgpgCf0_T_o1o-hT6OaqPQlgj90dKRalR7geuvTvXoSlZeUCSBJjCTq4j9UWo3ZOe17Y13KzwrOZwWJGczvoVVjjHK5_jFn8YHVwccYjH2cBwY5uU8e3CeT--TkPrlPNe-eDvKx4q_dyB-G9M-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2158389830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Piloting of WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist using a modified version in Sri Lanka</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Senanayake, H M ; Patabendige, M ; Ramachandran, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Senanayake, H M ; Patabendige, M ; Ramachandran, R</creatorcontrib><description>Data was gathered to study the impact of a context-specific modified WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (mSCC) at two tertiary care settings in Sri Lanka, as a part of an implementation program.
We provide data sets of a prospective observational study which was conducted in the University Obstetrics Unit at De Soysa Hospital for Women (DSHW), Colombo and two Obstetric Units at Teaching Hospital, Mahamodara, Galle (THMG), Sri Lanka. These consist of demographic and checklist implementation details and data on the level of acceptance. The study was conducted over 8 weeks at DSHW and over 4 weeks at THMG. Checklists were kept attached to clinical records at admission and collected on discharge. Level of acceptance was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. Outcome measures were adoption rate (percentage of deliveries where mSCC was used), adherence to practices (mean percentage of items checked in each checklist), response rate (percentage of staff members who responded to questionnaire) and level of acceptance (percentage of "strongly agree/agree" in Likert scale to five questions regarding acceptance of modified SCC).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-0500</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-0500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-4009-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30547838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Check lists ; Checklist ; Checklist - standards ; Childbirth & labor ; Data Note ; Delivery (Childbirth) ; Demographic aspects ; Developing countries ; Ethics ; Female ; Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Implementation ; LDCs ; Maternal mortality ; Obstetrics ; Obstetrics - standards ; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Parturition ; Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; Questionnaires ; Response rates ; Safe childbirth ; Safety and security measures ; Sri Lanka ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Trends ; WHO ; Womens health ; World Health Organization</subject><ispartof>BMC research notes, 2018-12, Vol.11 (1), p.896-896, Article 896</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509y-f0034e67315863559212f9f6e60adfb6c6066190a8f1d8e250724164995184563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509y-f0034e67315863559212f9f6e60adfb6c6066190a8f1d8e250724164995184563</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4092-7092</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6295046/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2158389830?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30547838$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Senanayake, H M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patabendige, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramachandran, R</creatorcontrib><title>Piloting of WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist using a modified version in Sri Lanka</title><title>BMC research notes</title><addtitle>BMC Res Notes</addtitle><description>Data was gathered to study the impact of a context-specific modified WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (mSCC) at two tertiary care settings in Sri Lanka, as a part of an implementation program.
We provide data sets of a prospective observational study which was conducted in the University Obstetrics Unit at De Soysa Hospital for Women (DSHW), Colombo and two Obstetric Units at Teaching Hospital, Mahamodara, Galle (THMG), Sri Lanka. These consist of demographic and checklist implementation details and data on the level of acceptance. The study was conducted over 8 weeks at DSHW and over 4 weeks at THMG. Checklists were kept attached to clinical records at admission and collected on discharge. Level of acceptance was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. Outcome measures were adoption rate (percentage of deliveries where mSCC was used), adherence to practices (mean percentage of items checked in each checklist), response rate (percentage of staff members who responded to questionnaire) and level of acceptance (percentage of "strongly agree/agree" in Likert scale to five questions regarding acceptance of modified SCC).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Check lists</subject><subject>Checklist</subject><subject>Checklist - standards</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Data Note</subject><subject>Delivery (Childbirth)</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Maternal mortality</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Obstetrics - standards</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Parturition</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Safe childbirth</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Sri Lanka</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>WHO</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>World Health Organization</subject><issn>1756-0500</issn><issn>1756-0500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v3CAQhq2qVZOm_QG9VEi9NAengzEYLpWiVdOstNJWSj-OCGPwsvGaFOyo---Ls9sorioOjIZnXobhzbK3GC4w5uxjxARDmQPmeQkg8v2z7BRXlOVAAZ4_iU-yVzFuARjmHL_MTgjQsuKEn2brr67zg-tb5C36eb1GN8oatNi4rqldGDYpNPq2c3FAY5wwhXa-cdaZBt2bEJ3vkevRTXBopfpb9Tp7YVUXzZvjfpZ9v_r8bXGdr9ZflovLVa4piH1uAUhpWEUw5YxQKgpcWGGZYaAaWzPNgDEsQHGLG24KClVRYlYKQTEvKSNn2fKg23i1lXfB7VTYS6-cfEj40EoVBqc7IxsuClIUKgnyUpBG1LautCIlWEUxgaT16aB1N9Y702jTD0F1M9H5Se82svX3khWCQjk18-EoEPyv0cRB7lzUputUb_wYZYFpxRgpgCf0_T_o1o-hT6OaqPQlgj90dKRalR7geuvTvXoSlZeUCSBJjCTq4j9UWo3ZOe17Y13KzwrOZwWJGczvoVVjjHK5_jFn8YHVwccYjH2cBwY5uU8e3CeT--TkPrlPNe-eDvKx4q_dyB-G9M-c</recordid><startdate>20181214</startdate><enddate>20181214</enddate><creator>Senanayake, H M</creator><creator>Patabendige, M</creator><creator>Ramachandran, R</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4092-7092</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181214</creationdate><title>Piloting of WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist using a modified version in Sri Lanka</title><author>Senanayake, H M ; Patabendige, M ; Ramachandran, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509y-f0034e67315863559212f9f6e60adfb6c6066190a8f1d8e250724164995184563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Check lists</topic><topic>Checklist</topic><topic>Checklist - standards</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Data Note</topic><topic>Delivery (Childbirth)</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Maternal mortality</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Obstetrics - standards</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Parturition</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Safe childbirth</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Sri Lanka</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>WHO</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>World Health Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Senanayake, H M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patabendige, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramachandran, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC research notes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Senanayake, H M</au><au>Patabendige, M</au><au>Ramachandran, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Piloting of WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist using a modified version in Sri Lanka</atitle><jtitle>BMC research notes</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Res Notes</addtitle><date>2018-12-14</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>896</spage><epage>896</epage><pages>896-896</pages><artnum>896</artnum><issn>1756-0500</issn><eissn>1756-0500</eissn><abstract>Data was gathered to study the impact of a context-specific modified WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (mSCC) at two tertiary care settings in Sri Lanka, as a part of an implementation program.
We provide data sets of a prospective observational study which was conducted in the University Obstetrics Unit at De Soysa Hospital for Women (DSHW), Colombo and two Obstetric Units at Teaching Hospital, Mahamodara, Galle (THMG), Sri Lanka. These consist of demographic and checklist implementation details and data on the level of acceptance. The study was conducted over 8 weeks at DSHW and over 4 weeks at THMG. Checklists were kept attached to clinical records at admission and collected on discharge. Level of acceptance was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. Outcome measures were adoption rate (percentage of deliveries where mSCC was used), adherence to practices (mean percentage of items checked in each checklist), response rate (percentage of staff members who responded to questionnaire) and level of acceptance (percentage of "strongly agree/agree" in Likert scale to five questions regarding acceptance of modified SCC).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>30547838</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13104-018-4009-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4092-7092</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1756-0500 |
ispartof | BMC research notes, 2018-12, Vol.11 (1), p.896-896, Article 896 |
issn | 1756-0500 1756-0500 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d892322a6618493d9bfb7ca340fa5130 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Check lists Checklist Checklist - standards Childbirth & labor Data Note Delivery (Childbirth) Demographic aspects Developing countries Ethics Female Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data Humans Implementation LDCs Maternal mortality Obstetrics Obstetrics - standards Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care - statistics & numerical data Parturition Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards Pregnancy Prospective Studies Questionnaires Response rates Safe childbirth Safety and security measures Sri Lanka Tertiary Care Centers Trends WHO Womens health World Health Organization |
title | Piloting of WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist using a modified version in Sri Lanka |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A02%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Piloting%20of%20WHO%20Safe%20Childbirth%20Checklist%20using%20a%20modified%20version%20in%20Sri%20Lanka&rft.jtitle=BMC%20research%20notes&rft.au=Senanayake,%20H%20M&rft.date=2018-12-14&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=896&rft.epage=896&rft.pages=896-896&rft.artnum=896&rft.issn=1756-0500&rft.eissn=1756-0500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13104-018-4009-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA569036323%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509y-f0034e67315863559212f9f6e60adfb6c6066190a8f1d8e250724164995184563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2158389830&rft_id=info:pmid/30547838&rft_galeid=A569036323&rfr_iscdi=true |