Impacts of land-use history on the recovery of ecosystems after agricultural abandonment

• Published in: Earth system dynamics 2016-09, Vol.7 (3), p.745-766
• Main Authors: Krause, Andreas, Pugh, Thomas A. M, Bayer, Anita D, Lindeskog, Mats, Arneth, Almut
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abandoned land; Agricultural ecosystems; Agricultural land; Agricultural management; Agricultural production; Agricultural Sciences; Agriculture; Analysis; Annan lantbruksvetenskap; Biogeochemical cycle; Biogeochemical cycles; Biogeochemistry; Biomass; Biomes; Boreal ecosystems; Boreal forests; Carbon cycle; Carbon sequestration; Climate; Climate change; Climate effects; Composition; Computer simulation; Data interpretation; Ecosystem recovery; Ecosystems; Environmental conditions; Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use; Grasses; Grasslands; Harvest; Land cover; Land management; Land use; Land use controls; Lantbruksvetenskap och veterinärmedicin; Local climates; Miljö- och naturvårdsvetenskap; Natural vegetation; Other Agricultural Sciences; Pasture; Productivity; Recovery; Regrowth; Soil; Soil carbon; Soils; Stocks; Tropical environments; Vegetation; Vegetation regrowth
• ISSN: 2190-4987; 2190-4979; 2190-4987
• DOI: 10.5194/esd-7-745-2016

Land-use changes have been shown to have large effects on climate and biogeochemical cycles, but so far most studies have focused on the effects of conversion of natural vegetation to croplands and pastures. By contrast, relatively little is known about the long-term influence of past agriculture on vegetation regrowth and carbon sequestration following land abandonment. We used the LPJ-GUESS dynamic vegetation model to study the legacy effects of different land-use histories (in terms of type and duration) across a range of ecosystems. To this end, we performed six idealized simulations for Europe and Africa in which we made a transition from natural vegetation to either pasture or cropland, followed by a transition back to natural vegetation after 20, 60 or 100 years. The simulations identified substantial differences in recovery trajectories of four key variables (vegetation composition, vegetation carbon, soil carbon, net biome productivity) after agricultural cessation. Vegetation carbon and composition typically recovered faster than soil carbon in subtropical, temperate and boreal regions, and vice versa in the tropics. While the effects of different land-use histories on recovery periods of soil carbon stocks often differed by centuries across our simulations, differences in recovery times across simulations were typically small for net biome productivity (a few decades) and modest for vegetation carbon and composition (several decades). Spatially, we found the greatest sensitivity of recovery times to prior land use in boreal forests and subtropical grasslands, where post-agricultural productivity was strongly affected by prior land management. Our results suggest that land-use history is a relevant factor affecting ecosystems long after agricultural cessation, and it should be considered not only when assessing historical or future changes in simulations of the terrestrial carbon cycle but also when establishing long-term monitoring networks and interpreting data derived therefrom, including analysis of a broad range of ecosystem properties or local climate effects related to land cover changes.