Barriers against Implementation of European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Performance Measures for Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice

• Published in: Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Lithuania), 2024-07, Vol.60 (7), p.1166
• Main Authors: Gibiino, Giulia, Frazzoni, Leonardo, Anderloni, Andrea, Fuccio, Lorenzo, Lacchini, Alessandro, Spada, Cristiano, Fabbri, Carlo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: adenoma detection rate; Adult; Aged; Clinical medicine; Colonoscopy; Colonoscopy - standards; Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data; electronic reporting systems; Endoscopy; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - standards; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - statistics & numerical data; Europe; Female; high-quality colonoscopy; high-quality endoscopy; Hospitals; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate analysis; Patient satisfaction; quality indicators; Questionnaires; Societies, Medical; Statistical analysis; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tumors; Variables
• ISSN: 1648-9144; 1010-660X; 1648-9144
• DOI: 10.3390/medicina60071166

The implementation and monitoring of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) performance measures for colonoscopy are suboptimal in clinical practice. Electronic reporting systems may play an important role in data retrieval. We aimed to define the possibility of systematically assessing and monitoring ESGE performance measures for colonoscopy through reporting systems. : We conducted a survey during a nationwide event on the quality of colonoscopy held in Rome, Italy, in March 2023 by a self-administered questionnaire. Analyses were conducted overall and by workplace setting. : The attendance was 93% (M/F 67/26), with equal distribution of age groups, regions and public or private practices. Only about one-third (34%) and 21.5% of participants stated that their reporting system allows them to retrieve all the ESGE performance measures, overall and as automatic retrieval, respectively. Only 66.7% and 10.7% of respondents can systematically report the cecal intubation and the adenoma detection rate, respectively. The analysis according to hospital setting revealed no significant difference for all the items. : We found a generalized lack of systematic tracking of performance measures for colonoscopy due to underperforming reporting systems. Our results underline the need to update reporting systems to monitor the quality of endoscopy practice in Italy.