Loading…
A method for estimation of accuracy of dose delivery with dynamic slit windows in medical linear accelerators
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) clinical dose delivery is based on computer-controlled multileaf movements at different velocities. To test the accuracy of modulation of the beam periodically, quality assurance (QA) methods are necessary. Using a cylindrical phantom, dose delivery was checke...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of medical physics 2008-07, Vol.33 (3), p.127-129 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-856f65931731a57c2a94e5e6ddfc81abf367c199b5373f6665bfaeda9c81f5f23 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 129 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 127 |
container_title | Journal of medical physics |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Ravichandran, R Binukumar, J P Sivakumar, S S Krishnamurthy, K Davis, C A |
description | Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) clinical dose delivery is based on computer-controlled multileaf movements at different velocities. To test the accuracy of modulation of the beam periodically, quality assurance (QA) methods are necessary. Using a cylindrical phantom, dose delivery was checked at a constant geometry for sweeping fields. Repeated measurements with an in-house designed methodology over a period of 1 year indicate that the method is very sensitive to check the proper functioning of such dose delivery in medical linacs. A cylindrical perspex phantom with facility to accurately position a 0.6-cc (FC 65) ion chamber at constant depth at isocenter, (SA 24 constancy check tool phantom for MU check, Scanditronix Wellhofer) was used. Dosimeter readings were integrated for 4-mm, 10-mm, 20-mm sweeping fields and for 3 angular positions of the gantry periodically. Consistency of standard sweeping field output (10-mm slit width) and the ratios of outputs against other slit widths over a long period were reported. A 10-mm sweeping field output was found reproducible within an accuracy of 0.03% (n = 25) over 1 year. Four-millimeter, 20-mm outputs expressed as ratio with respect to 10-mm sweep output remained within a mean deviation of 0.2% and 0.03% respectively. Outputs at 3 gantry angles remained within 0.5%, showing that the effect of dynamic movements of multileaf collimator (MLC) on the output is minimal for angular positions of gantry. This method of QA is very simple and is recommended in addition to individual patient QA measurements, which reflect the accuracy of dose planning system. In addition to standard output and energy checks of linacs, the above measurements can be complemented so as to check proper functioning of multileaf collimator for dynamic field dose delivery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/0971-6203.42768 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d8e90b309fe3462b9e622d59b1f31e1f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A185238359</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d8e90b309fe3462b9e622d59b1f31e1f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A185238359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-856f65931731a57c2a94e5e6ddfc81abf367c199b5373f6665bfaeda9c81f5f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1vGyEQRVWrJnV77q1atYee7CywsMulkhX1I1KkXtozYmGwsdaQwjqR_31mYyutKwsJ0MybN8zjEfKe1ouG1vyqVi2dS1bzRcNa2b0gl1Spbs4V5S_J5XP2grwpZVPXjVBN85pcUNUp3tb8kmyX1RbGdXKVT7mCMoatGUOKVfKVsXaXjd1Pd5cKVA6GcA95Xz2EcV25fTTbYKsyhBEj0aWHUoWIfC5YM1RDiGDyxAIDZDOmXN6SV94MBd4dzxn5_e3rr-sf89uf32-ul7dzK1Q9zjshvRSK05ZTI1rLjGpAgHTO246a3nPZWhy0F7zlXkopem_AGYVZLzzjM3Jz4HXJbPRdxqHyXicT9FMg5ZU2eQx2AO06UHXPa-WBN5L1CiRjTqieek4Btxn5cuC62_U4moU4ZjOckJ5mYljrVbrXrG1R-g4JPh8JcvqzQ4n1NhTUZDAR0q7oljeUSdVQRH78D7lJuxxRKd21lDEpmEDQpwNoZfD5IfqEXe1EqZe0Eww7onQzMj-DWkHEnxhSBB8wfIJfnMHjcoB_fLbg6lBgcyolg39WhNZ68qae3Kcn9-knb2LFh3-F_Is_mpE_ArI_3lc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871226525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A method for estimation of accuracy of dose delivery with dynamic slit windows in medical linear accelerators</title><source>Medknow Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ravichandran, R ; Binukumar, J P ; Sivakumar, S S ; Krishnamurthy, K ; Davis, C A</creator><creatorcontrib>Ravichandran, R ; Binukumar, J P ; Sivakumar, S S ; Krishnamurthy, K ; Davis, C A</creatorcontrib><description>Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) clinical dose delivery is based on computer-controlled multileaf movements at different velocities. To test the accuracy of modulation of the beam periodically, quality assurance (QA) methods are necessary. Using a cylindrical phantom, dose delivery was checked at a constant geometry for sweeping fields. Repeated measurements with an in-house designed methodology over a period of 1 year indicate that the method is very sensitive to check the proper functioning of such dose delivery in medical linacs. A cylindrical perspex phantom with facility to accurately position a 0.6-cc (FC 65) ion chamber at constant depth at isocenter, (SA 24 constancy check tool phantom for MU check, Scanditronix Wellhofer) was used. Dosimeter readings were integrated for 4-mm, 10-mm, 20-mm sweeping fields and for 3 angular positions of the gantry periodically. Consistency of standard sweeping field output (10-mm slit width) and the ratios of outputs against other slit widths over a long period were reported. A 10-mm sweeping field output was found reproducible within an accuracy of 0.03% (n = 25) over 1 year. Four-millimeter, 20-mm outputs expressed as ratio with respect to 10-mm sweep output remained within a mean deviation of 0.2% and 0.03% respectively. Outputs at 3 gantry angles remained within 0.5%, showing that the effect of dynamic movements of multileaf collimator (MLC) on the output is minimal for angular positions of gantry. This method of QA is very simple and is recommended in addition to individual patient QA measurements, which reflect the accuracy of dose planning system. In addition to standard output and energy checks of linacs, the above measurements can be complemented so as to check proper functioning of multileaf collimator for dynamic field dose delivery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0971-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.42768</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19893703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy dose delivery ; Dosimeters ; Health aspects ; Health physics ; Intensity-modulated radiotherapy ; Measurement ; Methods ; quality assurance methods ; Radiation ; Radiation therapy ; sliding window intensity-modulated radiotherapy ; Technical Note</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical physics, 2008-07, Vol.33 (3), p.127-129</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd Jul 2008</rights><rights>Journal of Medical Physics 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-856f65931731a57c2a94e5e6ddfc81abf367c199b5373f6665bfaeda9c81f5f23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2772038/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/871226525?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19893703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ravichandran, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binukumar, J P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivakumar, S S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, C A</creatorcontrib><title>A method for estimation of accuracy of dose delivery with dynamic slit windows in medical linear accelerators</title><title>Journal of medical physics</title><addtitle>J Med Phys</addtitle><description>Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) clinical dose delivery is based on computer-controlled multileaf movements at different velocities. To test the accuracy of modulation of the beam periodically, quality assurance (QA) methods are necessary. Using a cylindrical phantom, dose delivery was checked at a constant geometry for sweeping fields. Repeated measurements with an in-house designed methodology over a period of 1 year indicate that the method is very sensitive to check the proper functioning of such dose delivery in medical linacs. A cylindrical perspex phantom with facility to accurately position a 0.6-cc (FC 65) ion chamber at constant depth at isocenter, (SA 24 constancy check tool phantom for MU check, Scanditronix Wellhofer) was used. Dosimeter readings were integrated for 4-mm, 10-mm, 20-mm sweeping fields and for 3 angular positions of the gantry periodically. Consistency of standard sweeping field output (10-mm slit width) and the ratios of outputs against other slit widths over a long period were reported. A 10-mm sweeping field output was found reproducible within an accuracy of 0.03% (n = 25) over 1 year. Four-millimeter, 20-mm outputs expressed as ratio with respect to 10-mm sweep output remained within a mean deviation of 0.2% and 0.03% respectively. Outputs at 3 gantry angles remained within 0.5%, showing that the effect of dynamic movements of multileaf collimator (MLC) on the output is minimal for angular positions of gantry. This method of QA is very simple and is recommended in addition to individual patient QA measurements, which reflect the accuracy of dose planning system. In addition to standard output and energy checks of linacs, the above measurements can be complemented so as to check proper functioning of multileaf collimator for dynamic field dose delivery.</description><subject>Accuracy dose delivery</subject><subject>Dosimeters</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health physics</subject><subject>Intensity-modulated radiotherapy</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>quality assurance methods</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>sliding window intensity-modulated radiotherapy</subject><subject>Technical Note</subject><issn>0971-6203</issn><issn>1998-3913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1vGyEQRVWrJnV77q1atYee7CywsMulkhX1I1KkXtozYmGwsdaQwjqR_31mYyutKwsJ0MybN8zjEfKe1ouG1vyqVi2dS1bzRcNa2b0gl1Spbs4V5S_J5XP2grwpZVPXjVBN85pcUNUp3tb8kmyX1RbGdXKVT7mCMoatGUOKVfKVsXaXjd1Pd5cKVA6GcA95Xz2EcV25fTTbYKsyhBEj0aWHUoWIfC5YM1RDiGDyxAIDZDOmXN6SV94MBd4dzxn5_e3rr-sf89uf32-ul7dzK1Q9zjshvRSK05ZTI1rLjGpAgHTO246a3nPZWhy0F7zlXkopem_AGYVZLzzjM3Jz4HXJbPRdxqHyXicT9FMg5ZU2eQx2AO06UHXPa-WBN5L1CiRjTqieek4Btxn5cuC62_U4moU4ZjOckJ5mYljrVbrXrG1R-g4JPh8JcvqzQ4n1NhTUZDAR0q7oljeUSdVQRH78D7lJuxxRKd21lDEpmEDQpwNoZfD5IfqEXe1EqZe0Eww7onQzMj-DWkHEnxhSBB8wfIJfnMHjcoB_fLbg6lBgcyolg39WhNZ68qae3Kcn9-knb2LFh3-F_Is_mpE_ArI_3lc</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>Ravichandran, R</creator><creator>Binukumar, J P</creator><creator>Sivakumar, S S</creator><creator>Krishnamurthy, K</creator><creator>Davis, C A</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>A method for estimation of accuracy of dose delivery with dynamic slit windows in medical linear accelerators</title><author>Ravichandran, R ; Binukumar, J P ; Sivakumar, S S ; Krishnamurthy, K ; Davis, C A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-856f65931731a57c2a94e5e6ddfc81abf367c199b5373f6665bfaeda9c81f5f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Accuracy dose delivery</topic><topic>Dosimeters</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health physics</topic><topic>Intensity-modulated radiotherapy</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>quality assurance methods</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>sliding window intensity-modulated radiotherapy</topic><topic>Technical Note</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ravichandran, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binukumar, J P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivakumar, S S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, C A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ravichandran, R</au><au>Binukumar, J P</au><au>Sivakumar, S S</au><au>Krishnamurthy, K</au><au>Davis, C A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A method for estimation of accuracy of dose delivery with dynamic slit windows in medical linear accelerators</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Phys</addtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>127-129</pages><issn>0971-6203</issn><eissn>1998-3913</eissn><abstract>Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) clinical dose delivery is based on computer-controlled multileaf movements at different velocities. To test the accuracy of modulation of the beam periodically, quality assurance (QA) methods are necessary. Using a cylindrical phantom, dose delivery was checked at a constant geometry for sweeping fields. Repeated measurements with an in-house designed methodology over a period of 1 year indicate that the method is very sensitive to check the proper functioning of such dose delivery in medical linacs. A cylindrical perspex phantom with facility to accurately position a 0.6-cc (FC 65) ion chamber at constant depth at isocenter, (SA 24 constancy check tool phantom for MU check, Scanditronix Wellhofer) was used. Dosimeter readings were integrated for 4-mm, 10-mm, 20-mm sweeping fields and for 3 angular positions of the gantry periodically. Consistency of standard sweeping field output (10-mm slit width) and the ratios of outputs against other slit widths over a long period were reported. A 10-mm sweeping field output was found reproducible within an accuracy of 0.03% (n = 25) over 1 year. Four-millimeter, 20-mm outputs expressed as ratio with respect to 10-mm sweep output remained within a mean deviation of 0.2% and 0.03% respectively. Outputs at 3 gantry angles remained within 0.5%, showing that the effect of dynamic movements of multileaf collimator (MLC) on the output is minimal for angular positions of gantry. This method of QA is very simple and is recommended in addition to individual patient QA measurements, which reflect the accuracy of dose planning system. In addition to standard output and energy checks of linacs, the above measurements can be complemented so as to check proper functioning of multileaf collimator for dynamic field dose delivery.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>19893703</pmid><doi>10.4103/0971-6203.42768</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0971-6203 |
ispartof | Journal of medical physics, 2008-07, Vol.33 (3), p.127-129 |
issn | 0971-6203 1998-3913 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d8e90b309fe3462b9e622d59b1f31e1f |
source | Medknow Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content Database; IngentaConnect Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Accuracy dose delivery Dosimeters Health aspects Health physics Intensity-modulated radiotherapy Measurement Methods quality assurance methods Radiation Radiation therapy sliding window intensity-modulated radiotherapy Technical Note |
title | A method for estimation of accuracy of dose delivery with dynamic slit windows in medical linear accelerators |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A40%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20method%20for%20estimation%20of%20accuracy%20of%20dose%20delivery%20with%20dynamic%20slit%20windows%20in%20medical%20linear%20accelerators&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Ravichandran,%20R&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=127-129&rft.issn=0971-6203&rft.eissn=1998-3913&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0971-6203.42768&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA185238359%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-856f65931731a57c2a94e5e6ddfc81abf367c199b5373f6665bfaeda9c81f5f23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871226525&rft_id=info:pmid/19893703&rft_galeid=A185238359&rfr_iscdi=true |