Loading…

Comparison of the lymphocyte response to interval exercise versus continuous exercise in recreationally trained men

The purpose of this investigation was to compare changes in circulating lymphocyte subset cell counts between high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE), sprint interval exercise (SIE), and moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE). Recreationally active men (n ​= ​11; age: 23 ​± ​4 ​yr; height: 17...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain, behavior, & immunity. Health behavior, & immunity. Health, 2022-03, Vol.20, p.100415-100415, Article 100415
Main Authors: Arroyo, Eliott, Tagesen, Emily C., Hart, Tricia L., Miller, Brandon A., Jajtner, Adam R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-c7418d12eb48c05cfd723ef3540f010c881c183f93f418521e18dbd94fd600103
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-c7418d12eb48c05cfd723ef3540f010c881c183f93f418521e18dbd94fd600103
container_end_page 100415
container_issue
container_start_page 100415
container_title Brain, behavior, & immunity. Health
container_volume 20
creator Arroyo, Eliott
Tagesen, Emily C.
Hart, Tricia L.
Miller, Brandon A.
Jajtner, Adam R.
description The purpose of this investigation was to compare changes in circulating lymphocyte subset cell counts between high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE), sprint interval exercise (SIE), and moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE). Recreationally active men (n ​= ​11; age: 23 ​± ​4 ​yr; height: 179.9 ​± ​4.5 ​cm; body mass: 79.8 ​± ​8.7 ​kg; body fat %:12.6 ​± ​3.8%; V̇O2max: 46.6 ​± ​3.9 ​ml⋅kg−1⋅min−1) completed a maximal graded exercise test to determine maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) and three duration-matched cycling trials (HIIE, SIE, and MICE) in a randomized, counterbalanced fashion. HIIE consisted of fifteen 90-s bouts at 85% V̇O2max interspersed with 90-s active recovery periods. SIE consisted of fifteen 20-s bouts at 130% maximal power and 160-s active recovery periods. MICE was a continuous bout at 65% V̇O2max. Total exercise duration was 53 ​min in all three trials, including warm-up and cool-down. Blood was collected before, immediately post, 30 ​min, 2 ​h, 6 ​h, and 24 ​h post-exercise. Changes in lymphocyte subset counts, and surface expression of various markers were analyzed via flow cytometry. Changes were assessed using mixed model regression analysis with an autoregressive first order repeated measures correction. Significant decreases were observed in absolute counts of CD56dim NK cells, CD19+ B cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells 30 ​min and 24-h post-exercise in all three trials. Despite resulting in greater total work and oxygen consumption, MICE elicited similar changes in lymphocyte subset counts and receptor expression compared to both SIE and HIIE. Similarly, while the two interval trials resulted in differing oxygen consumption and total work, no differences in the lymphocyte response were observed. Though both forms of exercise resulted in declines in circulating lymphocyte cell counts, neither exercise type provides an immune-related advantage when matched for duration. •Continuous and interval exercise elicit similar changes in lymphocyte counts.•Sprint and high-intensity interval exercise elicit similar lymphocyte responses.•B, NK, and T cell subset counts are blunted 30 ​min and 24 ​h post-exercise.•Acute exercise increases the expression cell migration markers on CD8+ T cells.•Acute exercise may impair CD56dim NK cell function measured by CD69 expression.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100415
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d916dafd91f141a7a8b8b41e30c8cc52</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2666354622000059</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d916dafd91f141a7a8b8b41e30c8cc52</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2625266920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-c7418d12eb48c05cfd723ef3540f010c881c183f93f418521e18dbd94fd600103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1vEzEQXSEQrUr_AAfkI5ekHu-3hJBQBLRSJS5wtrz2uHG0ay-2E5F_3wlbovbCaUYz7735eEXxHvgaODQ3u_UwuO1acCGowCuoXxWXommaVVlXzetn-UVxndKOcy5KKNuqfVtclDWA4D1cFmkTpllFl4JnwbK8RTYep3kb9DEji5jm4BOyHJjzGeNBjQz_YNSOigeMaZ-YDj47vw-UnlvOE1dHVNkFr8bxyHJUzqNhE_p3xRurxoTXT_Gq-PXt68_N7er-x_e7zZf7la4F5JVuK-gMCByqTvNaW9OKEi2dxC0HrrsONHSl7UtLQKIgwQfTV9Y0nADlVXG36JqgdnKOblLxKINy8m8hxAepYnZ6RGl6aIyyFCxUoFrVDd1QAZY0RtM6pPV50Zr3w4RGo6eDxheiLzvebeVDOMiu7bnoOxL4-CQQw-89piwnlzSOo_JIr5OiETVZ1ovT3mKB6hhSimjPY4DLk_lyJ0_my5P5cjGfSB-eL3im_LOaAJ8WANLLDw6jTNqh12gcWZXpJ-5_-o-6mMMU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2625266920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the lymphocyte response to interval exercise versus continuous exercise in recreationally trained men</title><source>ScienceDirect Additional Titles</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Arroyo, Eliott ; Tagesen, Emily C. ; Hart, Tricia L. ; Miller, Brandon A. ; Jajtner, Adam R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Arroyo, Eliott ; Tagesen, Emily C. ; Hart, Tricia L. ; Miller, Brandon A. ; Jajtner, Adam R.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this investigation was to compare changes in circulating lymphocyte subset cell counts between high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE), sprint interval exercise (SIE), and moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE). Recreationally active men (n ​= ​11; age: 23 ​± ​4 ​yr; height: 179.9 ​± ​4.5 ​cm; body mass: 79.8 ​± ​8.7 ​kg; body fat %:12.6 ​± ​3.8%; V̇O2max: 46.6 ​± ​3.9 ​ml⋅kg−1⋅min−1) completed a maximal graded exercise test to determine maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) and three duration-matched cycling trials (HIIE, SIE, and MICE) in a randomized, counterbalanced fashion. HIIE consisted of fifteen 90-s bouts at 85% V̇O2max interspersed with 90-s active recovery periods. SIE consisted of fifteen 20-s bouts at 130% maximal power and 160-s active recovery periods. MICE was a continuous bout at 65% V̇O2max. Total exercise duration was 53 ​min in all three trials, including warm-up and cool-down. Blood was collected before, immediately post, 30 ​min, 2 ​h, 6 ​h, and 24 ​h post-exercise. Changes in lymphocyte subset counts, and surface expression of various markers were analyzed via flow cytometry. Changes were assessed using mixed model regression analysis with an autoregressive first order repeated measures correction. Significant decreases were observed in absolute counts of CD56dim NK cells, CD19+ B cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells 30 ​min and 24-h post-exercise in all three trials. Despite resulting in greater total work and oxygen consumption, MICE elicited similar changes in lymphocyte subset counts and receptor expression compared to both SIE and HIIE. Similarly, while the two interval trials resulted in differing oxygen consumption and total work, no differences in the lymphocyte response were observed. Though both forms of exercise resulted in declines in circulating lymphocyte cell counts, neither exercise type provides an immune-related advantage when matched for duration. •Continuous and interval exercise elicit similar changes in lymphocyte counts.•Sprint and high-intensity interval exercise elicit similar lymphocyte responses.•B, NK, and T cell subset counts are blunted 30 ​min and 24 ​h post-exercise.•Acute exercise increases the expression cell migration markers on CD8+ T cells.•Acute exercise may impair CD56dim NK cell function measured by CD69 expression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2666-3546</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2666-3546</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100415</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35112091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aerobic exercise ; B cells ; Full Length ; HIIT ; NK cells ; Sprint interval exercise ; T cells</subject><ispartof>Brain, behavior, &amp; immunity. Health, 2022-03, Vol.20, p.100415-100415, Article 100415</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>2022 The Authors.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-c7418d12eb48c05cfd723ef3540f010c881c183f93f418521e18dbd94fd600103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-c7418d12eb48c05cfd723ef3540f010c881c183f93f418521e18dbd94fd600103</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0780-8358 ; 0000-0002-7999-3994 ; 0000-0001-7008-763X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8790298/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354622000059$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3535,27903,27904,45759,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35112091$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arroyo, Eliott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagesen, Emily C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Tricia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Brandon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jajtner, Adam R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the lymphocyte response to interval exercise versus continuous exercise in recreationally trained men</title><title>Brain, behavior, &amp; immunity. Health</title><addtitle>Brain Behav Immun Health</addtitle><description>The purpose of this investigation was to compare changes in circulating lymphocyte subset cell counts between high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE), sprint interval exercise (SIE), and moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE). Recreationally active men (n ​= ​11; age: 23 ​± ​4 ​yr; height: 179.9 ​± ​4.5 ​cm; body mass: 79.8 ​± ​8.7 ​kg; body fat %:12.6 ​± ​3.8%; V̇O2max: 46.6 ​± ​3.9 ​ml⋅kg−1⋅min−1) completed a maximal graded exercise test to determine maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) and three duration-matched cycling trials (HIIE, SIE, and MICE) in a randomized, counterbalanced fashion. HIIE consisted of fifteen 90-s bouts at 85% V̇O2max interspersed with 90-s active recovery periods. SIE consisted of fifteen 20-s bouts at 130% maximal power and 160-s active recovery periods. MICE was a continuous bout at 65% V̇O2max. Total exercise duration was 53 ​min in all three trials, including warm-up and cool-down. Blood was collected before, immediately post, 30 ​min, 2 ​h, 6 ​h, and 24 ​h post-exercise. Changes in lymphocyte subset counts, and surface expression of various markers were analyzed via flow cytometry. Changes were assessed using mixed model regression analysis with an autoregressive first order repeated measures correction. Significant decreases were observed in absolute counts of CD56dim NK cells, CD19+ B cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells 30 ​min and 24-h post-exercise in all three trials. Despite resulting in greater total work and oxygen consumption, MICE elicited similar changes in lymphocyte subset counts and receptor expression compared to both SIE and HIIE. Similarly, while the two interval trials resulted in differing oxygen consumption and total work, no differences in the lymphocyte response were observed. Though both forms of exercise resulted in declines in circulating lymphocyte cell counts, neither exercise type provides an immune-related advantage when matched for duration. •Continuous and interval exercise elicit similar changes in lymphocyte counts.•Sprint and high-intensity interval exercise elicit similar lymphocyte responses.•B, NK, and T cell subset counts are blunted 30 ​min and 24 ​h post-exercise.•Acute exercise increases the expression cell migration markers on CD8+ T cells.•Acute exercise may impair CD56dim NK cell function measured by CD69 expression.</description><subject>Aerobic exercise</subject><subject>B cells</subject><subject>Full Length</subject><subject>HIIT</subject><subject>NK cells</subject><subject>Sprint interval exercise</subject><subject>T cells</subject><issn>2666-3546</issn><issn>2666-3546</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1vEzEQXSEQrUr_AAfkI5ekHu-3hJBQBLRSJS5wtrz2uHG0ay-2E5F_3wlbovbCaUYz7735eEXxHvgaODQ3u_UwuO1acCGowCuoXxWXommaVVlXzetn-UVxndKOcy5KKNuqfVtclDWA4D1cFmkTpllFl4JnwbK8RTYep3kb9DEji5jm4BOyHJjzGeNBjQz_YNSOigeMaZ-YDj47vw-UnlvOE1dHVNkFr8bxyHJUzqNhE_p3xRurxoTXT_Gq-PXt68_N7er-x_e7zZf7la4F5JVuK-gMCByqTvNaW9OKEi2dxC0HrrsONHSl7UtLQKIgwQfTV9Y0nADlVXG36JqgdnKOblLxKINy8m8hxAepYnZ6RGl6aIyyFCxUoFrVDd1QAZY0RtM6pPV50Zr3w4RGo6eDxheiLzvebeVDOMiu7bnoOxL4-CQQw-89piwnlzSOo_JIr5OiETVZ1ovT3mKB6hhSimjPY4DLk_lyJ0_my5P5cjGfSB-eL3im_LOaAJ8WANLLDw6jTNqh12gcWZXpJ-5_-o-6mMMU</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Arroyo, Eliott</creator><creator>Tagesen, Emily C.</creator><creator>Hart, Tricia L.</creator><creator>Miller, Brandon A.</creator><creator>Jajtner, Adam R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0780-8358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7999-3994</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7008-763X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Comparison of the lymphocyte response to interval exercise versus continuous exercise in recreationally trained men</title><author>Arroyo, Eliott ; Tagesen, Emily C. ; Hart, Tricia L. ; Miller, Brandon A. ; Jajtner, Adam R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-c7418d12eb48c05cfd723ef3540f010c881c183f93f418521e18dbd94fd600103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aerobic exercise</topic><topic>B cells</topic><topic>Full Length</topic><topic>HIIT</topic><topic>NK cells</topic><topic>Sprint interval exercise</topic><topic>T cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arroyo, Eliott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagesen, Emily C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Tricia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Brandon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jajtner, Adam R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Brain, behavior, &amp; immunity. Health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arroyo, Eliott</au><au>Tagesen, Emily C.</au><au>Hart, Tricia L.</au><au>Miller, Brandon A.</au><au>Jajtner, Adam R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the lymphocyte response to interval exercise versus continuous exercise in recreationally trained men</atitle><jtitle>Brain, behavior, &amp; immunity. Health</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Behav Immun Health</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>20</volume><spage>100415</spage><epage>100415</epage><pages>100415-100415</pages><artnum>100415</artnum><issn>2666-3546</issn><eissn>2666-3546</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this investigation was to compare changes in circulating lymphocyte subset cell counts between high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE), sprint interval exercise (SIE), and moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE). Recreationally active men (n ​= ​11; age: 23 ​± ​4 ​yr; height: 179.9 ​± ​4.5 ​cm; body mass: 79.8 ​± ​8.7 ​kg; body fat %:12.6 ​± ​3.8%; V̇O2max: 46.6 ​± ​3.9 ​ml⋅kg−1⋅min−1) completed a maximal graded exercise test to determine maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) and three duration-matched cycling trials (HIIE, SIE, and MICE) in a randomized, counterbalanced fashion. HIIE consisted of fifteen 90-s bouts at 85% V̇O2max interspersed with 90-s active recovery periods. SIE consisted of fifteen 20-s bouts at 130% maximal power and 160-s active recovery periods. MICE was a continuous bout at 65% V̇O2max. Total exercise duration was 53 ​min in all three trials, including warm-up and cool-down. Blood was collected before, immediately post, 30 ​min, 2 ​h, 6 ​h, and 24 ​h post-exercise. Changes in lymphocyte subset counts, and surface expression of various markers were analyzed via flow cytometry. Changes were assessed using mixed model regression analysis with an autoregressive first order repeated measures correction. Significant decreases were observed in absolute counts of CD56dim NK cells, CD19+ B cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells 30 ​min and 24-h post-exercise in all three trials. Despite resulting in greater total work and oxygen consumption, MICE elicited similar changes in lymphocyte subset counts and receptor expression compared to both SIE and HIIE. Similarly, while the two interval trials resulted in differing oxygen consumption and total work, no differences in the lymphocyte response were observed. Though both forms of exercise resulted in declines in circulating lymphocyte cell counts, neither exercise type provides an immune-related advantage when matched for duration. •Continuous and interval exercise elicit similar changes in lymphocyte counts.•Sprint and high-intensity interval exercise elicit similar lymphocyte responses.•B, NK, and T cell subset counts are blunted 30 ​min and 24 ​h post-exercise.•Acute exercise increases the expression cell migration markers on CD8+ T cells.•Acute exercise may impair CD56dim NK cell function measured by CD69 expression.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35112091</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100415</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0780-8358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7999-3994</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7008-763X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2666-3546
ispartof Brain, behavior, & immunity. Health, 2022-03, Vol.20, p.100415-100415, Article 100415
issn 2666-3546
2666-3546
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d916dafd91f141a7a8b8b41e30c8cc52
source ScienceDirect Additional Titles; PubMed Central
subjects Aerobic exercise
B cells
Full Length
HIIT
NK cells
Sprint interval exercise
T cells
title Comparison of the lymphocyte response to interval exercise versus continuous exercise in recreationally trained men
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A58%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20lymphocyte%20response%20to%20interval%20exercise%20versus%20continuous%20exercise%20in%20recreationally%20trained%20men&rft.jtitle=Brain,%20behavior,%20&%20immunity.%20Health&rft.au=Arroyo,%20Eliott&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=20&rft.spage=100415&rft.epage=100415&rft.pages=100415-100415&rft.artnum=100415&rft.issn=2666-3546&rft.eissn=2666-3546&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100415&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2625266920%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-c7418d12eb48c05cfd723ef3540f010c881c183f93f418521e18dbd94fd600103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2625266920&rft_id=info:pmid/35112091&rfr_iscdi=true