Strategic Approaches to Intraflap Anastomosis: Navigating Conjoined DIEP Flap Reconstruction-A Comprehensive Roadmap

• Published in: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open 2024-02, Vol.12 (2), p.e5627-e5627
• Main Authors: Parikh, Janak A, Bombardelli, Joao, Doval, Andres, Spiegel, Aldona J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 2169-7574; 2169-7574
• DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005627

For patients desiring autologous breast reconstruction without adequate abdominal tissue volume, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap may be stacked or combined with other flaps for bilateral reconstruction. Various combinations of anastomoses have been described in the literature. We sought to describe a framework for intraflap anastomoses. A retrospective review of 17 patients who underwent conjoined DIEP flaps with intraflap anastomoses with a single surgeon was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative details, and complications were reviewed. A framework scheme was developed for the type of intraflap anastomosis performed. Between 2016 and 2020, 17 patients underwent conjoined DIEP flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Fourteen patients had delayed reconstruction. Eleven patients underwent an intraflap anastomosis in which a medial perforator on the left hemiabdomen flap was anastomosed with a distal lateral row perforator in the right hemiabdomen flap (type A). Four patients underwent an intraflap anastomosis in which a left lateral perforator was anastomosed to a right distal lateral row perforator (type B). Two patients underwent an intraflap anastomosis in which the left superficial inferior epigastric vessel was anastomosed to a right lateral row perforator (type C). Complications included reoperation (11.8%), partial flap loss (5.9%), seroma (23.5%), and hematoma (11.8%). We report a detailed framework for intraflap anastomoses of conjoined DIEP flap reconstruction including superficial inferior epigastric artery/superficial inferior epigastric vessel options. Knowledge of this comprehensive framework will allow surgeons to identify the type of intraflap anastomoses required for the anatomy they encounter and will standardize reporting of surgical technique in the literature.