Loading…

An investigation into the range dependence of target delineation strategies for stereotactic lung radiotherapy

The "gold standard" approach for defining an internal target volume (ITV) is using 10 gross tumor volume (GTV) phases delineated over the course of one respiratory cycle. However, different sites have adopted several alternative techniques which compress all temporal information into one C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiation oncology (London, England) England), 2017-11, Vol.12 (1), p.166-166, Article 166
Main Authors: Mohatt, Dennis J, Keim, John M, Greene, Mathew C, Patel-Yadav, Ami, Gomez, Jorge A, Malhotra, Harish K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-48015f2f3d9e3081ce23266374337d9bd4f2f9a03c0a74205d4a85c581cccd163
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-48015f2f3d9e3081ce23266374337d9bd4f2f9a03c0a74205d4a85c581cccd163
container_end_page 166
container_issue 1
container_start_page 166
container_title Radiation oncology (London, England)
container_volume 12
creator Mohatt, Dennis J
Keim, John M
Greene, Mathew C
Patel-Yadav, Ami
Gomez, Jorge A
Malhotra, Harish K
description The "gold standard" approach for defining an internal target volume (ITV) is using 10 gross tumor volume (GTV) phases delineated over the course of one respiratory cycle. However, different sites have adopted several alternative techniques which compress all temporal information into one CT image set to optimize work flow efficiency. The purpose of this study is to evaluate alternative target segmentation strategies with respect to the 10 phase gold standard. A Quasar respiratory motion phantom was employed to simulate lung tumor movement. Utilizing 4DCT imaging, a gold standard ITV was created by merging 10 GTV time resolved image sets. Four alternative planed ITV's were compared using free breathing (FB), average intensity projection (AIP), maximum image projection (MIP), and an augmented FB (FB-Aug) set where the ITV included structures from FB plus max-inhale/exhale image sets. Statistical analysis was performed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Seventeen patients previously treated for lung SBRT were also included in this retroactive study. PTV's derived from the FB image set are the least comparable with the 10 phase benchmark (DSC = 0.740-0.408). For phantom target motion greater than 1 cm, FB and AIP ITV delineation exceeded the 10 phase benchmark by 2% or greater, whereas MIP target segmentation was found to be consistently within 2% agreement with the gold standard (DSC > 0.878). Clinically, however, the FB-Aug method proved to be most favorable for tumor movement up to 2 cm (DSC = 0.881 ± 0.056). Our results indicate the range of tumor motion dictates the accuracy of the defined PTV with respect to the gold standard. When considering delineation efficiency relative to the 10 phase benchmark, the FB-Aug technique presents a potentially proficient and viable clinical alternative. Among various techniques used for image segmentation, a judicious balance between accuracy and efficiency is inherently required to account for tumor trajectory, range and rate of mobility.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13014-017-0907-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d92be3c1888e440f941471bd3c74fa3e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A513282788</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d92be3c1888e440f941471bd3c74fa3e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A513282788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-48015f2f3d9e3081ce23266374337d9bd4f2f9a03c0a74205d4a85c581cccd163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1r3DAQhk1padK0P6CXYuilF6ejD1vSpbCEfgQCvbTQm9BKY0eLV9pK2kD-fbRxmmZL0UGa0TuPNMPbNG8JnBMih4-ZMCC8AyI6UCA6-aw5JYLLThDx6_mT80nzKucNAO8ZqJfNCVUEoOfytAmr0Ppwg7n4yRQfD1GJbbnGNpkwYetwh8FhsNjGsS0mTVhqcvYBF30uyRScPOZ2jKmGmDAWY4u37bwPU-U4Hyswmd3t6-bFaOaMbx72s-bnl88_Lr51V9-_Xl6srjrbD1A6LoH0Ix2ZU8hAEouU0WFggjMmnFo7Xi-VAWbBCE6hd9zI3vZVaa0jAztrLheui2ajd8lvTbrV0Xh9n4hp0ibVH86onaJrZJZIKZFzGBUnXJC1Y1bw0TCsrE8La7dfb9FZDLXj-Qh6fBP8tZ7ije4HAYL2FfDhAZDi730dtd76bHGeTcC4z5qoARSlCmiVvv9Huon7FOqo7lWScgL9X9VkagM-jLG-aw9QveoJo5IKKavq_D-quhxuvY0BR1_zRwVkKbAp5pxwfOyRgD4YTi-G09Vw-mA4fah593Q4jxV_HMbuAMAX0TI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1960824105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An investigation into the range dependence of target delineation strategies for stereotactic lung radiotherapy</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mohatt, Dennis J ; Keim, John M ; Greene, Mathew C ; Patel-Yadav, Ami ; Gomez, Jorge A ; Malhotra, Harish K</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohatt, Dennis J ; Keim, John M ; Greene, Mathew C ; Patel-Yadav, Ami ; Gomez, Jorge A ; Malhotra, Harish K</creatorcontrib><description>The "gold standard" approach for defining an internal target volume (ITV) is using 10 gross tumor volume (GTV) phases delineated over the course of one respiratory cycle. However, different sites have adopted several alternative techniques which compress all temporal information into one CT image set to optimize work flow efficiency. The purpose of this study is to evaluate alternative target segmentation strategies with respect to the 10 phase gold standard. A Quasar respiratory motion phantom was employed to simulate lung tumor movement. Utilizing 4DCT imaging, a gold standard ITV was created by merging 10 GTV time resolved image sets. Four alternative planed ITV's were compared using free breathing (FB), average intensity projection (AIP), maximum image projection (MIP), and an augmented FB (FB-Aug) set where the ITV included structures from FB plus max-inhale/exhale image sets. Statistical analysis was performed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Seventeen patients previously treated for lung SBRT were also included in this retroactive study. PTV's derived from the FB image set are the least comparable with the 10 phase benchmark (DSC = 0.740-0.408). For phantom target motion greater than 1 cm, FB and AIP ITV delineation exceeded the 10 phase benchmark by 2% or greater, whereas MIP target segmentation was found to be consistently within 2% agreement with the gold standard (DSC &gt; 0.878). Clinically, however, the FB-Aug method proved to be most favorable for tumor movement up to 2 cm (DSC = 0.881 ± 0.056). Our results indicate the range of tumor motion dictates the accuracy of the defined PTV with respect to the gold standard. When considering delineation efficiency relative to the 10 phase benchmark, the FB-Aug technique presents a potentially proficient and viable clinical alternative. Among various techniques used for image segmentation, a judicious balance between accuracy and efficiency is inherently required to account for tumor trajectory, range and rate of mobility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-717X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-717X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0907-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29100548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Average intensity projection ; Benchmarks ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; CAT scans ; Computed tomography ; Datasets ; Delineation ; Dependence ; Diagnosis ; Dice similarity coefficient ; Efficiency ; Four dimensional computed tomography ; Image processing ; Image segmentation ; Investigations ; Lung cancer ; Lungs ; Maximum intensity projection ; Medical imaging ; Movement ; Planning ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy ; Statistical analysis ; Stereotactic body radiotherapy ; Target recognition ; Tumors ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>Radiation oncology (London, England), 2017-11, Vol.12 (1), p.166-166, Article 166</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-48015f2f3d9e3081ce23266374337d9bd4f2f9a03c0a74205d4a85c581cccd163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-48015f2f3d9e3081ce23266374337d9bd4f2f9a03c0a74205d4a85c581cccd163</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1508-0878</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670725/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1960824105?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohatt, Dennis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keim, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Mathew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel-Yadav, Ami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Jorge A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Harish K</creatorcontrib><title>An investigation into the range dependence of target delineation strategies for stereotactic lung radiotherapy</title><title>Radiation oncology (London, England)</title><addtitle>Radiat Oncol</addtitle><description>The "gold standard" approach for defining an internal target volume (ITV) is using 10 gross tumor volume (GTV) phases delineated over the course of one respiratory cycle. However, different sites have adopted several alternative techniques which compress all temporal information into one CT image set to optimize work flow efficiency. The purpose of this study is to evaluate alternative target segmentation strategies with respect to the 10 phase gold standard. A Quasar respiratory motion phantom was employed to simulate lung tumor movement. Utilizing 4DCT imaging, a gold standard ITV was created by merging 10 GTV time resolved image sets. Four alternative planed ITV's were compared using free breathing (FB), average intensity projection (AIP), maximum image projection (MIP), and an augmented FB (FB-Aug) set where the ITV included structures from FB plus max-inhale/exhale image sets. Statistical analysis was performed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Seventeen patients previously treated for lung SBRT were also included in this retroactive study. PTV's derived from the FB image set are the least comparable with the 10 phase benchmark (DSC = 0.740-0.408). For phantom target motion greater than 1 cm, FB and AIP ITV delineation exceeded the 10 phase benchmark by 2% or greater, whereas MIP target segmentation was found to be consistently within 2% agreement with the gold standard (DSC &gt; 0.878). Clinically, however, the FB-Aug method proved to be most favorable for tumor movement up to 2 cm (DSC = 0.881 ± 0.056). Our results indicate the range of tumor motion dictates the accuracy of the defined PTV with respect to the gold standard. When considering delineation efficiency relative to the 10 phase benchmark, the FB-Aug technique presents a potentially proficient and viable clinical alternative. Among various techniques used for image segmentation, a judicious balance between accuracy and efficiency is inherently required to account for tumor trajectory, range and rate of mobility.</description><subject>Average intensity projection</subject><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>CAT scans</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Delineation</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Dice similarity coefficient</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Four dimensional computed tomography</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Image segmentation</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Maximum intensity projection</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stereotactic body radiotherapy</subject><subject>Target recognition</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>1748-717X</issn><issn>1748-717X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1r3DAQhk1padK0P6CXYuilF6ejD1vSpbCEfgQCvbTQm9BKY0eLV9pK2kD-fbRxmmZL0UGa0TuPNMPbNG8JnBMih4-ZMCC8AyI6UCA6-aw5JYLLThDx6_mT80nzKucNAO8ZqJfNCVUEoOfytAmr0Ppwg7n4yRQfD1GJbbnGNpkwYetwh8FhsNjGsS0mTVhqcvYBF30uyRScPOZ2jKmGmDAWY4u37bwPU-U4Hyswmd3t6-bFaOaMbx72s-bnl88_Lr51V9-_Xl6srjrbD1A6LoH0Ix2ZU8hAEouU0WFggjMmnFo7Xi-VAWbBCE6hd9zI3vZVaa0jAztrLheui2ajd8lvTbrV0Xh9n4hp0ibVH86onaJrZJZIKZFzGBUnXJC1Y1bw0TCsrE8La7dfb9FZDLXj-Qh6fBP8tZ7ije4HAYL2FfDhAZDi730dtd76bHGeTcC4z5qoARSlCmiVvv9Huon7FOqo7lWScgL9X9VkagM-jLG-aw9QveoJo5IKKavq_D-quhxuvY0BR1_zRwVkKbAp5pxwfOyRgD4YTi-G09Vw-mA4fah593Q4jxV_HMbuAMAX0TI</recordid><startdate>20171103</startdate><enddate>20171103</enddate><creator>Mohatt, Dennis J</creator><creator>Keim, John M</creator><creator>Greene, Mathew C</creator><creator>Patel-Yadav, Ami</creator><creator>Gomez, Jorge A</creator><creator>Malhotra, Harish K</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1508-0878</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171103</creationdate><title>An investigation into the range dependence of target delineation strategies for stereotactic lung radiotherapy</title><author>Mohatt, Dennis J ; Keim, John M ; Greene, Mathew C ; Patel-Yadav, Ami ; Gomez, Jorge A ; Malhotra, Harish K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-48015f2f3d9e3081ce23266374337d9bd4f2f9a03c0a74205d4a85c581cccd163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Average intensity projection</topic><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>CAT scans</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Delineation</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Dice similarity coefficient</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Four dimensional computed tomography</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Image segmentation</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Maximum intensity projection</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stereotactic body radiotherapy</topic><topic>Target recognition</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohatt, Dennis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keim, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Mathew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel-Yadav, Ami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Jorge A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Harish K</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Radiation oncology (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohatt, Dennis J</au><au>Keim, John M</au><au>Greene, Mathew C</au><au>Patel-Yadav, Ami</au><au>Gomez, Jorge A</au><au>Malhotra, Harish K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An investigation into the range dependence of target delineation strategies for stereotactic lung radiotherapy</atitle><jtitle>Radiation oncology (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Oncol</addtitle><date>2017-11-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>166-166</pages><artnum>166</artnum><issn>1748-717X</issn><eissn>1748-717X</eissn><abstract>The "gold standard" approach for defining an internal target volume (ITV) is using 10 gross tumor volume (GTV) phases delineated over the course of one respiratory cycle. However, different sites have adopted several alternative techniques which compress all temporal information into one CT image set to optimize work flow efficiency. The purpose of this study is to evaluate alternative target segmentation strategies with respect to the 10 phase gold standard. A Quasar respiratory motion phantom was employed to simulate lung tumor movement. Utilizing 4DCT imaging, a gold standard ITV was created by merging 10 GTV time resolved image sets. Four alternative planed ITV's were compared using free breathing (FB), average intensity projection (AIP), maximum image projection (MIP), and an augmented FB (FB-Aug) set where the ITV included structures from FB plus max-inhale/exhale image sets. Statistical analysis was performed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Seventeen patients previously treated for lung SBRT were also included in this retroactive study. PTV's derived from the FB image set are the least comparable with the 10 phase benchmark (DSC = 0.740-0.408). For phantom target motion greater than 1 cm, FB and AIP ITV delineation exceeded the 10 phase benchmark by 2% or greater, whereas MIP target segmentation was found to be consistently within 2% agreement with the gold standard (DSC &gt; 0.878). Clinically, however, the FB-Aug method proved to be most favorable for tumor movement up to 2 cm (DSC = 0.881 ± 0.056). Our results indicate the range of tumor motion dictates the accuracy of the defined PTV with respect to the gold standard. When considering delineation efficiency relative to the 10 phase benchmark, the FB-Aug technique presents a potentially proficient and viable clinical alternative. Among various techniques used for image segmentation, a judicious balance between accuracy and efficiency is inherently required to account for tumor trajectory, range and rate of mobility.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>29100548</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13014-017-0907-8</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1508-0878</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-717X
ispartof Radiation oncology (London, England), 2017-11, Vol.12 (1), p.166-166, Article 166
issn 1748-717X
1748-717X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d92be3c1888e440f941471bd3c74fa3e
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Average intensity projection
Benchmarks
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
CAT scans
Computed tomography
Datasets
Delineation
Dependence
Diagnosis
Dice similarity coefficient
Efficiency
Four dimensional computed tomography
Image processing
Image segmentation
Investigations
Lung cancer
Lungs
Maximum intensity projection
Medical imaging
Movement
Planning
Radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
Statistical analysis
Stereotactic body radiotherapy
Target recognition
Tumors
Workflow
title An investigation into the range dependence of target delineation strategies for stereotactic lung radiotherapy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A51%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20investigation%20into%20the%20range%20dependence%20of%20target%20delineation%20strategies%20for%20stereotactic%20lung%20radiotherapy&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20oncology%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Mohatt,%20Dennis%20J&rft.date=2017-11-03&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=166-166&rft.artnum=166&rft.issn=1748-717X&rft.eissn=1748-717X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13014-017-0907-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA513282788%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-48015f2f3d9e3081ce23266374337d9bd4f2f9a03c0a74205d4a85c581cccd163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1960824105&rft_id=info:pmid/29100548&rft_galeid=A513282788&rfr_iscdi=true