Loading…
An investigation into the range dependence of target delineation strategies for stereotactic lung radiotherapy
The "gold standard" approach for defining an internal target volume (ITV) is using 10 gross tumor volume (GTV) phases delineated over the course of one respiratory cycle. However, different sites have adopted several alternative techniques which compress all temporal information into one C...
Saved in:
Published in: | Radiation oncology (London, England) England), 2017-11, Vol.12 (1), p.166-166, Article 166 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-48015f2f3d9e3081ce23266374337d9bd4f2f9a03c0a74205d4a85c581cccd163 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-48015f2f3d9e3081ce23266374337d9bd4f2f9a03c0a74205d4a85c581cccd163 |
container_end_page | 166 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 166 |
container_title | Radiation oncology (London, England) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Mohatt, Dennis J Keim, John M Greene, Mathew C Patel-Yadav, Ami Gomez, Jorge A Malhotra, Harish K |
description | The "gold standard" approach for defining an internal target volume (ITV) is using 10 gross tumor volume (GTV) phases delineated over the course of one respiratory cycle. However, different sites have adopted several alternative techniques which compress all temporal information into one CT image set to optimize work flow efficiency. The purpose of this study is to evaluate alternative target segmentation strategies with respect to the 10 phase gold standard.
A Quasar respiratory motion phantom was employed to simulate lung tumor movement. Utilizing 4DCT imaging, a gold standard ITV was created by merging 10 GTV time resolved image sets. Four alternative planed ITV's were compared using free breathing (FB), average intensity projection (AIP), maximum image projection (MIP), and an augmented FB (FB-Aug) set where the ITV included structures from FB plus max-inhale/exhale image sets. Statistical analysis was performed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Seventeen patients previously treated for lung SBRT were also included in this retroactive study.
PTV's derived from the FB image set are the least comparable with the 10 phase benchmark (DSC = 0.740-0.408). For phantom target motion greater than 1 cm, FB and AIP ITV delineation exceeded the 10 phase benchmark by 2% or greater, whereas MIP target segmentation was found to be consistently within 2% agreement with the gold standard (DSC > 0.878). Clinically, however, the FB-Aug method proved to be most favorable for tumor movement up to 2 cm (DSC = 0.881 ± 0.056).
Our results indicate the range of tumor motion dictates the accuracy of the defined PTV with respect to the gold standard. When considering delineation efficiency relative to the 10 phase benchmark, the FB-Aug technique presents a potentially proficient and viable clinical alternative. Among various techniques used for image segmentation, a judicious balance between accuracy and efficiency is inherently required to account for tumor trajectory, range and rate of mobility. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13014-017-0907-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d92be3c1888e440f941471bd3c74fa3e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A513282788</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d92be3c1888e440f941471bd3c74fa3e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A513282788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-48015f2f3d9e3081ce23266374337d9bd4f2f9a03c0a74205d4a85c581cccd163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1r3DAQhk1padK0P6CXYuilF6ejD1vSpbCEfgQCvbTQm9BKY0eLV9pK2kD-fbRxmmZL0UGa0TuPNMPbNG8JnBMih4-ZMCC8AyI6UCA6-aw5JYLLThDx6_mT80nzKucNAO8ZqJfNCVUEoOfytAmr0Ppwg7n4yRQfD1GJbbnGNpkwYetwh8FhsNjGsS0mTVhqcvYBF30uyRScPOZ2jKmGmDAWY4u37bwPU-U4Hyswmd3t6-bFaOaMbx72s-bnl88_Lr51V9-_Xl6srjrbD1A6LoH0Ix2ZU8hAEouU0WFggjMmnFo7Xi-VAWbBCE6hd9zI3vZVaa0jAztrLheui2ajd8lvTbrV0Xh9n4hp0ibVH86onaJrZJZIKZFzGBUnXJC1Y1bw0TCsrE8La7dfb9FZDLXj-Qh6fBP8tZ7ije4HAYL2FfDhAZDi730dtd76bHGeTcC4z5qoARSlCmiVvv9Huon7FOqo7lWScgL9X9VkagM-jLG-aw9QveoJo5IKKavq_D-quhxuvY0BR1_zRwVkKbAp5pxwfOyRgD4YTi-G09Vw-mA4fah593Q4jxV_HMbuAMAX0TI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1960824105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An investigation into the range dependence of target delineation strategies for stereotactic lung radiotherapy</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mohatt, Dennis J ; Keim, John M ; Greene, Mathew C ; Patel-Yadav, Ami ; Gomez, Jorge A ; Malhotra, Harish K</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohatt, Dennis J ; Keim, John M ; Greene, Mathew C ; Patel-Yadav, Ami ; Gomez, Jorge A ; Malhotra, Harish K</creatorcontrib><description>The "gold standard" approach for defining an internal target volume (ITV) is using 10 gross tumor volume (GTV) phases delineated over the course of one respiratory cycle. However, different sites have adopted several alternative techniques which compress all temporal information into one CT image set to optimize work flow efficiency. The purpose of this study is to evaluate alternative target segmentation strategies with respect to the 10 phase gold standard.
A Quasar respiratory motion phantom was employed to simulate lung tumor movement. Utilizing 4DCT imaging, a gold standard ITV was created by merging 10 GTV time resolved image sets. Four alternative planed ITV's were compared using free breathing (FB), average intensity projection (AIP), maximum image projection (MIP), and an augmented FB (FB-Aug) set where the ITV included structures from FB plus max-inhale/exhale image sets. Statistical analysis was performed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Seventeen patients previously treated for lung SBRT were also included in this retroactive study.
PTV's derived from the FB image set are the least comparable with the 10 phase benchmark (DSC = 0.740-0.408). For phantom target motion greater than 1 cm, FB and AIP ITV delineation exceeded the 10 phase benchmark by 2% or greater, whereas MIP target segmentation was found to be consistently within 2% agreement with the gold standard (DSC > 0.878). Clinically, however, the FB-Aug method proved to be most favorable for tumor movement up to 2 cm (DSC = 0.881 ± 0.056).
Our results indicate the range of tumor motion dictates the accuracy of the defined PTV with respect to the gold standard. When considering delineation efficiency relative to the 10 phase benchmark, the FB-Aug technique presents a potentially proficient and viable clinical alternative. Among various techniques used for image segmentation, a judicious balance between accuracy and efficiency is inherently required to account for tumor trajectory, range and rate of mobility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-717X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-717X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0907-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29100548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Average intensity projection ; Benchmarks ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; CAT scans ; Computed tomography ; Datasets ; Delineation ; Dependence ; Diagnosis ; Dice similarity coefficient ; Efficiency ; Four dimensional computed tomography ; Image processing ; Image segmentation ; Investigations ; Lung cancer ; Lungs ; Maximum intensity projection ; Medical imaging ; Movement ; Planning ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy ; Statistical analysis ; Stereotactic body radiotherapy ; Target recognition ; Tumors ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>Radiation oncology (London, England), 2017-11, Vol.12 (1), p.166-166, Article 166</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-48015f2f3d9e3081ce23266374337d9bd4f2f9a03c0a74205d4a85c581cccd163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-48015f2f3d9e3081ce23266374337d9bd4f2f9a03c0a74205d4a85c581cccd163</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1508-0878</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5670725/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1960824105?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohatt, Dennis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keim, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Mathew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel-Yadav, Ami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Jorge A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Harish K</creatorcontrib><title>An investigation into the range dependence of target delineation strategies for stereotactic lung radiotherapy</title><title>Radiation oncology (London, England)</title><addtitle>Radiat Oncol</addtitle><description>The "gold standard" approach for defining an internal target volume (ITV) is using 10 gross tumor volume (GTV) phases delineated over the course of one respiratory cycle. However, different sites have adopted several alternative techniques which compress all temporal information into one CT image set to optimize work flow efficiency. The purpose of this study is to evaluate alternative target segmentation strategies with respect to the 10 phase gold standard.
A Quasar respiratory motion phantom was employed to simulate lung tumor movement. Utilizing 4DCT imaging, a gold standard ITV was created by merging 10 GTV time resolved image sets. Four alternative planed ITV's were compared using free breathing (FB), average intensity projection (AIP), maximum image projection (MIP), and an augmented FB (FB-Aug) set where the ITV included structures from FB plus max-inhale/exhale image sets. Statistical analysis was performed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Seventeen patients previously treated for lung SBRT were also included in this retroactive study.
PTV's derived from the FB image set are the least comparable with the 10 phase benchmark (DSC = 0.740-0.408). For phantom target motion greater than 1 cm, FB and AIP ITV delineation exceeded the 10 phase benchmark by 2% or greater, whereas MIP target segmentation was found to be consistently within 2% agreement with the gold standard (DSC > 0.878). Clinically, however, the FB-Aug method proved to be most favorable for tumor movement up to 2 cm (DSC = 0.881 ± 0.056).
Our results indicate the range of tumor motion dictates the accuracy of the defined PTV with respect to the gold standard. When considering delineation efficiency relative to the 10 phase benchmark, the FB-Aug technique presents a potentially proficient and viable clinical alternative. Among various techniques used for image segmentation, a judicious balance between accuracy and efficiency is inherently required to account for tumor trajectory, range and rate of mobility.</description><subject>Average intensity projection</subject><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>CAT scans</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Delineation</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Dice similarity coefficient</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Four dimensional computed tomography</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Image segmentation</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Maximum intensity projection</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stereotactic body radiotherapy</subject><subject>Target recognition</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>1748-717X</issn><issn>1748-717X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1r3DAQhk1padK0P6CXYuilF6ejD1vSpbCEfgQCvbTQm9BKY0eLV9pK2kD-fbRxmmZL0UGa0TuPNMPbNG8JnBMih4-ZMCC8AyI6UCA6-aw5JYLLThDx6_mT80nzKucNAO8ZqJfNCVUEoOfytAmr0Ppwg7n4yRQfD1GJbbnGNpkwYetwh8FhsNjGsS0mTVhqcvYBF30uyRScPOZ2jKmGmDAWY4u37bwPU-U4Hyswmd3t6-bFaOaMbx72s-bnl88_Lr51V9-_Xl6srjrbD1A6LoH0Ix2ZU8hAEouU0WFggjMmnFo7Xi-VAWbBCE6hd9zI3vZVaa0jAztrLheui2ajd8lvTbrV0Xh9n4hp0ibVH86onaJrZJZIKZFzGBUnXJC1Y1bw0TCsrE8La7dfb9FZDLXj-Qh6fBP8tZ7ije4HAYL2FfDhAZDi730dtd76bHGeTcC4z5qoARSlCmiVvv9Huon7FOqo7lWScgL9X9VkagM-jLG-aw9QveoJo5IKKavq_D-quhxuvY0BR1_zRwVkKbAp5pxwfOyRgD4YTi-G09Vw-mA4fah593Q4jxV_HMbuAMAX0TI</recordid><startdate>20171103</startdate><enddate>20171103</enddate><creator>Mohatt, Dennis J</creator><creator>Keim, John M</creator><creator>Greene, Mathew C</creator><creator>Patel-Yadav, Ami</creator><creator>Gomez, Jorge A</creator><creator>Malhotra, Harish K</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1508-0878</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171103</creationdate><title>An investigation into the range dependence of target delineation strategies for stereotactic lung radiotherapy</title><author>Mohatt, Dennis J ; Keim, John M ; Greene, Mathew C ; Patel-Yadav, Ami ; Gomez, Jorge A ; Malhotra, Harish K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-48015f2f3d9e3081ce23266374337d9bd4f2f9a03c0a74205d4a85c581cccd163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Average intensity projection</topic><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>CAT scans</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Delineation</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Dice similarity coefficient</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Four dimensional computed tomography</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Image segmentation</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Maximum intensity projection</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stereotactic body radiotherapy</topic><topic>Target recognition</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohatt, Dennis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keim, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Mathew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel-Yadav, Ami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Jorge A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Harish K</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Radiation oncology (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohatt, Dennis J</au><au>Keim, John M</au><au>Greene, Mathew C</au><au>Patel-Yadav, Ami</au><au>Gomez, Jorge A</au><au>Malhotra, Harish K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An investigation into the range dependence of target delineation strategies for stereotactic lung radiotherapy</atitle><jtitle>Radiation oncology (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Oncol</addtitle><date>2017-11-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>166-166</pages><artnum>166</artnum><issn>1748-717X</issn><eissn>1748-717X</eissn><abstract>The "gold standard" approach for defining an internal target volume (ITV) is using 10 gross tumor volume (GTV) phases delineated over the course of one respiratory cycle. However, different sites have adopted several alternative techniques which compress all temporal information into one CT image set to optimize work flow efficiency. The purpose of this study is to evaluate alternative target segmentation strategies with respect to the 10 phase gold standard.
A Quasar respiratory motion phantom was employed to simulate lung tumor movement. Utilizing 4DCT imaging, a gold standard ITV was created by merging 10 GTV time resolved image sets. Four alternative planed ITV's were compared using free breathing (FB), average intensity projection (AIP), maximum image projection (MIP), and an augmented FB (FB-Aug) set where the ITV included structures from FB plus max-inhale/exhale image sets. Statistical analysis was performed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Seventeen patients previously treated for lung SBRT were also included in this retroactive study.
PTV's derived from the FB image set are the least comparable with the 10 phase benchmark (DSC = 0.740-0.408). For phantom target motion greater than 1 cm, FB and AIP ITV delineation exceeded the 10 phase benchmark by 2% or greater, whereas MIP target segmentation was found to be consistently within 2% agreement with the gold standard (DSC > 0.878). Clinically, however, the FB-Aug method proved to be most favorable for tumor movement up to 2 cm (DSC = 0.881 ± 0.056).
Our results indicate the range of tumor motion dictates the accuracy of the defined PTV with respect to the gold standard. When considering delineation efficiency relative to the 10 phase benchmark, the FB-Aug technique presents a potentially proficient and viable clinical alternative. Among various techniques used for image segmentation, a judicious balance between accuracy and efficiency is inherently required to account for tumor trajectory, range and rate of mobility.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>29100548</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13014-017-0907-8</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1508-0878</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-717X |
ispartof | Radiation oncology (London, England), 2017-11, Vol.12 (1), p.166-166, Article 166 |
issn | 1748-717X 1748-717X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d92be3c1888e440f941471bd3c74fa3e |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Average intensity projection Benchmarks Cancer therapies Care and treatment CAT scans Computed tomography Datasets Delineation Dependence Diagnosis Dice similarity coefficient Efficiency Four dimensional computed tomography Image processing Image segmentation Investigations Lung cancer Lungs Maximum intensity projection Medical imaging Movement Planning Radiation therapy Radiotherapy Statistical analysis Stereotactic body radiotherapy Target recognition Tumors Workflow |
title | An investigation into the range dependence of target delineation strategies for stereotactic lung radiotherapy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A51%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20investigation%20into%20the%20range%20dependence%20of%20target%20delineation%20strategies%20for%20stereotactic%20lung%20radiotherapy&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20oncology%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Mohatt,%20Dennis%20J&rft.date=2017-11-03&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=166-166&rft.artnum=166&rft.issn=1748-717X&rft.eissn=1748-717X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13014-017-0907-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA513282788%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-48015f2f3d9e3081ce23266374337d9bd4f2f9a03c0a74205d4a85c581cccd163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1960824105&rft_id=info:pmid/29100548&rft_galeid=A513282788&rfr_iscdi=true |