Loading…
Detection of cognitive impairment using self-rated AD8 and informant-reported AD8
Abstract Background/Purpose Screening of dementia can help to initiate proper management of the disorder. The use of the Ascertain Dementia 8-item Questionnaire (AD8) in screening has been promoted in Taiwan recently. The purpose of this study was to compare the psychometric properties and appropria...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 2018-01, Vol.117 (1), p.42-47 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Background/Purpose Screening of dementia can help to initiate proper management of the disorder. The use of the Ascertain Dementia 8-item Questionnaire (AD8) in screening has been promoted in Taiwan recently. The purpose of this study was to compare the psychometric properties and appropriateness of informant-reported and self-rated AD8 in cognitive impairment screening in Taiwan. Methods The AD8 were administered to 153 participants and their informants recruited from two neurology out-patient clinics. The discriminative abilities for early cognitive impairment [Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR) 0.5 and 1] of informant-based and self-rating AD8 were determined and compared with their areas under the receiver operating curve. κ coefficients representing the agreement between self-rated and informant-reported AD8 scores were also calculated. Results Participants and their informants were aged 76.9 years and 56.0 years on average, respectively. Only informant-reported AD8 was significantly associated with CDR level (Spearman ρ = 0.469, p < 0.001) and Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument score (Spearman ρ = −0.458, p < 0.001). The item-by-item agreements between self-rated and informant-reported AD8 were poor (κ coefficients: –0.030 to 0.206). The area under the receiver–operator characteristic curve was 0.59 for self-rated AD8 scores, and 0.77 for informant-reported AD8 scores, indicating that the discriminating ability of AD8 scores between CDR 0 and CDR 0.5 or greater is better when reported by informant than when rated by self. Conclusion Informant-rated AD8 gave more accurate screening results than self-reported AD8 in an out-patient clinic setting. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0929-6646 1876-0821 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jfma.2017.02.015 |