Loading…

Comparison of the efficacy of the modified S-P approach and the Ganz method for surgical hip dislocation in Pipkin I fractures: an early follow-up study

Femoral head fractures result from high-energy trauma and may be associated with posterior dislocation of the hip joint. An appropriate surgical approach is essential for improving clinical outcomes and preventing complications. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of the modified Smith-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2025-02, Vol.26 (1), p.116-10, Article 116
Main Authors: Zhang, Hanwen, Deng, Wei, Wang, Shengtao, Yin, Yong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Femoral head fractures result from high-energy trauma and may be associated with posterior dislocation of the hip joint. An appropriate surgical approach is essential for improving clinical outcomes and preventing complications. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of the modified Smith-Peterson (mS-P) approach and Ganz surgical dislocation (GSD) approach in the treatment of Pipkin I fractures. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with Pipkin I fractures at Pidu District People's Hospital from June 2010 to May 2020. Of these, 11 cases were treated with the mS-P approach and 12 cases were treated with the GSD approach. All patients were followed for 12-55 months, with a mean duration of 37.7 months. Basic demographic information, perioperative-related records, postoperative complications, and outcomes at the final follow-up were compared. Functional evaluations included the Thompson-Epstein Score, the Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), and the Vail Hip Score (VHS). Overall, 21 patients were included in the study. We found that the mS-P approach was associated with a smaller incision, shorter operative time, and reduced intraoperative blood loss compared to the GSD approach (P 
ISSN:1471-2474
1471-2474
DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08380-x