Description of the use of multicriteria to support pricing and reimbursement decisions by European health technology assessment bodies

• Published in: BMC health services research 2021-08, Vol.21 (1), p.1-814, Article 814
• Main Authors: Elvira, David, Obach, Mercè, Pontes, Caridad
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Collaboration; Costs; Decision making; Drugs; Evaluation; Expenditures; Health aspects; Health care expenditures; Health services; Health technology assessment; Innovations; Medical care, Cost of; Medical prognosis; Multicriteria assessment methods; Multiple criteria decision making; Oncology; Pharmaceuticals; Prices; Prospective payment systems (Medical care); Quality of life; Reimbursement; Reimbursement systems
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06784-8

Background Heterogeneity in drug access throughout Europe may be influenced by differences in drug-assessment strategies. The EUnetHTA's assessment core model (EUnetHTA-core) and the EVIDEM's multicriteria framework are reference methodologies in this context, the latter including a wider compromise between non-contextual and contextual criteria. Compliance of 37 European Health Technology Assessment bodies (HTAb) with EUnetHTA-core has been reported, but the use of EVIDEM by this HTAb is still unknown. Methods To describe the uptake and use of multicriteria approaches to evaluate drug value by European HTAb using EVIDEM as reference framework, a multicriteria framework was obtained based on EVIDEM model. The criteria used for drug appraisal by HTAb was extracted from the EUnetHTA report, and completed through search of websites, publications and HTAb reports. Use of EVIDEM assessment model in 37 European HTAb has been described semi-quantitatively and summarized using an alignment heatmap. Results Aligned, medium or misaligned profiles were seen for 24,3%, 51,4% and 24,3% of HTAb when matching to EVIDEM dimensions and criteria was considered. HTAb with explicit responsibilities in providing specific advice on reimbursement showed more aligned profiles on contextual and non-contextual dimensions. Conclusions EUnetHTA's core model is limited in assessing medicines while EVIDEM's framework provides contextual dimension used by some HTAb in Europe that can be escalated to other agencies. Most of the 37 European HTAb have room to broaden their contextual assessment tools, especially when social and medical perception of need requires to be explicit to support payer's decision on reimbursement. Keywords: Health technology assessment, Multicriteria assessment methods, Reimbursement systems