Orthodontic findings and treatment need in patients with amelogenesis imperfecta: a descriptive analysis

• Published in: Head & face medicine 2024-06, Vol.20 (1), p.36-14, Article 36
• Main Authors: Möhlhenrich, Stephan Christian, Chhatwani, Sachin, Schmidt, Peter, Kniha, Kristian, Postberg, Jan, Schulte, Andreas G, Jackowski, Jochen, Zimmer, Stefan, Danesh, Gholamreza
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Amelogenesis Imperfecta - genetics; Amelogenesis Imperfecta - therapy; Care and treatment; Child; Classification; Dental enamel; Dentin; Dysplasia; Female; Genotype & phenotype; Germany; Humans; Interdisciplinary aspects; Male; Malocclusion - therapy; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Mutation; Orthodontics; Orthodontics, Corrective - methods; Proteins; Radiography, Panoramic; Retrospective Studies; Teeth
• ISSN: 1746-160X; 1746-160X
• DOI: 10.1186/s13005-024-00436-y

Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a genetically determined, non-syndromic enamel dysplasia that may manifest as hypoplasia, hypomaturation, or hypocalcification and can commonly be classified into four primary groups. In this retrospective analysis, specific orofacial characteristics are described and associated with each of the AI types based on a patient cohort from Witten/Herdecke University, Germany. Data from 19 patients (ten male and nine female, mean age 12.27 ± 4.06 years) with AI who presented at the Department of Orthodontics between July 2011 and December 2023 were analyzed. Baseline skeletal and dental conditions were assessed, including the presence of hypodontia, displacements, and taurodontism. AI was classified into classes I-IV based on phenotype. Treatment needs were evaluated according to the main findings following the German KIG classification, while the radiological enamel situation was determined using panoramic radiographs. An approximately equal distribution between classes II and III was found and a slight inclination toward a dolichofacial configuration (ΔML-NSL: 5.07 ± 9.23°, ΔML-NL: 4.24 ± 8.04°). Regarding orthodontic findings, disturbance in tooth eruption as well as open bite were the most prevalent issues (both 36.8%, n = 7). The most common AI classes were type I and II, which show an almost even distribution about the skeletal classes in sagittal dimension, while dolichofacial configuration was found most frequently in vertical dimension. Both clinical and radiological orthodontic findings in context with AI are subject to extensive distribution. It seems that no specific orofacial findings can be confirmed in association with AI with regard to the common simple classes I-IV. It may be more appropriate to differentiate the many subtypes according to their genetic aspects to identify possible associated orthodontic findings.