Optometry student clinical practice at public health facilities: A systematic review

• Published in: Health SA = SA Gesondheid 2024, Vol.29 (1), p.2441-2441
• Main Authors: Segooa, Raserogole F., Moodley, Vanessa R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical medicine; Clinical supervision; Content analysis; Critical care; Education; Health Care Sciences & Services; Health Policy & Services; Occupational therapy; Optometry; Original Research; Pharmacy; Physical therapy; Public health; Public sector; Research methodology; Science; Speech therapy; student clinical practice standards; student clinical training; student clinical training facilities; Students; Supervision; Systematic review
• ISSN: 1025-9848; 2071-9736; 2071-9736
• DOI: 10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2441

\r\nBackground\r\nClinical training, supervision and practice are the most important aspects of health profession education, including optometry. Institutions implore various methods for students to gain access, exposure and experience in different clinical environments, away from their normal academic settings.\r\n\r\n\r\nAim\r\nThis review aimed to investigate studies and related documentary evidence to determine existing standards and methods for educational institutions in conducting optometry clinical training at the external sites.\r\n\r\n\r\nSetting\r\nThe electronic databases – ProQuest One, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Sabinet, Science Direct and Google Scholar – were searched systematically for studies on the implementation of workplace clinical training of undergraduate optometry students.\r\n\r\n\r\nMethods\r\nThe study followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) systematic review methodology and a systematic search of various electronic databases was conducted for studies on implementation of workplace clinical training. Of the 450 full-text studies searched, 13 studies were found to be reputable sources of evidence and were included in this systematic review.\r\n\r\n\r\nResults\r\nFour themes relating to student clinical training emerged, namely, clinical training approaches implemented, expected minimum standards at the training sites, clinical training environment wherein students and supervisors find themselves and clinical competence of the supervisors and students. They encompass important factors to consider in the planning and provision of quality, efficient and effective student clinical supervision at the external training facilities.\r\n\r\n\r\nConclusion\r\nThere is a dearth of scholarly studies to guide clinical training of optometry training within the public health sector. However, more studies are undertaken in other health disciplines, and they provide generic guidelines, which can be adapted for optometry.\r\n\r\n\r\nContribution\r\nThe article highlights the need for further studies in optometry student clinical training, focussing on programme designs and standardisation of clinical training in multi-institutional, low-income contexts.\r\n