Loading…

Ground control by L-shaped cemented paste backfilling technology in underground coal seam mining: a case study

Traditional cemented paste backfilling continues to face the shortcomings such as paste leakage, poor adaptability to geological structures and insufficient roof-contact. To solve the limitations, a novel L-shaped cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed in this study. It is to set...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geomechanics and geophysics for geo-energy and geo-resources. 2024-12, Vol.10 (1), p.1-26, Article 31
Main Authors: Guo, Mingjie, Guo, Wenbing, Tan, Yi, Zhang, Hebing, Zheng, Qinling, Zhao, Gaobo, Bai, Erhu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3001b12bb84e535e1b032a4f525cb50621b28ea1b885f14fc1fa8d51cb76a7923
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3001b12bb84e535e1b032a4f525cb50621b28ea1b885f14fc1fa8d51cb76a7923
container_end_page 26
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Geomechanics and geophysics for geo-energy and geo-resources.
container_volume 10
creator Guo, Mingjie
Guo, Wenbing
Tan, Yi
Zhang, Hebing
Zheng, Qinling
Zhao, Gaobo
Bai, Erhu
description Traditional cemented paste backfilling continues to face the shortcomings such as paste leakage, poor adaptability to geological structures and insufficient roof-contact. To solve the limitations, a novel L-shaped cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed in this study. It is to set L-shaped filling zones and partition zones in the goaf to perform interval and multiple filling. A mechanical model was established to calculate backfilling body strength, widths of L-shaped filling zones and partition zones and backfilled ratio and etc. The results of a case study showed that: (1) The LCPB mining has a high backfilled ratio, without prominent ground pressure. The maximum values of roof-to-floor convergence of the working face and roadway were 58 mm and 259 mm, respectively. It could effectively control the deformation of surrounding rock and achieve roadway retention. (2) When the floor strata were intact, the maximum floor damage depth was less than 4 m, and the floor near the fault was 10–12 m. The secondary lift height of the confined water was about 5 m near the fault. The LCPB mining allows for safety mining above a confined aquifer. (3) The maximum surface inclination and curvature were 1.75 mm/m and 0.06 mm/m 2 , respectively. The draw angle was 11.3°, and the subsidence factor was 0.085. The ground surface deformation was reduced to be less than that allowed in the first level of the building damage (inclination and curvature of 3 mm/m and 0.2 mm/m 2 , respectively). Article Highlights L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed. The critical parameters of LCPB were theoretically determined. LCPB in ground control was verified through an engineering application.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40948-024-00758-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_da5d1ccd45344066948c52fda70c2eb4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_da5d1ccd45344066948c52fda70c2eb4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2919136082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3001b12bb84e535e1b032a4f525cb50621b28ea1b885f14fc1fa8d51cb76a7923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3TAQhaOKSkWUP9CVJdYpHj8Sh12FWkC6Ujft2ho7kxDItS92rtD99xjCY8fK49E534zmVNUP4D-B8_Y8K94pU3Oh6vLVpn78Uh0L2cjaKNEevdfQfatOc54clyAaqUAcV-EqxX3omY9hSXFm7sA2db7FHZUebSkspdhhXog59PfDNM9TGNlC_jbEOY4HNgVWAJTGNxDOLBNu2XYKRXrBkHnMxPKy7w_fq68DzplOX9-T6v-f3_8ur-vN36uby1-b2ivRLbXkHBwI54wiLTVBWVmgGrTQ3mneCHDCEIIzRg-gBg8Dml6Dd22DbSfkSXWzcvuId3aXpi2mg4042ZdGTKPFtEx-Jtuj7sH7XmmpFG-ackqvxdBjy70gpwrrbGXtUnzYU17sXdynUNa3ooMOZMPN80SxqnyKOSca3qcCt88x2TUmW2KyLzHZx2KSqykXcRgpfaA_cT0BQkyWPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919136082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ground control by L-shaped cemented paste backfilling technology in underground coal seam mining: a case study</title><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Guo, Mingjie ; Guo, Wenbing ; Tan, Yi ; Zhang, Hebing ; Zheng, Qinling ; Zhao, Gaobo ; Bai, Erhu</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Mingjie ; Guo, Wenbing ; Tan, Yi ; Zhang, Hebing ; Zheng, Qinling ; Zhao, Gaobo ; Bai, Erhu</creatorcontrib><description>Traditional cemented paste backfilling continues to face the shortcomings such as paste leakage, poor adaptability to geological structures and insufficient roof-contact. To solve the limitations, a novel L-shaped cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed in this study. It is to set L-shaped filling zones and partition zones in the goaf to perform interval and multiple filling. A mechanical model was established to calculate backfilling body strength, widths of L-shaped filling zones and partition zones and backfilled ratio and etc. The results of a case study showed that: (1) The LCPB mining has a high backfilled ratio, without prominent ground pressure. The maximum values of roof-to-floor convergence of the working face and roadway were 58 mm and 259 mm, respectively. It could effectively control the deformation of surrounding rock and achieve roadway retention. (2) When the floor strata were intact, the maximum floor damage depth was less than 4 m, and the floor near the fault was 10–12 m. The secondary lift height of the confined water was about 5 m near the fault. The LCPB mining allows for safety mining above a confined aquifer. (3) The maximum surface inclination and curvature were 1.75 mm/m and 0.06 mm/m 2 , respectively. The draw angle was 11.3°, and the subsidence factor was 0.085. The ground surface deformation was reduced to be less than that allowed in the first level of the building damage (inclination and curvature of 3 mm/m and 0.2 mm/m 2 , respectively). Article Highlights L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed. The critical parameters of LCPB were theoretically determined. LCPB in ground control was verified through an engineering application.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2363-8419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2363-8427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40948-024-00758-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adaptability ; Aquifers ; Backfill ; Case studies ; Coal mining ; Confined aquifers ; Critical parameters ; Curvature ; Damage ; Deformation ; Deformation effects ; Energy ; Engineering ; Engineering application ; Environmental Science and Engineering ; Foundations ; Geoengineering ; Geological structures ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Ground based control ; Ground control ; Hydraulics ; Inclination ; L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling ; Methodology ; Mining ; Mining accidents &amp; safety ; Roads ; Technology ; Underground mining ; Work face</subject><ispartof>Geomechanics and geophysics for geo-energy and geo-resources., 2024-12, Vol.10 (1), p.1-26, Article 31</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3001b12bb84e535e1b032a4f525cb50621b28ea1b885f14fc1fa8d51cb76a7923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3001b12bb84e535e1b032a4f525cb50621b28ea1b885f14fc1fa8d51cb76a7923</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7265-9478</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Mingjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Wenbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hebing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Qinling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Gaobo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Erhu</creatorcontrib><title>Ground control by L-shaped cemented paste backfilling technology in underground coal seam mining: a case study</title><title>Geomechanics and geophysics for geo-energy and geo-resources.</title><addtitle>Geomech. Geophys. Geo-energ. Geo-resour</addtitle><description>Traditional cemented paste backfilling continues to face the shortcomings such as paste leakage, poor adaptability to geological structures and insufficient roof-contact. To solve the limitations, a novel L-shaped cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed in this study. It is to set L-shaped filling zones and partition zones in the goaf to perform interval and multiple filling. A mechanical model was established to calculate backfilling body strength, widths of L-shaped filling zones and partition zones and backfilled ratio and etc. The results of a case study showed that: (1) The LCPB mining has a high backfilled ratio, without prominent ground pressure. The maximum values of roof-to-floor convergence of the working face and roadway were 58 mm and 259 mm, respectively. It could effectively control the deformation of surrounding rock and achieve roadway retention. (2) When the floor strata were intact, the maximum floor damage depth was less than 4 m, and the floor near the fault was 10–12 m. The secondary lift height of the confined water was about 5 m near the fault. The LCPB mining allows for safety mining above a confined aquifer. (3) The maximum surface inclination and curvature were 1.75 mm/m and 0.06 mm/m 2 , respectively. The draw angle was 11.3°, and the subsidence factor was 0.085. The ground surface deformation was reduced to be less than that allowed in the first level of the building damage (inclination and curvature of 3 mm/m and 0.2 mm/m 2 , respectively). Article Highlights L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed. The critical parameters of LCPB were theoretically determined. LCPB in ground control was verified through an engineering application.</description><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Backfill</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Coal mining</subject><subject>Confined aquifers</subject><subject>Critical parameters</subject><subject>Curvature</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Deformation effects</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering application</subject><subject>Environmental Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Geoengineering</subject><subject>Geological structures</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ground based control</subject><subject>Ground control</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Inclination</subject><subject>L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Mining accidents &amp; safety</subject><subject>Roads</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Underground mining</subject><subject>Work face</subject><issn>2363-8419</issn><issn>2363-8427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtP3TAQhaOKSkWUP9CVJdYpHj8Sh12FWkC6Ujft2ho7kxDItS92rtD99xjCY8fK49E534zmVNUP4D-B8_Y8K94pU3Oh6vLVpn78Uh0L2cjaKNEevdfQfatOc54clyAaqUAcV-EqxX3omY9hSXFm7sA2db7FHZUebSkspdhhXog59PfDNM9TGNlC_jbEOY4HNgVWAJTGNxDOLBNu2XYKRXrBkHnMxPKy7w_fq68DzplOX9-T6v-f3_8ur-vN36uby1-b2ivRLbXkHBwI54wiLTVBWVmgGrTQ3mneCHDCEIIzRg-gBg8Dml6Dd22DbSfkSXWzcvuId3aXpi2mg4042ZdGTKPFtEx-Jtuj7sH7XmmpFG-ackqvxdBjy70gpwrrbGXtUnzYU17sXdynUNa3ooMOZMPN80SxqnyKOSca3qcCt88x2TUmW2KyLzHZx2KSqykXcRgpfaA_cT0BQkyWPQ</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Guo, Mingjie</creator><creator>Guo, Wenbing</creator><creator>Tan, Yi</creator><creator>Zhang, Hebing</creator><creator>Zheng, Qinling</creator><creator>Zhao, Gaobo</creator><creator>Bai, Erhu</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7265-9478</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Ground control by L-shaped cemented paste backfilling technology in underground coal seam mining: a case study</title><author>Guo, Mingjie ; Guo, Wenbing ; Tan, Yi ; Zhang, Hebing ; Zheng, Qinling ; Zhao, Gaobo ; Bai, Erhu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3001b12bb84e535e1b032a4f525cb50621b28ea1b885f14fc1fa8d51cb76a7923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Backfill</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Coal mining</topic><topic>Confined aquifers</topic><topic>Critical parameters</topic><topic>Curvature</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Deformation effects</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering application</topic><topic>Environmental Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Geoengineering</topic><topic>Geological structures</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ground based control</topic><topic>Ground control</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Inclination</topic><topic>L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Mining accidents &amp; safety</topic><topic>Roads</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Underground mining</topic><topic>Work face</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Mingjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Wenbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hebing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Qinling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Gaobo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Erhu</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Geomechanics and geophysics for geo-energy and geo-resources.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Mingjie</au><au>Guo, Wenbing</au><au>Tan, Yi</au><au>Zhang, Hebing</au><au>Zheng, Qinling</au><au>Zhao, Gaobo</au><au>Bai, Erhu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ground control by L-shaped cemented paste backfilling technology in underground coal seam mining: a case study</atitle><jtitle>Geomechanics and geophysics for geo-energy and geo-resources.</jtitle><stitle>Geomech. Geophys. Geo-energ. Geo-resour</stitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>1-26</pages><artnum>31</artnum><issn>2363-8419</issn><eissn>2363-8427</eissn><abstract>Traditional cemented paste backfilling continues to face the shortcomings such as paste leakage, poor adaptability to geological structures and insufficient roof-contact. To solve the limitations, a novel L-shaped cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed in this study. It is to set L-shaped filling zones and partition zones in the goaf to perform interval and multiple filling. A mechanical model was established to calculate backfilling body strength, widths of L-shaped filling zones and partition zones and backfilled ratio and etc. The results of a case study showed that: (1) The LCPB mining has a high backfilled ratio, without prominent ground pressure. The maximum values of roof-to-floor convergence of the working face and roadway were 58 mm and 259 mm, respectively. It could effectively control the deformation of surrounding rock and achieve roadway retention. (2) When the floor strata were intact, the maximum floor damage depth was less than 4 m, and the floor near the fault was 10–12 m. The secondary lift height of the confined water was about 5 m near the fault. The LCPB mining allows for safety mining above a confined aquifer. (3) The maximum surface inclination and curvature were 1.75 mm/m and 0.06 mm/m 2 , respectively. The draw angle was 11.3°, and the subsidence factor was 0.085. The ground surface deformation was reduced to be less than that allowed in the first level of the building damage (inclination and curvature of 3 mm/m and 0.2 mm/m 2 , respectively). Article Highlights L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed. The critical parameters of LCPB were theoretically determined. LCPB in ground control was verified through an engineering application.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40948-024-00758-w</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7265-9478</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2363-8419
ispartof Geomechanics and geophysics for geo-energy and geo-resources., 2024-12, Vol.10 (1), p.1-26, Article 31
issn 2363-8419
2363-8427
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_da5d1ccd45344066948c52fda70c2eb4
source Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects Adaptability
Aquifers
Backfill
Case studies
Coal mining
Confined aquifers
Critical parameters
Curvature
Damage
Deformation
Deformation effects
Energy
Engineering
Engineering application
Environmental Science and Engineering
Foundations
Geoengineering
Geological structures
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Ground based control
Ground control
Hydraulics
Inclination
L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling
Methodology
Mining
Mining accidents & safety
Roads
Technology
Underground mining
Work face
title Ground control by L-shaped cemented paste backfilling technology in underground coal seam mining: a case study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A24%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ground%20control%20by%20L-shaped%20cemented%20paste%20backfilling%20technology%20in%20underground%20coal%20seam%20mining:%20a%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=Geomechanics%20and%20geophysics%20for%20geo-energy%20and%20geo-resources.&rft.au=Guo,%20Mingjie&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=1-26&rft.artnum=31&rft.issn=2363-8419&rft.eissn=2363-8427&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40948-024-00758-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2919136082%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3001b12bb84e535e1b032a4f525cb50621b28ea1b885f14fc1fa8d51cb76a7923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919136082&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true