Loading…
Ground control by L-shaped cemented paste backfilling technology in underground coal seam mining: a case study
Traditional cemented paste backfilling continues to face the shortcomings such as paste leakage, poor adaptability to geological structures and insufficient roof-contact. To solve the limitations, a novel L-shaped cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed in this study. It is to set...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geomechanics and geophysics for geo-energy and geo-resources. 2024-12, Vol.10 (1), p.1-26, Article 31 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3001b12bb84e535e1b032a4f525cb50621b28ea1b885f14fc1fa8d51cb76a7923 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3001b12bb84e535e1b032a4f525cb50621b28ea1b885f14fc1fa8d51cb76a7923 |
container_end_page | 26 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Geomechanics and geophysics for geo-energy and geo-resources. |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Guo, Mingjie Guo, Wenbing Tan, Yi Zhang, Hebing Zheng, Qinling Zhao, Gaobo Bai, Erhu |
description | Traditional cemented paste backfilling continues to face the shortcomings such as paste leakage, poor adaptability to geological structures and insufficient roof-contact. To solve the limitations, a novel L-shaped cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed in this study. It is to set L-shaped filling zones and partition zones in the goaf to perform interval and multiple filling. A mechanical model was established to calculate backfilling body strength, widths of L-shaped filling zones and partition zones and backfilled ratio and etc. The results of a case study showed that: (1) The LCPB mining has a high backfilled ratio, without prominent ground pressure. The maximum values of roof-to-floor convergence of the working face and roadway were 58 mm and 259 mm, respectively. It could effectively control the deformation of surrounding rock and achieve roadway retention. (2) When the floor strata were intact, the maximum floor damage depth was less than 4 m, and the floor near the fault was 10–12 m. The secondary lift height of the confined water was about 5 m near the fault. The LCPB mining allows for safety mining above a confined aquifer. (3) The maximum surface inclination and curvature were 1.75 mm/m and 0.06 mm/m
2
, respectively. The draw angle was 11.3°, and the subsidence factor was 0.085. The ground surface deformation was reduced to be less than that allowed in the first level of the building damage (inclination and curvature of 3 mm/m and 0.2 mm/m
2
, respectively).
Article Highlights
L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed.
The critical parameters of LCPB were theoretically determined.
LCPB in ground control was verified through an engineering application. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40948-024-00758-w |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_da5d1ccd45344066948c52fda70c2eb4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_da5d1ccd45344066948c52fda70c2eb4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2919136082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3001b12bb84e535e1b032a4f525cb50621b28ea1b885f14fc1fa8d51cb76a7923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3TAQhaOKSkWUP9CVJdYpHj8Sh12FWkC6Ujft2ho7kxDItS92rtD99xjCY8fK49E534zmVNUP4D-B8_Y8K94pU3Oh6vLVpn78Uh0L2cjaKNEevdfQfatOc54clyAaqUAcV-EqxX3omY9hSXFm7sA2db7FHZUebSkspdhhXog59PfDNM9TGNlC_jbEOY4HNgVWAJTGNxDOLBNu2XYKRXrBkHnMxPKy7w_fq68DzplOX9-T6v-f3_8ur-vN36uby1-b2ivRLbXkHBwI54wiLTVBWVmgGrTQ3mneCHDCEIIzRg-gBg8Dml6Dd22DbSfkSXWzcvuId3aXpi2mg4042ZdGTKPFtEx-Jtuj7sH7XmmpFG-ackqvxdBjy70gpwrrbGXtUnzYU17sXdynUNa3ooMOZMPN80SxqnyKOSca3qcCt88x2TUmW2KyLzHZx2KSqykXcRgpfaA_cT0BQkyWPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919136082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ground control by L-shaped cemented paste backfilling technology in underground coal seam mining: a case study</title><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Guo, Mingjie ; Guo, Wenbing ; Tan, Yi ; Zhang, Hebing ; Zheng, Qinling ; Zhao, Gaobo ; Bai, Erhu</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Mingjie ; Guo, Wenbing ; Tan, Yi ; Zhang, Hebing ; Zheng, Qinling ; Zhao, Gaobo ; Bai, Erhu</creatorcontrib><description>Traditional cemented paste backfilling continues to face the shortcomings such as paste leakage, poor adaptability to geological structures and insufficient roof-contact. To solve the limitations, a novel L-shaped cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed in this study. It is to set L-shaped filling zones and partition zones in the goaf to perform interval and multiple filling. A mechanical model was established to calculate backfilling body strength, widths of L-shaped filling zones and partition zones and backfilled ratio and etc. The results of a case study showed that: (1) The LCPB mining has a high backfilled ratio, without prominent ground pressure. The maximum values of roof-to-floor convergence of the working face and roadway were 58 mm and 259 mm, respectively. It could effectively control the deformation of surrounding rock and achieve roadway retention. (2) When the floor strata were intact, the maximum floor damage depth was less than 4 m, and the floor near the fault was 10–12 m. The secondary lift height of the confined water was about 5 m near the fault. The LCPB mining allows for safety mining above a confined aquifer. (3) The maximum surface inclination and curvature were 1.75 mm/m and 0.06 mm/m
2
, respectively. The draw angle was 11.3°, and the subsidence factor was 0.085. The ground surface deformation was reduced to be less than that allowed in the first level of the building damage (inclination and curvature of 3 mm/m and 0.2 mm/m
2
, respectively).
Article Highlights
L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed.
The critical parameters of LCPB were theoretically determined.
LCPB in ground control was verified through an engineering application.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2363-8419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2363-8427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40948-024-00758-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adaptability ; Aquifers ; Backfill ; Case studies ; Coal mining ; Confined aquifers ; Critical parameters ; Curvature ; Damage ; Deformation ; Deformation effects ; Energy ; Engineering ; Engineering application ; Environmental Science and Engineering ; Foundations ; Geoengineering ; Geological structures ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Ground based control ; Ground control ; Hydraulics ; Inclination ; L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling ; Methodology ; Mining ; Mining accidents & safety ; Roads ; Technology ; Underground mining ; Work face</subject><ispartof>Geomechanics and geophysics for geo-energy and geo-resources., 2024-12, Vol.10 (1), p.1-26, Article 31</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3001b12bb84e535e1b032a4f525cb50621b28ea1b885f14fc1fa8d51cb76a7923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3001b12bb84e535e1b032a4f525cb50621b28ea1b885f14fc1fa8d51cb76a7923</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7265-9478</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Mingjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Wenbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hebing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Qinling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Gaobo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Erhu</creatorcontrib><title>Ground control by L-shaped cemented paste backfilling technology in underground coal seam mining: a case study</title><title>Geomechanics and geophysics for geo-energy and geo-resources.</title><addtitle>Geomech. Geophys. Geo-energ. Geo-resour</addtitle><description>Traditional cemented paste backfilling continues to face the shortcomings such as paste leakage, poor adaptability to geological structures and insufficient roof-contact. To solve the limitations, a novel L-shaped cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed in this study. It is to set L-shaped filling zones and partition zones in the goaf to perform interval and multiple filling. A mechanical model was established to calculate backfilling body strength, widths of L-shaped filling zones and partition zones and backfilled ratio and etc. The results of a case study showed that: (1) The LCPB mining has a high backfilled ratio, without prominent ground pressure. The maximum values of roof-to-floor convergence of the working face and roadway were 58 mm and 259 mm, respectively. It could effectively control the deformation of surrounding rock and achieve roadway retention. (2) When the floor strata were intact, the maximum floor damage depth was less than 4 m, and the floor near the fault was 10–12 m. The secondary lift height of the confined water was about 5 m near the fault. The LCPB mining allows for safety mining above a confined aquifer. (3) The maximum surface inclination and curvature were 1.75 mm/m and 0.06 mm/m
2
, respectively. The draw angle was 11.3°, and the subsidence factor was 0.085. The ground surface deformation was reduced to be less than that allowed in the first level of the building damage (inclination and curvature of 3 mm/m and 0.2 mm/m
2
, respectively).
Article Highlights
L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed.
The critical parameters of LCPB were theoretically determined.
LCPB in ground control was verified through an engineering application.</description><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Backfill</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Coal mining</subject><subject>Confined aquifers</subject><subject>Critical parameters</subject><subject>Curvature</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Deformation effects</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering application</subject><subject>Environmental Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Geoengineering</subject><subject>Geological structures</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ground based control</subject><subject>Ground control</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Inclination</subject><subject>L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Mining accidents & safety</subject><subject>Roads</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Underground mining</subject><subject>Work face</subject><issn>2363-8419</issn><issn>2363-8427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtP3TAQhaOKSkWUP9CVJdYpHj8Sh12FWkC6Ujft2ho7kxDItS92rtD99xjCY8fK49E534zmVNUP4D-B8_Y8K94pU3Oh6vLVpn78Uh0L2cjaKNEevdfQfatOc54clyAaqUAcV-EqxX3omY9hSXFm7sA2db7FHZUebSkspdhhXog59PfDNM9TGNlC_jbEOY4HNgVWAJTGNxDOLBNu2XYKRXrBkHnMxPKy7w_fq68DzplOX9-T6v-f3_8ur-vN36uby1-b2ivRLbXkHBwI54wiLTVBWVmgGrTQ3mneCHDCEIIzRg-gBg8Dml6Dd22DbSfkSXWzcvuId3aXpi2mg4042ZdGTKPFtEx-Jtuj7sH7XmmpFG-ackqvxdBjy70gpwrrbGXtUnzYU17sXdynUNa3ooMOZMPN80SxqnyKOSca3qcCt88x2TUmW2KyLzHZx2KSqykXcRgpfaA_cT0BQkyWPQ</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Guo, Mingjie</creator><creator>Guo, Wenbing</creator><creator>Tan, Yi</creator><creator>Zhang, Hebing</creator><creator>Zheng, Qinling</creator><creator>Zhao, Gaobo</creator><creator>Bai, Erhu</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7265-9478</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Ground control by L-shaped cemented paste backfilling technology in underground coal seam mining: a case study</title><author>Guo, Mingjie ; Guo, Wenbing ; Tan, Yi ; Zhang, Hebing ; Zheng, Qinling ; Zhao, Gaobo ; Bai, Erhu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3001b12bb84e535e1b032a4f525cb50621b28ea1b885f14fc1fa8d51cb76a7923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Backfill</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Coal mining</topic><topic>Confined aquifers</topic><topic>Critical parameters</topic><topic>Curvature</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Deformation effects</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering application</topic><topic>Environmental Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Geoengineering</topic><topic>Geological structures</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ground based control</topic><topic>Ground control</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Inclination</topic><topic>L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Mining accidents & safety</topic><topic>Roads</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Underground mining</topic><topic>Work face</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Mingjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Wenbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hebing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Qinling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Gaobo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Erhu</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Geomechanics and geophysics for geo-energy and geo-resources.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Mingjie</au><au>Guo, Wenbing</au><au>Tan, Yi</au><au>Zhang, Hebing</au><au>Zheng, Qinling</au><au>Zhao, Gaobo</au><au>Bai, Erhu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ground control by L-shaped cemented paste backfilling technology in underground coal seam mining: a case study</atitle><jtitle>Geomechanics and geophysics for geo-energy and geo-resources.</jtitle><stitle>Geomech. Geophys. Geo-energ. Geo-resour</stitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>1-26</pages><artnum>31</artnum><issn>2363-8419</issn><eissn>2363-8427</eissn><abstract>Traditional cemented paste backfilling continues to face the shortcomings such as paste leakage, poor adaptability to geological structures and insufficient roof-contact. To solve the limitations, a novel L-shaped cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed in this study. It is to set L-shaped filling zones and partition zones in the goaf to perform interval and multiple filling. A mechanical model was established to calculate backfilling body strength, widths of L-shaped filling zones and partition zones and backfilled ratio and etc. The results of a case study showed that: (1) The LCPB mining has a high backfilled ratio, without prominent ground pressure. The maximum values of roof-to-floor convergence of the working face and roadway were 58 mm and 259 mm, respectively. It could effectively control the deformation of surrounding rock and achieve roadway retention. (2) When the floor strata were intact, the maximum floor damage depth was less than 4 m, and the floor near the fault was 10–12 m. The secondary lift height of the confined water was about 5 m near the fault. The LCPB mining allows for safety mining above a confined aquifer. (3) The maximum surface inclination and curvature were 1.75 mm/m and 0.06 mm/m
2
, respectively. The draw angle was 11.3°, and the subsidence factor was 0.085. The ground surface deformation was reduced to be less than that allowed in the first level of the building damage (inclination and curvature of 3 mm/m and 0.2 mm/m
2
, respectively).
Article Highlights
L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling (LCPB) technology was proposed.
The critical parameters of LCPB were theoretically determined.
LCPB in ground control was verified through an engineering application.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40948-024-00758-w</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7265-9478</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2363-8419 |
ispartof | Geomechanics and geophysics for geo-energy and geo-resources., 2024-12, Vol.10 (1), p.1-26, Article 31 |
issn | 2363-8419 2363-8427 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_da5d1ccd45344066948c52fda70c2eb4 |
source | Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | Adaptability Aquifers Backfill Case studies Coal mining Confined aquifers Critical parameters Curvature Damage Deformation Deformation effects Energy Engineering Engineering application Environmental Science and Engineering Foundations Geoengineering Geological structures Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Ground based control Ground control Hydraulics Inclination L-shaped interval cemented paste backfilling Methodology Mining Mining accidents & safety Roads Technology Underground mining Work face |
title | Ground control by L-shaped cemented paste backfilling technology in underground coal seam mining: a case study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A24%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ground%20control%20by%20L-shaped%20cemented%20paste%20backfilling%20technology%20in%20underground%20coal%20seam%20mining:%20a%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=Geomechanics%20and%20geophysics%20for%20geo-energy%20and%20geo-resources.&rft.au=Guo,%20Mingjie&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=1-26&rft.artnum=31&rft.issn=2363-8419&rft.eissn=2363-8427&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40948-024-00758-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2919136082%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3001b12bb84e535e1b032a4f525cb50621b28ea1b885f14fc1fa8d51cb76a7923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919136082&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |