Loading…

High-resolution digital mapping of soil erodibility in China

•The mean K was 0.035 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1 in China and varies with soil and water conservation zones.•The RF model has high accuracy in predicting K, with R2 = 0.49, RMSE = 0.0077 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1.•The machine learning method represented more spatial variation detail.•Topographical and climat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geoderma 2024-04, Vol.444, p.116853, Article 116853
Main Authors: Sun, Longhui, Liu, Feng, Zhu, Xuchao, Zhang, Ganlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a396t-6a76b6af9138f708ec1778d9c96dc969fac7f260e9ea73dd810f24748b0a9c573
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 116853
container_title Geoderma
container_volume 444
creator Sun, Longhui
Liu, Feng
Zhu, Xuchao
Zhang, Ganlin
description •The mean K was 0.035 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1 in China and varies with soil and water conservation zones.•The RF model has high accuracy in predicting K, with R2 = 0.49, RMSE = 0.0077 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1.•The machine learning method represented more spatial variation detail.•Topographical and climatic variables were the primary variables affecting K. Soil erodibility (K) is the intrinsic susceptibility of a soil to water erosion. Currently, its detailed and accurate spatial distribution information especially over large areas is urgently required for national and regional soil erosion assessment and soil conservation decision making. This study combined pedotransfer function with digital soil mapping techniques to develop a high-resolution map of soil erodibility across China. The First, based on a recent national soil survey, we adopted the erosion-productivity impact calculator (EPIC) to calculate soil erodibility values at 4710 soil sampling points. Then, with the caclulated values of points, we used five techniques including polygon linking (PL), ordinary kriging (OK), Cubist, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and random forests (RF) to generate spatial distribution of soil erodibility. The three latter machine learning techniques modeled the quantitative relationships between soil erodibility and a set of environmental covariates. The results showed that machine learning methods exhibited much more spatial details than the PL and OK did. Among the five techniques the RF achieved the highest accuracy with R2 of 0.49 and RMSE of 0.0077 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1 based on 10-fold cross-validation. Spatial uncertainty analysis of the RF predictions showed that high uncerntainty occurred in northwestern China and low uncertainty in the center and southeast. We found that topographical and climatic variables are major environmental factors indirectly controlling spatial variation of soil erodibility while the soil particle composition and SOC contents directly influence the variation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116853
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_da6d8c11eb574c2bad12d15b68cdd8d9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S001670612400082X</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_da6d8c11eb574c2bad12d15b68cdd8d9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S001670612400082X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a396t-6a76b6af9138f708ec1778d9c96dc969fac7f260e9ea73dd810f24748b0a9c573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1KxDAQgIMouK6-gvQFWpO0zQ94UBZ1Fxa86DlMk7Q7pdssaRX27e1a9ephGGaY-Zj5CLllNGOUibs2a3xwPu4h45QXGWNClfkZWTAleSp4qc_Jgk6TqaSCXZKrYWinUlJOF-R-jc0ujX4I3ceIoU8cNjhCl-zhcMC-SUKdDAG7xMfgsMIOx2OCfbLaYQ_X5KKGbvA3P3lJ3p-f3lbrdPv6slk9blPItRhTAVJUAmrNclVLqrxlUiqnrRZuCl2DlTUX1GsPMndOMVrzQhaqoqBtKfMl2cxcF6A1h4h7iEcTAM13I8TGQBzRdt44EE5ZxnxVysLyChzjjpWVUHYCOz2xxMyyMQxD9PUfj1Fz8mla8-vTnHya2ee0-DAv-unTT_TRDBZ9b73D6O04nYL_Ib4A2KyCMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>High-resolution digital mapping of soil erodibility in China</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Sun, Longhui ; Liu, Feng ; Zhu, Xuchao ; Zhang, Ganlin</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Longhui ; Liu, Feng ; Zhu, Xuchao ; Zhang, Ganlin</creatorcontrib><description>•The mean K was 0.035 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1 in China and varies with soil and water conservation zones.•The RF model has high accuracy in predicting K, with R2 = 0.49, RMSE = 0.0077 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1.•The machine learning method represented more spatial variation detail.•Topographical and climatic variables were the primary variables affecting K. Soil erodibility (K) is the intrinsic susceptibility of a soil to water erosion. Currently, its detailed and accurate spatial distribution information especially over large areas is urgently required for national and regional soil erosion assessment and soil conservation decision making. This study combined pedotransfer function with digital soil mapping techniques to develop a high-resolution map of soil erodibility across China. The First, based on a recent national soil survey, we adopted the erosion-productivity impact calculator (EPIC) to calculate soil erodibility values at 4710 soil sampling points. Then, with the caclulated values of points, we used five techniques including polygon linking (PL), ordinary kriging (OK), Cubist, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and random forests (RF) to generate spatial distribution of soil erodibility. The three latter machine learning techniques modeled the quantitative relationships between soil erodibility and a set of environmental covariates. The results showed that machine learning methods exhibited much more spatial details than the PL and OK did. Among the five techniques the RF achieved the highest accuracy with R2 of 0.49 and RMSE of 0.0077 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1 based on 10-fold cross-validation. Spatial uncertainty analysis of the RF predictions showed that high uncerntainty occurred in northwestern China and low uncertainty in the center and southeast. We found that topographical and climatic variables are major environmental factors indirectly controlling spatial variation of soil erodibility while the soil particle composition and SOC contents directly influence the variation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116853</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Environmental covariates ; K factor ; Machine learning ; Predictive soil mapping ; Soil erosion ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Geoderma, 2024-04, Vol.444, p.116853, Article 116853</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a396t-6a76b6af9138f708ec1778d9c96dc969fac7f260e9ea73dd810f24748b0a9c573</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7618-9095 ; 0000-0003-2733-0379</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Longhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xuchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ganlin</creatorcontrib><title>High-resolution digital mapping of soil erodibility in China</title><title>Geoderma</title><description>•The mean K was 0.035 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1 in China and varies with soil and water conservation zones.•The RF model has high accuracy in predicting K, with R2 = 0.49, RMSE = 0.0077 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1.•The machine learning method represented more spatial variation detail.•Topographical and climatic variables were the primary variables affecting K. Soil erodibility (K) is the intrinsic susceptibility of a soil to water erosion. Currently, its detailed and accurate spatial distribution information especially over large areas is urgently required for national and regional soil erosion assessment and soil conservation decision making. This study combined pedotransfer function with digital soil mapping techniques to develop a high-resolution map of soil erodibility across China. The First, based on a recent national soil survey, we adopted the erosion-productivity impact calculator (EPIC) to calculate soil erodibility values at 4710 soil sampling points. Then, with the caclulated values of points, we used five techniques including polygon linking (PL), ordinary kriging (OK), Cubist, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and random forests (RF) to generate spatial distribution of soil erodibility. The three latter machine learning techniques modeled the quantitative relationships between soil erodibility and a set of environmental covariates. The results showed that machine learning methods exhibited much more spatial details than the PL and OK did. Among the five techniques the RF achieved the highest accuracy with R2 of 0.49 and RMSE of 0.0077 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1 based on 10-fold cross-validation. Spatial uncertainty analysis of the RF predictions showed that high uncerntainty occurred in northwestern China and low uncertainty in the center and southeast. We found that topographical and climatic variables are major environmental factors indirectly controlling spatial variation of soil erodibility while the soil particle composition and SOC contents directly influence the variation.</description><subject>Environmental covariates</subject><subject>K factor</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Predictive soil mapping</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0016-7061</issn><issn>1872-6259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1KxDAQgIMouK6-gvQFWpO0zQ94UBZ1Fxa86DlMk7Q7pdssaRX27e1a9ephGGaY-Zj5CLllNGOUibs2a3xwPu4h45QXGWNClfkZWTAleSp4qc_Jgk6TqaSCXZKrYWinUlJOF-R-jc0ujX4I3ceIoU8cNjhCl-zhcMC-SUKdDAG7xMfgsMIOx2OCfbLaYQ_X5KKGbvA3P3lJ3p-f3lbrdPv6slk9blPItRhTAVJUAmrNclVLqrxlUiqnrRZuCl2DlTUX1GsPMndOMVrzQhaqoqBtKfMl2cxcF6A1h4h7iEcTAM13I8TGQBzRdt44EE5ZxnxVysLyChzjjpWVUHYCOz2xxMyyMQxD9PUfj1Fz8mla8-vTnHya2ee0-DAv-unTT_TRDBZ9b73D6O04nYL_Ib4A2KyCMg</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Sun, Longhui</creator><creator>Liu, Feng</creator><creator>Zhu, Xuchao</creator><creator>Zhang, Ganlin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7618-9095</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2733-0379</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>High-resolution digital mapping of soil erodibility in China</title><author>Sun, Longhui ; Liu, Feng ; Zhu, Xuchao ; Zhang, Ganlin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a396t-6a76b6af9138f708ec1778d9c96dc969fac7f260e9ea73dd810f24748b0a9c573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Environmental covariates</topic><topic>K factor</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Predictive soil mapping</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Longhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xuchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ganlin</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Geoderma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Longhui</au><au>Liu, Feng</au><au>Zhu, Xuchao</au><au>Zhang, Ganlin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High-resolution digital mapping of soil erodibility in China</atitle><jtitle>Geoderma</jtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>444</volume><spage>116853</spage><pages>116853-</pages><artnum>116853</artnum><issn>0016-7061</issn><eissn>1872-6259</eissn><abstract>•The mean K was 0.035 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1 in China and varies with soil and water conservation zones.•The RF model has high accuracy in predicting K, with R2 = 0.49, RMSE = 0.0077 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1.•The machine learning method represented more spatial variation detail.•Topographical and climatic variables were the primary variables affecting K. Soil erodibility (K) is the intrinsic susceptibility of a soil to water erosion. Currently, its detailed and accurate spatial distribution information especially over large areas is urgently required for national and regional soil erosion assessment and soil conservation decision making. This study combined pedotransfer function with digital soil mapping techniques to develop a high-resolution map of soil erodibility across China. The First, based on a recent national soil survey, we adopted the erosion-productivity impact calculator (EPIC) to calculate soil erodibility values at 4710 soil sampling points. Then, with the caclulated values of points, we used five techniques including polygon linking (PL), ordinary kriging (OK), Cubist, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and random forests (RF) to generate spatial distribution of soil erodibility. The three latter machine learning techniques modeled the quantitative relationships between soil erodibility and a set of environmental covariates. The results showed that machine learning methods exhibited much more spatial details than the PL and OK did. Among the five techniques the RF achieved the highest accuracy with R2 of 0.49 and RMSE of 0.0077 t ha h ha−1 MJ−1 mm−1 based on 10-fold cross-validation. Spatial uncertainty analysis of the RF predictions showed that high uncerntainty occurred in northwestern China and low uncertainty in the center and southeast. We found that topographical and climatic variables are major environmental factors indirectly controlling spatial variation of soil erodibility while the soil particle composition and SOC contents directly influence the variation.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116853</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7618-9095</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2733-0379</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-7061
ispartof Geoderma, 2024-04, Vol.444, p.116853, Article 116853
issn 0016-7061
1872-6259
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_da6d8c11eb574c2bad12d15b68cdd8d9
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Environmental covariates
K factor
Machine learning
Predictive soil mapping
Soil erosion
Uncertainty
title High-resolution digital mapping of soil erodibility in China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T02%3A48%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High-resolution%20digital%20mapping%20of%20soil%20erodibility%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=Geoderma&rft.au=Sun,%20Longhui&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=444&rft.spage=116853&rft.pages=116853-&rft.artnum=116853&rft.issn=0016-7061&rft.eissn=1872-6259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116853&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES001670612400082X%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a396t-6a76b6af9138f708ec1778d9c96dc969fac7f260e9ea73dd810f24748b0a9c573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true