Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2019-11, Vol.20 (1), p.533-533, Article 533
• Main Authors: Nagata, Kosei, Yamada, Koji, Shinozaki, Tomohiro, Miyazaki, Tsuyoshi, Tokimura, Fumiaki, Oka, Hiroyuki, Tajiri, Yasuhito, Tanaka, Sakae, Okazaki, Hiroshi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage; Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects; Antibiotic Prophylaxis - adverse effects; Antibiotics; Cancer treatment; Chemotherapy; Communicable diseases; Comparative analysis; Comparative literature; Data collection; Drug Administration Schedule; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Health aspects; Humans; Infection; Infection control; Japan; Microbial drug resistance; Mortality; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Orthopedic Procedures - adverse effects; Orthopedic surgery; Pathogenic microorganisms; Pharmacists; Physicians; Prevention; Professional associations; Prophylaxis; Prospective Studies; Public health; Risk Factors; Study Protocol; Surgical Wound Infection - diagnostic imaging; Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Urinary tract infections
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2879-3

Antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) is one of the most important measures for preventing surgical site infections (SSIs); however, controversies remain regarding its adequate duration. Although the World Health Organization and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention do not recommend additional AMP after closure, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists and the Musculoskeletal Infection Society permit the use of postoperative AMP, but recommend discontinuation within 24 h. Similarly, the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japan Society for Surgical Infection also permit AMP within 24-48 h after various orthopaedic procedures. In these guidelines, recommendations regarding AMP duration were weak due to a relative lack of evidence, and currently, there is no high-quality evidence comparing AMP use within 24 h versus 24-48 h regarding orthopaedic procedures. Urinary tract infection (UTI) and respiratory tract infection (RTI) are also important health care-associated infections (HAIs) faced after surgery. Although AMP duration may affect these HAIs, its effects have not been well evaluated. We have organized a multicenter, prospective, cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial to examine the non-inferiority of shorter AMP duration (within 24 h) against longer duration (24-48 h) in preventing postoperative HAIs. Participating facilities will be divided into two groups. In Group 24, AMP will be discontinued within 24 h after surgery. In Group 48, AMP will be discontinued within 24-48 h after surgery. The group allocation will be switched every 2 months until the targeted recruitment (500 participants per group) is met. The primary outcome will be the cumulative incidence of all HAIs (SSI, UTI, RTI, and other infectious diseases), which require antibiotic therapies within 30 days after surgery. In addition to mortality and cardiovascular events, prolonged hospitalization (> 30 days) and the rate of antibiotic resistance rate of SSI pathogens will also be evaluated. Outcomes will be evaluated within 30-180 days after surgery in person by the surgeon, by mail, or by telephone survey. Data will be analyzed by a statistician not engaged in data collection. This study may provide valuable information for developing future recommendations for adequate AMP duration after clean orthopaedic surgery. UMIN000030929, registered January 22, 2018.