Loading…

Double trouble: Unmasking two hook effects on Siemens Atellica® - Total PSA and total hCG assays

The “hook effect” or “prozone phenomenon” occurs when the concentration of a particular analyte saturates the antibodies used in the test, resulting in falsely low or negative results despite the presence of high analyte concentrations. We report two recent cases of hook effect encountered with a wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Practical laboratory medicine 2024-03, Vol.39, p.e00366, Article e00366
Main Authors: Benamour, Meryem, Brouwers, Pauline, Nevraumont, Arnaud, Roy, Tatiana, Bayart, Jean-Louis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-beb6564cc49b67ee8e07a8f1360c03dfb7f59f91600765673b843a3d0f1a4fd73
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page e00366
container_title Practical laboratory medicine
container_volume 39
creator Benamour, Meryem
Brouwers, Pauline
Nevraumont, Arnaud
Roy, Tatiana
Bayart, Jean-Louis
description The “hook effect” or “prozone phenomenon” occurs when the concentration of a particular analyte saturates the antibodies used in the test, resulting in falsely low or negative results despite the presence of high analyte concentrations. We report two recent cases of hook effect encountered with a widely used immunoassay analyzer, the Siemens Atellica® IM1600. The first case involves a patient with advanced metastatic prostate cancer whose total PSA (tPSA) concentration dropped dramatically from his last biological control. The second case concerns a pregnant woman whose total HCG (ThCG) levels were also subject to the hook effect and who was found to have a molar pregnancy. In both cases, a dilution step enabled to overcome this analytical concern and to obtain a correct result. In addition, a comparison of the sensitivity of different immunoassay analyzers to this phenomenon was carried out. To avoid this analytical error, an additional dilution step should automatically be performed when there is a clinical suspicion of elevated levels of tumor or hormone markers. Finally, the most affected manufacturers should adapt their assays, accordingly. •Two cases of “hook effect” were encountered with the Siemens Atellica® analyzer, affecting total PSA and total hCG assays.•At high PSA or HCG levels, this can lead to inaccurately low results, leading to potential clinical consequences.•A dilution of the sample should be performed systematically when there is a suspicion of hook effect.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00366
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_daa5d3198b594923923dd9cf768d46d7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S235255172400012X</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_daa5d3198b594923923dd9cf768d46d7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S235255172400012X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-beb6564cc49b67ee8e07a8f1360c03dfb7f59f91600765673b843a3d0f1a4fd73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UW1q3DAQNaWlCWlOUCi6gLf6sCW5UMqyadNAoIUkv4U-Rrva2NZiebfkUj1ET1at3abJn4JgRpp5b57mFcVbghcEE_5-u9i12nQLimm1AIwZ5y-KU8pqWtY1ES-f5CfFeUpbjDGRQjSYvi5OmMxFwthpoS_i3rSAxmGKH9Bd3-l0H_o1Gn9EtInxHoH3YMeEYo9uAnTQJ7QcoW2D1b9-ohLdxlG36PvNEuneoXG6bVaXSKekH9Kb4pXXbYLzP_GsuPvy-Xb1tbz-dnm1Wl6XtpJiLA0YXvPK2qoxXABIwEJLTxjHFjPnjfB14xvCMRa5UTAjK6aZw57oyjvBzoqrmddFvVW7IXR6eFBRBzU9xGGt9DAG24JyWteOkUaauqkayvJxrrFecOkqPnF9mrl2e9OBs9CPg26fkT6v9GGj1vGgCJacYkwzA5sZ2gBryNNNUAc6Iad832Y5VhlQlHKpshhK5D-UHWJKA_jHkQSro-8q_-zouzr6rmbfM-rdU7WPmL8u54aPcwPk_R8CDCrZAL0FF4bsbF5Q-O-A3z76v_s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Double trouble: Unmasking two hook effects on Siemens Atellica® - Total PSA and total hCG assays</title><source>ScienceDirect Additional Titles</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Benamour, Meryem ; Brouwers, Pauline ; Nevraumont, Arnaud ; Roy, Tatiana ; Bayart, Jean-Louis</creator><creatorcontrib>Benamour, Meryem ; Brouwers, Pauline ; Nevraumont, Arnaud ; Roy, Tatiana ; Bayart, Jean-Louis</creatorcontrib><description>The “hook effect” or “prozone phenomenon” occurs when the concentration of a particular analyte saturates the antibodies used in the test, resulting in falsely low or negative results despite the presence of high analyte concentrations. We report two recent cases of hook effect encountered with a widely used immunoassay analyzer, the Siemens Atellica® IM1600. The first case involves a patient with advanced metastatic prostate cancer whose total PSA (tPSA) concentration dropped dramatically from his last biological control. The second case concerns a pregnant woman whose total HCG (ThCG) levels were also subject to the hook effect and who was found to have a molar pregnancy. In both cases, a dilution step enabled to overcome this analytical concern and to obtain a correct result. In addition, a comparison of the sensitivity of different immunoassay analyzers to this phenomenon was carried out. To avoid this analytical error, an additional dilution step should automatically be performed when there is a clinical suspicion of elevated levels of tumor or hormone markers. Finally, the most affected manufacturers should adapt their assays, accordingly. •Two cases of “hook effect” were encountered with the Siemens Atellica® analyzer, affecting total PSA and total hCG assays.•At high PSA or HCG levels, this can lead to inaccurately low results, leading to potential clinical consequences.•A dilution of the sample should be performed systematically when there is a suspicion of hook effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2352-5517</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-5517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00366</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38352133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Atellica ; Case Report ; Hook effect ; Human health sciences ; Immunoassay ; Interferences ; Laboratory medicine &amp; medical technology ; Médecine de laboratoire &amp; technologie médicale ; Sciences de la santé humaine ; Total HCG ; Total PSA</subject><ispartof>Practical laboratory medicine, 2024-03, Vol.39, p.e00366, Article e00366</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-beb6564cc49b67ee8e07a8f1360c03dfb7f59f91600765673b843a3d0f1a4fd73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10862002/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255172400012X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3547,27922,27923,45778,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38352133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benamour, Meryem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouwers, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevraumont, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayart, Jean-Louis</creatorcontrib><title>Double trouble: Unmasking two hook effects on Siemens Atellica® - Total PSA and total hCG assays</title><title>Practical laboratory medicine</title><addtitle>Pract Lab Med</addtitle><description>The “hook effect” or “prozone phenomenon” occurs when the concentration of a particular analyte saturates the antibodies used in the test, resulting in falsely low or negative results despite the presence of high analyte concentrations. We report two recent cases of hook effect encountered with a widely used immunoassay analyzer, the Siemens Atellica® IM1600. The first case involves a patient with advanced metastatic prostate cancer whose total PSA (tPSA) concentration dropped dramatically from his last biological control. The second case concerns a pregnant woman whose total HCG (ThCG) levels were also subject to the hook effect and who was found to have a molar pregnancy. In both cases, a dilution step enabled to overcome this analytical concern and to obtain a correct result. In addition, a comparison of the sensitivity of different immunoassay analyzers to this phenomenon was carried out. To avoid this analytical error, an additional dilution step should automatically be performed when there is a clinical suspicion of elevated levels of tumor or hormone markers. Finally, the most affected manufacturers should adapt their assays, accordingly. •Two cases of “hook effect” were encountered with the Siemens Atellica® analyzer, affecting total PSA and total hCG assays.•At high PSA or HCG levels, this can lead to inaccurately low results, leading to potential clinical consequences.•A dilution of the sample should be performed systematically when there is a suspicion of hook effect.</description><subject>Atellica</subject><subject>Case Report</subject><subject>Hook effect</subject><subject>Human health sciences</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>Interferences</subject><subject>Laboratory medicine &amp; medical technology</subject><subject>Médecine de laboratoire &amp; technologie médicale</subject><subject>Sciences de la santé humaine</subject><subject>Total HCG</subject><subject>Total PSA</subject><issn>2352-5517</issn><issn>2352-5517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UW1q3DAQNaWlCWlOUCi6gLf6sCW5UMqyadNAoIUkv4U-Rrva2NZiebfkUj1ET1at3abJn4JgRpp5b57mFcVbghcEE_5-u9i12nQLimm1AIwZ5y-KU8pqWtY1ES-f5CfFeUpbjDGRQjSYvi5OmMxFwthpoS_i3rSAxmGKH9Bd3-l0H_o1Gn9EtInxHoH3YMeEYo9uAnTQJ7QcoW2D1b9-ohLdxlG36PvNEuneoXG6bVaXSKekH9Kb4pXXbYLzP_GsuPvy-Xb1tbz-dnm1Wl6XtpJiLA0YXvPK2qoxXABIwEJLTxjHFjPnjfB14xvCMRa5UTAjK6aZw57oyjvBzoqrmddFvVW7IXR6eFBRBzU9xGGt9DAG24JyWteOkUaauqkayvJxrrFecOkqPnF9mrl2e9OBs9CPg26fkT6v9GGj1vGgCJacYkwzA5sZ2gBryNNNUAc6Iad832Y5VhlQlHKpshhK5D-UHWJKA_jHkQSro-8q_-zouzr6rmbfM-rdU7WPmL8u54aPcwPk_R8CDCrZAL0FF4bsbF5Q-O-A3z76v_s</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Benamour, Meryem</creator><creator>Brouwers, Pauline</creator><creator>Nevraumont, Arnaud</creator><creator>Roy, Tatiana</creator><creator>Bayart, Jean-Louis</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>Q33</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Double trouble: Unmasking two hook effects on Siemens Atellica® - Total PSA and total hCG assays</title><author>Benamour, Meryem ; Brouwers, Pauline ; Nevraumont, Arnaud ; Roy, Tatiana ; Bayart, Jean-Louis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-beb6564cc49b67ee8e07a8f1360c03dfb7f59f91600765673b843a3d0f1a4fd73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Atellica</topic><topic>Case Report</topic><topic>Hook effect</topic><topic>Human health sciences</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>Interferences</topic><topic>Laboratory medicine &amp; medical technology</topic><topic>Médecine de laboratoire &amp; technologie médicale</topic><topic>Sciences de la santé humaine</topic><topic>Total HCG</topic><topic>Total PSA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benamour, Meryem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouwers, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevraumont, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayart, Jean-Louis</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Université de Liège - Open Repository and Bibliography (ORBI)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Practical laboratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benamour, Meryem</au><au>Brouwers, Pauline</au><au>Nevraumont, Arnaud</au><au>Roy, Tatiana</au><au>Bayart, Jean-Louis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Double trouble: Unmasking two hook effects on Siemens Atellica® - Total PSA and total hCG assays</atitle><jtitle>Practical laboratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Pract Lab Med</addtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><spage>e00366</spage><pages>e00366-</pages><artnum>e00366</artnum><issn>2352-5517</issn><eissn>2352-5517</eissn><abstract>The “hook effect” or “prozone phenomenon” occurs when the concentration of a particular analyte saturates the antibodies used in the test, resulting in falsely low or negative results despite the presence of high analyte concentrations. We report two recent cases of hook effect encountered with a widely used immunoassay analyzer, the Siemens Atellica® IM1600. The first case involves a patient with advanced metastatic prostate cancer whose total PSA (tPSA) concentration dropped dramatically from his last biological control. The second case concerns a pregnant woman whose total HCG (ThCG) levels were also subject to the hook effect and who was found to have a molar pregnancy. In both cases, a dilution step enabled to overcome this analytical concern and to obtain a correct result. In addition, a comparison of the sensitivity of different immunoassay analyzers to this phenomenon was carried out. To avoid this analytical error, an additional dilution step should automatically be performed when there is a clinical suspicion of elevated levels of tumor or hormone markers. Finally, the most affected manufacturers should adapt their assays, accordingly. •Two cases of “hook effect” were encountered with the Siemens Atellica® analyzer, affecting total PSA and total hCG assays.•At high PSA or HCG levels, this can lead to inaccurately low results, leading to potential clinical consequences.•A dilution of the sample should be performed systematically when there is a suspicion of hook effect.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>38352133</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00366</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2352-5517
ispartof Practical laboratory medicine, 2024-03, Vol.39, p.e00366, Article e00366
issn 2352-5517
2352-5517
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_daa5d3198b594923923dd9cf768d46d7
source ScienceDirect Additional Titles; PubMed Central
subjects Atellica
Case Report
Hook effect
Human health sciences
Immunoassay
Interferences
Laboratory medicine & medical technology
Médecine de laboratoire & technologie médicale
Sciences de la santé humaine
Total HCG
Total PSA
title Double trouble: Unmasking two hook effects on Siemens Atellica® - Total PSA and total hCG assays
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T15%3A03%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Double%20trouble:%20Unmasking%20two%20hook%20effects%20on%20Siemens%20Atellica%C2%AE%20-%20Total%20PSA%20and%20total%20hCG%20assays&rft.jtitle=Practical%20laboratory%20medicine&rft.au=Benamour,%20Meryem&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=39&rft.spage=e00366&rft.pages=e00366-&rft.artnum=e00366&rft.issn=2352-5517&rft.eissn=2352-5517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00366&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES235255172400012X%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-beb6564cc49b67ee8e07a8f1360c03dfb7f59f91600765673b843a3d0f1a4fd73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/38352133&rfr_iscdi=true