Rethinking trophic niches: Speed and body mass colimit prey space of mammalian predators

• Published in: Ecology and evolution 2020-07, Vol.10 (14), p.7094-7105
• Main Authors: Hirt, Myriam R., Tucker, Marlee, Müller, Thomas, Rosenbaum, Benjamin, Brose, Ulrich
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: ambushing; Animal behavior; Body mass; body mass ratio; Carnivores; Diet; Food chains; Food webs; group hunting; Herbivores; Hunting; Mammals; Mass ratios; mega‐carnivores; movement; Niches; Original Research; Predation; Predator-prey interactions; Predators; Prey; prey range; pursuit predation; Success; Terrestrial environments
• ISSN: 2045-7758; 2045-7758
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6411

Realized trophic niches of predators are often characterized along a one‐dimensional range in predator–prey body mass ratios. This prey range is constrained by an “energy limit” and a “subdue limit” toward small and large prey, respectively. Besides these body mass ratios, maximum speed is an additional key component in most predator–prey interactions. Here, we extend the concept of a one‐dimensional prey range to a two‐dimensional prey space by incorporating a hump‐shaped speed‐body mass relation. This new “speed limit” additionally constrains trophic niches of predators toward fast prey. To test this concept of two‐dimensional prey spaces for different hunting strategies (pursuit, group, and ambush predation), we synthesized data on 63 terrestrial mammalian predator–prey interactions, their body masses, and maximum speeds. We found that pursuit predators hunt smaller and slower prey, whereas group hunters focus on larger but mostly slower prey and ambushers are more flexible. Group hunters and ambushers have evolved different strategies to occupy a similar trophic niche that avoids competition with pursuit predators. Moreover, our concept suggests energetic optima of these hunting strategies along a body mass axis and thereby provides mechanistic explanations for why there are no small group hunters (referred to as “micro‐lions”) or mega‐carnivores (referred to as “mega‐cheetahs”). Our results demonstrate that advancing the concept of prey ranges to prey spaces by adding the new dimension of speed will foster a new and mechanistic understanding of predator trophic niches and improve our predictions of predator–prey interactions, food web structure, and ecosystem functions. Trophic niches of predators are often characterized along a one‐dimensional range in predator–prey body mass ratios setting an "energy limit" and a "subdue limit" toward small and large prey, respectively. To this concept, we add a "speed limit" toward fast prey and show that predators of different hunting strategies separate along these two dimensions to avoid competition.