Loading…

A Fuzzy Prescriptive Analytics Approach to Power Generation Capacity Planning

This study examines the long-term energy capacity investment problem of a power generation company (GenCo), considering the drought threat posed by climate change in hydropower resources in Turkey. The mid-term planning decisions such as maintenance and refurbishment scheduling of power plants are a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies (Basel) 2022-05, Vol.15 (9), p.3176
Main Authors: Tektaş, Berna, Turan, Hasan Hüseyin, Kasap, Nihat, Çebi, Ferhan, Delen, Dursun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c20d60f3278f02497ef85e776e05200dfd67e9f2ba3ead351e0512e9f446fa793
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 3176
container_title Energies (Basel)
container_volume 15
creator Tektaş, Berna
Turan, Hasan Hüseyin
Kasap, Nihat
Çebi, Ferhan
Delen, Dursun
description This study examines the long-term energy capacity investment problem of a power generation company (GenCo), considering the drought threat posed by climate change in hydropower resources in Turkey. The mid-term planning decisions such as maintenance and refurbishment scheduling of power plants are also considered in the studied investment planning problem. In the modeled electricity market, it is assumed that GenCos conduct business in uncertain market conditions with both bilateral contracts (BIC) and day-ahead market (DAM) transactions. The problem is modeled as a fuzzy mixed-integer linear programming model with a fuzzy objective and fuzzy constraints to handle the imprecisions regarding both the electricity market (e.g., prices) and environmental factors (e.g., hydroelectric output due to drought). Bellman and Zadeh’s max-min criteria are used to transform the fuzzy capacity investment model into a model with a crisp objective and constraints. The applicability of methodology is illustrated by a case study on the Turkish electric market in which GenCo tries to find the optimal power generation investment portfolio that contains five various generation technologies alternatives, namely, hydropower, wind, conventional and advanced combined-cycle natural gas, and steam (lignite) turbines. The results show that wind turbines with low marginal costs and steam turbines with high energy conversion efficiency are preferable, compared with hydroelectric power plant investments when the fuzziness in hydroelectric output exists (i.e., the expectation of increasing drought conditions as a result of climate change). Furthermore, the results indicate that the gas turbine investments were found to be the least preferable due to high gas prices in all scenarios.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/en15093176
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_daf3ef73a35f43bfb91d90fd8f2bad21</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_daf3ef73a35f43bfb91d90fd8f2bad21</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2663000633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c20d60f3278f02497ef85e776e05200dfd67e9f2ba3ead351e0512e9f446fa793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFKAzEQhoMoWGovPkHAm1BNMrtJc1yKrQXFHvQc0k1SU9bNmmyV9ulNrahzmeFn5p-ZD6FLSm4AJLm1LS2JBCr4CRpQKfmYEgGn_-pzNEppQ3IAUAAYoMcKz7b7_Q4vo0119F3vPyyuWt3sel8nXHVdDLp-xX3Ay_BpI57b1kbd-9Diqe507fs83Oi29e36Ap053SQ7-slD9DK7e57ejx-e5otp9TCugZF-XDNiOHHAxMQRVkhh3aS0QnBLSkaIcYYLKx1babDaQEmzTllWioI7LSQM0eLoa4LeqC76Nx13KmivvoUQ10rHfH9jldEOrBOgoXQFrNxKUiOJM5ODvWE0e10dvfKj71uberUJ25gBJMU4h8yKZ1JDdH3sqmNIKVr3u5USdaCv_ujDF6N1dpY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2663000633</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Fuzzy Prescriptive Analytics Approach to Power Generation Capacity Planning</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Tektaş, Berna ; Turan, Hasan Hüseyin ; Kasap, Nihat ; Çebi, Ferhan ; Delen, Dursun</creator><creatorcontrib>Tektaş, Berna ; Turan, Hasan Hüseyin ; Kasap, Nihat ; Çebi, Ferhan ; Delen, Dursun</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the long-term energy capacity investment problem of a power generation company (GenCo), considering the drought threat posed by climate change in hydropower resources in Turkey. The mid-term planning decisions such as maintenance and refurbishment scheduling of power plants are also considered in the studied investment planning problem. In the modeled electricity market, it is assumed that GenCos conduct business in uncertain market conditions with both bilateral contracts (BIC) and day-ahead market (DAM) transactions. The problem is modeled as a fuzzy mixed-integer linear programming model with a fuzzy objective and fuzzy constraints to handle the imprecisions regarding both the electricity market (e.g., prices) and environmental factors (e.g., hydroelectric output due to drought). Bellman and Zadeh’s max-min criteria are used to transform the fuzzy capacity investment model into a model with a crisp objective and constraints. The applicability of methodology is illustrated by a case study on the Turkish electric market in which GenCo tries to find the optimal power generation investment portfolio that contains five various generation technologies alternatives, namely, hydropower, wind, conventional and advanced combined-cycle natural gas, and steam (lignite) turbines. The results show that wind turbines with low marginal costs and steam turbines with high energy conversion efficiency are preferable, compared with hydroelectric power plant investments when the fuzziness in hydroelectric output exists (i.e., the expectation of increasing drought conditions as a result of climate change). Furthermore, the results indicate that the gas turbine investments were found to be the least preferable due to high gas prices in all scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en15093176</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Climate change ; Coal ; Combined cycle ; Constraint modelling ; Costs ; Decision making ; Drought ; Dynamic programming ; Electric power ; Electric power generation ; Electricity ; Electricity distribution ; Electricity pricing ; Energy conversion ; Energy conversion efficiency ; Energy resources ; Environmental factors ; Expansion ; Fuzzy logic ; fuzzy mathematical programming ; Gas turbines ; generation investment planning ; Hydroelectric plants ; Hydroelectric power ; Hydroelectric resources ; Integer programming ; Investments ; Lignite ; Linear programming ; maintenance and refurbishment scheduling ; Natural gas ; Optimization ; Planning ; Power plants ; Renewable resources ; Steam turbines ; uncertainty ; Wind power</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2022-05, Vol.15 (9), p.3176</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c20d60f3278f02497ef85e776e05200dfd67e9f2ba3ead351e0512e9f446fa793</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5435-6633 ; 0000-0001-8857-5148 ; 0000-0003-3100-3020</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2663000633/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2663000633?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,38516,43895,44590,74412,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tektaş, Berna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turan, Hasan Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasap, Nihat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çebi, Ferhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delen, Dursun</creatorcontrib><title>A Fuzzy Prescriptive Analytics Approach to Power Generation Capacity Planning</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>This study examines the long-term energy capacity investment problem of a power generation company (GenCo), considering the drought threat posed by climate change in hydropower resources in Turkey. The mid-term planning decisions such as maintenance and refurbishment scheduling of power plants are also considered in the studied investment planning problem. In the modeled electricity market, it is assumed that GenCos conduct business in uncertain market conditions with both bilateral contracts (BIC) and day-ahead market (DAM) transactions. The problem is modeled as a fuzzy mixed-integer linear programming model with a fuzzy objective and fuzzy constraints to handle the imprecisions regarding both the electricity market (e.g., prices) and environmental factors (e.g., hydroelectric output due to drought). Bellman and Zadeh’s max-min criteria are used to transform the fuzzy capacity investment model into a model with a crisp objective and constraints. The applicability of methodology is illustrated by a case study on the Turkish electric market in which GenCo tries to find the optimal power generation investment portfolio that contains five various generation technologies alternatives, namely, hydropower, wind, conventional and advanced combined-cycle natural gas, and steam (lignite) turbines. The results show that wind turbines with low marginal costs and steam turbines with high energy conversion efficiency are preferable, compared with hydroelectric power plant investments when the fuzziness in hydroelectric output exists (i.e., the expectation of increasing drought conditions as a result of climate change). Furthermore, the results indicate that the gas turbine investments were found to be the least preferable due to high gas prices in all scenarios.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Combined cycle</subject><subject>Constraint modelling</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Dynamic programming</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity distribution</subject><subject>Electricity pricing</subject><subject>Energy conversion</subject><subject>Energy conversion efficiency</subject><subject>Energy resources</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Expansion</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>fuzzy mathematical programming</subject><subject>Gas turbines</subject><subject>generation investment planning</subject><subject>Hydroelectric plants</subject><subject>Hydroelectric power</subject><subject>Hydroelectric resources</subject><subject>Integer programming</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Lignite</subject><subject>Linear programming</subject><subject>maintenance and refurbishment scheduling</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Steam turbines</subject><subject>uncertainty</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFKAzEQhoMoWGovPkHAm1BNMrtJc1yKrQXFHvQc0k1SU9bNmmyV9ulNrahzmeFn5p-ZD6FLSm4AJLm1LS2JBCr4CRpQKfmYEgGn_-pzNEppQ3IAUAAYoMcKz7b7_Q4vo0119F3vPyyuWt3sel8nXHVdDLp-xX3Ay_BpI57b1kbd-9Diqe507fs83Oi29e36Ap053SQ7-slD9DK7e57ejx-e5otp9TCugZF-XDNiOHHAxMQRVkhh3aS0QnBLSkaIcYYLKx1babDaQEmzTllWioI7LSQM0eLoa4LeqC76Nx13KmivvoUQ10rHfH9jldEOrBOgoXQFrNxKUiOJM5ODvWE0e10dvfKj71uberUJ25gBJMU4h8yKZ1JDdH3sqmNIKVr3u5USdaCv_ujDF6N1dpY</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Tektaş, Berna</creator><creator>Turan, Hasan Hüseyin</creator><creator>Kasap, Nihat</creator><creator>Çebi, Ferhan</creator><creator>Delen, Dursun</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5435-6633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8857-5148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3100-3020</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>A Fuzzy Prescriptive Analytics Approach to Power Generation Capacity Planning</title><author>Tektaş, Berna ; Turan, Hasan Hüseyin ; Kasap, Nihat ; Çebi, Ferhan ; Delen, Dursun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c20d60f3278f02497ef85e776e05200dfd67e9f2ba3ead351e0512e9f446fa793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Combined cycle</topic><topic>Constraint modelling</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Dynamic programming</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity distribution</topic><topic>Electricity pricing</topic><topic>Energy conversion</topic><topic>Energy conversion efficiency</topic><topic>Energy resources</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Expansion</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>fuzzy mathematical programming</topic><topic>Gas turbines</topic><topic>generation investment planning</topic><topic>Hydroelectric plants</topic><topic>Hydroelectric power</topic><topic>Hydroelectric resources</topic><topic>Integer programming</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Lignite</topic><topic>Linear programming</topic><topic>maintenance and refurbishment scheduling</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Steam turbines</topic><topic>uncertainty</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tektaş, Berna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turan, Hasan Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasap, Nihat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çebi, Ferhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delen, Dursun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tektaş, Berna</au><au>Turan, Hasan Hüseyin</au><au>Kasap, Nihat</au><au>Çebi, Ferhan</au><au>Delen, Dursun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Fuzzy Prescriptive Analytics Approach to Power Generation Capacity Planning</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3176</spage><pages>3176-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>This study examines the long-term energy capacity investment problem of a power generation company (GenCo), considering the drought threat posed by climate change in hydropower resources in Turkey. The mid-term planning decisions such as maintenance and refurbishment scheduling of power plants are also considered in the studied investment planning problem. In the modeled electricity market, it is assumed that GenCos conduct business in uncertain market conditions with both bilateral contracts (BIC) and day-ahead market (DAM) transactions. The problem is modeled as a fuzzy mixed-integer linear programming model with a fuzzy objective and fuzzy constraints to handle the imprecisions regarding both the electricity market (e.g., prices) and environmental factors (e.g., hydroelectric output due to drought). Bellman and Zadeh’s max-min criteria are used to transform the fuzzy capacity investment model into a model with a crisp objective and constraints. The applicability of methodology is illustrated by a case study on the Turkish electric market in which GenCo tries to find the optimal power generation investment portfolio that contains five various generation technologies alternatives, namely, hydropower, wind, conventional and advanced combined-cycle natural gas, and steam (lignite) turbines. The results show that wind turbines with low marginal costs and steam turbines with high energy conversion efficiency are preferable, compared with hydroelectric power plant investments when the fuzziness in hydroelectric output exists (i.e., the expectation of increasing drought conditions as a result of climate change). Furthermore, the results indicate that the gas turbine investments were found to be the least preferable due to high gas prices in all scenarios.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en15093176</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5435-6633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8857-5148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3100-3020</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1996-1073
ispartof Energies (Basel), 2022-05, Vol.15 (9), p.3176
issn 1996-1073
1996-1073
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_daf3ef73a35f43bfb91d90fd8f2bad21
source Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Alternative energy sources
Climate change
Coal
Combined cycle
Constraint modelling
Costs
Decision making
Drought
Dynamic programming
Electric power
Electric power generation
Electricity
Electricity distribution
Electricity pricing
Energy conversion
Energy conversion efficiency
Energy resources
Environmental factors
Expansion
Fuzzy logic
fuzzy mathematical programming
Gas turbines
generation investment planning
Hydroelectric plants
Hydroelectric power
Hydroelectric resources
Integer programming
Investments
Lignite
Linear programming
maintenance and refurbishment scheduling
Natural gas
Optimization
Planning
Power plants
Renewable resources
Steam turbines
uncertainty
Wind power
title A Fuzzy Prescriptive Analytics Approach to Power Generation Capacity Planning
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A24%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Fuzzy%20Prescriptive%20Analytics%20Approach%20to%20Power%20Generation%20Capacity%20Planning&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=Tekta%C5%9F,%20Berna&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3176&rft.pages=3176-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en15093176&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2663000633%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c20d60f3278f02497ef85e776e05200dfd67e9f2ba3ead351e0512e9f446fa793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2663000633&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true