How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions

This comment argues that four critical questions needs to be resolved before MCDA tools can improve priority setting in health: how to merge the quantitative and deliberative elements of MCDA; how to select criteria; how to weigh them, and whom to bring to the table.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cost effectiveness and resource allocation 2018-11, Vol.16 (Suppl 1), p.44-44, Article 44
Main Author: Norheim, Ole F
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cost analysis
Cost-effectiveness
Decision making
Equity
Ethics
Global health
Multi-criteria decision analysis
Priority setting
Public health
Values
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This comment argues that four critical questions needs to be resolved before MCDA tools can improve priority setting in health: how to merge the quantitative and deliberative elements of MCDA; how to select criteria; how to weigh them, and whom to bring to the table.
ISSN:1478-7547
1478-7547
DOI:10.1186/s12962-018-0119-6