Loading…
Dosimetric evaluation of Acuros XB Advanced Dose Calculation algorithm in heterogeneous media
A study was realised to evaluate and determine relative figures of merit of a new algorithm for photon dose calculation when applied to inhomogeneous media. The new Acuros XB algorithm implemented in the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system was compared against a Monte Carlo method (VMC++), and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Radiation oncology (London, England) England), 2011-07, Vol.6 (1), p.82-82, Article 82 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b646t-974dea4b56cc9cfb2c7b10839cf1081c08cfa56327c3f1c303782430e6e737903 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b646t-974dea4b56cc9cfb2c7b10839cf1081c08cfa56327c3f1c303782430e6e737903 |
container_end_page | 82 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 82 |
container_title | Radiation oncology (London, England) |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Fogliata, Antonella Nicolini, Giorgia Clivio, Alessandro Vanetti, Eugenio Cozzi, Luca |
description | A study was realised to evaluate and determine relative figures of merit of a new algorithm for photon dose calculation when applied to inhomogeneous media.
The new Acuros XB algorithm implemented in the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system was compared against a Monte Carlo method (VMC++), and the Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA). The study was carried out in virtual phantoms characterized by simple geometrical structures. An insert of different material and density was included in a phantom built of skeletal-muscle and HU = 0 (setting "A"): Normal Lung (lung, 0.198 g/cm3); Light Lung (lung, 0.035 g/cm3); Bone (bone, 1.798 g/cm3); another phantom (setting "B") was built of adipose material and including thin layers of bone (1.85 g/cm3), adipose (0.92 g/cm3), cartilage (1.4745 g/cm3), air (0.0012 g/cm3). Investigations were performed for 6 and 15 MV photon beams, and for a large (13 × 13 cm2) and a small (2.8 × 13 cm2) field.
Results are provided in terms of depth dose curves, transverse profiles and Gamma analysis (3 mm/3% and 2 mm/2% distance to agreement/dose difference criteria) in planes parallel to the beam central axis; Monte Carlo simulations were assumed as reference. Acuros XB gave an average gamma agreement, with a 3 mm/3% criteria, of 100%, 86% and 100% for Normal Lung, Light Lung and Bone settings, respectively, and dose to medium calculations. The same figures were 86%, 11% and 100% for AAA, where only dose rescaled to water calculations are possible.
In conclusion, Acuros XB algorithm provides a valid and accurate alternative to Monte Carlo calculations for heterogeneity management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1748-717X-6-82 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dbfaf1d7b3064e6bb4a9e19fbede20bb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A266374903</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_dbfaf1d7b3064e6bb4a9e19fbede20bb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A266374903</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b646t-974dea4b56cc9cfb2c7b10839cf1081c08cfa56327c3f1c303782430e6e737903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5YgsceCUYsde27kgbZevSpW4gNQLsuzJOOsqiYuTrMS_x9uUVVcU-TCjmdeP5qsoXjN6zpiW75kSulRMXZey1NWT4vQQePrAPylejOMNpWLFaf28OKmYUowzdVr8_BjH0OOUAhDc2W62U4gDiZ6sYU5xJNcXZN3s7ADYkKxFsrEdzN0is10bU5i2PQkD2eKEKbY4YJxH0mMT7MvimbfdiK_u7Vnx4_On75uv5dW3L5eb9VXppJBTWSvRoBVuJQFq8K4C5RjVPPvZMKAavF1JXingngGnXOlKcIoSFVc15WfF5cJtor0xtyn0Nv020QZzF4ipNTZNATo0jfPWs0Y5TqVA6ZywNbLaO2ywos5l1oeFdTu73ATgMCXbHUGPM0PYmjbuDGdSC8YyYL0AXIj_ARxnIPZmvyqzX5WRRleZ8e6-iBR_zThOpg8jYNfZu-karTXnUlCVlW8XZWtzd2HwMTNhrzbrSkquRJ5PVp0_osqvwT5AHNCHHH_sA-QjGBP6Q_2Mmv3l_Vvxm4djO8j_nhr_A71y1aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>888336407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dosimetric evaluation of Acuros XB Advanced Dose Calculation algorithm in heterogeneous media</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Fogliata, Antonella ; Nicolini, Giorgia ; Clivio, Alessandro ; Vanetti, Eugenio ; Cozzi, Luca</creator><creatorcontrib>Fogliata, Antonella ; Nicolini, Giorgia ; Clivio, Alessandro ; Vanetti, Eugenio ; Cozzi, Luca</creatorcontrib><description>A study was realised to evaluate and determine relative figures of merit of a new algorithm for photon dose calculation when applied to inhomogeneous media.
The new Acuros XB algorithm implemented in the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system was compared against a Monte Carlo method (VMC++), and the Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA). The study was carried out in virtual phantoms characterized by simple geometrical structures. An insert of different material and density was included in a phantom built of skeletal-muscle and HU = 0 (setting "A"): Normal Lung (lung, 0.198 g/cm3); Light Lung (lung, 0.035 g/cm3); Bone (bone, 1.798 g/cm3); another phantom (setting "B") was built of adipose material and including thin layers of bone (1.85 g/cm3), adipose (0.92 g/cm3), cartilage (1.4745 g/cm3), air (0.0012 g/cm3). Investigations were performed for 6 and 15 MV photon beams, and for a large (13 × 13 cm2) and a small (2.8 × 13 cm2) field.
Results are provided in terms of depth dose curves, transverse profiles and Gamma analysis (3 mm/3% and 2 mm/2% distance to agreement/dose difference criteria) in planes parallel to the beam central axis; Monte Carlo simulations were assumed as reference. Acuros XB gave an average gamma agreement, with a 3 mm/3% criteria, of 100%, 86% and 100% for Normal Lung, Light Lung and Bone settings, respectively, and dose to medium calculations. The same figures were 86%, 11% and 100% for AAA, where only dose rescaled to water calculations are possible.
In conclusion, Acuros XB algorithm provides a valid and accurate alternative to Monte Carlo calculations for heterogeneity management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-717X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-717X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-82</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21771317</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>AAA ; Acuros ; Algorithms ; Anisotropy ; dose calculation algorithm ; Gamma Rays ; Health aspects ; Humans ; inhomogeneity ; Models, Statistical ; Monte Carlo Method ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Photons ; Photons - therapeutic use ; Programming Languages ; Radiometry - methods ; Radiotherapy - methods ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; VMC++ ; Water - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Radiation oncology (London, England), 2011-07, Vol.6 (1), p.82-82, Article 82</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright ©2011 Fogliata et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011 Fogliata et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b646t-974dea4b56cc9cfb2c7b10839cf1081c08cfa56327c3f1c303782430e6e737903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b646t-974dea4b56cc9cfb2c7b10839cf1081c08cfa56327c3f1c303782430e6e737903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168411/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168411/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,36990,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21771317$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fogliata, Antonella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolini, Giorgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clivio, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanetti, Eugenio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cozzi, Luca</creatorcontrib><title>Dosimetric evaluation of Acuros XB Advanced Dose Calculation algorithm in heterogeneous media</title><title>Radiation oncology (London, England)</title><addtitle>Radiat Oncol</addtitle><description>A study was realised to evaluate and determine relative figures of merit of a new algorithm for photon dose calculation when applied to inhomogeneous media.
The new Acuros XB algorithm implemented in the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system was compared against a Monte Carlo method (VMC++), and the Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA). The study was carried out in virtual phantoms characterized by simple geometrical structures. An insert of different material and density was included in a phantom built of skeletal-muscle and HU = 0 (setting "A"): Normal Lung (lung, 0.198 g/cm3); Light Lung (lung, 0.035 g/cm3); Bone (bone, 1.798 g/cm3); another phantom (setting "B") was built of adipose material and including thin layers of bone (1.85 g/cm3), adipose (0.92 g/cm3), cartilage (1.4745 g/cm3), air (0.0012 g/cm3). Investigations were performed for 6 and 15 MV photon beams, and for a large (13 × 13 cm2) and a small (2.8 × 13 cm2) field.
Results are provided in terms of depth dose curves, transverse profiles and Gamma analysis (3 mm/3% and 2 mm/2% distance to agreement/dose difference criteria) in planes parallel to the beam central axis; Monte Carlo simulations were assumed as reference. Acuros XB gave an average gamma agreement, with a 3 mm/3% criteria, of 100%, 86% and 100% for Normal Lung, Light Lung and Bone settings, respectively, and dose to medium calculations. The same figures were 86%, 11% and 100% for AAA, where only dose rescaled to water calculations are possible.
In conclusion, Acuros XB algorithm provides a valid and accurate alternative to Monte Carlo calculations for heterogeneity management.</description><subject>AAA</subject><subject>Acuros</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Anisotropy</subject><subject>dose calculation algorithm</subject><subject>Gamma Rays</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>inhomogeneity</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Photons - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Programming Languages</subject><subject>Radiometry - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>VMC++</subject><subject>Water - chemistry</subject><issn>1748-717X</issn><issn>1748-717X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5YgsceCUYsde27kgbZevSpW4gNQLsuzJOOsqiYuTrMS_x9uUVVcU-TCjmdeP5qsoXjN6zpiW75kSulRMXZey1NWT4vQQePrAPylejOMNpWLFaf28OKmYUowzdVr8_BjH0OOUAhDc2W62U4gDiZ6sYU5xJNcXZN3s7ADYkKxFsrEdzN0is10bU5i2PQkD2eKEKbY4YJxH0mMT7MvimbfdiK_u7Vnx4_On75uv5dW3L5eb9VXppJBTWSvRoBVuJQFq8K4C5RjVPPvZMKAavF1JXingngGnXOlKcIoSFVc15WfF5cJtor0xtyn0Nv020QZzF4ipNTZNATo0jfPWs0Y5TqVA6ZywNbLaO2ywos5l1oeFdTu73ATgMCXbHUGPM0PYmjbuDGdSC8YyYL0AXIj_ARxnIPZmvyqzX5WRRleZ8e6-iBR_zThOpg8jYNfZu-karTXnUlCVlW8XZWtzd2HwMTNhrzbrSkquRJ5PVp0_osqvwT5AHNCHHH_sA-QjGBP6Q_2Mmv3l_Vvxm4djO8j_nhr_A71y1aw</recordid><startdate>20110719</startdate><enddate>20110719</enddate><creator>Fogliata, Antonella</creator><creator>Nicolini, Giorgia</creator><creator>Clivio, Alessandro</creator><creator>Vanetti, Eugenio</creator><creator>Cozzi, Luca</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110719</creationdate><title>Dosimetric evaluation of Acuros XB Advanced Dose Calculation algorithm in heterogeneous media</title><author>Fogliata, Antonella ; Nicolini, Giorgia ; Clivio, Alessandro ; Vanetti, Eugenio ; Cozzi, Luca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b646t-974dea4b56cc9cfb2c7b10839cf1081c08cfa56327c3f1c303782430e6e737903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>AAA</topic><topic>Acuros</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Anisotropy</topic><topic>dose calculation algorithm</topic><topic>Gamma Rays</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>inhomogeneity</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Photons - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Programming Languages</topic><topic>Radiometry - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>VMC++</topic><topic>Water - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fogliata, Antonella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolini, Giorgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clivio, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanetti, Eugenio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cozzi, Luca</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Radiation oncology (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fogliata, Antonella</au><au>Nicolini, Giorgia</au><au>Clivio, Alessandro</au><au>Vanetti, Eugenio</au><au>Cozzi, Luca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dosimetric evaluation of Acuros XB Advanced Dose Calculation algorithm in heterogeneous media</atitle><jtitle>Radiation oncology (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Oncol</addtitle><date>2011-07-19</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>82-82</pages><artnum>82</artnum><issn>1748-717X</issn><eissn>1748-717X</eissn><abstract>A study was realised to evaluate and determine relative figures of merit of a new algorithm for photon dose calculation when applied to inhomogeneous media.
The new Acuros XB algorithm implemented in the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system was compared against a Monte Carlo method (VMC++), and the Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA). The study was carried out in virtual phantoms characterized by simple geometrical structures. An insert of different material and density was included in a phantom built of skeletal-muscle and HU = 0 (setting "A"): Normal Lung (lung, 0.198 g/cm3); Light Lung (lung, 0.035 g/cm3); Bone (bone, 1.798 g/cm3); another phantom (setting "B") was built of adipose material and including thin layers of bone (1.85 g/cm3), adipose (0.92 g/cm3), cartilage (1.4745 g/cm3), air (0.0012 g/cm3). Investigations were performed for 6 and 15 MV photon beams, and for a large (13 × 13 cm2) and a small (2.8 × 13 cm2) field.
Results are provided in terms of depth dose curves, transverse profiles and Gamma analysis (3 mm/3% and 2 mm/2% distance to agreement/dose difference criteria) in planes parallel to the beam central axis; Monte Carlo simulations were assumed as reference. Acuros XB gave an average gamma agreement, with a 3 mm/3% criteria, of 100%, 86% and 100% for Normal Lung, Light Lung and Bone settings, respectively, and dose to medium calculations. The same figures were 86%, 11% and 100% for AAA, where only dose rescaled to water calculations are possible.
In conclusion, Acuros XB algorithm provides a valid and accurate alternative to Monte Carlo calculations for heterogeneity management.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>21771317</pmid><doi>10.1186/1748-717X-6-82</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-717X |
ispartof | Radiation oncology (London, England), 2011-07, Vol.6 (1), p.82-82, Article 82 |
issn | 1748-717X 1748-717X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dbfaf1d7b3064e6bb4a9e19fbede20bb |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | AAA Acuros Algorithms Anisotropy dose calculation algorithm Gamma Rays Health aspects Humans inhomogeneity Models, Statistical Monte Carlo Method Phantoms, Imaging Photons Photons - therapeutic use Programming Languages Radiometry - methods Radiotherapy - methods Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods Reproducibility of Results VMC++ Water - chemistry |
title | Dosimetric evaluation of Acuros XB Advanced Dose Calculation algorithm in heterogeneous media |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A50%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dosimetric%20evaluation%20of%20Acuros%20XB%20Advanced%20Dose%20Calculation%20algorithm%20in%20heterogeneous%20media&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20oncology%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Fogliata,%20Antonella&rft.date=2011-07-19&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=82-82&rft.artnum=82&rft.issn=1748-717X&rft.eissn=1748-717X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1748-717X-6-82&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA266374903%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b646t-974dea4b56cc9cfb2c7b10839cf1081c08cfa56327c3f1c303782430e6e737903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=888336407&rft_id=info:pmid/21771317&rft_galeid=A266374903&rfr_iscdi=true |