Loading…

Determinants of consumer acceptance of meat analogues: Exploring measures of risk preferences in predicting consumption

There are perceptions that meat alternatives carry risks similar to other novel foods. These perceptions are barriers to its acceptance by meat consumers. Previous studies reported an association between risk attitudes and consumer food choices on the one hand and consumption decisions on the other....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of agriculture and food research 2023-03, Vol.11, p.100509, Article 100509
Main Authors: Begho, Toritseju, Zhu, Ying
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-3fd9ec41ef9fbd76e4104fef061086cca0d8ff0a5fa7fbceb0feb1d437764b4e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-3fd9ec41ef9fbd76e4104fef061086cca0d8ff0a5fa7fbceb0feb1d437764b4e3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 100509
container_title Journal of agriculture and food research
container_volume 11
creator Begho, Toritseju
Zhu, Ying
description There are perceptions that meat alternatives carry risks similar to other novel foods. These perceptions are barriers to its acceptance by meat consumers. Previous studies reported an association between risk attitudes and consumer food choices on the one hand and consumption decisions on the other. Thus, this paper extends the investigation to whether consumers' risk preferences and perceptions influence the intent to try and the intent to accept meat analogues. Risk preferences were elicited by a self-reported and a lottery-style hybrid experiment framed as food and non-food context. We surveyed Chinese meat consumers and analysed the data using probit regression. We find that different factors explain the intent to try meat analogues for the first time and the intent to repeat consuming meat analogues. Specifically, the results show that the main determinants of the intent to try meat analogues were consumers' risk attitudes toward foods in general, new foods specifically and food nutrient composition. As expected, respondents who reported being one of the first to try new foods are more likely to have the intent to try meat analogues for the first time. In addition, we find that the greater the risk perceived from eating new foods, the less likely the intent to try meat analogues. Also, having the intent to try meat analogues decreases with nutritional uncertainties. On the other hand, the intent to repeat consuming meat analogues was influenced by attitude to food safety. The less respondents are bothered about food safety, the greater the chances they would have the intent to repeat consuming meat analogues. We conclude that different barriers need to be overcome for people to try meat analogues from those required to sustain consumption. [Display omitted] •The paper investigated the effect of risk preferences on consumption intentions of meat analogues.•Risk attitudes were determined from self-reported and a lottery-style hybrid experiment.•The intent to try meat analogue and to repeat consuming meat analogues was influenced by risk attitudes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100509
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dc5b8bbadb5f4311b931490e2e7897f6</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2666154323000169</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_dc5b8bbadb5f4311b931490e2e7897f6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S2666154323000169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-3fd9ec41ef9fbd76e4104fef061086cca0d8ff0a5fa7fbceb0feb1d437764b4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRSMEEhX0B1jlB1LGieM0iA0qBSpVYgNry49x5dDEke3y-HuSBiFWrGxfzz2amZskVwQWBAi7bhaNMH6RQ14MApRQnySznDGWkZIWp3_u58k8hAYA8pKQsiaz5OMeI_rWdqKLIXUmVa4LhxZ9KpTCPopO4Si3KGIqOrF3uwOGm3T92e-dt91u_AkHj0ezt-Et7T0a9DgYQ2q78amtimPpxO6jdd1lcmbEPuD857xIXh_WL6unbPv8uFndbTNVUIhZYXSNihI0tZG6YkgJUIMGGIElU0qAXhoDojSiMlKhBIOSaFpUFaOSYnGRbCaudqLhvbet8F_cCcuPgvM7Lny0ao9cq1IupRRaloYWhMi6ILQGzLFa1pVhAyufWMq7EIYpf3kE-JgEb_iYBB-T4FMSg-l2MuEw5btFz4Oy43K09aji0Ib9z_4NvmCV0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants of consumer acceptance of meat analogues: Exploring measures of risk preferences in predicting consumption</title><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>Begho, Toritseju ; Zhu, Ying</creator><creatorcontrib>Begho, Toritseju ; Zhu, Ying</creatorcontrib><description>There are perceptions that meat alternatives carry risks similar to other novel foods. These perceptions are barriers to its acceptance by meat consumers. Previous studies reported an association between risk attitudes and consumer food choices on the one hand and consumption decisions on the other. Thus, this paper extends the investigation to whether consumers' risk preferences and perceptions influence the intent to try and the intent to accept meat analogues. Risk preferences were elicited by a self-reported and a lottery-style hybrid experiment framed as food and non-food context. We surveyed Chinese meat consumers and analysed the data using probit regression. We find that different factors explain the intent to try meat analogues for the first time and the intent to repeat consuming meat analogues. Specifically, the results show that the main determinants of the intent to try meat analogues were consumers' risk attitudes toward foods in general, new foods specifically and food nutrient composition. As expected, respondents who reported being one of the first to try new foods are more likely to have the intent to try meat analogues for the first time. In addition, we find that the greater the risk perceived from eating new foods, the less likely the intent to try meat analogues. Also, having the intent to try meat analogues decreases with nutritional uncertainties. On the other hand, the intent to repeat consuming meat analogues was influenced by attitude to food safety. The less respondents are bothered about food safety, the greater the chances they would have the intent to repeat consuming meat analogues. We conclude that different barriers need to be overcome for people to try meat analogues from those required to sustain consumption. [Display omitted] •The paper investigated the effect of risk preferences on consumption intentions of meat analogues.•Risk attitudes were determined from self-reported and a lottery-style hybrid experiment.•The intent to try meat analogue and to repeat consuming meat analogues was influenced by risk attitudes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2666-1543</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2666-1543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100509</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Behaviour ; Consumer acceptance ; Novel food ; Plant-based meat ; Risk</subject><ispartof>Journal of agriculture and food research, 2023-03, Vol.11, p.100509, Article 100509</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-3fd9ec41ef9fbd76e4104fef061086cca0d8ff0a5fa7fbceb0feb1d437764b4e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-3fd9ec41ef9fbd76e4104fef061086cca0d8ff0a5fa7fbceb0feb1d437764b4e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2137-2826</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154323000169$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Begho, Toritseju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Ying</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants of consumer acceptance of meat analogues: Exploring measures of risk preferences in predicting consumption</title><title>Journal of agriculture and food research</title><description>There are perceptions that meat alternatives carry risks similar to other novel foods. These perceptions are barriers to its acceptance by meat consumers. Previous studies reported an association between risk attitudes and consumer food choices on the one hand and consumption decisions on the other. Thus, this paper extends the investigation to whether consumers' risk preferences and perceptions influence the intent to try and the intent to accept meat analogues. Risk preferences were elicited by a self-reported and a lottery-style hybrid experiment framed as food and non-food context. We surveyed Chinese meat consumers and analysed the data using probit regression. We find that different factors explain the intent to try meat analogues for the first time and the intent to repeat consuming meat analogues. Specifically, the results show that the main determinants of the intent to try meat analogues were consumers' risk attitudes toward foods in general, new foods specifically and food nutrient composition. As expected, respondents who reported being one of the first to try new foods are more likely to have the intent to try meat analogues for the first time. In addition, we find that the greater the risk perceived from eating new foods, the less likely the intent to try meat analogues. Also, having the intent to try meat analogues decreases with nutritional uncertainties. On the other hand, the intent to repeat consuming meat analogues was influenced by attitude to food safety. The less respondents are bothered about food safety, the greater the chances they would have the intent to repeat consuming meat analogues. We conclude that different barriers need to be overcome for people to try meat analogues from those required to sustain consumption. [Display omitted] •The paper investigated the effect of risk preferences on consumption intentions of meat analogues.•Risk attitudes were determined from self-reported and a lottery-style hybrid experiment.•The intent to try meat analogue and to repeat consuming meat analogues was influenced by risk attitudes.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behaviour</subject><subject>Consumer acceptance</subject><subject>Novel food</subject><subject>Plant-based meat</subject><subject>Risk</subject><issn>2666-1543</issn><issn>2666-1543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRSMEEhX0B1jlB1LGieM0iA0qBSpVYgNry49x5dDEke3y-HuSBiFWrGxfzz2amZskVwQWBAi7bhaNMH6RQ14MApRQnySznDGWkZIWp3_u58k8hAYA8pKQsiaz5OMeI_rWdqKLIXUmVa4LhxZ9KpTCPopO4Si3KGIqOrF3uwOGm3T92e-dt91u_AkHj0ezt-Et7T0a9DgYQ2q78amtimPpxO6jdd1lcmbEPuD857xIXh_WL6unbPv8uFndbTNVUIhZYXSNihI0tZG6YkgJUIMGGIElU0qAXhoDojSiMlKhBIOSaFpUFaOSYnGRbCaudqLhvbet8F_cCcuPgvM7Lny0ao9cq1IupRRaloYWhMi6ILQGzLFa1pVhAyufWMq7EIYpf3kE-JgEb_iYBB-T4FMSg-l2MuEw5btFz4Oy43K09aji0Ib9z_4NvmCV0g</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Begho, Toritseju</creator><creator>Zhu, Ying</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2137-2826</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Determinants of consumer acceptance of meat analogues: Exploring measures of risk preferences in predicting consumption</title><author>Begho, Toritseju ; Zhu, Ying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-3fd9ec41ef9fbd76e4104fef061086cca0d8ff0a5fa7fbceb0feb1d437764b4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behaviour</topic><topic>Consumer acceptance</topic><topic>Novel food</topic><topic>Plant-based meat</topic><topic>Risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Begho, Toritseju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Ying</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of agriculture and food research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Begho, Toritseju</au><au>Zhu, Ying</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants of consumer acceptance of meat analogues: Exploring measures of risk preferences in predicting consumption</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agriculture and food research</jtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>100509</spage><pages>100509-</pages><artnum>100509</artnum><issn>2666-1543</issn><eissn>2666-1543</eissn><abstract>There are perceptions that meat alternatives carry risks similar to other novel foods. These perceptions are barriers to its acceptance by meat consumers. Previous studies reported an association between risk attitudes and consumer food choices on the one hand and consumption decisions on the other. Thus, this paper extends the investigation to whether consumers' risk preferences and perceptions influence the intent to try and the intent to accept meat analogues. Risk preferences were elicited by a self-reported and a lottery-style hybrid experiment framed as food and non-food context. We surveyed Chinese meat consumers and analysed the data using probit regression. We find that different factors explain the intent to try meat analogues for the first time and the intent to repeat consuming meat analogues. Specifically, the results show that the main determinants of the intent to try meat analogues were consumers' risk attitudes toward foods in general, new foods specifically and food nutrient composition. As expected, respondents who reported being one of the first to try new foods are more likely to have the intent to try meat analogues for the first time. In addition, we find that the greater the risk perceived from eating new foods, the less likely the intent to try meat analogues. Also, having the intent to try meat analogues decreases with nutritional uncertainties. On the other hand, the intent to repeat consuming meat analogues was influenced by attitude to food safety. The less respondents are bothered about food safety, the greater the chances they would have the intent to repeat consuming meat analogues. We conclude that different barriers need to be overcome for people to try meat analogues from those required to sustain consumption. [Display omitted] •The paper investigated the effect of risk preferences on consumption intentions of meat analogues.•Risk attitudes were determined from self-reported and a lottery-style hybrid experiment.•The intent to try meat analogue and to repeat consuming meat analogues was influenced by risk attitudes.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100509</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2137-2826</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2666-1543
ispartof Journal of agriculture and food research, 2023-03, Vol.11, p.100509, Article 100509
issn 2666-1543
2666-1543
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dc5b8bbadb5f4311b931490e2e7897f6
source ScienceDirect®
subjects Attitudes
Behaviour
Consumer acceptance
Novel food
Plant-based meat
Risk
title Determinants of consumer acceptance of meat analogues: Exploring measures of risk preferences in predicting consumption
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A04%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20of%20consumer%20acceptance%20of%20meat%20analogues:%20Exploring%20measures%20of%20risk%20preferences%20in%20predicting%20consumption&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agriculture%20and%20food%20research&rft.au=Begho,%20Toritseju&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=100509&rft.pages=100509-&rft.artnum=100509&rft.issn=2666-1543&rft.eissn=2666-1543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100509&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES2666154323000169%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-3fd9ec41ef9fbd76e4104fef061086cca0d8ff0a5fa7fbceb0feb1d437764b4e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true