Loading…
Efficacy and tolerability of dimethyl fumarate in White-, African- and Hispanic- Americans with multiple sclerosis
Background: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) based on two phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs). There were not enough non-White patients enrolled in these RCTs to allow for subgroup...
Saved in:
Published in: | Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders 2016-11, Vol.9 (6), p.454-461 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-4b3374cdf17cd12f5dd7afee648879f8fd415edceae542acb862dd6ce50b51ff3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-4b3374cdf17cd12f5dd7afee648879f8fd415edceae542acb862dd6ce50b51ff3 |
container_end_page | 461 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 454 |
container_title | Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Zhovtis Ryerson, Lana Green, Rivka Confident, Gladyne Pandey, Krupa Richter, Benjamin Bacon, Tamar Sammarco, Carrie Laing, Lisa Kalina, Jennifer Kister, Ilya |
description | Background:
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) based on two phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs). There were not enough non-White patients enrolled in these RCTs to allow for subgroup analysis based on race. Efficacy and tolerability of DMF therapy across various racial groups is unknown.
Methods:
Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with RRMS who were started on DMF in two tertiary multiple sclerosis (MS) clinics. Efficacy and tolerability of DMF was compared across three self-identified racial groups: White-American (WA), African-American (AA) and Hispanic-American (HA).
Results:
A total of 390 RRMS patients were included in the study: 261 (66.9%) WA, 69 (17.7%) AA and 52 (13.3%) HA. When comparing ‘pre-DMF’ (1 year) and ‘on DMF’ (mean follow up of 14 months) periods, statistically significant reduction in rates of annualized relapses (WA from 0.44 to 0.19, AA from 0.39 to 0.15, and HA from 0.39 to 0.14; no differences between groups), new T2 lesions (WA from 45% to 23%, AA from 39% to 23%, HA from 52% to 26%; no difference between groups), and Gd+ lesions (WA from 25% to 13%, AA from 24% to 7%, HA from 23% to 12%; no difference between groups) were seen. DMF was relatively well tolerated across all groups, with an overall discontinuation rate of 20% (no difference between the three groups).
Conclusion:
Efficacy of DMF in our clinic population did not differ across three major ethnic groups, WA, AA and HA, and was comparable with results observed in the pivotal studies. These ‘real-life’ data suggest that race is not a factor that needs to be taken into account when initiating DMF. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1756285616661929 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dce2aa5c6c9a48299afca03f33b40cd3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1756285616661929</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_dce2aa5c6c9a48299afca03f33b40cd3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2425913510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-4b3374cdf17cd12f5dd7afee648879f8fd415edceae542acb862dd6ce50b51ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstrVDEUxi9isbW6dyUBNy68Nu-buxGGUm2h0E3FZTg3j5kM9zEmuZX5783M1NoWBFcJJ9_3O4-cqnpH8GdCmuaMNEJSJSSRUpKWti-qk12opkryl4_ux9XrlNYYS9pw_Ko6po3CGFNyUsUL74MBs0UwWpSn3kXoQh_yFk0e2TC4vNr2yM8DRMgOhRH9WIXs6k9o4WNxjvXeeRnSBsZgarQY3D6e0K-QV2iY-xw2vUPJFPaUQnpTHXnok3t7f55W379e3J5f1tc3367OF9e1KQ3lmneMNdxYTxpjCfXC2ga8c5Ir1bReecuJcNY4cIJTMJ2S1FppnMCdIN6z0-rqwLUTrPUmhtLCVk8Q9D4wxaWGmEMpSxcKBRBGmha4om0L3gBmnrGOY2NZYX05sDZzN-ySjjlC_wT69GUMK72c7rTAUgraFsDHe0Ccfs4uZT2EZFzfw-imOWmiWMOwEAr_j1SU32OKF-mHZ9L1NMexTFVTTkVLmCA7ID6oTJl_is4_1E2w3u2Rfr5HxfL-cb8Phj-LUwT1QZBg6f5m_SfwNxU20c4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425913510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and tolerability of dimethyl fumarate in White-, African- and Hispanic- Americans with multiple sclerosis</title><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Zhovtis Ryerson, Lana ; Green, Rivka ; Confident, Gladyne ; Pandey, Krupa ; Richter, Benjamin ; Bacon, Tamar ; Sammarco, Carrie ; Laing, Lisa ; Kalina, Jennifer ; Kister, Ilya</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhovtis Ryerson, Lana ; Green, Rivka ; Confident, Gladyne ; Pandey, Krupa ; Richter, Benjamin ; Bacon, Tamar ; Sammarco, Carrie ; Laing, Lisa ; Kalina, Jennifer ; Kister, Ilya</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) based on two phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs). There were not enough non-White patients enrolled in these RCTs to allow for subgroup analysis based on race. Efficacy and tolerability of DMF therapy across various racial groups is unknown.
Methods:
Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with RRMS who were started on DMF in two tertiary multiple sclerosis (MS) clinics. Efficacy and tolerability of DMF was compared across three self-identified racial groups: White-American (WA), African-American (AA) and Hispanic-American (HA).
Results:
A total of 390 RRMS patients were included in the study: 261 (66.9%) WA, 69 (17.7%) AA and 52 (13.3%) HA. When comparing ‘pre-DMF’ (1 year) and ‘on DMF’ (mean follow up of 14 months) periods, statistically significant reduction in rates of annualized relapses (WA from 0.44 to 0.19, AA from 0.39 to 0.15, and HA from 0.39 to 0.14; no differences between groups), new T2 lesions (WA from 45% to 23%, AA from 39% to 23%, HA from 52% to 26%; no difference between groups), and Gd+ lesions (WA from 25% to 13%, AA from 24% to 7%, HA from 23% to 12%; no difference between groups) were seen. DMF was relatively well tolerated across all groups, with an overall discontinuation rate of 20% (no difference between the three groups).
Conclusion:
Efficacy of DMF in our clinic population did not differ across three major ethnic groups, WA, AA and HA, and was comparable with results observed in the pivotal studies. These ‘real-life’ data suggest that race is not a factor that needs to be taken into account when initiating DMF.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-2864</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1756-2856</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-2864</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1756285616661929</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27800021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Multiple sclerosis ; Original Research ; Patients ; Race ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2016-11, Vol.9 (6), p.454-461</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2016</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2016. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/reusing-open-access-and-sage-choice-content</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2016 2016 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-4b3374cdf17cd12f5dd7afee648879f8fd415edceae542acb862dd6ce50b51ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-4b3374cdf17cd12f5dd7afee648879f8fd415edceae542acb862dd6ce50b51ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066529/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2425913510?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,21947,25734,27834,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,44926,45314,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1756285616661929?utm_source=summon&utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27800021$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhovtis Ryerson, Lana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Rivka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Confident, Gladyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Krupa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacon, Tamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sammarco, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laing, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalina, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kister, Ilya</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and tolerability of dimethyl fumarate in White-, African- and Hispanic- Americans with multiple sclerosis</title><title>Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders</title><addtitle>Ther Adv Neurol Disord</addtitle><description>Background:
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) based on two phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs). There were not enough non-White patients enrolled in these RCTs to allow for subgroup analysis based on race. Efficacy and tolerability of DMF therapy across various racial groups is unknown.
Methods:
Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with RRMS who were started on DMF in two tertiary multiple sclerosis (MS) clinics. Efficacy and tolerability of DMF was compared across three self-identified racial groups: White-American (WA), African-American (AA) and Hispanic-American (HA).
Results:
A total of 390 RRMS patients were included in the study: 261 (66.9%) WA, 69 (17.7%) AA and 52 (13.3%) HA. When comparing ‘pre-DMF’ (1 year) and ‘on DMF’ (mean follow up of 14 months) periods, statistically significant reduction in rates of annualized relapses (WA from 0.44 to 0.19, AA from 0.39 to 0.15, and HA from 0.39 to 0.14; no differences between groups), new T2 lesions (WA from 45% to 23%, AA from 39% to 23%, HA from 52% to 26%; no difference between groups), and Gd+ lesions (WA from 25% to 13%, AA from 24% to 7%, HA from 23% to 12%; no difference between groups) were seen. DMF was relatively well tolerated across all groups, with an overall discontinuation rate of 20% (no difference between the three groups).
Conclusion:
Efficacy of DMF in our clinic population did not differ across three major ethnic groups, WA, AA and HA, and was comparable with results observed in the pivotal studies. These ‘real-life’ data suggest that race is not a factor that needs to be taken into account when initiating DMF.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>1756-2864</issn><issn>1756-2856</issn><issn>1756-2864</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkstrVDEUxi9isbW6dyUBNy68Nu-buxGGUm2h0E3FZTg3j5kM9zEmuZX5783M1NoWBFcJJ9_3O4-cqnpH8GdCmuaMNEJSJSSRUpKWti-qk12opkryl4_ux9XrlNYYS9pw_Ko6po3CGFNyUsUL74MBs0UwWpSn3kXoQh_yFk0e2TC4vNr2yM8DRMgOhRH9WIXs6k9o4WNxjvXeeRnSBsZgarQY3D6e0K-QV2iY-xw2vUPJFPaUQnpTHXnok3t7f55W379e3J5f1tc3367OF9e1KQ3lmneMNdxYTxpjCfXC2ga8c5Ir1bReecuJcNY4cIJTMJ2S1FppnMCdIN6z0-rqwLUTrPUmhtLCVk8Q9D4wxaWGmEMpSxcKBRBGmha4om0L3gBmnrGOY2NZYX05sDZzN-ySjjlC_wT69GUMK72c7rTAUgraFsDHe0Ccfs4uZT2EZFzfw-imOWmiWMOwEAr_j1SU32OKF-mHZ9L1NMexTFVTTkVLmCA7ID6oTJl_is4_1E2w3u2Rfr5HxfL-cb8Phj-LUwT1QZBg6f5m_SfwNxU20c4</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Zhovtis Ryerson, Lana</creator><creator>Green, Rivka</creator><creator>Confident, Gladyne</creator><creator>Pandey, Krupa</creator><creator>Richter, Benjamin</creator><creator>Bacon, Tamar</creator><creator>Sammarco, Carrie</creator><creator>Laing, Lisa</creator><creator>Kalina, Jennifer</creator><creator>Kister, Ilya</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Efficacy and tolerability of dimethyl fumarate in White-, African- and Hispanic- Americans with multiple sclerosis</title><author>Zhovtis Ryerson, Lana ; Green, Rivka ; Confident, Gladyne ; Pandey, Krupa ; Richter, Benjamin ; Bacon, Tamar ; Sammarco, Carrie ; Laing, Lisa ; Kalina, Jennifer ; Kister, Ilya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-4b3374cdf17cd12f5dd7afee648879f8fd415edceae542acb862dd6ce50b51ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhovtis Ryerson, Lana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Rivka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Confident, Gladyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Krupa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacon, Tamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sammarco, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laing, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalina, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kister, Ilya</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhovtis Ryerson, Lana</au><au>Green, Rivka</au><au>Confident, Gladyne</au><au>Pandey, Krupa</au><au>Richter, Benjamin</au><au>Bacon, Tamar</au><au>Sammarco, Carrie</au><au>Laing, Lisa</au><au>Kalina, Jennifer</au><au>Kister, Ilya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and tolerability of dimethyl fumarate in White-, African- and Hispanic- Americans with multiple sclerosis</atitle><jtitle>Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Ther Adv Neurol Disord</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>454</spage><epage>461</epage><pages>454-461</pages><issn>1756-2864</issn><issn>1756-2856</issn><eissn>1756-2864</eissn><abstract>Background:
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) based on two phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs). There were not enough non-White patients enrolled in these RCTs to allow for subgroup analysis based on race. Efficacy and tolerability of DMF therapy across various racial groups is unknown.
Methods:
Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with RRMS who were started on DMF in two tertiary multiple sclerosis (MS) clinics. Efficacy and tolerability of DMF was compared across three self-identified racial groups: White-American (WA), African-American (AA) and Hispanic-American (HA).
Results:
A total of 390 RRMS patients were included in the study: 261 (66.9%) WA, 69 (17.7%) AA and 52 (13.3%) HA. When comparing ‘pre-DMF’ (1 year) and ‘on DMF’ (mean follow up of 14 months) periods, statistically significant reduction in rates of annualized relapses (WA from 0.44 to 0.19, AA from 0.39 to 0.15, and HA from 0.39 to 0.14; no differences between groups), new T2 lesions (WA from 45% to 23%, AA from 39% to 23%, HA from 52% to 26%; no difference between groups), and Gd+ lesions (WA from 25% to 13%, AA from 24% to 7%, HA from 23% to 12%; no difference between groups) were seen. DMF was relatively well tolerated across all groups, with an overall discontinuation rate of 20% (no difference between the three groups).
Conclusion:
Efficacy of DMF in our clinic population did not differ across three major ethnic groups, WA, AA and HA, and was comparable with results observed in the pivotal studies. These ‘real-life’ data suggest that race is not a factor that needs to be taken into account when initiating DMF.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>27800021</pmid><doi>10.1177/1756285616661929</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1756-2864 |
ispartof | Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2016-11, Vol.9 (6), p.454-461 |
issn | 1756-2864 1756-2856 1756-2864 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dce2aa5c6c9a48299afca03f33b40cd3 |
source | Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 |
subjects | Clinical trials Minority & ethnic groups Multiple sclerosis Original Research Patients Race Statistical analysis |
title | Efficacy and tolerability of dimethyl fumarate in White-, African- and Hispanic- Americans with multiple sclerosis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T22%3A54%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20tolerability%20of%20dimethyl%20fumarate%20in%20White-,%20African-%20and%20Hispanic-%20Americans%20with%20multiple%20sclerosis&rft.jtitle=Therapeutic%20advances%20in%20neurological%20disorders&rft.au=Zhovtis%20Ryerson,%20Lana&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=454&rft.epage=461&rft.pages=454-461&rft.issn=1756-2864&rft.eissn=1756-2864&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1756285616661929&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AFRWT%3E2425913510%3C/proquest_AFRWT%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-4b3374cdf17cd12f5dd7afee648879f8fd415edceae542acb862dd6ce50b51ff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425913510&rft_id=info:pmid/27800021&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1756285616661929&rfr_iscdi=true |