Loading…

Machine Learning Prediction of Nitrification From Ammonia- and Nitrite-Oxidizer Community Structure

Accurately modeling nitrification and understanding the role specific ammonia- or nitrite-oxidizing taxa play in it are of great interest and importance to microbial ecologists. In this study, we applied machine learning to 16S rRNA sequence and nitrification potential data from an experiment examin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in microbiology 2022-07, Vol.13, p.899565-899565
Main Authors: Lee, Conard, Amini, Fatemeh, Hu, Guiping, Halverson, Larry J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-669a321bf1cb305b9868b014b4d34b82d71626ed7625c6a7bbd300601783c0e3
container_end_page 899565
container_issue
container_start_page 899565
container_title Frontiers in microbiology
container_volume 13
creator Lee, Conard
Amini, Fatemeh
Hu, Guiping
Halverson, Larry J.
description Accurately modeling nitrification and understanding the role specific ammonia- or nitrite-oxidizing taxa play in it are of great interest and importance to microbial ecologists. In this study, we applied machine learning to 16S rRNA sequence and nitrification potential data from an experiment examining interactions between cropping systems and rhizosphere on microbial community assembly and nitrogen cycling processes. Given the high dimensionality of microbiome datasets, we only included nitrifers since only a few taxa are capable of ammonia and nitrite oxidation. We compared the performance of linear and nonlinear algorithms with and without qPCR measures of bacterial and archaea ammonia monooxygenase subunit A ( amoA ) gene abundance. Our feature selection process facilitated the identification of taxons that are most predictive of nitrification and to compare habitats. We found that Nitrosomonas and Nitrospirae were more frequently identified as important predictors of nitrification in conventional systems, whereas Thaumarchaeota were more important predictors in diversified systems. Our results suggest that model performance was not substantively improved by incorporating additional time-consuming and expensive qPCR data on amoA gene abundance. We also identified several clades of nitrifiers important for nitrification in different cropping systems, though we were unable to detect system- or rhizosphere-specific patterns in OTU-level biomarkers for nitrification. Finally, our results highlight the inherent risk of combining data from disparate habitats with the goal of increasing sample size to avoid overfitting models. This study represents a step toward developing machine learning approaches for microbiome research to identify nitrifier ecotypes that may be important for distinguishing ecotypes with defining roles in different habitats.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fmicb.2022.899565
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dce97c4fcd604d1882c973a5cd53df73</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_dce97c4fcd604d1882c973a5cd53df73</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2696011364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-669a321bf1cb305b9868b014b4d34b82d71626ed7625c6a7bbd300601783c0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1r3DAQhkVpaUKSH5Cbj714qy_L0qUQlqYNbJtAc8hNSCN5o2BJqSyXpr--zjqUZg4zw8zLMwMvQucEbxiT6uMQA9gNxZRupFKd6N6gYyIEbxmmd2__64_Q2TQ94CU4pkt-j45YJ5VUBB8j-GbgPiTf7LwpKaR9c1O8C1BDTk0emu-hljAEMIfBZcmxuYgxp2DaxiS37qtvr38HF_740mxzjHMK9an5UcsMdS7-FL0bzDj5s5d6gm4vP99uv7a76y9X24tdC0zx2gqhDKPEDgQsw51VUkiLCbfcMW4ldT0RVHjXC9qBML21jmEsMOklA-zZCbpasS6bB_1YQjTlSWcT9GGQy16bUgOMXjvwqgc-gBOYOyIlBdUz04HrmBt6trA-razH2Ua_yFMtZnwFfb1J4V7v8y-tGFZdJxfAhxdAyT9nP1UdwwR-HE3yeZ40FWr5nDDBFylZpVDyNBU__DtDsH62Wh-s1s9W69Vq9hcuxJ1Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2696011364</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine Learning Prediction of Nitrification From Ammonia- and Nitrite-Oxidizer Community Structure</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lee, Conard ; Amini, Fatemeh ; Hu, Guiping ; Halverson, Larry J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Conard ; Amini, Fatemeh ; Hu, Guiping ; Halverson, Larry J.</creatorcontrib><description>Accurately modeling nitrification and understanding the role specific ammonia- or nitrite-oxidizing taxa play in it are of great interest and importance to microbial ecologists. In this study, we applied machine learning to 16S rRNA sequence and nitrification potential data from an experiment examining interactions between cropping systems and rhizosphere on microbial community assembly and nitrogen cycling processes. Given the high dimensionality of microbiome datasets, we only included nitrifers since only a few taxa are capable of ammonia and nitrite oxidation. We compared the performance of linear and nonlinear algorithms with and without qPCR measures of bacterial and archaea ammonia monooxygenase subunit A ( amoA ) gene abundance. Our feature selection process facilitated the identification of taxons that are most predictive of nitrification and to compare habitats. We found that Nitrosomonas and Nitrospirae were more frequently identified as important predictors of nitrification in conventional systems, whereas Thaumarchaeota were more important predictors in diversified systems. Our results suggest that model performance was not substantively improved by incorporating additional time-consuming and expensive qPCR data on amoA gene abundance. We also identified several clades of nitrifiers important for nitrification in different cropping systems, though we were unable to detect system- or rhizosphere-specific patterns in OTU-level biomarkers for nitrification. Finally, our results highlight the inherent risk of combining data from disparate habitats with the goal of increasing sample size to avoid overfitting models. This study represents a step toward developing machine learning approaches for microbiome research to identify nitrifier ecotypes that may be important for distinguishing ecotypes with defining roles in different habitats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-302X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-302X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.899565</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35898910</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>ammonia-oxidizers ; machine learning ; Microbiology ; microbiome ; nitrification ; nitrifiers</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in microbiology, 2022-07, Vol.13, p.899565-899565</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Lee, Amini, Hu and Halverson. 2022 Lee, Amini, Hu and Halverson</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-669a321bf1cb305b9868b014b4d34b82d71626ed7625c6a7bbd300601783c0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309558/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309558/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Conard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amini, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Guiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halverson, Larry J.</creatorcontrib><title>Machine Learning Prediction of Nitrification From Ammonia- and Nitrite-Oxidizer Community Structure</title><title>Frontiers in microbiology</title><description>Accurately modeling nitrification and understanding the role specific ammonia- or nitrite-oxidizing taxa play in it are of great interest and importance to microbial ecologists. In this study, we applied machine learning to 16S rRNA sequence and nitrification potential data from an experiment examining interactions between cropping systems and rhizosphere on microbial community assembly and nitrogen cycling processes. Given the high dimensionality of microbiome datasets, we only included nitrifers since only a few taxa are capable of ammonia and nitrite oxidation. We compared the performance of linear and nonlinear algorithms with and without qPCR measures of bacterial and archaea ammonia monooxygenase subunit A ( amoA ) gene abundance. Our feature selection process facilitated the identification of taxons that are most predictive of nitrification and to compare habitats. We found that Nitrosomonas and Nitrospirae were more frequently identified as important predictors of nitrification in conventional systems, whereas Thaumarchaeota were more important predictors in diversified systems. Our results suggest that model performance was not substantively improved by incorporating additional time-consuming and expensive qPCR data on amoA gene abundance. We also identified several clades of nitrifiers important for nitrification in different cropping systems, though we were unable to detect system- or rhizosphere-specific patterns in OTU-level biomarkers for nitrification. Finally, our results highlight the inherent risk of combining data from disparate habitats with the goal of increasing sample size to avoid overfitting models. This study represents a step toward developing machine learning approaches for microbiome research to identify nitrifier ecotypes that may be important for distinguishing ecotypes with defining roles in different habitats.</description><subject>ammonia-oxidizers</subject><subject>machine learning</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>microbiome</subject><subject>nitrification</subject><subject>nitrifiers</subject><issn>1664-302X</issn><issn>1664-302X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1r3DAQhkVpaUKSH5Cbj714qy_L0qUQlqYNbJtAc8hNSCN5o2BJqSyXpr--zjqUZg4zw8zLMwMvQucEbxiT6uMQA9gNxZRupFKd6N6gYyIEbxmmd2__64_Q2TQ94CU4pkt-j45YJ5VUBB8j-GbgPiTf7LwpKaR9c1O8C1BDTk0emu-hljAEMIfBZcmxuYgxp2DaxiS37qtvr38HF_740mxzjHMK9an5UcsMdS7-FL0bzDj5s5d6gm4vP99uv7a76y9X24tdC0zx2gqhDKPEDgQsw51VUkiLCbfcMW4ldT0RVHjXC9qBML21jmEsMOklA-zZCbpasS6bB_1YQjTlSWcT9GGQy16bUgOMXjvwqgc-gBOYOyIlBdUz04HrmBt6trA-razH2Ua_yFMtZnwFfb1J4V7v8y-tGFZdJxfAhxdAyT9nP1UdwwR-HE3yeZ40FWr5nDDBFylZpVDyNBU__DtDsH62Wh-s1s9W69Vq9hcuxJ1Z</recordid><startdate>20220711</startdate><enddate>20220711</enddate><creator>Lee, Conard</creator><creator>Amini, Fatemeh</creator><creator>Hu, Guiping</creator><creator>Halverson, Larry J.</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220711</creationdate><title>Machine Learning Prediction of Nitrification From Ammonia- and Nitrite-Oxidizer Community Structure</title><author>Lee, Conard ; Amini, Fatemeh ; Hu, Guiping ; Halverson, Larry J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-669a321bf1cb305b9868b014b4d34b82d71626ed7625c6a7bbd300601783c0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>ammonia-oxidizers</topic><topic>machine learning</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>microbiome</topic><topic>nitrification</topic><topic>nitrifiers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Conard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amini, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Guiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halverson, Larry J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Conard</au><au>Amini, Fatemeh</au><au>Hu, Guiping</au><au>Halverson, Larry J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine Learning Prediction of Nitrification From Ammonia- and Nitrite-Oxidizer Community Structure</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in microbiology</jtitle><date>2022-07-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><spage>899565</spage><epage>899565</epage><pages>899565-899565</pages><issn>1664-302X</issn><eissn>1664-302X</eissn><abstract>Accurately modeling nitrification and understanding the role specific ammonia- or nitrite-oxidizing taxa play in it are of great interest and importance to microbial ecologists. In this study, we applied machine learning to 16S rRNA sequence and nitrification potential data from an experiment examining interactions between cropping systems and rhizosphere on microbial community assembly and nitrogen cycling processes. Given the high dimensionality of microbiome datasets, we only included nitrifers since only a few taxa are capable of ammonia and nitrite oxidation. We compared the performance of linear and nonlinear algorithms with and without qPCR measures of bacterial and archaea ammonia monooxygenase subunit A ( amoA ) gene abundance. Our feature selection process facilitated the identification of taxons that are most predictive of nitrification and to compare habitats. We found that Nitrosomonas and Nitrospirae were more frequently identified as important predictors of nitrification in conventional systems, whereas Thaumarchaeota were more important predictors in diversified systems. Our results suggest that model performance was not substantively improved by incorporating additional time-consuming and expensive qPCR data on amoA gene abundance. We also identified several clades of nitrifiers important for nitrification in different cropping systems, though we were unable to detect system- or rhizosphere-specific patterns in OTU-level biomarkers for nitrification. Finally, our results highlight the inherent risk of combining data from disparate habitats with the goal of increasing sample size to avoid overfitting models. This study represents a step toward developing machine learning approaches for microbiome research to identify nitrifier ecotypes that may be important for distinguishing ecotypes with defining roles in different habitats.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>35898910</pmid><doi>10.3389/fmicb.2022.899565</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-302X
ispartof Frontiers in microbiology, 2022-07, Vol.13, p.899565-899565
issn 1664-302X
1664-302X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dce97c4fcd604d1882c973a5cd53df73
source PubMed Central
subjects ammonia-oxidizers
machine learning
Microbiology
microbiome
nitrification
nitrifiers
title Machine Learning Prediction of Nitrification From Ammonia- and Nitrite-Oxidizer Community Structure
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A37%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20Learning%20Prediction%20of%20Nitrification%20From%20Ammonia-%20and%20Nitrite-Oxidizer%20Community%20Structure&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20microbiology&rft.au=Lee,%20Conard&rft.date=2022-07-11&rft.volume=13&rft.spage=899565&rft.epage=899565&rft.pages=899565-899565&rft.issn=1664-302X&rft.eissn=1664-302X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fmicb.2022.899565&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2696011364%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-669a321bf1cb305b9868b014b4d34b82d71626ed7625c6a7bbd300601783c0e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2696011364&rft_id=info:pmid/35898910&rfr_iscdi=true