Loading…
Downslope windstorm in Iceland – WRF/MM5 model comparison
A severe windstorm downstream of Mt. Öræfajökull in Southeast Iceland is simulated on a grid of 1 km horizontal resolution by using the PSU/NCAR MM5 model and the Advanced Research WRF model. Both models are run with a new, two equation planetary boundary layer (PBL) scheme as well as the ETA/MYJ PB...
Saved in:
Published in: | Atmospheric chemistry and physics 2011-01, Vol.11 (1), p.103-120 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f681216e79d199eb3b83a479d3a7171d8a1ce3299962d2e32f998b06d19a0b0a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f681216e79d199eb3b83a479d3a7171d8a1ce3299962d2e32f998b06d19a0b0a3 |
container_end_page | 120 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | Atmospheric chemistry and physics |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Rögnvaldsson, Ó. Bao, J.-W. Ágústsson, H. Ólafsson, H. |
description | A severe windstorm downstream of Mt. Öræfajökull in Southeast Iceland is simulated on a grid of 1 km horizontal resolution by using the PSU/NCAR MM5 model and the Advanced Research WRF model. Both models are run with a new, two equation planetary boundary layer (PBL) scheme as well as the ETA/MYJ PBL schemes. The storm is also simulated using six different micro-physics schemes in combination with the MYJ PBL scheme in WRF, as well as one "dry" run. Output from a 3 km MM5 domain simulation is used to initialise and drive both the 1 km MM5 and WRF simulations. Both models capture gravity-wave breaking over Mt. Öræfajökull, while the vertical structure of the lee wave differs between the two models and the PBL schemes. The WRF simulated downslope winds, using both the MYJ and 2EQ PBL schemes, are in good agreement with the strength of the observed downslope windstorm. The MM5 simulated surface winds, with the new two equation model, are in better agreement to observations than when using the ETA scheme. Micro-physics processes are shown to play an important role in the formation of downslope windstorms and a correctly simulated moisture distribution is decisive for a successful windstorm prediction. Of the micro-physics schemes tested, only the Thompson scheme captures the downslope windstorm. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5194/acp-11-103-2011 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dd463f5d41e84c1cb071fdc9221865c7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_dd463f5d41e84c1cb071fdc9221865c7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>856779849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f681216e79d199eb3b83a479d3a7171d8a1ce3299962d2e32f998b06d19a0b0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFLxDAQhYsouK6evRYvnupmkrRJ8CSrqwu7CKJ4DGmSSpe2qUmXxZv_wX_oLzHrioineTN8PObxkuQU0EUOgk6U7jOADBDJMALYS0ZQcJQxgun-H32YHIWwQgjnCOgoubx2my40rrfppu5MGJxv07pL59o2qjPp5_tH-vwwmyyXedo6Y5tUu7ZXvg6uO04OKtUEe_Izx8nT7OZxepct7m_n06tFpiliQ1YVHDAUlgkDQtiSlJwoGjeiGDAwXIG2BAshCmxwVJUQvERFpBUqkSLjZL7zNU6tZO_rVvk36VQtvw_Ov0jlh1o3VhpDC1LlhoLlVIMuEYPKaIEx8CLXLHqd77x6717XNgyyrUPMGsNatw6S5wVjglMRybN_5MqtfReDSk7zGIlRHKHJDtLeheBt9fseILmtRcZaJEBcidzWQr4ADAt-QA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>845812742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Downslope windstorm in Iceland – WRF/MM5 model comparison</title><source>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rögnvaldsson, Ó. ; Bao, J.-W. ; Ágústsson, H. ; Ólafsson, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rögnvaldsson, Ó. ; Bao, J.-W. ; Ágústsson, H. ; Ólafsson, H.</creatorcontrib><description>A severe windstorm downstream of Mt. Öræfajökull in Southeast Iceland is simulated on a grid of 1 km horizontal resolution by using the PSU/NCAR MM5 model and the Advanced Research WRF model. Both models are run with a new, two equation planetary boundary layer (PBL) scheme as well as the ETA/MYJ PBL schemes. The storm is also simulated using six different micro-physics schemes in combination with the MYJ PBL scheme in WRF, as well as one "dry" run. Output from a 3 km MM5 domain simulation is used to initialise and drive both the 1 km MM5 and WRF simulations. Both models capture gravity-wave breaking over Mt. Öræfajökull, while the vertical structure of the lee wave differs between the two models and the PBL schemes. The WRF simulated downslope winds, using both the MYJ and 2EQ PBL schemes, are in good agreement with the strength of the observed downslope windstorm. The MM5 simulated surface winds, with the new two equation model, are in better agreement to observations than when using the ETA scheme. Micro-physics processes are shown to play an important role in the formation of downslope windstorms and a correctly simulated moisture distribution is decisive for a successful windstorm prediction. Of the micro-physics schemes tested, only the Thompson scheme captures the downslope windstorm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1680-7324</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1680-7316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1680-7324</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-103-2011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Katlenburg-Lindau: Copernicus GmbH</publisher><ispartof>Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 2011-01, Vol.11 (1), p.103-120</ispartof><rights>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f681216e79d199eb3b83a479d3a7171d8a1ce3299962d2e32f998b06d19a0b0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f681216e79d199eb3b83a479d3a7171d8a1ce3299962d2e32f998b06d19a0b0a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/845812742/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/845812742?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2095,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rögnvaldsson, Ó.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, J.-W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ágústsson, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ólafsson, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Downslope windstorm in Iceland – WRF/MM5 model comparison</title><title>Atmospheric chemistry and physics</title><description>A severe windstorm downstream of Mt. Öræfajökull in Southeast Iceland is simulated on a grid of 1 km horizontal resolution by using the PSU/NCAR MM5 model and the Advanced Research WRF model. Both models are run with a new, two equation planetary boundary layer (PBL) scheme as well as the ETA/MYJ PBL schemes. The storm is also simulated using six different micro-physics schemes in combination with the MYJ PBL scheme in WRF, as well as one "dry" run. Output from a 3 km MM5 domain simulation is used to initialise and drive both the 1 km MM5 and WRF simulations. Both models capture gravity-wave breaking over Mt. Öræfajökull, while the vertical structure of the lee wave differs between the two models and the PBL schemes. The WRF simulated downslope winds, using both the MYJ and 2EQ PBL schemes, are in good agreement with the strength of the observed downslope windstorm. The MM5 simulated surface winds, with the new two equation model, are in better agreement to observations than when using the ETA scheme. Micro-physics processes are shown to play an important role in the formation of downslope windstorms and a correctly simulated moisture distribution is decisive for a successful windstorm prediction. Of the micro-physics schemes tested, only the Thompson scheme captures the downslope windstorm.</description><issn>1680-7324</issn><issn>1680-7316</issn><issn>1680-7324</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFLxDAQhYsouK6evRYvnupmkrRJ8CSrqwu7CKJ4DGmSSpe2qUmXxZv_wX_oLzHrioineTN8PObxkuQU0EUOgk6U7jOADBDJMALYS0ZQcJQxgun-H32YHIWwQgjnCOgoubx2my40rrfppu5MGJxv07pL59o2qjPp5_tH-vwwmyyXedo6Y5tUu7ZXvg6uO04OKtUEe_Izx8nT7OZxepct7m_n06tFpiliQ1YVHDAUlgkDQtiSlJwoGjeiGDAwXIG2BAshCmxwVJUQvERFpBUqkSLjZL7zNU6tZO_rVvk36VQtvw_Ov0jlh1o3VhpDC1LlhoLlVIMuEYPKaIEx8CLXLHqd77x6717XNgyyrUPMGsNatw6S5wVjglMRybN_5MqtfReDSk7zGIlRHKHJDtLeheBt9fseILmtRcZaJEBcidzWQr4ADAt-QA</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Rögnvaldsson, Ó.</creator><creator>Bao, J.-W.</creator><creator>Ágústsson, H.</creator><creator>Ólafsson, H.</creator><general>Copernicus GmbH</general><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Downslope windstorm in Iceland – WRF/MM5 model comparison</title><author>Rögnvaldsson, Ó. ; Bao, J.-W. ; Ágústsson, H. ; Ólafsson, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f681216e79d199eb3b83a479d3a7171d8a1ce3299962d2e32f998b06d19a0b0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rögnvaldsson, Ó.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, J.-W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ágústsson, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ólafsson, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric chemistry and physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rögnvaldsson, Ó.</au><au>Bao, J.-W.</au><au>Ágústsson, H.</au><au>Ólafsson, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Downslope windstorm in Iceland – WRF/MM5 model comparison</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric chemistry and physics</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>103-120</pages><issn>1680-7324</issn><issn>1680-7316</issn><eissn>1680-7324</eissn><abstract>A severe windstorm downstream of Mt. Öræfajökull in Southeast Iceland is simulated on a grid of 1 km horizontal resolution by using the PSU/NCAR MM5 model and the Advanced Research WRF model. Both models are run with a new, two equation planetary boundary layer (PBL) scheme as well as the ETA/MYJ PBL schemes. The storm is also simulated using six different micro-physics schemes in combination with the MYJ PBL scheme in WRF, as well as one "dry" run. Output from a 3 km MM5 domain simulation is used to initialise and drive both the 1 km MM5 and WRF simulations. Both models capture gravity-wave breaking over Mt. Öræfajökull, while the vertical structure of the lee wave differs between the two models and the PBL schemes. The WRF simulated downslope winds, using both the MYJ and 2EQ PBL schemes, are in good agreement with the strength of the observed downslope windstorm. The MM5 simulated surface winds, with the new two equation model, are in better agreement to observations than when using the ETA scheme. Micro-physics processes are shown to play an important role in the formation of downslope windstorms and a correctly simulated moisture distribution is decisive for a successful windstorm prediction. Of the micro-physics schemes tested, only the Thompson scheme captures the downslope windstorm.</abstract><cop>Katlenburg-Lindau</cop><pub>Copernicus GmbH</pub><doi>10.5194/acp-11-103-2011</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1680-7324 |
ispartof | Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 2011-01, Vol.11 (1), p.103-120 |
issn | 1680-7324 1680-7316 1680-7324 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dd463f5d41e84c1cb071fdc9221865c7 |
source | Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content Database; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Downslope windstorm in Iceland – WRF/MM5 model comparison |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T08%3A50%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Downslope%20windstorm%20in%20Iceland%20%E2%80%93%20WRF/MM5%20model%20comparison&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20chemistry%20and%20physics&rft.au=R%C3%B6gnvaldsson,%20%C3%93.&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=103-120&rft.issn=1680-7324&rft.eissn=1680-7324&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/acp-11-103-2011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E856779849%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f681216e79d199eb3b83a479d3a7171d8a1ce3299962d2e32f998b06d19a0b0a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=845812742&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |