Loading…

Common volume satellite studies of polar mesospheric clouds with Odin/OSIRIS tomography and AIM/CIPS nadir imaging

Two important approaches for satellite studies of polar mesospheric clouds (PMCs) are nadir measurements adapting phase function analysis and limb measurements adapting spectroscopic analysis. Combining both approaches enables new studies of cloud structures and microphysical processes but is compli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric chemistry and physics 2019-10, Vol.19 (19), p.12455-12475
Main Authors: Broman, Lina, Benze, Susanne, Gumbel, Jörg, Christensen, Ole Martin, Randall, Cora E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e1585ac067bde58373d1f776c3c1833e45db6e0904845c370d2322dd50c06d43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e1585ac067bde58373d1f776c3c1833e45db6e0904845c370d2322dd50c06d43
container_end_page 12475
container_issue 19
container_start_page 12455
container_title Atmospheric chemistry and physics
container_volume 19
creator Broman, Lina
Benze, Susanne
Gumbel, Jörg
Christensen, Ole Martin
Randall, Cora E.
description Two important approaches for satellite studies of polar mesospheric clouds (PMCs) are nadir measurements adapting phase function analysis and limb measurements adapting spectroscopic analysis. Combining both approaches enables new studies of cloud structures and microphysical processes but is complicated by differences in scattering conditions, observation geometry and sensitivity. In this study, we compare common volume PMC observations from the nadir-viewing Cloud Imaging and Particle Size (CIPS) instrument on the Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere (AIM) satellite and a special set of tomographic limb observations from the Optical Spectrograph and InfraRed Imager System (OSIRIS) on the Odin satellite performed over 18 d for the years 2010 and 2011 and the latitude range 78 to 80∘ N. While CIPS provides preeminent horizontal resolution, the OSIRIS tomographic analysis provides combined horizontal and vertical PMC information. This first direct comparison is an important step towards co-analysing CIPS and OSIRIS data, aiming at unprecedented insights into horizontal and vertical cloud processes. Important scientific questions on how the PMC life cycle is affected by changes in humidity and temperature due to atmospheric gravity waves, planetary waves and tides can be addressed by combining PMC observations in multiple dimensions. Two- and three-dimensional cloud structures simultaneously observed by CIPS and tomographic OSIRIS provide a useful tool for studies of cloud growth and sublimation. Moreover, the combined CIPS/tomographic OSIRIS dataset can be used for studies of even more fundamental character, such as the question of the assumption of the PMC particle size distribution. We perform the first thorough error characterization of OSIRIS tomographic cloud brightness and cloud ice water content (IWC). We establish a consistent method for comparing cloud properties from limb tomography and nadir observations, accounting for differences in scattering conditions, resolution and sensitivity. Based on an extensive common volume and a temporal coincidence criterion of only 5 min, our method enables a detailed comparison of PMC regions of varying brightness and IWC. However, since the dataset is limited to 18 d of observations this study does not include a comparison of cloud frequency. The cloud properties of the OSIRIS tomographic dataset are vertically resolved, while the cloud properties of the CIPS dataset is vertically integrated. To make these differen
doi_str_mv 10.5194/acp-19-12455-2019
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dd510a431f934951a7d58f6042b1f216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_dd510a431f934951a7d58f6042b1f216</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2301771768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e1585ac067bde58373d1f776c3c1833e45db6e0904845c370d2322dd50c06d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd1r2zAUxU1ZoV26P2Bvgr3Oi64-LPsxZB81dKQ0pa9CkeREwbY8yW7ofz81LmN9uofLOb_L5WTZZ8DfOFRsqfSQQ5UDYZznBEN1kV1DUeJcUMI-_Kevso8xHjEmHAO7zsLad53v0bNvp86iqEbbtm5MapyMsxH5Bg2-VQF1Nvo4HGxwGunWTyaikxsPaGNcv9xs64d6i0bf-X1Qw-EFqd6gVf17ua7vt6hXxgXkOrV3_f4mu2xUG-2nt7nIHn_-eFzf5nebX_V6dZdrBtWYW-AlVxoXYmcsL6mgBhohCk01lJRaxs2usLjCrGRcU4ENoYQYw3HKGEYXWT1jjVdHOYR0PbxIr5w8L3zYSxVGp1srUwiwYhSairKKgxKGl02BGdlBQ6BIrK8zK57sMO3e0b67p9WZFicJgpcAyf5ltg_B_5lsHOXRT6FPz0pCMQgBoiiTC2aXDj7GYJt_WMDytVSZSpVQyXOp8rVU-hf3fZQH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2301771768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Common volume satellite studies of polar mesospheric clouds with Odin/OSIRIS tomography and AIM/CIPS nadir imaging</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Broman, Lina ; Benze, Susanne ; Gumbel, Jörg ; Christensen, Ole Martin ; Randall, Cora E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Broman, Lina ; Benze, Susanne ; Gumbel, Jörg ; Christensen, Ole Martin ; Randall, Cora E.</creatorcontrib><description>Two important approaches for satellite studies of polar mesospheric clouds (PMCs) are nadir measurements adapting phase function analysis and limb measurements adapting spectroscopic analysis. Combining both approaches enables new studies of cloud structures and microphysical processes but is complicated by differences in scattering conditions, observation geometry and sensitivity. In this study, we compare common volume PMC observations from the nadir-viewing Cloud Imaging and Particle Size (CIPS) instrument on the Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere (AIM) satellite and a special set of tomographic limb observations from the Optical Spectrograph and InfraRed Imager System (OSIRIS) on the Odin satellite performed over 18 d for the years 2010 and 2011 and the latitude range 78 to 80∘ N. While CIPS provides preeminent horizontal resolution, the OSIRIS tomographic analysis provides combined horizontal and vertical PMC information. This first direct comparison is an important step towards co-analysing CIPS and OSIRIS data, aiming at unprecedented insights into horizontal and vertical cloud processes. Important scientific questions on how the PMC life cycle is affected by changes in humidity and temperature due to atmospheric gravity waves, planetary waves and tides can be addressed by combining PMC observations in multiple dimensions. Two- and three-dimensional cloud structures simultaneously observed by CIPS and tomographic OSIRIS provide a useful tool for studies of cloud growth and sublimation. Moreover, the combined CIPS/tomographic OSIRIS dataset can be used for studies of even more fundamental character, such as the question of the assumption of the PMC particle size distribution. We perform the first thorough error characterization of OSIRIS tomographic cloud brightness and cloud ice water content (IWC). We establish a consistent method for comparing cloud properties from limb tomography and nadir observations, accounting for differences in scattering conditions, resolution and sensitivity. Based on an extensive common volume and a temporal coincidence criterion of only 5 min, our method enables a detailed comparison of PMC regions of varying brightness and IWC. However, since the dataset is limited to 18 d of observations this study does not include a comparison of cloud frequency. The cloud properties of the OSIRIS tomographic dataset are vertically resolved, while the cloud properties of the CIPS dataset is vertically integrated. To make these different quantities comparable, the OSIRIS tomographic cloud properties cloud scattering coefficient and ice mass density (IMD) have been integrated over the vertical extent of the cloud to form cloud albedo and IWC of the same quantity as CIPS cloud products. We find that the OSIRIS albedo (obtained from the vertical integration of the primary OSIRIS tomography product, cloud scattering coefficient) shows very good agreement with the primary CIPS product, cloud albedo, with a correlation coefficient of 0.96. However, OSIRIS systematically reports brighter clouds than CIPS and the bias between the instruments (OSIRIS – CIPS) is 3.4×10-6 sr−1 (±2.9×10-6 sr−1) on average. The OSIRIS tomography IWC (obtained from the vertical integration of IMD) agrees well with the CIPS IWC, with a correlation coefficient of 0.91. However, the IWC reported by OSIRIS is lower than CIPS, and we quantify the bias to −22 g km−2 (±14 g km−2) on average.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1680-7324</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1680-7316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1680-7324</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-12455-2019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Katlenburg-Lindau: Copernicus GmbH</publisher><subject>Aeronomy ; Albedo ; Atmospheric gravity waves ; Bias ; Brightness ; Cloud albedo ; Cloud properties ; Clouds ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Datasets ; Dimensions ; Function analysis ; Gravitational waves ; Gravity waves ; Humidity ; Imaging techniques ; Instruments ; Integration ; Life cycle ; Life cycles ; Mesosphere ; Moisture content ; Particle size ; Particle size distribution ; Planetary waves ; Polar mesospheric clouds ; Properties ; Properties (attributes) ; Questions ; Resolution ; Satellites ; Scattering coefficient ; Sensitivity ; Size distribution ; Spectroscopic analysis ; Sublimation ; Tides ; Tomography ; Water content</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 2019-10, Vol.19 (19), p.12455-12475</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e1585ac067bde58373d1f776c3c1833e45db6e0904845c370d2322dd50c06d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e1585ac067bde58373d1f776c3c1833e45db6e0904845c370d2322dd50c06d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9260-2265 ; 0000-0002-2454-549X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2301771768/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2301771768?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,2102,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-175811$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Broman, Lina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benze, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gumbel, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Ole Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randall, Cora E.</creatorcontrib><title>Common volume satellite studies of polar mesospheric clouds with Odin/OSIRIS tomography and AIM/CIPS nadir imaging</title><title>Atmospheric chemistry and physics</title><description>Two important approaches for satellite studies of polar mesospheric clouds (PMCs) are nadir measurements adapting phase function analysis and limb measurements adapting spectroscopic analysis. Combining both approaches enables new studies of cloud structures and microphysical processes but is complicated by differences in scattering conditions, observation geometry and sensitivity. In this study, we compare common volume PMC observations from the nadir-viewing Cloud Imaging and Particle Size (CIPS) instrument on the Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere (AIM) satellite and a special set of tomographic limb observations from the Optical Spectrograph and InfraRed Imager System (OSIRIS) on the Odin satellite performed over 18 d for the years 2010 and 2011 and the latitude range 78 to 80∘ N. While CIPS provides preeminent horizontal resolution, the OSIRIS tomographic analysis provides combined horizontal and vertical PMC information. This first direct comparison is an important step towards co-analysing CIPS and OSIRIS data, aiming at unprecedented insights into horizontal and vertical cloud processes. Important scientific questions on how the PMC life cycle is affected by changes in humidity and temperature due to atmospheric gravity waves, planetary waves and tides can be addressed by combining PMC observations in multiple dimensions. Two- and three-dimensional cloud structures simultaneously observed by CIPS and tomographic OSIRIS provide a useful tool for studies of cloud growth and sublimation. Moreover, the combined CIPS/tomographic OSIRIS dataset can be used for studies of even more fundamental character, such as the question of the assumption of the PMC particle size distribution. We perform the first thorough error characterization of OSIRIS tomographic cloud brightness and cloud ice water content (IWC). We establish a consistent method for comparing cloud properties from limb tomography and nadir observations, accounting for differences in scattering conditions, resolution and sensitivity. Based on an extensive common volume and a temporal coincidence criterion of only 5 min, our method enables a detailed comparison of PMC regions of varying brightness and IWC. However, since the dataset is limited to 18 d of observations this study does not include a comparison of cloud frequency. The cloud properties of the OSIRIS tomographic dataset are vertically resolved, while the cloud properties of the CIPS dataset is vertically integrated. To make these different quantities comparable, the OSIRIS tomographic cloud properties cloud scattering coefficient and ice mass density (IMD) have been integrated over the vertical extent of the cloud to form cloud albedo and IWC of the same quantity as CIPS cloud products. We find that the OSIRIS albedo (obtained from the vertical integration of the primary OSIRIS tomography product, cloud scattering coefficient) shows very good agreement with the primary CIPS product, cloud albedo, with a correlation coefficient of 0.96. However, OSIRIS systematically reports brighter clouds than CIPS and the bias between the instruments (OSIRIS – CIPS) is 3.4×10-6 sr−1 (±2.9×10-6 sr−1) on average. The OSIRIS tomography IWC (obtained from the vertical integration of IMD) agrees well with the CIPS IWC, with a correlation coefficient of 0.91. However, the IWC reported by OSIRIS is lower than CIPS, and we quantify the bias to −22 g km−2 (±14 g km−2) on average.</description><subject>Aeronomy</subject><subject>Albedo</subject><subject>Atmospheric gravity waves</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Brightness</subject><subject>Cloud albedo</subject><subject>Cloud properties</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Dimensions</subject><subject>Function analysis</subject><subject>Gravitational waves</subject><subject>Gravity waves</subject><subject>Humidity</subject><subject>Imaging techniques</subject><subject>Instruments</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Life cycle</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Mesosphere</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Particle size distribution</subject><subject>Planetary waves</subject><subject>Polar mesospheric clouds</subject><subject>Properties</subject><subject>Properties (attributes)</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Scattering coefficient</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><subject>Spectroscopic analysis</subject><subject>Sublimation</subject><subject>Tides</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Water content</subject><issn>1680-7324</issn><issn>1680-7316</issn><issn>1680-7324</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkd1r2zAUxU1ZoV26P2Bvgr3Oi64-LPsxZB81dKQ0pa9CkeREwbY8yW7ofz81LmN9uofLOb_L5WTZZ8DfOFRsqfSQQ5UDYZznBEN1kV1DUeJcUMI-_Kevso8xHjEmHAO7zsLad53v0bNvp86iqEbbtm5MapyMsxH5Bg2-VQF1Nvo4HGxwGunWTyaikxsPaGNcv9xs64d6i0bf-X1Qw-EFqd6gVf17ua7vt6hXxgXkOrV3_f4mu2xUG-2nt7nIHn_-eFzf5nebX_V6dZdrBtWYW-AlVxoXYmcsL6mgBhohCk01lJRaxs2usLjCrGRcU4ENoYQYw3HKGEYXWT1jjVdHOYR0PbxIr5w8L3zYSxVGp1srUwiwYhSairKKgxKGl02BGdlBQ6BIrK8zK57sMO3e0b67p9WZFicJgpcAyf5ltg_B_5lsHOXRT6FPz0pCMQgBoiiTC2aXDj7GYJt_WMDytVSZSpVQyXOp8rVU-hf3fZQH</recordid><startdate>20191008</startdate><enddate>20191008</enddate><creator>Broman, Lina</creator><creator>Benze, Susanne</creator><creator>Gumbel, Jörg</creator><creator>Christensen, Ole Martin</creator><creator>Randall, Cora E.</creator><general>Copernicus GmbH</general><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>ABAVF</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>DG7</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9260-2265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2454-549X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191008</creationdate><title>Common volume satellite studies of polar mesospheric clouds with Odin/OSIRIS tomography and AIM/CIPS nadir imaging</title><author>Broman, Lina ; Benze, Susanne ; Gumbel, Jörg ; Christensen, Ole Martin ; Randall, Cora E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e1585ac067bde58373d1f776c3c1833e45db6e0904845c370d2322dd50c06d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aeronomy</topic><topic>Albedo</topic><topic>Atmospheric gravity waves</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Brightness</topic><topic>Cloud albedo</topic><topic>Cloud properties</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Dimensions</topic><topic>Function analysis</topic><topic>Gravitational waves</topic><topic>Gravity waves</topic><topic>Humidity</topic><topic>Imaging techniques</topic><topic>Instruments</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Life cycle</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Mesosphere</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Particle size distribution</topic><topic>Planetary waves</topic><topic>Polar mesospheric clouds</topic><topic>Properties</topic><topic>Properties (attributes)</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Scattering coefficient</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><topic>Spectroscopic analysis</topic><topic>Sublimation</topic><topic>Tides</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Water content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Broman, Lina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benze, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gumbel, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Ole Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randall, Cora E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SWEPUB Stockholms universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Stockholms universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric chemistry and physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Broman, Lina</au><au>Benze, Susanne</au><au>Gumbel, Jörg</au><au>Christensen, Ole Martin</au><au>Randall, Cora E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Common volume satellite studies of polar mesospheric clouds with Odin/OSIRIS tomography and AIM/CIPS nadir imaging</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric chemistry and physics</jtitle><date>2019-10-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>12455</spage><epage>12475</epage><pages>12455-12475</pages><issn>1680-7324</issn><issn>1680-7316</issn><eissn>1680-7324</eissn><abstract>Two important approaches for satellite studies of polar mesospheric clouds (PMCs) are nadir measurements adapting phase function analysis and limb measurements adapting spectroscopic analysis. Combining both approaches enables new studies of cloud structures and microphysical processes but is complicated by differences in scattering conditions, observation geometry and sensitivity. In this study, we compare common volume PMC observations from the nadir-viewing Cloud Imaging and Particle Size (CIPS) instrument on the Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere (AIM) satellite and a special set of tomographic limb observations from the Optical Spectrograph and InfraRed Imager System (OSIRIS) on the Odin satellite performed over 18 d for the years 2010 and 2011 and the latitude range 78 to 80∘ N. While CIPS provides preeminent horizontal resolution, the OSIRIS tomographic analysis provides combined horizontal and vertical PMC information. This first direct comparison is an important step towards co-analysing CIPS and OSIRIS data, aiming at unprecedented insights into horizontal and vertical cloud processes. Important scientific questions on how the PMC life cycle is affected by changes in humidity and temperature due to atmospheric gravity waves, planetary waves and tides can be addressed by combining PMC observations in multiple dimensions. Two- and three-dimensional cloud structures simultaneously observed by CIPS and tomographic OSIRIS provide a useful tool for studies of cloud growth and sublimation. Moreover, the combined CIPS/tomographic OSIRIS dataset can be used for studies of even more fundamental character, such as the question of the assumption of the PMC particle size distribution. We perform the first thorough error characterization of OSIRIS tomographic cloud brightness and cloud ice water content (IWC). We establish a consistent method for comparing cloud properties from limb tomography and nadir observations, accounting for differences in scattering conditions, resolution and sensitivity. Based on an extensive common volume and a temporal coincidence criterion of only 5 min, our method enables a detailed comparison of PMC regions of varying brightness and IWC. However, since the dataset is limited to 18 d of observations this study does not include a comparison of cloud frequency. The cloud properties of the OSIRIS tomographic dataset are vertically resolved, while the cloud properties of the CIPS dataset is vertically integrated. To make these different quantities comparable, the OSIRIS tomographic cloud properties cloud scattering coefficient and ice mass density (IMD) have been integrated over the vertical extent of the cloud to form cloud albedo and IWC of the same quantity as CIPS cloud products. We find that the OSIRIS albedo (obtained from the vertical integration of the primary OSIRIS tomography product, cloud scattering coefficient) shows very good agreement with the primary CIPS product, cloud albedo, with a correlation coefficient of 0.96. However, OSIRIS systematically reports brighter clouds than CIPS and the bias between the instruments (OSIRIS – CIPS) is 3.4×10-6 sr−1 (±2.9×10-6 sr−1) on average. The OSIRIS tomography IWC (obtained from the vertical integration of IMD) agrees well with the CIPS IWC, with a correlation coefficient of 0.91. However, the IWC reported by OSIRIS is lower than CIPS, and we quantify the bias to −22 g km−2 (±14 g km−2) on average.</abstract><cop>Katlenburg-Lindau</cop><pub>Copernicus GmbH</pub><doi>10.5194/acp-19-12455-2019</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9260-2265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2454-549X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1680-7324
ispartof Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 2019-10, Vol.19 (19), p.12455-12475
issn 1680-7324
1680-7316
1680-7324
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dd510a431f934951a7d58f6042b1f216
source Publicly Available Content Database; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aeronomy
Albedo
Atmospheric gravity waves
Bias
Brightness
Cloud albedo
Cloud properties
Clouds
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Datasets
Dimensions
Function analysis
Gravitational waves
Gravity waves
Humidity
Imaging techniques
Instruments
Integration
Life cycle
Life cycles
Mesosphere
Moisture content
Particle size
Particle size distribution
Planetary waves
Polar mesospheric clouds
Properties
Properties (attributes)
Questions
Resolution
Satellites
Scattering coefficient
Sensitivity
Size distribution
Spectroscopic analysis
Sublimation
Tides
Tomography
Water content
title Common volume satellite studies of polar mesospheric clouds with Odin/OSIRIS tomography and AIM/CIPS nadir imaging
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A09%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Common%20volume%20satellite%20studies%20of%20polar%20mesospheric%20clouds%20with%20Odin/OSIRIS%20tomography%20and%20AIM/CIPS%20nadir%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20chemistry%20and%20physics&rft.au=Broman,%20Lina&rft.date=2019-10-08&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=12455&rft.epage=12475&rft.pages=12455-12475&rft.issn=1680-7324&rft.eissn=1680-7324&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/acp-19-12455-2019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2301771768%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e1585ac067bde58373d1f776c3c1833e45db6e0904845c370d2322dd50c06d43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2301771768&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true