Loading…

Harvesting entanglement by non-identical detectors with different energy gaps

A bstract It has been shown that the vacuum state of a free quantum field is entangled and such vacuum entanglement can be harvested by a pair of initially uncorrelated detectors interacting locally with the vacuum field for a finite time. In this paper, we examine the entanglement harvesting phenom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of high energy physics 2022-05, Vol.2022 (5), p.112-14, Article 112
Main Authors: Hu, Hui, Zhang, Jialin, Yu, Hongwei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A bstract It has been shown that the vacuum state of a free quantum field is entangled and such vacuum entanglement can be harvested by a pair of initially uncorrelated detectors interacting locally with the vacuum field for a finite time. In this paper, we examine the entanglement harvesting phenomenon of two non-identical inertial detectors with different energy gaps locally interacting with massless scalar fields via a Gaussian switching function. We focus on how entanglement harvesting depends on the energy gap difference from two perspectives: the amount of entanglement harvested and the harvesting-achievable separation between the two detectors. In the sense of the amount of entanglement, we find that as long as the inter-detector separation is not too small with respect to the interaction duration parameter, two non-identical detectors could extract more entanglement from the vacuum state than the identical detectors. There exists an optimal value of the energy gap difference when the inter-detector separation is sufficiently large that renders the harvested entanglement to peak. Regarding the harvesting-achievable separation, we further find that the presence of an energy gap difference generally enlarges the harvesting-achievable separation range. Our results suggest that the non-identical detectors may be advantageous to extracting entanglement from vacuum in certain circumstances as compared to identical detectors.
ISSN:1029-8479
1029-8479
DOI:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)112