Loading…

Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS)

Sevoflurane is an inhalational agent of choice in paediatric anaesthesia. For management of airways in children a suitable alternative to ETT is a paediatric proseal laryngeal mask airway (benchmark second generation SAD). Various studies have shown that less sevoflurane concentration is required fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier) 2016-01, Vol.66 (1), p.24-28
Main Authors: Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S., Santhosh, M.C.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3541-9e48f4cd30cf5e14d297b8f50ed4f5d1d9358554a2bd40f35af4c936d588247a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3541-9e48f4cd30cf5e14d297b8f50ed4f5d1d9358554a2bd40f35af4c936d588247a3
container_end_page 28
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)
container_volume 66
creator Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S.
Santhosh, M.C.B.
description Sevoflurane is an inhalational agent of choice in paediatric anaesthesia. For management of airways in children a suitable alternative to ETT is a paediatric proseal laryngeal mask airway (benchmark second generation SAD). Various studies have shown that less sevoflurane concentration is required for LMA insertion in comparison to TI. BIS is a useful monitor of depth of anaesthesia. To compare concentration of sevoflurane (end tidal and MAC value) required for proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion and tracheal intubation in correlation with BIS index. The prospective randomised single blind study was done in children between 2 and 9 years of ASA I and II and they were randomly allocated to Group P (proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion) and Group TI (tracheal intubation). No sedative premedication was given. Induction was done with 8% sevoflurane and then predetermined concentration was maintained for 10min. Airway was secured either by proseal laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube without using muscle relaxant. End tidal sevoflurane concentration, MAC, BIS, and other vital parameters were monitored every minute till insertion of an airway device. Insertion conditions were observed. Statistical analysis was done by ANOVA and Students t test. Difference between ETLMI (2.49±0.44) and ETTI (2.81±0.65) as well as MACLMI (1.67±0.13) and MACTI (1.77±0.43) was statistically very significant, while BISLMI (49.05±10.76) and BISTI (41.25±3.25) was significant. Insertion conditions were comparable in both the groups. We can conclude that in children airway can be secured safely with proseal laryngeal mask airway using less sevoflurane concentration in comparison to tracheal intubation and this was supported by BIS index. Sevoflurano é um agente inalatório de escolha em anestesia pediátrica. Para o manejo de vias aéreas em crianças, uma alternativa adequada para o TET é uma MLP pediátrica (referência de segunda geração SAD). Vários estudos mostraram que uma menor concentração do sevoflurano é necessária para a inserção da ML em comparação com a IT. O BIS é um monitor útil da profundidade da anestesia. Comparar a concentração de sevoflurano (valores ao final da expiração e da CAM) necessária para a inserção de MLP e intubação traqueal em correlação com o BIS. Estudo prospectivo, randômico e cego conduzido com crianças entre 2-9 anos de idade, estado físico ASA I-II, randomicamente alocados nos grupos P (inserção de MLP) e IT (intubação traqueal). Pré-medicação
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.07.011
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ddfd9661e66a40d784faf3bd0c8a4944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0034_70942016000100024</scielo_id><els_id>S0104001414001845</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ddfd9661e66a40d784faf3bd0c8a4944</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1760893824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3541-9e48f4cd30cf5e14d297b8f50ed4f5d1d9358554a2bd40f35af4c936d588247a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVkt_ARLysRw2jGPHSQ4coOJjpUocCmfLscddh6y92Emr_gz-Mc6mVJw4WB573jyP35uieE2hpEDFu6HsB-WxrIDyEpoSKH1WnAMFvoV89fyf-Ky4SGmAHFLWsQpeFmeVaETbVeK8-H0VDkcVXQqeBEsS3gU7zjFTEx28Rj9FNbmctCES5xPG0ylDjzEkVCMZVXzwt0t0UOknUS7eqweivCG5VO-XhPPT3K80zhO9d6OJ6MmlDjHiuCbu3bQnH3c3b18VL6waE1487pvix-dP36--bq-_fdldfbjealZzuu2Qt5Zrw0DbGik3Vdf0ra0BDbe1oaZjdVvXXFW94WBZrTK6Y8LUbVvxRrFNsVt5TVCDPEZ3yB-RQTl5ugjxVqr8WT2iNMaaTgiKQigOpmm5VZb1BnSreMd55ipXrqQdjkEOYY4-Ny9vABiXDXQ8GyUWD_KqloLLtSCr-GvGNMmDSxrHMQsf5iRpI6DtWHuCshWqs-Apon3qlYJcZkEO8jQLcpkFCY1cjN4Ubx4fmPsDmqeav85nwPsVgFnjO4dRLr1nx42LqKcsgvvvA38APk7Fgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760893824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS)</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><source>SciELO</source><creator>Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S. ; Santhosh, M.C.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S. ; Santhosh, M.C.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Sevoflurane is an inhalational agent of choice in paediatric anaesthesia. For management of airways in children a suitable alternative to ETT is a paediatric proseal laryngeal mask airway (benchmark second generation SAD). Various studies have shown that less sevoflurane concentration is required for LMA insertion in comparison to TI. BIS is a useful monitor of depth of anaesthesia. To compare concentration of sevoflurane (end tidal and MAC value) required for proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion and tracheal intubation in correlation with BIS index. The prospective randomised single blind study was done in children between 2 and 9 years of ASA I and II and they were randomly allocated to Group P (proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion) and Group TI (tracheal intubation). No sedative premedication was given. Induction was done with 8% sevoflurane and then predetermined concentration was maintained for 10min. Airway was secured either by proseal laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube without using muscle relaxant. End tidal sevoflurane concentration, MAC, BIS, and other vital parameters were monitored every minute till insertion of an airway device. Insertion conditions were observed. Statistical analysis was done by ANOVA and Students t test. Difference between ETLMI (2.49±0.44) and ETTI (2.81±0.65) as well as MACLMI (1.67±0.13) and MACTI (1.77±0.43) was statistically very significant, while BISLMI (49.05±10.76) and BISTI (41.25±3.25) was significant. Insertion conditions were comparable in both the groups. We can conclude that in children airway can be secured safely with proseal laryngeal mask airway using less sevoflurane concentration in comparison to tracheal intubation and this was supported by BIS index. Sevoflurano é um agente inalatório de escolha em anestesia pediátrica. Para o manejo de vias aéreas em crianças, uma alternativa adequada para o TET é uma MLP pediátrica (referência de segunda geração SAD). Vários estudos mostraram que uma menor concentração do sevoflurano é necessária para a inserção da ML em comparação com a IT. O BIS é um monitor útil da profundidade da anestesia. Comparar a concentração de sevoflurano (valores ao final da expiração e da CAM) necessária para a inserção de MLP e intubação traqueal em correlação com o BIS. Estudo prospectivo, randômico e cego conduzido com crianças entre 2-9 anos de idade, estado físico ASA I-II, randomicamente alocados nos grupos P (inserção de MLP) e IT (intubação traqueal). Pré-medicação sedativa não foi administrada. A indução foi realizada com sevoflurano a 8% e, em seguida, a concentração predeterminada foi mantida durante 10min. A via aérea foi garantida por MLP ou tubo endotraqueal, sem o uso de relaxante muscular. A concentração de sevoflurano ao final da expiração, CAM, BIS e outros parâmetros vitais foram monitorados a cada minuto até a inserção do dispositivo respiratório. As condições de inserção foram observadas. A análise estatística foi realizada com o teste-t de Student e ANOVA. As diferenças entre TEIML (2,49±0,44) e TEIT (2,81±0,65), bem como CAMIML (1,67±0,13) e CAMIT (1,77±0,43) foram estatisticamente muito significativas; enquanto BISIML (49,05±10,76) e BISIT (41,25±3,25) foram significativos. As condições de inserção foram comparáveis em ambos os grupos. Podermos concluir que a MLP em comparação com a intubação traqueal pode ser segura para a via aérea de crianças, usando menos concentração de sevoflurano, o que foi confirmado pelo BIS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0104-0014</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1806-907X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0104-0014</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.07.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26768926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Elsevier Editora Ltda</publisher><subject>Airway Management - methods ; ANESTHESIOLOGY ; Anesthetics, Inhalation - administration &amp; dosage ; Anesthetics, Inhalation - pharmacokinetics ; Bispectral index monitor ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Consciousness Monitors ; Endotracheal tube ; Female ; Humans ; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods ; Laryngeal Masks ; Male ; Methyl Ethers - administration &amp; dosage ; Methyl Ethers - pharmacokinetics ; Monitor do índice bispectral ; Máscara laríngea proseal ; Pilot Projects ; Proseal laryngeal mask airway ; Prospective Studies ; Sevoflurane ; Sevoflurano ; Single-Blind Method ; Tubo endotraqueal</subject><ispartof>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier), 2016-01, Vol.66 (1), p.24-28</ispartof><rights>2014 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3541-9e48f4cd30cf5e14d297b8f50ed4f5d1d9358554a2bd40f35af4c936d588247a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3541-9e48f4cd30cf5e14d297b8f50ed4f5d1d9358554a2bd40f35af4c936d588247a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001414001845$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,24129,27901,27902,45756</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26768926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santhosh, M.C.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS)</title><title>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)</title><addtitle>Braz J Anesthesiol</addtitle><description>Sevoflurane is an inhalational agent of choice in paediatric anaesthesia. For management of airways in children a suitable alternative to ETT is a paediatric proseal laryngeal mask airway (benchmark second generation SAD). Various studies have shown that less sevoflurane concentration is required for LMA insertion in comparison to TI. BIS is a useful monitor of depth of anaesthesia. To compare concentration of sevoflurane (end tidal and MAC value) required for proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion and tracheal intubation in correlation with BIS index. The prospective randomised single blind study was done in children between 2 and 9 years of ASA I and II and they were randomly allocated to Group P (proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion) and Group TI (tracheal intubation). No sedative premedication was given. Induction was done with 8% sevoflurane and then predetermined concentration was maintained for 10min. Airway was secured either by proseal laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube without using muscle relaxant. End tidal sevoflurane concentration, MAC, BIS, and other vital parameters were monitored every minute till insertion of an airway device. Insertion conditions were observed. Statistical analysis was done by ANOVA and Students t test. Difference between ETLMI (2.49±0.44) and ETTI (2.81±0.65) as well as MACLMI (1.67±0.13) and MACTI (1.77±0.43) was statistically very significant, while BISLMI (49.05±10.76) and BISTI (41.25±3.25) was significant. Insertion conditions were comparable in both the groups. We can conclude that in children airway can be secured safely with proseal laryngeal mask airway using less sevoflurane concentration in comparison to tracheal intubation and this was supported by BIS index. Sevoflurano é um agente inalatório de escolha em anestesia pediátrica. Para o manejo de vias aéreas em crianças, uma alternativa adequada para o TET é uma MLP pediátrica (referência de segunda geração SAD). Vários estudos mostraram que uma menor concentração do sevoflurano é necessária para a inserção da ML em comparação com a IT. O BIS é um monitor útil da profundidade da anestesia. Comparar a concentração de sevoflurano (valores ao final da expiração e da CAM) necessária para a inserção de MLP e intubação traqueal em correlação com o BIS. Estudo prospectivo, randômico e cego conduzido com crianças entre 2-9 anos de idade, estado físico ASA I-II, randomicamente alocados nos grupos P (inserção de MLP) e IT (intubação traqueal). Pré-medicação sedativa não foi administrada. A indução foi realizada com sevoflurano a 8% e, em seguida, a concentração predeterminada foi mantida durante 10min. A via aérea foi garantida por MLP ou tubo endotraqueal, sem o uso de relaxante muscular. A concentração de sevoflurano ao final da expiração, CAM, BIS e outros parâmetros vitais foram monitorados a cada minuto até a inserção do dispositivo respiratório. As condições de inserção foram observadas. A análise estatística foi realizada com o teste-t de Student e ANOVA. As diferenças entre TEIML (2,49±0,44) e TEIT (2,81±0,65), bem como CAMIML (1,67±0,13) e CAMIT (1,77±0,43) foram estatisticamente muito significativas; enquanto BISIML (49,05±10,76) e BISIT (41,25±3,25) foram significativos. As condições de inserção foram comparáveis em ambos os grupos. Podermos concluir que a MLP em comparação com a intubação traqueal pode ser segura para a via aérea de crianças, usando menos concentração de sevoflurano, o que foi confirmado pelo BIS.</description><subject>Airway Management - methods</subject><subject>ANESTHESIOLOGY</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Inhalation - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Inhalation - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Bispectral index monitor</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Consciousness Monitors</subject><subject>Endotracheal tube</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</subject><subject>Laryngeal Masks</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methyl Ethers - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Methyl Ethers - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Monitor do índice bispectral</subject><subject>Máscara laríngea proseal</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Proseal laryngeal mask airway</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sevoflurane</subject><subject>Sevoflurano</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Tubo endotraqueal</subject><issn>0104-0014</issn><issn>1806-907X</issn><issn>0104-0014</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVkt_ARLysRw2jGPHSQ4coOJjpUocCmfLscddh6y92Emr_gz-Mc6mVJw4WB573jyP35uieE2hpEDFu6HsB-WxrIDyEpoSKH1WnAMFvoV89fyf-Ky4SGmAHFLWsQpeFmeVaETbVeK8-H0VDkcVXQqeBEsS3gU7zjFTEx28Rj9FNbmctCES5xPG0ylDjzEkVCMZVXzwt0t0UOknUS7eqweivCG5VO-XhPPT3K80zhO9d6OJ6MmlDjHiuCbu3bQnH3c3b18VL6waE1487pvix-dP36--bq-_fdldfbjealZzuu2Qt5Zrw0DbGik3Vdf0ra0BDbe1oaZjdVvXXFW94WBZrTK6Y8LUbVvxRrFNsVt5TVCDPEZ3yB-RQTl5ugjxVqr8WT2iNMaaTgiKQigOpmm5VZb1BnSreMd55ipXrqQdjkEOYY4-Ny9vABiXDXQ8GyUWD_KqloLLtSCr-GvGNMmDSxrHMQsf5iRpI6DtWHuCshWqs-Apon3qlYJcZkEO8jQLcpkFCY1cjN4Ubx4fmPsDmqeav85nwPsVgFnjO4dRLr1nx42LqKcsgvvvA38APk7Fgw</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S.</creator><creator>Santhosh, M.C.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Editora Ltda</general><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS)</title><author>Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S. ; Santhosh, M.C.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3541-9e48f4cd30cf5e14d297b8f50ed4f5d1d9358554a2bd40f35af4c936d588247a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Airway Management - methods</topic><topic>ANESTHESIOLOGY</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Inhalation - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Inhalation - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Bispectral index monitor</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Consciousness Monitors</topic><topic>Endotracheal tube</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</topic><topic>Laryngeal Masks</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methyl Ethers - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Methyl Ethers - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Monitor do índice bispectral</topic><topic>Máscara laríngea proseal</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Proseal laryngeal mask airway</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sevoflurane</topic><topic>Sevoflurano</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Tubo endotraqueal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santhosh, M.C.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals - May need to register for free articles</collection><jtitle>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S.</au><au>Santhosh, M.C.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS)</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)</jtitle><addtitle>Braz J Anesthesiol</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>24-28</pages><issn>0104-0014</issn><issn>1806-907X</issn><eissn>0104-0014</eissn><abstract>Sevoflurane is an inhalational agent of choice in paediatric anaesthesia. For management of airways in children a suitable alternative to ETT is a paediatric proseal laryngeal mask airway (benchmark second generation SAD). Various studies have shown that less sevoflurane concentration is required for LMA insertion in comparison to TI. BIS is a useful monitor of depth of anaesthesia. To compare concentration of sevoflurane (end tidal and MAC value) required for proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion and tracheal intubation in correlation with BIS index. The prospective randomised single blind study was done in children between 2 and 9 years of ASA I and II and they were randomly allocated to Group P (proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion) and Group TI (tracheal intubation). No sedative premedication was given. Induction was done with 8% sevoflurane and then predetermined concentration was maintained for 10min. Airway was secured either by proseal laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube without using muscle relaxant. End tidal sevoflurane concentration, MAC, BIS, and other vital parameters were monitored every minute till insertion of an airway device. Insertion conditions were observed. Statistical analysis was done by ANOVA and Students t test. Difference between ETLMI (2.49±0.44) and ETTI (2.81±0.65) as well as MACLMI (1.67±0.13) and MACTI (1.77±0.43) was statistically very significant, while BISLMI (49.05±10.76) and BISTI (41.25±3.25) was significant. Insertion conditions were comparable in both the groups. We can conclude that in children airway can be secured safely with proseal laryngeal mask airway using less sevoflurane concentration in comparison to tracheal intubation and this was supported by BIS index. Sevoflurano é um agente inalatório de escolha em anestesia pediátrica. Para o manejo de vias aéreas em crianças, uma alternativa adequada para o TET é uma MLP pediátrica (referência de segunda geração SAD). Vários estudos mostraram que uma menor concentração do sevoflurano é necessária para a inserção da ML em comparação com a IT. O BIS é um monitor útil da profundidade da anestesia. Comparar a concentração de sevoflurano (valores ao final da expiração e da CAM) necessária para a inserção de MLP e intubação traqueal em correlação com o BIS. Estudo prospectivo, randômico e cego conduzido com crianças entre 2-9 anos de idade, estado físico ASA I-II, randomicamente alocados nos grupos P (inserção de MLP) e IT (intubação traqueal). Pré-medicação sedativa não foi administrada. A indução foi realizada com sevoflurano a 8% e, em seguida, a concentração predeterminada foi mantida durante 10min. A via aérea foi garantida por MLP ou tubo endotraqueal, sem o uso de relaxante muscular. A concentração de sevoflurano ao final da expiração, CAM, BIS e outros parâmetros vitais foram monitorados a cada minuto até a inserção do dispositivo respiratório. As condições de inserção foram observadas. A análise estatística foi realizada com o teste-t de Student e ANOVA. As diferenças entre TEIML (2,49±0,44) e TEIT (2,81±0,65), bem como CAMIML (1,67±0,13) e CAMIT (1,77±0,43) foram estatisticamente muito significativas; enquanto BISIML (49,05±10,76) e BISIT (41,25±3,25) foram significativos. As condições de inserção foram comparáveis em ambos os grupos. Podermos concluir que a MLP em comparação com a intubação traqueal pode ser segura para a via aérea de crianças, usando menos concentração de sevoflurano, o que foi confirmado pelo BIS.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Elsevier Editora Ltda</pub><pmid>26768926</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjane.2014.07.011</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0104-0014
ispartof Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier), 2016-01, Vol.66 (1), p.24-28
issn 0104-0014
1806-907X
0104-0014
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ddfd9661e66a40d784faf3bd0c8a4944
source ScienceDirect; BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS; SciELO
subjects Airway Management - methods
ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthetics, Inhalation - administration & dosage
Anesthetics, Inhalation - pharmacokinetics
Bispectral index monitor
Child
Child, Preschool
Consciousness Monitors
Endotracheal tube
Female
Humans
Intubation, Intratracheal - methods
Laryngeal Masks
Male
Methyl Ethers - administration & dosage
Methyl Ethers - pharmacokinetics
Monitor do índice bispectral
Máscara laríngea proseal
Pilot Projects
Proseal laryngeal mask airway
Prospective Studies
Sevoflurane
Sevoflurano
Single-Blind Method
Tubo endotraqueal
title Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A52%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20sevoflurane%20concentration%20for%20insertion%20of%20proseal%20laryngeal%20mask%20airway%20and%20tracheal%20intubation%20in%20children%20(correlation%20with%20BIS)&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20journal%20of%20anesthesiology%20(Elsevier)&rft.au=Mudakanagoudar,%20Mahantesh%20S.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=24-28&rft.issn=0104-0014&rft.eissn=0104-0014&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.07.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1760893824%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3541-9e48f4cd30cf5e14d297b8f50ed4f5d1d9358554a2bd40f35af4c936d588247a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760893824&rft_id=info:pmid/26768926&rft_scielo_id=S0034_70942016000100024&rfr_iscdi=true