Loading…
Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS)
Sevoflurane is an inhalational agent of choice in paediatric anaesthesia. For management of airways in children a suitable alternative to ETT is a paediatric proseal laryngeal mask airway (benchmark second generation SAD). Various studies have shown that less sevoflurane concentration is required fo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier) 2016-01, Vol.66 (1), p.24-28 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3541-9e48f4cd30cf5e14d297b8f50ed4f5d1d9358554a2bd40f35af4c936d588247a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3541-9e48f4cd30cf5e14d297b8f50ed4f5d1d9358554a2bd40f35af4c936d588247a3 |
container_end_page | 28 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier) |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S. Santhosh, M.C.B. |
description | Sevoflurane is an inhalational agent of choice in paediatric anaesthesia. For management of airways in children a suitable alternative to ETT is a paediatric proseal laryngeal mask airway (benchmark second generation SAD). Various studies have shown that less sevoflurane concentration is required for LMA insertion in comparison to TI. BIS is a useful monitor of depth of anaesthesia.
To compare concentration of sevoflurane (end tidal and MAC value) required for proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion and tracheal intubation in correlation with BIS index.
The prospective randomised single blind study was done in children between 2 and 9 years of ASA I and II and they were randomly allocated to Group P (proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion) and Group TI (tracheal intubation). No sedative premedication was given. Induction was done with 8% sevoflurane and then predetermined concentration was maintained for 10min. Airway was secured either by proseal laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube without using muscle relaxant. End tidal sevoflurane concentration, MAC, BIS, and other vital parameters were monitored every minute till insertion of an airway device. Insertion conditions were observed. Statistical analysis was done by ANOVA and Students t test.
Difference between ETLMI (2.49±0.44) and ETTI (2.81±0.65) as well as MACLMI (1.67±0.13) and MACTI (1.77±0.43) was statistically very significant, while BISLMI (49.05±10.76) and BISTI (41.25±3.25) was significant. Insertion conditions were comparable in both the groups.
We can conclude that in children airway can be secured safely with proseal laryngeal mask airway using less sevoflurane concentration in comparison to tracheal intubation and this was supported by BIS index.
Sevoflurano é um agente inalatório de escolha em anestesia pediátrica. Para o manejo de vias aéreas em crianças, uma alternativa adequada para o TET é uma MLP pediátrica (referência de segunda geração SAD). Vários estudos mostraram que uma menor concentração do sevoflurano é necessária para a inserção da ML em comparação com a IT. O BIS é um monitor útil da profundidade da anestesia.
Comparar a concentração de sevoflurano (valores ao final da expiração e da CAM) necessária para a inserção de MLP e intubação traqueal em correlação com o BIS.
Estudo prospectivo, randômico e cego conduzido com crianças entre 2-9 anos de idade, estado físico ASA I-II, randomicamente alocados nos grupos P (inserção de MLP) e IT (intubação traqueal). Pré-medicação |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.07.011 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ddfd9661e66a40d784faf3bd0c8a4944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0034_70942016000100024</scielo_id><els_id>S0104001414001845</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ddfd9661e66a40d784faf3bd0c8a4944</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1760893824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3541-9e48f4cd30cf5e14d297b8f50ed4f5d1d9358554a2bd40f35af4c936d588247a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVkt_ARLysRw2jGPHSQ4coOJjpUocCmfLscddh6y92Emr_gz-Mc6mVJw4WB573jyP35uieE2hpEDFu6HsB-WxrIDyEpoSKH1WnAMFvoV89fyf-Ky4SGmAHFLWsQpeFmeVaETbVeK8-H0VDkcVXQqeBEsS3gU7zjFTEx28Rj9FNbmctCES5xPG0ylDjzEkVCMZVXzwt0t0UOknUS7eqweivCG5VO-XhPPT3K80zhO9d6OJ6MmlDjHiuCbu3bQnH3c3b18VL6waE1487pvix-dP36--bq-_fdldfbjealZzuu2Qt5Zrw0DbGik3Vdf0ra0BDbe1oaZjdVvXXFW94WBZrTK6Y8LUbVvxRrFNsVt5TVCDPEZ3yB-RQTl5ugjxVqr8WT2iNMaaTgiKQigOpmm5VZb1BnSreMd55ipXrqQdjkEOYY4-Ny9vABiXDXQ8GyUWD_KqloLLtSCr-GvGNMmDSxrHMQsf5iRpI6DtWHuCshWqs-Apon3qlYJcZkEO8jQLcpkFCY1cjN4Ubx4fmPsDmqeav85nwPsVgFnjO4dRLr1nx42LqKcsgvvvA38APk7Fgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760893824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS)</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><source>SciELO</source><creator>Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S. ; Santhosh, M.C.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S. ; Santhosh, M.C.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Sevoflurane is an inhalational agent of choice in paediatric anaesthesia. For management of airways in children a suitable alternative to ETT is a paediatric proseal laryngeal mask airway (benchmark second generation SAD). Various studies have shown that less sevoflurane concentration is required for LMA insertion in comparison to TI. BIS is a useful monitor of depth of anaesthesia.
To compare concentration of sevoflurane (end tidal and MAC value) required for proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion and tracheal intubation in correlation with BIS index.
The prospective randomised single blind study was done in children between 2 and 9 years of ASA I and II and they were randomly allocated to Group P (proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion) and Group TI (tracheal intubation). No sedative premedication was given. Induction was done with 8% sevoflurane and then predetermined concentration was maintained for 10min. Airway was secured either by proseal laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube without using muscle relaxant. End tidal sevoflurane concentration, MAC, BIS, and other vital parameters were monitored every minute till insertion of an airway device. Insertion conditions were observed. Statistical analysis was done by ANOVA and Students t test.
Difference between ETLMI (2.49±0.44) and ETTI (2.81±0.65) as well as MACLMI (1.67±0.13) and MACTI (1.77±0.43) was statistically very significant, while BISLMI (49.05±10.76) and BISTI (41.25±3.25) was significant. Insertion conditions were comparable in both the groups.
We can conclude that in children airway can be secured safely with proseal laryngeal mask airway using less sevoflurane concentration in comparison to tracheal intubation and this was supported by BIS index.
Sevoflurano é um agente inalatório de escolha em anestesia pediátrica. Para o manejo de vias aéreas em crianças, uma alternativa adequada para o TET é uma MLP pediátrica (referência de segunda geração SAD). Vários estudos mostraram que uma menor concentração do sevoflurano é necessária para a inserção da ML em comparação com a IT. O BIS é um monitor útil da profundidade da anestesia.
Comparar a concentração de sevoflurano (valores ao final da expiração e da CAM) necessária para a inserção de MLP e intubação traqueal em correlação com o BIS.
Estudo prospectivo, randômico e cego conduzido com crianças entre 2-9 anos de idade, estado físico ASA I-II, randomicamente alocados nos grupos P (inserção de MLP) e IT (intubação traqueal). Pré-medicação sedativa não foi administrada. A indução foi realizada com sevoflurano a 8% e, em seguida, a concentração predeterminada foi mantida durante 10min. A via aérea foi garantida por MLP ou tubo endotraqueal, sem o uso de relaxante muscular. A concentração de sevoflurano ao final da expiração, CAM, BIS e outros parâmetros vitais foram monitorados a cada minuto até a inserção do dispositivo respiratório. As condições de inserção foram observadas. A análise estatística foi realizada com o teste-t de Student e ANOVA.
As diferenças entre TEIML (2,49±0,44) e TEIT (2,81±0,65), bem como CAMIML (1,67±0,13) e CAMIT (1,77±0,43) foram estatisticamente muito significativas; enquanto BISIML (49,05±10,76) e BISIT (41,25±3,25) foram significativos. As condições de inserção foram comparáveis em ambos os grupos.
Podermos concluir que a MLP em comparação com a intubação traqueal pode ser segura para a via aérea de crianças, usando menos concentração de sevoflurano, o que foi confirmado pelo BIS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0104-0014</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1806-907X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0104-0014</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.07.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26768926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Elsevier Editora Ltda</publisher><subject>Airway Management - methods ; ANESTHESIOLOGY ; Anesthetics, Inhalation - administration & dosage ; Anesthetics, Inhalation - pharmacokinetics ; Bispectral index monitor ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Consciousness Monitors ; Endotracheal tube ; Female ; Humans ; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods ; Laryngeal Masks ; Male ; Methyl Ethers - administration & dosage ; Methyl Ethers - pharmacokinetics ; Monitor do índice bispectral ; Máscara laríngea proseal ; Pilot Projects ; Proseal laryngeal mask airway ; Prospective Studies ; Sevoflurane ; Sevoflurano ; Single-Blind Method ; Tubo endotraqueal</subject><ispartof>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier), 2016-01, Vol.66 (1), p.24-28</ispartof><rights>2014 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3541-9e48f4cd30cf5e14d297b8f50ed4f5d1d9358554a2bd40f35af4c936d588247a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3541-9e48f4cd30cf5e14d297b8f50ed4f5d1d9358554a2bd40f35af4c936d588247a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001414001845$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,24129,27901,27902,45756</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26768926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santhosh, M.C.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS)</title><title>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)</title><addtitle>Braz J Anesthesiol</addtitle><description>Sevoflurane is an inhalational agent of choice in paediatric anaesthesia. For management of airways in children a suitable alternative to ETT is a paediatric proseal laryngeal mask airway (benchmark second generation SAD). Various studies have shown that less sevoflurane concentration is required for LMA insertion in comparison to TI. BIS is a useful monitor of depth of anaesthesia.
To compare concentration of sevoflurane (end tidal and MAC value) required for proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion and tracheal intubation in correlation with BIS index.
The prospective randomised single blind study was done in children between 2 and 9 years of ASA I and II and they were randomly allocated to Group P (proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion) and Group TI (tracheal intubation). No sedative premedication was given. Induction was done with 8% sevoflurane and then predetermined concentration was maintained for 10min. Airway was secured either by proseal laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube without using muscle relaxant. End tidal sevoflurane concentration, MAC, BIS, and other vital parameters were monitored every minute till insertion of an airway device. Insertion conditions were observed. Statistical analysis was done by ANOVA and Students t test.
Difference between ETLMI (2.49±0.44) and ETTI (2.81±0.65) as well as MACLMI (1.67±0.13) and MACTI (1.77±0.43) was statistically very significant, while BISLMI (49.05±10.76) and BISTI (41.25±3.25) was significant. Insertion conditions were comparable in both the groups.
We can conclude that in children airway can be secured safely with proseal laryngeal mask airway using less sevoflurane concentration in comparison to tracheal intubation and this was supported by BIS index.
Sevoflurano é um agente inalatório de escolha em anestesia pediátrica. Para o manejo de vias aéreas em crianças, uma alternativa adequada para o TET é uma MLP pediátrica (referência de segunda geração SAD). Vários estudos mostraram que uma menor concentração do sevoflurano é necessária para a inserção da ML em comparação com a IT. O BIS é um monitor útil da profundidade da anestesia.
Comparar a concentração de sevoflurano (valores ao final da expiração e da CAM) necessária para a inserção de MLP e intubação traqueal em correlação com o BIS.
Estudo prospectivo, randômico e cego conduzido com crianças entre 2-9 anos de idade, estado físico ASA I-II, randomicamente alocados nos grupos P (inserção de MLP) e IT (intubação traqueal). Pré-medicação sedativa não foi administrada. A indução foi realizada com sevoflurano a 8% e, em seguida, a concentração predeterminada foi mantida durante 10min. A via aérea foi garantida por MLP ou tubo endotraqueal, sem o uso de relaxante muscular. A concentração de sevoflurano ao final da expiração, CAM, BIS e outros parâmetros vitais foram monitorados a cada minuto até a inserção do dispositivo respiratório. As condições de inserção foram observadas. A análise estatística foi realizada com o teste-t de Student e ANOVA.
As diferenças entre TEIML (2,49±0,44) e TEIT (2,81±0,65), bem como CAMIML (1,67±0,13) e CAMIT (1,77±0,43) foram estatisticamente muito significativas; enquanto BISIML (49,05±10,76) e BISIT (41,25±3,25) foram significativos. As condições de inserção foram comparáveis em ambos os grupos.
Podermos concluir que a MLP em comparação com a intubação traqueal pode ser segura para a via aérea de crianças, usando menos concentração de sevoflurano, o que foi confirmado pelo BIS.</description><subject>Airway Management - methods</subject><subject>ANESTHESIOLOGY</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Inhalation - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Inhalation - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Bispectral index monitor</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Consciousness Monitors</subject><subject>Endotracheal tube</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</subject><subject>Laryngeal Masks</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methyl Ethers - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Methyl Ethers - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Monitor do índice bispectral</subject><subject>Máscara laríngea proseal</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Proseal laryngeal mask airway</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sevoflurane</subject><subject>Sevoflurano</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Tubo endotraqueal</subject><issn>0104-0014</issn><issn>1806-907X</issn><issn>0104-0014</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVkt_ARLysRw2jGPHSQ4coOJjpUocCmfLscddh6y92Emr_gz-Mc6mVJw4WB573jyP35uieE2hpEDFu6HsB-WxrIDyEpoSKH1WnAMFvoV89fyf-Ky4SGmAHFLWsQpeFmeVaETbVeK8-H0VDkcVXQqeBEsS3gU7zjFTEx28Rj9FNbmctCES5xPG0ylDjzEkVCMZVXzwt0t0UOknUS7eqweivCG5VO-XhPPT3K80zhO9d6OJ6MmlDjHiuCbu3bQnH3c3b18VL6waE1487pvix-dP36--bq-_fdldfbjealZzuu2Qt5Zrw0DbGik3Vdf0ra0BDbe1oaZjdVvXXFW94WBZrTK6Y8LUbVvxRrFNsVt5TVCDPEZ3yB-RQTl5ugjxVqr8WT2iNMaaTgiKQigOpmm5VZb1BnSreMd55ipXrqQdjkEOYY4-Ny9vABiXDXQ8GyUWD_KqloLLtSCr-GvGNMmDSxrHMQsf5iRpI6DtWHuCshWqs-Apon3qlYJcZkEO8jQLcpkFCY1cjN4Ubx4fmPsDmqeav85nwPsVgFnjO4dRLr1nx42LqKcsgvvvA38APk7Fgw</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S.</creator><creator>Santhosh, M.C.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Editora Ltda</general><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS)</title><author>Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S. ; Santhosh, M.C.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3541-9e48f4cd30cf5e14d297b8f50ed4f5d1d9358554a2bd40f35af4c936d588247a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Airway Management - methods</topic><topic>ANESTHESIOLOGY</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Inhalation - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Inhalation - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Bispectral index monitor</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Consciousness Monitors</topic><topic>Endotracheal tube</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</topic><topic>Laryngeal Masks</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methyl Ethers - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Methyl Ethers - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Monitor do índice bispectral</topic><topic>Máscara laríngea proseal</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Proseal laryngeal mask airway</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sevoflurane</topic><topic>Sevoflurano</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Tubo endotraqueal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santhosh, M.C.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals - May need to register for free articles</collection><jtitle>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mudakanagoudar, Mahantesh S.</au><au>Santhosh, M.C.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS)</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)</jtitle><addtitle>Braz J Anesthesiol</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>24-28</pages><issn>0104-0014</issn><issn>1806-907X</issn><eissn>0104-0014</eissn><abstract>Sevoflurane is an inhalational agent of choice in paediatric anaesthesia. For management of airways in children a suitable alternative to ETT is a paediatric proseal laryngeal mask airway (benchmark second generation SAD). Various studies have shown that less sevoflurane concentration is required for LMA insertion in comparison to TI. BIS is a useful monitor of depth of anaesthesia.
To compare concentration of sevoflurane (end tidal and MAC value) required for proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion and tracheal intubation in correlation with BIS index.
The prospective randomised single blind study was done in children between 2 and 9 years of ASA I and II and they were randomly allocated to Group P (proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion) and Group TI (tracheal intubation). No sedative premedication was given. Induction was done with 8% sevoflurane and then predetermined concentration was maintained for 10min. Airway was secured either by proseal laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube without using muscle relaxant. End tidal sevoflurane concentration, MAC, BIS, and other vital parameters were monitored every minute till insertion of an airway device. Insertion conditions were observed. Statistical analysis was done by ANOVA and Students t test.
Difference between ETLMI (2.49±0.44) and ETTI (2.81±0.65) as well as MACLMI (1.67±0.13) and MACTI (1.77±0.43) was statistically very significant, while BISLMI (49.05±10.76) and BISTI (41.25±3.25) was significant. Insertion conditions were comparable in both the groups.
We can conclude that in children airway can be secured safely with proseal laryngeal mask airway using less sevoflurane concentration in comparison to tracheal intubation and this was supported by BIS index.
Sevoflurano é um agente inalatório de escolha em anestesia pediátrica. Para o manejo de vias aéreas em crianças, uma alternativa adequada para o TET é uma MLP pediátrica (referência de segunda geração SAD). Vários estudos mostraram que uma menor concentração do sevoflurano é necessária para a inserção da ML em comparação com a IT. O BIS é um monitor útil da profundidade da anestesia.
Comparar a concentração de sevoflurano (valores ao final da expiração e da CAM) necessária para a inserção de MLP e intubação traqueal em correlação com o BIS.
Estudo prospectivo, randômico e cego conduzido com crianças entre 2-9 anos de idade, estado físico ASA I-II, randomicamente alocados nos grupos P (inserção de MLP) e IT (intubação traqueal). Pré-medicação sedativa não foi administrada. A indução foi realizada com sevoflurano a 8% e, em seguida, a concentração predeterminada foi mantida durante 10min. A via aérea foi garantida por MLP ou tubo endotraqueal, sem o uso de relaxante muscular. A concentração de sevoflurano ao final da expiração, CAM, BIS e outros parâmetros vitais foram monitorados a cada minuto até a inserção do dispositivo respiratório. As condições de inserção foram observadas. A análise estatística foi realizada com o teste-t de Student e ANOVA.
As diferenças entre TEIML (2,49±0,44) e TEIT (2,81±0,65), bem como CAMIML (1,67±0,13) e CAMIT (1,77±0,43) foram estatisticamente muito significativas; enquanto BISIML (49,05±10,76) e BISIT (41,25±3,25) foram significativos. As condições de inserção foram comparáveis em ambos os grupos.
Podermos concluir que a MLP em comparação com a intubação traqueal pode ser segura para a via aérea de crianças, usando menos concentração de sevoflurano, o que foi confirmado pelo BIS.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Elsevier Editora Ltda</pub><pmid>26768926</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjane.2014.07.011</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0104-0014 |
ispartof | Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier), 2016-01, Vol.66 (1), p.24-28 |
issn | 0104-0014 1806-907X 0104-0014 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ddfd9661e66a40d784faf3bd0c8a4944 |
source | ScienceDirect; BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS; SciELO |
subjects | Airway Management - methods ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthetics, Inhalation - administration & dosage Anesthetics, Inhalation - pharmacokinetics Bispectral index monitor Child Child, Preschool Consciousness Monitors Endotracheal tube Female Humans Intubation, Intratracheal - methods Laryngeal Masks Male Methyl Ethers - administration & dosage Methyl Ethers - pharmacokinetics Monitor do índice bispectral Máscara laríngea proseal Pilot Projects Proseal laryngeal mask airway Prospective Studies Sevoflurane Sevoflurano Single-Blind Method Tubo endotraqueal |
title | Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A52%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20sevoflurane%20concentration%20for%20insertion%20of%20proseal%20laryngeal%20mask%20airway%20and%20tracheal%20intubation%20in%20children%20(correlation%20with%20BIS)&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20journal%20of%20anesthesiology%20(Elsevier)&rft.au=Mudakanagoudar,%20Mahantesh%20S.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=24-28&rft.issn=0104-0014&rft.eissn=0104-0014&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.07.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1760893824%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3541-9e48f4cd30cf5e14d297b8f50ed4f5d1d9358554a2bd40f35af4c936d588247a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760893824&rft_id=info:pmid/26768926&rft_scielo_id=S0034_70942016000100024&rfr_iscdi=true |