Loading…

The impacts of trust, cost and risk on collaboration in environmental governance

Collaborative approaches to environmental governance are drawing increased interest in research and practice. In this article we investigate the structure and functioning of actor networks engaged in collaboration. We specifically seek to advance understanding of how and why collaborative networks a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.) N.J.), 2020-09, Vol.2 (3), p.734-749
Main Authors: Bodin, Örjan, Baird, Julia, Schultz, Lisen, Plummer, Ryan, Armitage, Derek, Nimmo, Dale
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-d0d523a3c9d00ce74773046f9fe21cfb9389e2d66d20e8c9bcfc6ad776b3c92c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-d0d523a3c9d00ce74773046f9fe21cfb9389e2d66d20e8c9bcfc6ad776b3c92c3
container_end_page 749
container_issue 3
container_start_page 734
container_title People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.)
container_volume 2
creator Bodin, Örjan
Baird, Julia
Schultz, Lisen
Plummer, Ryan
Armitage, Derek
Nimmo, Dale
description Collaborative approaches to environmental governance are drawing increased interest in research and practice. In this article we investigate the structure and functioning of actor networks engaged in collaboration. We specifically seek to advance understanding of how and why collaborative networks are formed as actors engage in addressing two broad classes of collective action problems: coordination and cooperation. It has been proposed that more risk‐prone cooperative problems favour denser and more cohesive bonding network structures, whereas less risky coordination problems favour sparser and more centralized bridging structures. Recent empirical findings, however, cast some doubts on these assumptions. In building on previous work we propose and evaluate a set of propositions in order to remedy these ambiguities. Our propositions build on the assumption that bridging structures could, if actors experience sufficient levels of trust in the collaborative process, adequately support both cooperation and coordination problems. Our empirical investigation of four UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves gives initial support for our assumptions, and suggests that bridging structures emerge when actors have trust in the collaborative endeavour, and/or when the cost of collaborative failure is deemed low. While caution is warranted due to data limitations, our findings contribute to improved policies and guidelines on how to stimulate and facilitate more effective collaborative approaches to environmental governance. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pan3.10097
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_de1f8efc72164fe1992fc270a945e78a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_de1f8efc72164fe1992fc270a945e78a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2439743730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-d0d523a3c9d00ce74773046f9fe21cfb9389e2d66d20e8c9bcfc6ad776b3c92c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3DAURiPUSiBgwy-wxA4xxa_E8XIEhSIhyoJ2azn2NXjI2MFOQPx7PBOE6Kar-9C5R7r6quqI4B8EY3o26MA2nRQ71R6tRb1oGeHfvvS71WHOK1xgTFjD2V51d_8IyK8HbcaMokNjmvJ4ikzMI9LBouTzE4qhLPpedzHp0ZfJBwThxacY1hBG3aOH-AIp6GDgoPrudJ_h8KPuV38uf96f_1rc_L66Pl_eLAznWCwstjVlmhlpMTYguBAM88ZJB5QY10nWSqC2aSzF0BrZGWcabYVounJDDduvrmevjXqlhuTXOr2pqL3aLmJ6UDqN3vSgLBDXgjOCkoY7IFJSZ6jAWvIaRKuL63R25VcYpu4f24X_u9za8qSIrJu2LvjxjA8pPk-QR7WKU_m-z4pyJgVn5ZdCncyUSTHnBO5TS7Da5KU2ealtXgUmM_zqe3j7D6nulrdsvnkHGCyXNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2439743730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impacts of trust, cost and risk on collaboration in environmental governance</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Bodin, Örjan ; Baird, Julia ; Schultz, Lisen ; Plummer, Ryan ; Armitage, Derek ; Nimmo, Dale</creator><contributor>Nimmo, Dale</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bodin, Örjan ; Baird, Julia ; Schultz, Lisen ; Plummer, Ryan ; Armitage, Derek ; Nimmo, Dale ; Nimmo, Dale</creatorcontrib><description>Collaborative approaches to environmental governance are drawing increased interest in research and practice. In this article we investigate the structure and functioning of actor networks engaged in collaboration. We specifically seek to advance understanding of how and why collaborative networks are formed as actors engage in addressing two broad classes of collective action problems: coordination and cooperation. It has been proposed that more risk‐prone cooperative problems favour denser and more cohesive bonding network structures, whereas less risky coordination problems favour sparser and more centralized bridging structures. Recent empirical findings, however, cast some doubts on these assumptions. In building on previous work we propose and evaluate a set of propositions in order to remedy these ambiguities. Our propositions build on the assumption that bridging structures could, if actors experience sufficient levels of trust in the collaborative process, adequately support both cooperation and coordination problems. Our empirical investigation of four UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves gives initial support for our assumptions, and suggests that bridging structures emerge when actors have trust in the collaborative endeavour, and/or when the cost of collaborative failure is deemed low. While caution is warranted due to data limitations, our findings contribute to improved policies and guidelines on how to stimulate and facilitate more effective collaborative approaches to environmental governance. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article</description><identifier>ISSN: 2575-8314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2575-8314</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biosphere ; Biosphere reserves ; Bridging ; Collaboration ; collaborative governance ; Collective action ; Conflicts of interest ; Cooperation ; Coordination ; Costs ; Environmental governance ; Environmental impact ; environmental studies ; Hypotheses ; MAB ; Perceptions ; social networks ; social-ecological systems ; UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves</subject><ispartof>People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.), 2020-09, Vol.2 (3), p.734-749</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-d0d523a3c9d00ce74773046f9fe21cfb9389e2d66d20e8c9bcfc6ad776b3c92c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-d0d523a3c9d00ce74773046f9fe21cfb9389e2d66d20e8c9bcfc6ad776b3c92c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5749-6201 ; 0000-0002-8218-1153 ; 0000-0003-4763-8872 ; 0000-0002-8921-1693 ; 0000-0002-2580-5361</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2439743730/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2439743730?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,46052,46476,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-195685$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Nimmo, Dale</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bodin, Örjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baird, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Lisen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plummer, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armitage, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nimmo, Dale</creatorcontrib><title>The impacts of trust, cost and risk on collaboration in environmental governance</title><title>People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.)</title><description>Collaborative approaches to environmental governance are drawing increased interest in research and practice. In this article we investigate the structure and functioning of actor networks engaged in collaboration. We specifically seek to advance understanding of how and why collaborative networks are formed as actors engage in addressing two broad classes of collective action problems: coordination and cooperation. It has been proposed that more risk‐prone cooperative problems favour denser and more cohesive bonding network structures, whereas less risky coordination problems favour sparser and more centralized bridging structures. Recent empirical findings, however, cast some doubts on these assumptions. In building on previous work we propose and evaluate a set of propositions in order to remedy these ambiguities. Our propositions build on the assumption that bridging structures could, if actors experience sufficient levels of trust in the collaborative process, adequately support both cooperation and coordination problems. Our empirical investigation of four UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves gives initial support for our assumptions, and suggests that bridging structures emerge when actors have trust in the collaborative endeavour, and/or when the cost of collaborative failure is deemed low. While caution is warranted due to data limitations, our findings contribute to improved policies and guidelines on how to stimulate and facilitate more effective collaborative approaches to environmental governance. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article</description><subject>Biosphere</subject><subject>Biosphere reserves</subject><subject>Bridging</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>collaborative governance</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Environmental governance</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>environmental studies</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>MAB</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>social networks</subject><subject>social-ecological systems</subject><subject>UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves</subject><issn>2575-8314</issn><issn>2575-8314</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtP3DAURiPUSiBgwy-wxA4xxa_E8XIEhSIhyoJ2azn2NXjI2MFOQPx7PBOE6Kar-9C5R7r6quqI4B8EY3o26MA2nRQ71R6tRb1oGeHfvvS71WHOK1xgTFjD2V51d_8IyK8HbcaMokNjmvJ4ikzMI9LBouTzE4qhLPpedzHp0ZfJBwThxacY1hBG3aOH-AIp6GDgoPrudJ_h8KPuV38uf96f_1rc_L66Pl_eLAznWCwstjVlmhlpMTYguBAM88ZJB5QY10nWSqC2aSzF0BrZGWcabYVounJDDduvrmevjXqlhuTXOr2pqL3aLmJ6UDqN3vSgLBDXgjOCkoY7IFJSZ6jAWvIaRKuL63R25VcYpu4f24X_u9za8qSIrJu2LvjxjA8pPk-QR7WKU_m-z4pyJgVn5ZdCncyUSTHnBO5TS7Da5KU2ealtXgUmM_zqe3j7D6nulrdsvnkHGCyXNQ</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Bodin, Örjan</creator><creator>Baird, Julia</creator><creator>Schultz, Lisen</creator><creator>Plummer, Ryan</creator><creator>Armitage, Derek</creator><creator>Nimmo, Dale</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>ABAVF</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>DG7</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5749-6201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8218-1153</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4763-8872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8921-1693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2580-5361</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>The impacts of trust, cost and risk on collaboration in environmental governance</title><author>Bodin, Örjan ; Baird, Julia ; Schultz, Lisen ; Plummer, Ryan ; Armitage, Derek ; Nimmo, Dale</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-d0d523a3c9d00ce74773046f9fe21cfb9389e2d66d20e8c9bcfc6ad776b3c92c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biosphere</topic><topic>Biosphere reserves</topic><topic>Bridging</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>collaborative governance</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Environmental governance</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>environmental studies</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>MAB</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>social networks</topic><topic>social-ecological systems</topic><topic>UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bodin, Örjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baird, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Lisen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plummer, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armitage, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nimmo, Dale</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SWEPUB Stockholms universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Stockholms universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bodin, Örjan</au><au>Baird, Julia</au><au>Schultz, Lisen</au><au>Plummer, Ryan</au><au>Armitage, Derek</au><au>Nimmo, Dale</au><au>Nimmo, Dale</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impacts of trust, cost and risk on collaboration in environmental governance</atitle><jtitle>People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>734</spage><epage>749</epage><pages>734-749</pages><issn>2575-8314</issn><eissn>2575-8314</eissn><abstract>Collaborative approaches to environmental governance are drawing increased interest in research and practice. In this article we investigate the structure and functioning of actor networks engaged in collaboration. We specifically seek to advance understanding of how and why collaborative networks are formed as actors engage in addressing two broad classes of collective action problems: coordination and cooperation. It has been proposed that more risk‐prone cooperative problems favour denser and more cohesive bonding network structures, whereas less risky coordination problems favour sparser and more centralized bridging structures. Recent empirical findings, however, cast some doubts on these assumptions. In building on previous work we propose and evaluate a set of propositions in order to remedy these ambiguities. Our propositions build on the assumption that bridging structures could, if actors experience sufficient levels of trust in the collaborative process, adequately support both cooperation and coordination problems. Our empirical investigation of four UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves gives initial support for our assumptions, and suggests that bridging structures emerge when actors have trust in the collaborative endeavour, and/or when the cost of collaborative failure is deemed low. While caution is warranted due to data limitations, our findings contribute to improved policies and guidelines on how to stimulate and facilitate more effective collaborative approaches to environmental governance. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/pan3.10097</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5749-6201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8218-1153</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4763-8872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8921-1693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2580-5361</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2575-8314
ispartof People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.), 2020-09, Vol.2 (3), p.734-749
issn 2575-8314
2575-8314
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_de1f8efc72164fe1992fc270a945e78a
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Biosphere
Biosphere reserves
Bridging
Collaboration
collaborative governance
Collective action
Conflicts of interest
Cooperation
Coordination
Costs
Environmental governance
Environmental impact
environmental studies
Hypotheses
MAB
Perceptions
social networks
social-ecological systems
UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves
title The impacts of trust, cost and risk on collaboration in environmental governance
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A34%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impacts%20of%20trust,%20cost%20and%20risk%20on%20collaboration%20in%20environmental%20governance&rft.jtitle=People%20and%20nature%20(Hoboken,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Bodin,%20%C3%96rjan&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=734&rft.epage=749&rft.pages=734-749&rft.issn=2575-8314&rft.eissn=2575-8314&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pan3.10097&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2439743730%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-d0d523a3c9d00ce74773046f9fe21cfb9389e2d66d20e8c9bcfc6ad776b3c92c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2439743730&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true