Loading…
The impacts of trust, cost and risk on collaboration in environmental governance
Collaborative approaches to environmental governance are drawing increased interest in research and practice. In this article we investigate the structure and functioning of actor networks engaged in collaboration. We specifically seek to advance understanding of how and why collaborative networks a...
Saved in:
Published in: | People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.) N.J.), 2020-09, Vol.2 (3), p.734-749 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-d0d523a3c9d00ce74773046f9fe21cfb9389e2d66d20e8c9bcfc6ad776b3c92c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-d0d523a3c9d00ce74773046f9fe21cfb9389e2d66d20e8c9bcfc6ad776b3c92c3 |
container_end_page | 749 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 734 |
container_title | People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.) |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Bodin, Örjan Baird, Julia Schultz, Lisen Plummer, Ryan Armitage, Derek Nimmo, Dale |
description | Collaborative approaches to environmental governance are drawing increased interest in research and practice. In this article we investigate the structure and functioning of actor networks engaged in collaboration.
We specifically seek to advance understanding of how and why collaborative networks are formed as actors engage in addressing two broad classes of collective action problems: coordination and cooperation. It has been proposed that more risk‐prone cooperative problems favour denser and more cohesive bonding network structures, whereas less risky coordination problems favour sparser and more centralized bridging structures.
Recent empirical findings, however, cast some doubts on these assumptions. In building on previous work we propose and evaluate a set of propositions in order to remedy these ambiguities. Our propositions build on the assumption that bridging structures could, if actors experience sufficient levels of trust in the collaborative process, adequately support both cooperation and coordination problems.
Our empirical investigation of four UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves gives initial support for our assumptions, and suggests that bridging structures emerge when actors have trust in the collaborative endeavour, and/or when the cost of collaborative failure is deemed low. While caution is warranted due to data limitations, our findings contribute to improved policies and guidelines on how to stimulate and facilitate more effective collaborative approaches to environmental governance.
A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pan3.10097 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_de1f8efc72164fe1992fc270a945e78a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_de1f8efc72164fe1992fc270a945e78a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2439743730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-d0d523a3c9d00ce74773046f9fe21cfb9389e2d66d20e8c9bcfc6ad776b3c92c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3DAURiPUSiBgwy-wxA4xxa_E8XIEhSIhyoJ2azn2NXjI2MFOQPx7PBOE6Kar-9C5R7r6quqI4B8EY3o26MA2nRQ71R6tRb1oGeHfvvS71WHOK1xgTFjD2V51d_8IyK8HbcaMokNjmvJ4ikzMI9LBouTzE4qhLPpedzHp0ZfJBwThxacY1hBG3aOH-AIp6GDgoPrudJ_h8KPuV38uf96f_1rc_L66Pl_eLAznWCwstjVlmhlpMTYguBAM88ZJB5QY10nWSqC2aSzF0BrZGWcabYVounJDDduvrmevjXqlhuTXOr2pqL3aLmJ6UDqN3vSgLBDXgjOCkoY7IFJSZ6jAWvIaRKuL63R25VcYpu4f24X_u9za8qSIrJu2LvjxjA8pPk-QR7WKU_m-z4pyJgVn5ZdCncyUSTHnBO5TS7Da5KU2ealtXgUmM_zqe3j7D6nulrdsvnkHGCyXNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2439743730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impacts of trust, cost and risk on collaboration in environmental governance</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Bodin, Örjan ; Baird, Julia ; Schultz, Lisen ; Plummer, Ryan ; Armitage, Derek ; Nimmo, Dale</creator><contributor>Nimmo, Dale</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bodin, Örjan ; Baird, Julia ; Schultz, Lisen ; Plummer, Ryan ; Armitage, Derek ; Nimmo, Dale ; Nimmo, Dale</creatorcontrib><description>Collaborative approaches to environmental governance are drawing increased interest in research and practice. In this article we investigate the structure and functioning of actor networks engaged in collaboration.
We specifically seek to advance understanding of how and why collaborative networks are formed as actors engage in addressing two broad classes of collective action problems: coordination and cooperation. It has been proposed that more risk‐prone cooperative problems favour denser and more cohesive bonding network structures, whereas less risky coordination problems favour sparser and more centralized bridging structures.
Recent empirical findings, however, cast some doubts on these assumptions. In building on previous work we propose and evaluate a set of propositions in order to remedy these ambiguities. Our propositions build on the assumption that bridging structures could, if actors experience sufficient levels of trust in the collaborative process, adequately support both cooperation and coordination problems.
Our empirical investigation of four UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves gives initial support for our assumptions, and suggests that bridging structures emerge when actors have trust in the collaborative endeavour, and/or when the cost of collaborative failure is deemed low. While caution is warranted due to data limitations, our findings contribute to improved policies and guidelines on how to stimulate and facilitate more effective collaborative approaches to environmental governance.
A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article</description><identifier>ISSN: 2575-8314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2575-8314</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biosphere ; Biosphere reserves ; Bridging ; Collaboration ; collaborative governance ; Collective action ; Conflicts of interest ; Cooperation ; Coordination ; Costs ; Environmental governance ; Environmental impact ; environmental studies ; Hypotheses ; MAB ; Perceptions ; social networks ; social-ecological systems ; UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves</subject><ispartof>People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.), 2020-09, Vol.2 (3), p.734-749</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-d0d523a3c9d00ce74773046f9fe21cfb9389e2d66d20e8c9bcfc6ad776b3c92c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-d0d523a3c9d00ce74773046f9fe21cfb9389e2d66d20e8c9bcfc6ad776b3c92c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5749-6201 ; 0000-0002-8218-1153 ; 0000-0003-4763-8872 ; 0000-0002-8921-1693 ; 0000-0002-2580-5361</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2439743730/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2439743730?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,46052,46476,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-195685$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Nimmo, Dale</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bodin, Örjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baird, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Lisen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plummer, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armitage, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nimmo, Dale</creatorcontrib><title>The impacts of trust, cost and risk on collaboration in environmental governance</title><title>People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.)</title><description>Collaborative approaches to environmental governance are drawing increased interest in research and practice. In this article we investigate the structure and functioning of actor networks engaged in collaboration.
We specifically seek to advance understanding of how and why collaborative networks are formed as actors engage in addressing two broad classes of collective action problems: coordination and cooperation. It has been proposed that more risk‐prone cooperative problems favour denser and more cohesive bonding network structures, whereas less risky coordination problems favour sparser and more centralized bridging structures.
Recent empirical findings, however, cast some doubts on these assumptions. In building on previous work we propose and evaluate a set of propositions in order to remedy these ambiguities. Our propositions build on the assumption that bridging structures could, if actors experience sufficient levels of trust in the collaborative process, adequately support both cooperation and coordination problems.
Our empirical investigation of four UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves gives initial support for our assumptions, and suggests that bridging structures emerge when actors have trust in the collaborative endeavour, and/or when the cost of collaborative failure is deemed low. While caution is warranted due to data limitations, our findings contribute to improved policies and guidelines on how to stimulate and facilitate more effective collaborative approaches to environmental governance.
A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article</description><subject>Biosphere</subject><subject>Biosphere reserves</subject><subject>Bridging</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>collaborative governance</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Environmental governance</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>environmental studies</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>MAB</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>social networks</subject><subject>social-ecological systems</subject><subject>UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves</subject><issn>2575-8314</issn><issn>2575-8314</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtP3DAURiPUSiBgwy-wxA4xxa_E8XIEhSIhyoJ2azn2NXjI2MFOQPx7PBOE6Kar-9C5R7r6quqI4B8EY3o26MA2nRQ71R6tRb1oGeHfvvS71WHOK1xgTFjD2V51d_8IyK8HbcaMokNjmvJ4ikzMI9LBouTzE4qhLPpedzHp0ZfJBwThxacY1hBG3aOH-AIp6GDgoPrudJ_h8KPuV38uf96f_1rc_L66Pl_eLAznWCwstjVlmhlpMTYguBAM88ZJB5QY10nWSqC2aSzF0BrZGWcabYVounJDDduvrmevjXqlhuTXOr2pqL3aLmJ6UDqN3vSgLBDXgjOCkoY7IFJSZ6jAWvIaRKuL63R25VcYpu4f24X_u9za8qSIrJu2LvjxjA8pPk-QR7WKU_m-z4pyJgVn5ZdCncyUSTHnBO5TS7Da5KU2ealtXgUmM_zqe3j7D6nulrdsvnkHGCyXNQ</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Bodin, Örjan</creator><creator>Baird, Julia</creator><creator>Schultz, Lisen</creator><creator>Plummer, Ryan</creator><creator>Armitage, Derek</creator><creator>Nimmo, Dale</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>ABAVF</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>DG7</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5749-6201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8218-1153</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4763-8872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8921-1693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2580-5361</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>The impacts of trust, cost and risk on collaboration in environmental governance</title><author>Bodin, Örjan ; Baird, Julia ; Schultz, Lisen ; Plummer, Ryan ; Armitage, Derek ; Nimmo, Dale</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-d0d523a3c9d00ce74773046f9fe21cfb9389e2d66d20e8c9bcfc6ad776b3c92c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biosphere</topic><topic>Biosphere reserves</topic><topic>Bridging</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>collaborative governance</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Environmental governance</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>environmental studies</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>MAB</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>social networks</topic><topic>social-ecological systems</topic><topic>UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bodin, Örjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baird, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Lisen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plummer, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armitage, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nimmo, Dale</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SWEPUB Stockholms universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Stockholms universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bodin, Örjan</au><au>Baird, Julia</au><au>Schultz, Lisen</au><au>Plummer, Ryan</au><au>Armitage, Derek</au><au>Nimmo, Dale</au><au>Nimmo, Dale</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impacts of trust, cost and risk on collaboration in environmental governance</atitle><jtitle>People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>734</spage><epage>749</epage><pages>734-749</pages><issn>2575-8314</issn><eissn>2575-8314</eissn><abstract>Collaborative approaches to environmental governance are drawing increased interest in research and practice. In this article we investigate the structure and functioning of actor networks engaged in collaboration.
We specifically seek to advance understanding of how and why collaborative networks are formed as actors engage in addressing two broad classes of collective action problems: coordination and cooperation. It has been proposed that more risk‐prone cooperative problems favour denser and more cohesive bonding network structures, whereas less risky coordination problems favour sparser and more centralized bridging structures.
Recent empirical findings, however, cast some doubts on these assumptions. In building on previous work we propose and evaluate a set of propositions in order to remedy these ambiguities. Our propositions build on the assumption that bridging structures could, if actors experience sufficient levels of trust in the collaborative process, adequately support both cooperation and coordination problems.
Our empirical investigation of four UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves gives initial support for our assumptions, and suggests that bridging structures emerge when actors have trust in the collaborative endeavour, and/or when the cost of collaborative failure is deemed low. While caution is warranted due to data limitations, our findings contribute to improved policies and guidelines on how to stimulate and facilitate more effective collaborative approaches to environmental governance.
A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/pan3.10097</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5749-6201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8218-1153</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4763-8872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8921-1693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2580-5361</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2575-8314 |
ispartof | People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.), 2020-09, Vol.2 (3), p.734-749 |
issn | 2575-8314 2575-8314 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_de1f8efc72164fe1992fc270a945e78a |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Biosphere Biosphere reserves Bridging Collaboration collaborative governance Collective action Conflicts of interest Cooperation Coordination Costs Environmental governance Environmental impact environmental studies Hypotheses MAB Perceptions social networks social-ecological systems UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves |
title | The impacts of trust, cost and risk on collaboration in environmental governance |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A34%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impacts%20of%20trust,%20cost%20and%20risk%20on%20collaboration%20in%20environmental%20governance&rft.jtitle=People%20and%20nature%20(Hoboken,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Bodin,%20%C3%96rjan&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=734&rft.epage=749&rft.pages=734-749&rft.issn=2575-8314&rft.eissn=2575-8314&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pan3.10097&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2439743730%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-d0d523a3c9d00ce74773046f9fe21cfb9389e2d66d20e8c9bcfc6ad776b3c92c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2439743730&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |