Disparities in dialysis modality decision-making using a social-ecological lens: a qualitative approach

• Published in: BMC nephrology 2022-08, Vol.23 (1), p.1-276, Article 276
• Main Authors: Vélez-Bermúdez, Miriam, Adamowicz, Jenna L, Askelson, Natoshia M, Lutgendorf, Susan K, Fraer, Mony, Christensen, Alan J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Care and treatment; Chronic kidney failure; Cognitive ability; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Decision making; Demographic aspects; Diagnosis; Dialysis; Economic aspects; End-stage renal disease; Health aspects; Health care; Health care disparities; Healthcare disparities; Interviews; Kidney diseases; Methods; Nephrology; Pandemics; Patient education; Patient outcomes; Patients; Peritoneal dialysis; Qualitative methods; Qualitative research; Quality of life; Questionnaires; Renal replacement therapy; Surveys
• ISSN: 1471-2369; 1471-2369
• DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02905-5

Background Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) may choose to undergo dialysis in-center or at home, but uptake of home dialysis in the US has been minimal despite its benefits over in-center dialysis. Factors that may have led patients to select home dialysis over in-center dialysis are poorly understood in the literature, and interventions to improve selection of home dialysis have focused on patient knowledge and shared decision-making processes between patients and providers. The purpose of this study was to explore micro- and macro-level factors surrounding dialysis modality decision-making among patients undergoing in-center and home dialysis, and explore what leads patients to select home dialysis over in-center dialysis. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted in a dialysis clinic at a large Midwestern research hospital, from September 2019 to December 2020. Participants were 18 years or older, undergoing dialysis for ESKD, and had the cognitive ability to provide consent. Surveys assessing demographic and clinical information were administered to participants following their interviews. Results Forty patients completed interviews and surveys (20 [50%] in-center dialysis, 17 [43%] female, mean [SD] age, 59 [15.99] years). Qualitative findings suggested that healthcare access and engagement before entering nephrology care, after entering nephrology care, and following dialysis initiation influenced patients' awareness regarding their kidney disease status, progression toward ESKD, and dialysis options. Potential modifiers of these outcomes include race, ethnicity, and language barriers. Most participants adopted a passive-approach during decision-making. Finally, fatigue, concerns regarding one's dialyzing schedule, and problems with fistula/catheter access sites contributed to overall satisfaction with one's dialysis modality. Conclusions Findings point to broader factors affecting dialysis selection, including healthcare access and racial/ethnic inequities. Providing dialysis information before entering nephrology and after dialysis initiation may improve patient agency in decision-making. Additional resources should be prioritized for patients of underrepresented backgrounds. Dialysis decision-making may be appropriately modeled under the social-ecological framework to inform future interventions. Keywords: Decision-making, Qualitative methods, Dialysis, Healthcare disparities