The Multiple Faces of Effective Grand Strategy

• Published in: Journal of strategic security 2010-07, Vol.3 (2), p.1-12
• Main Author: Groves, Bryan N.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Case studies; Communication; Conflict studies; Connective tissue; Connective tissues; Diplomacy; Diplomatic & consular services; Factor analysis; History; International relations; Irregular warfare; Leadership; Military history; Military theory; National power; National security; Objectives; Political leaders; Principles; Rationality; Religious leaders; Strategic planning; Strategies; Strategy; Success; War
• ISSN: 1944-0464; 1944-0472
• DOI: 10.5038/1944-0472.3.2.1

Effective national leaders throughout history have deliberately developed grand strategies and successfully implemented them to attain their political goals, while also integrating and accomplishing economic, social, defense, and sometimes religious objectives. Not all leaders have been successful, however, as this process is immensely complex and can be adversely affected by the actions of other leaders around their region and the world. It bears examination, then, to determine what factors contribute to successful grand strategies and why many leaders fail to reach their stated ends. This article utilizes a historic case study approach and explores three key areas of grand strategy: universal principles, Clausewitzian approaches, and indirect approaches. I handle each separately and in distinct fashion, though some connective tissue does interlace across sections. Additionally, the unifying argument is that thoughtful, rational leaders, who weigh the costs and benefits associated with each course of action available to them, still must heed the truths embedded in these three sections to attain their objectives. Not doing so often leads to failure, unrealized goals, and a nation gone awry.