Loading…
Sacral Nerve Modulation Has No Effect on the Postprandial Response in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Irritable bowel syndrome is a common gastrointestinal disorder with a global prevalence of approximately 11%. Onset or worsening of symptoms following digestion is one of the characteristics of the condition. The present study aimed at evaluating the postprandial sensory and motor response before an...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical and experimental gastroenterology 2020-01, Vol.13, p.235-244 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-458b082a409f01121138fcf58d25b991f13517347b8002905b6a2cdb5bb937aa3 |
container_end_page | 244 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 235 |
container_title | Clinical and experimental gastroenterology |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Fassov, Janne Liao, Donghua Brock, Christina Lundby, Lilli Laurberg, Søren Krogh, Klaus |
description | Irritable bowel syndrome is a common gastrointestinal disorder with a global prevalence of approximately 11%. Onset or worsening of symptoms following digestion is one of the characteristics of the condition. The present study aimed at evaluating the postprandial sensory and motor response before and after treatment with sacral nerve modulation.
Twenty-one irritable bowel syndrome patients, 12 diarrhea-predominant and 9 mixed, were eligible for a 6-week sacral nerve modulation test period. Patients were investigated with multimodal impedance planimetry including a standardized meal at baseline and at the end of 2 weeks of suprasensory stimulation embedded in the 6-week sacral nerve modulation period.
There was no statistical significant difference in the sensory response to heat or cold before and after sacral nerve modulation, p>0.05. At baseline, wall tension increased after the meal (mean 124.79 [range 82.5 to 237.3] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 207.76 [range, 143.5 to 429] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.048 indicating a postprandial response. During sacral nerve modulation, the postprandial increase in wall tension did not reach statistical significance (mean 86.79 [range 28.8 to 204.5] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 159.71 [range 71.3 to 270.8] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.277. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the postprandial wall tension at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p=0.489. Likewise, we found no difference between pressure or stretch ratio at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p>0.05.
Sacral nerve modulation does not exert its positive treatments effects in diarrhea-predominant and mixed irritable bowel syndrome through a modulation of the postprandial response. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2147/CEG.S245209 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_de9e8b0e637a47df822138ebaac17591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A630509545</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_de9e8b0e637a47df822138ebaac17591</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A630509545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-458b082a409f01121138fcf58d25b991f13517347b8002905b6a2cdb5bb937aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt-LEzEQxxdRvOO8J98lIIggrfmx2WxehLP07grnKVZfDdnspE3ZJjXZveP-e1Nbz1ZMHhImn-93yMwUxUuCx5SU4v1kejWe05JTLJ8Up4SIeiQwZU8P7ifFeUornBdjRFTyeXHCaMWqquKnxY-5NlF36BbiHaBPoR063bvg0bVO6DagqbVgepQD_RLQl5D6TdS-dVnyFdIm-ATIeTSL0fW66QB9DPfQofmDb2NYw4vimdVdgvP9eVZ8v5x-m1yPbj5fzSYXNyPDGelHJa8bXFNdYmkxIZQQVltjed1S3khJLGGcCFaKpsaYSsybSlPTNrxpJBNas7NitvNtg16pTXRrHR9U0E79DoS4UDr2znSgWpCQs0GVhaVobU1pzgaN1oYILkn2-rDz2gzNGloDvs8VOjI9fvFuqRbhTgnGOBUiG7zdG8Twc4DUq7VLBrpOewhDUrTMreOywjyjr_9BV2GIPpdqS5WMciHpX2qh8wectyHnNVtTdVExzLHk5dZr_B8q7xbWzgQP1uX4keDNgWAJuuuXKXTDtv_pGHy3A00MKUWwj8UgWG3HUOUxVPsxzPSrw_o9sn-Gjv0Cui3ToQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424325792</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sacral Nerve Modulation Has No Effect on the Postprandial Response in Irritable Bowel Syndrome</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access(OpenAccess)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Fassov, Janne ; Liao, Donghua ; Brock, Christina ; Lundby, Lilli ; Laurberg, Søren ; Krogh, Klaus</creator><creatorcontrib>Fassov, Janne ; Liao, Donghua ; Brock, Christina ; Lundby, Lilli ; Laurberg, Søren ; Krogh, Klaus</creatorcontrib><description>Irritable bowel syndrome is a common gastrointestinal disorder with a global prevalence of approximately 11%. Onset or worsening of symptoms following digestion is one of the characteristics of the condition. The present study aimed at evaluating the postprandial sensory and motor response before and after treatment with sacral nerve modulation.
Twenty-one irritable bowel syndrome patients, 12 diarrhea-predominant and 9 mixed, were eligible for a 6-week sacral nerve modulation test period. Patients were investigated with multimodal impedance planimetry including a standardized meal at baseline and at the end of 2 weeks of suprasensory stimulation embedded in the 6-week sacral nerve modulation period.
There was no statistical significant difference in the sensory response to heat or cold before and after sacral nerve modulation, p>0.05. At baseline, wall tension increased after the meal (mean 124.79 [range 82.5 to 237.3] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 207.76 [range, 143.5 to 429] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.048 indicating a postprandial response. During sacral nerve modulation, the postprandial increase in wall tension did not reach statistical significance (mean 86.79 [range 28.8 to 204.5] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 159.71 [range 71.3 to 270.8] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.277. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the postprandial wall tension at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p=0.489. Likewise, we found no difference between pressure or stretch ratio at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p>0.05.
Sacral nerve modulation does not exert its positive treatments effects in diarrhea-predominant and mixed irritable bowel syndrome through a modulation of the postprandial response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1178-7023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1178-7023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/CEG.S245209</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32636665</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Dove Medical Press Limited</publisher><subject>Biomechanics ; Care and treatment ; Diarrhea ; Electrodes ; Fecal incontinence ; gastrocolic response ; Gastroenterology ; Irritable bowel syndrome ; Medical research ; Original Research ; Pain ; Patients ; postprandial response ; sacral nerve modulation ; sacral nerve stimulation ; Software ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2020-01, Vol.13, p.235-244</ispartof><rights>2020 Fassov et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Dove Medical Press Limited</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Fassov et al. 2020 Fassov et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-458b082a409f01121138fcf58d25b991f13517347b8002905b6a2cdb5bb937aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0600-223X ; 0000-0002-3381-1884</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2424325792/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2424325792?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,25736,27907,27908,36995,36996,44573,53774,53776,74877</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32636665$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fassov, Janne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Donghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brock, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundby, Lilli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurberg, Søren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krogh, Klaus</creatorcontrib><title>Sacral Nerve Modulation Has No Effect on the Postprandial Response in Irritable Bowel Syndrome</title><title>Clinical and experimental gastroenterology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>Irritable bowel syndrome is a common gastrointestinal disorder with a global prevalence of approximately 11%. Onset or worsening of symptoms following digestion is one of the characteristics of the condition. The present study aimed at evaluating the postprandial sensory and motor response before and after treatment with sacral nerve modulation.
Twenty-one irritable bowel syndrome patients, 12 diarrhea-predominant and 9 mixed, were eligible for a 6-week sacral nerve modulation test period. Patients were investigated with multimodal impedance planimetry including a standardized meal at baseline and at the end of 2 weeks of suprasensory stimulation embedded in the 6-week sacral nerve modulation period.
There was no statistical significant difference in the sensory response to heat or cold before and after sacral nerve modulation, p>0.05. At baseline, wall tension increased after the meal (mean 124.79 [range 82.5 to 237.3] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 207.76 [range, 143.5 to 429] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.048 indicating a postprandial response. During sacral nerve modulation, the postprandial increase in wall tension did not reach statistical significance (mean 86.79 [range 28.8 to 204.5] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 159.71 [range 71.3 to 270.8] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.277. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the postprandial wall tension at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p=0.489. Likewise, we found no difference between pressure or stretch ratio at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p>0.05.
Sacral nerve modulation does not exert its positive treatments effects in diarrhea-predominant and mixed irritable bowel syndrome through a modulation of the postprandial response.</description><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Diarrhea</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Fecal incontinence</subject><subject>gastrocolic response</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Irritable bowel syndrome</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>postprandial response</subject><subject>sacral nerve modulation</subject><subject>sacral nerve stimulation</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1178-7023</issn><issn>1178-7023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt-LEzEQxxdRvOO8J98lIIggrfmx2WxehLP07grnKVZfDdnspE3ZJjXZveP-e1Nbz1ZMHhImn-93yMwUxUuCx5SU4v1kejWe05JTLJ8Up4SIeiQwZU8P7ifFeUornBdjRFTyeXHCaMWqquKnxY-5NlF36BbiHaBPoR063bvg0bVO6DagqbVgepQD_RLQl5D6TdS-dVnyFdIm-ATIeTSL0fW66QB9DPfQofmDb2NYw4vimdVdgvP9eVZ8v5x-m1yPbj5fzSYXNyPDGelHJa8bXFNdYmkxIZQQVltjed1S3khJLGGcCFaKpsaYSsybSlPTNrxpJBNas7NitvNtg16pTXRrHR9U0E79DoS4UDr2znSgWpCQs0GVhaVobU1pzgaN1oYILkn2-rDz2gzNGloDvs8VOjI9fvFuqRbhTgnGOBUiG7zdG8Twc4DUq7VLBrpOewhDUrTMreOywjyjr_9BV2GIPpdqS5WMciHpX2qh8wectyHnNVtTdVExzLHk5dZr_B8q7xbWzgQP1uX4keDNgWAJuuuXKXTDtv_pGHy3A00MKUWwj8UgWG3HUOUxVPsxzPSrw_o9sn-Gjv0Cui3ToQ</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Fassov, Janne</creator><creator>Liao, Donghua</creator><creator>Brock, Christina</creator><creator>Lundby, Lilli</creator><creator>Laurberg, Søren</creator><creator>Krogh, Klaus</creator><general>Dove Medical Press Limited</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Dove</general><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0600-223X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3381-1884</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Sacral Nerve Modulation Has No Effect on the Postprandial Response in Irritable Bowel Syndrome</title><author>Fassov, Janne ; Liao, Donghua ; Brock, Christina ; Lundby, Lilli ; Laurberg, Søren ; Krogh, Klaus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-458b082a409f01121138fcf58d25b991f13517347b8002905b6a2cdb5bb937aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Diarrhea</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Fecal incontinence</topic><topic>gastrocolic response</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Irritable bowel syndrome</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>postprandial response</topic><topic>sacral nerve modulation</topic><topic>sacral nerve stimulation</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fassov, Janne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Donghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brock, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundby, Lilli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurberg, Søren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krogh, Klaus</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fassov, Janne</au><au>Liao, Donghua</au><au>Brock, Christina</au><au>Lundby, Lilli</au><au>Laurberg, Søren</au><au>Krogh, Klaus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sacral Nerve Modulation Has No Effect on the Postprandial Response in Irritable Bowel Syndrome</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental gastroenterology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><spage>235</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>235-244</pages><issn>1178-7023</issn><eissn>1178-7023</eissn><abstract>Irritable bowel syndrome is a common gastrointestinal disorder with a global prevalence of approximately 11%. Onset or worsening of symptoms following digestion is one of the characteristics of the condition. The present study aimed at evaluating the postprandial sensory and motor response before and after treatment with sacral nerve modulation.
Twenty-one irritable bowel syndrome patients, 12 diarrhea-predominant and 9 mixed, were eligible for a 6-week sacral nerve modulation test period. Patients were investigated with multimodal impedance planimetry including a standardized meal at baseline and at the end of 2 weeks of suprasensory stimulation embedded in the 6-week sacral nerve modulation period.
There was no statistical significant difference in the sensory response to heat or cold before and after sacral nerve modulation, p>0.05. At baseline, wall tension increased after the meal (mean 124.79 [range 82.5 to 237.3] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 207.76 [range, 143.5 to 429] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.048 indicating a postprandial response. During sacral nerve modulation, the postprandial increase in wall tension did not reach statistical significance (mean 86.79 [range 28.8 to 204.5] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 159.71 [range 71.3 to 270.8] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.277. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the postprandial wall tension at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p=0.489. Likewise, we found no difference between pressure or stretch ratio at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p>0.05.
Sacral nerve modulation does not exert its positive treatments effects in diarrhea-predominant and mixed irritable bowel syndrome through a modulation of the postprandial response.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Dove Medical Press Limited</pub><pmid>32636665</pmid><doi>10.2147/CEG.S245209</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0600-223X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3381-1884</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1178-7023 |
ispartof | Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2020-01, Vol.13, p.235-244 |
issn | 1178-7023 1178-7023 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_de9e8b0e637a47df822138ebaac17591 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Taylor & Francis Open Access(OpenAccess); PubMed Central |
subjects | Biomechanics Care and treatment Diarrhea Electrodes Fecal incontinence gastrocolic response Gastroenterology Irritable bowel syndrome Medical research Original Research Pain Patients postprandial response sacral nerve modulation sacral nerve stimulation Software Studies |
title | Sacral Nerve Modulation Has No Effect on the Postprandial Response in Irritable Bowel Syndrome |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T02%3A26%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sacral%20Nerve%20Modulation%20Has%20No%20Effect%20on%20the%20Postprandial%20Response%20in%20Irritable%20Bowel%20Syndrome&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20gastroenterology&rft.au=Fassov,%20Janne&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=235-244&rft.issn=1178-7023&rft.eissn=1178-7023&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/CEG.S245209&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA630509545%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-458b082a409f01121138fcf58d25b991f13517347b8002905b6a2cdb5bb937aa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424325792&rft_id=info:pmid/32636665&rft_galeid=A630509545&rfr_iscdi=true |