Loading…

Sacral Nerve Modulation Has No Effect on the Postprandial Response in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome is a common gastrointestinal disorder with a global prevalence of approximately 11%. Onset or worsening of symptoms following digestion is one of the characteristics of the condition. The present study aimed at evaluating the postprandial sensory and motor response before an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical and experimental gastroenterology 2020-01, Vol.13, p.235-244
Main Authors: Fassov, Janne, Liao, Donghua, Brock, Christina, Lundby, Lilli, Laurberg, Søren, Krogh, Klaus
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-458b082a409f01121138fcf58d25b991f13517347b8002905b6a2cdb5bb937aa3
container_end_page 244
container_issue
container_start_page 235
container_title Clinical and experimental gastroenterology
container_volume 13
creator Fassov, Janne
Liao, Donghua
Brock, Christina
Lundby, Lilli
Laurberg, Søren
Krogh, Klaus
description Irritable bowel syndrome is a common gastrointestinal disorder with a global prevalence of approximately 11%. Onset or worsening of symptoms following digestion is one of the characteristics of the condition. The present study aimed at evaluating the postprandial sensory and motor response before and after treatment with sacral nerve modulation. Twenty-one irritable bowel syndrome patients, 12 diarrhea-predominant and 9 mixed, were eligible for a 6-week sacral nerve modulation test period. Patients were investigated with multimodal impedance planimetry including a standardized meal at baseline and at the end of 2 weeks of suprasensory stimulation embedded in the 6-week sacral nerve modulation period. There was no statistical significant difference in the sensory response to heat or cold before and after sacral nerve modulation, p>0.05. At baseline, wall tension increased after the meal (mean 124.79 [range 82.5 to 237.3] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 207.76 [range, 143.5 to 429] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.048 indicating a postprandial response. During sacral nerve modulation, the postprandial increase in wall tension did not reach statistical significance (mean 86.79 [range 28.8 to 204.5] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 159.71 [range 71.3 to 270.8] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.277. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the postprandial wall tension at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p=0.489. Likewise, we found no difference between pressure or stretch ratio at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p>0.05. Sacral nerve modulation does not exert its positive treatments effects in diarrhea-predominant and mixed irritable bowel syndrome through a modulation of the postprandial response.
doi_str_mv 10.2147/CEG.S245209
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_de9e8b0e637a47df822138ebaac17591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A630509545</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_de9e8b0e637a47df822138ebaac17591</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A630509545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-458b082a409f01121138fcf58d25b991f13517347b8002905b6a2cdb5bb937aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt-LEzEQxxdRvOO8J98lIIggrfmx2WxehLP07grnKVZfDdnspE3ZJjXZveP-e1Nbz1ZMHhImn-93yMwUxUuCx5SU4v1kejWe05JTLJ8Up4SIeiQwZU8P7ifFeUornBdjRFTyeXHCaMWqquKnxY-5NlF36BbiHaBPoR063bvg0bVO6DagqbVgepQD_RLQl5D6TdS-dVnyFdIm-ATIeTSL0fW66QB9DPfQofmDb2NYw4vimdVdgvP9eVZ8v5x-m1yPbj5fzSYXNyPDGelHJa8bXFNdYmkxIZQQVltjed1S3khJLGGcCFaKpsaYSsybSlPTNrxpJBNas7NitvNtg16pTXRrHR9U0E79DoS4UDr2znSgWpCQs0GVhaVobU1pzgaN1oYILkn2-rDz2gzNGloDvs8VOjI9fvFuqRbhTgnGOBUiG7zdG8Twc4DUq7VLBrpOewhDUrTMreOywjyjr_9BV2GIPpdqS5WMciHpX2qh8wectyHnNVtTdVExzLHk5dZr_B8q7xbWzgQP1uX4keDNgWAJuuuXKXTDtv_pGHy3A00MKUWwj8UgWG3HUOUxVPsxzPSrw_o9sn-Gjv0Cui3ToQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424325792</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sacral Nerve Modulation Has No Effect on the Postprandial Response in Irritable Bowel Syndrome</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access(OpenAccess)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Fassov, Janne ; Liao, Donghua ; Brock, Christina ; Lundby, Lilli ; Laurberg, Søren ; Krogh, Klaus</creator><creatorcontrib>Fassov, Janne ; Liao, Donghua ; Brock, Christina ; Lundby, Lilli ; Laurberg, Søren ; Krogh, Klaus</creatorcontrib><description>Irritable bowel syndrome is a common gastrointestinal disorder with a global prevalence of approximately 11%. Onset or worsening of symptoms following digestion is one of the characteristics of the condition. The present study aimed at evaluating the postprandial sensory and motor response before and after treatment with sacral nerve modulation. Twenty-one irritable bowel syndrome patients, 12 diarrhea-predominant and 9 mixed, were eligible for a 6-week sacral nerve modulation test period. Patients were investigated with multimodal impedance planimetry including a standardized meal at baseline and at the end of 2 weeks of suprasensory stimulation embedded in the 6-week sacral nerve modulation period. There was no statistical significant difference in the sensory response to heat or cold before and after sacral nerve modulation, p&gt;0.05. At baseline, wall tension increased after the meal (mean 124.79 [range 82.5 to 237.3] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 207.76 [range, 143.5 to 429] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.048 indicating a postprandial response. During sacral nerve modulation, the postprandial increase in wall tension did not reach statistical significance (mean 86.79 [range 28.8 to 204.5] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 159.71 [range 71.3 to 270.8] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.277. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the postprandial wall tension at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p=0.489. Likewise, we found no difference between pressure or stretch ratio at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p&gt;0.05. Sacral nerve modulation does not exert its positive treatments effects in diarrhea-predominant and mixed irritable bowel syndrome through a modulation of the postprandial response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1178-7023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1178-7023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/CEG.S245209</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32636665</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Dove Medical Press Limited</publisher><subject>Biomechanics ; Care and treatment ; Diarrhea ; Electrodes ; Fecal incontinence ; gastrocolic response ; Gastroenterology ; Irritable bowel syndrome ; Medical research ; Original Research ; Pain ; Patients ; postprandial response ; sacral nerve modulation ; sacral nerve stimulation ; Software ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2020-01, Vol.13, p.235-244</ispartof><rights>2020 Fassov et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Dove Medical Press Limited</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Fassov et al. 2020 Fassov et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-458b082a409f01121138fcf58d25b991f13517347b8002905b6a2cdb5bb937aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0600-223X ; 0000-0002-3381-1884</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2424325792/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2424325792?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,25736,27907,27908,36995,36996,44573,53774,53776,74877</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32636665$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fassov, Janne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Donghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brock, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundby, Lilli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurberg, Søren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krogh, Klaus</creatorcontrib><title>Sacral Nerve Modulation Has No Effect on the Postprandial Response in Irritable Bowel Syndrome</title><title>Clinical and experimental gastroenterology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>Irritable bowel syndrome is a common gastrointestinal disorder with a global prevalence of approximately 11%. Onset or worsening of symptoms following digestion is one of the characteristics of the condition. The present study aimed at evaluating the postprandial sensory and motor response before and after treatment with sacral nerve modulation. Twenty-one irritable bowel syndrome patients, 12 diarrhea-predominant and 9 mixed, were eligible for a 6-week sacral nerve modulation test period. Patients were investigated with multimodal impedance planimetry including a standardized meal at baseline and at the end of 2 weeks of suprasensory stimulation embedded in the 6-week sacral nerve modulation period. There was no statistical significant difference in the sensory response to heat or cold before and after sacral nerve modulation, p&gt;0.05. At baseline, wall tension increased after the meal (mean 124.79 [range 82.5 to 237.3] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 207.76 [range, 143.5 to 429] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.048 indicating a postprandial response. During sacral nerve modulation, the postprandial increase in wall tension did not reach statistical significance (mean 86.79 [range 28.8 to 204.5] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 159.71 [range 71.3 to 270.8] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.277. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the postprandial wall tension at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p=0.489. Likewise, we found no difference between pressure or stretch ratio at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p&gt;0.05. Sacral nerve modulation does not exert its positive treatments effects in diarrhea-predominant and mixed irritable bowel syndrome through a modulation of the postprandial response.</description><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Diarrhea</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Fecal incontinence</subject><subject>gastrocolic response</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Irritable bowel syndrome</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>postprandial response</subject><subject>sacral nerve modulation</subject><subject>sacral nerve stimulation</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1178-7023</issn><issn>1178-7023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt-LEzEQxxdRvOO8J98lIIggrfmx2WxehLP07grnKVZfDdnspE3ZJjXZveP-e1Nbz1ZMHhImn-93yMwUxUuCx5SU4v1kejWe05JTLJ8Up4SIeiQwZU8P7ifFeUornBdjRFTyeXHCaMWqquKnxY-5NlF36BbiHaBPoR063bvg0bVO6DagqbVgepQD_RLQl5D6TdS-dVnyFdIm-ATIeTSL0fW66QB9DPfQofmDb2NYw4vimdVdgvP9eVZ8v5x-m1yPbj5fzSYXNyPDGelHJa8bXFNdYmkxIZQQVltjed1S3khJLGGcCFaKpsaYSsybSlPTNrxpJBNas7NitvNtg16pTXRrHR9U0E79DoS4UDr2znSgWpCQs0GVhaVobU1pzgaN1oYILkn2-rDz2gzNGloDvs8VOjI9fvFuqRbhTgnGOBUiG7zdG8Twc4DUq7VLBrpOewhDUrTMreOywjyjr_9BV2GIPpdqS5WMciHpX2qh8wectyHnNVtTdVExzLHk5dZr_B8q7xbWzgQP1uX4keDNgWAJuuuXKXTDtv_pGHy3A00MKUWwj8UgWG3HUOUxVPsxzPSrw_o9sn-Gjv0Cui3ToQ</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Fassov, Janne</creator><creator>Liao, Donghua</creator><creator>Brock, Christina</creator><creator>Lundby, Lilli</creator><creator>Laurberg, Søren</creator><creator>Krogh, Klaus</creator><general>Dove Medical Press Limited</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Dove</general><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0600-223X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3381-1884</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Sacral Nerve Modulation Has No Effect on the Postprandial Response in Irritable Bowel Syndrome</title><author>Fassov, Janne ; Liao, Donghua ; Brock, Christina ; Lundby, Lilli ; Laurberg, Søren ; Krogh, Klaus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-458b082a409f01121138fcf58d25b991f13517347b8002905b6a2cdb5bb937aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Diarrhea</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Fecal incontinence</topic><topic>gastrocolic response</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Irritable bowel syndrome</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>postprandial response</topic><topic>sacral nerve modulation</topic><topic>sacral nerve stimulation</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fassov, Janne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Donghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brock, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundby, Lilli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurberg, Søren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krogh, Klaus</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fassov, Janne</au><au>Liao, Donghua</au><au>Brock, Christina</au><au>Lundby, Lilli</au><au>Laurberg, Søren</au><au>Krogh, Klaus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sacral Nerve Modulation Has No Effect on the Postprandial Response in Irritable Bowel Syndrome</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental gastroenterology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><spage>235</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>235-244</pages><issn>1178-7023</issn><eissn>1178-7023</eissn><abstract>Irritable bowel syndrome is a common gastrointestinal disorder with a global prevalence of approximately 11%. Onset or worsening of symptoms following digestion is one of the characteristics of the condition. The present study aimed at evaluating the postprandial sensory and motor response before and after treatment with sacral nerve modulation. Twenty-one irritable bowel syndrome patients, 12 diarrhea-predominant and 9 mixed, were eligible for a 6-week sacral nerve modulation test period. Patients were investigated with multimodal impedance planimetry including a standardized meal at baseline and at the end of 2 weeks of suprasensory stimulation embedded in the 6-week sacral nerve modulation period. There was no statistical significant difference in the sensory response to heat or cold before and after sacral nerve modulation, p&gt;0.05. At baseline, wall tension increased after the meal (mean 124.79 [range 82.5 to 237.3] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 207.76 [range, 143.5 to 429] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.048 indicating a postprandial response. During sacral nerve modulation, the postprandial increase in wall tension did not reach statistical significance (mean 86.79 [range 28.8 to 204.5] mmHg.mm before the meal, mean 159.71 [range 71.3 to 270.8] mmHg.mm after the meal), p=0.277. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the postprandial wall tension at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p=0.489. Likewise, we found no difference between pressure or stretch ratio at baseline and during sacral nerve modulation, p&gt;0.05. Sacral nerve modulation does not exert its positive treatments effects in diarrhea-predominant and mixed irritable bowel syndrome through a modulation of the postprandial response.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Dove Medical Press Limited</pub><pmid>32636665</pmid><doi>10.2147/CEG.S245209</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0600-223X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3381-1884</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1178-7023
ispartof Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2020-01, Vol.13, p.235-244
issn 1178-7023
1178-7023
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_de9e8b0e637a47df822138ebaac17591
source Publicly Available Content Database; Taylor & Francis Open Access(OpenAccess); PubMed Central
subjects Biomechanics
Care and treatment
Diarrhea
Electrodes
Fecal incontinence
gastrocolic response
Gastroenterology
Irritable bowel syndrome
Medical research
Original Research
Pain
Patients
postprandial response
sacral nerve modulation
sacral nerve stimulation
Software
Studies
title Sacral Nerve Modulation Has No Effect on the Postprandial Response in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T02%3A26%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sacral%20Nerve%20Modulation%20Has%20No%20Effect%20on%20the%20Postprandial%20Response%20in%20Irritable%20Bowel%20Syndrome&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20gastroenterology&rft.au=Fassov,%20Janne&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=235-244&rft.issn=1178-7023&rft.eissn=1178-7023&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/CEG.S245209&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA630509545%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-458b082a409f01121138fcf58d25b991f13517347b8002905b6a2cdb5bb937aa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424325792&rft_id=info:pmid/32636665&rft_galeid=A630509545&rfr_iscdi=true