Loading…

Elevation-dependent warming: observations, models, and energetic mechanisms

Observational data and numerical models suggest that, under climate change, elevated land surfaces warm faster than non-elevated ones. Proposed drivers of this “elevation-dependent warming” (EDW) include surface albedo and water vapour feedbacks, the temperature dependence of longwave emission, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Weather and climate dynamics 2024-05, Vol.5 (2), p.763-777
Main Authors: Byrne, Michael P., Boos, William R., Hu, Shineng
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-5c9a678a4a3afaac842955d1056b45cec38dd6e90f820a360f6d18f10439fe3f3
container_end_page 777
container_issue 2
container_start_page 763
container_title Weather and climate dynamics
container_volume 5
creator Byrne, Michael P.
Boos, William R.
Hu, Shineng
description Observational data and numerical models suggest that, under climate change, elevated land surfaces warm faster than non-elevated ones. Proposed drivers of this “elevation-dependent warming” (EDW) include surface albedo and water vapour feedbacks, the temperature dependence of longwave emission, and aerosols. Yet the relative importance of each proposed mechanism both regionally and at large scales is unclear, highlighting an incomplete physical understanding of EDW. Here we expand on previous regional studies and use gridded observations, atmospheric reanalysis, and a range of climate model simulations to investigate EDW over the historical period across the tropics and subtropics (40° S to 40° N). Observations, reanalysis, and fully coupled models exhibit annual mean warming trends (1959–2014), binned by surface elevation, which are larger over elevated surfaces and broadly consistent across datasets. EDW varies by season, with stronger observed signals in local winter and autumn. Analysis of large ensembles of single-forcing simulations (1959–2005) suggests historical EDW is likely a forced response of the climate system rather than an artefact of internal variability and is primarily driven by increasing greenhouse gas concentrations. To gain quantitative insight into the mechanisms contributing to large-scale EDW, a forcing–feedback framework based on top-of-atmosphere energy balance is applied to the fully coupled models. This framework identifies the Planck and surface albedo feedbacks as being robust drivers of EDW (i.e. enhancing warming over elevated surfaces), with energy transport by the atmospheric circulation also playing an important role. In contrast, water vapour and cloud feedbacks along with weaker radiative forcing in elevated regions oppose EDW. Implications of the results for understanding future EDW are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.5194/wcd-5-763-2024
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_de9f29eab85e4edcb7e04d7ceb9ea222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_de9f29eab85e4edcb7e04d7ceb9ea222</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_de9f29eab85e4edcb7e04d7ceb9ea222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-5c9a678a4a3afaac842955d1056b45cec38dd6e90f820a360f6d18f10439fe3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGq3rucHmJrJaxJ3UuoDC250He4kN3XKPEoyWPz3Tq2Iq3M5Bz4uHyHXJVuq0srbgw9U0UoLyhmXZ2TGtTVUslKf_7svySLnHWOMm0pIbWbkZd3iJ4zN0NOAe-wD9mNxgNQ1_fauGOqM6TTnm6IbArZTQh8K7DFtcWx80aH_gL7JXb4iFxHajIvfnJP3h_Xb6oluXh-fV_cb6gVjI1Xegq4MSBAQAbyR3CoVSqZ0LZVHL0wIGi2LhjMQmkUdShNLJoWNKKKYk-cTNwywc_vUdJC-3ACN-ymGtHWQptdadAFt5BahNgolBl9XyGSoPNZTyTmfWMsTy6ch54Txj1cydzTrJrNOucmsO5oV3_HKbd8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Elevation-dependent warming: observations, models, and energetic mechanisms</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Byrne, Michael P. ; Boos, William R. ; Hu, Shineng</creator><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Michael P. ; Boos, William R. ; Hu, Shineng</creatorcontrib><description>Observational data and numerical models suggest that, under climate change, elevated land surfaces warm faster than non-elevated ones. Proposed drivers of this “elevation-dependent warming” (EDW) include surface albedo and water vapour feedbacks, the temperature dependence of longwave emission, and aerosols. Yet the relative importance of each proposed mechanism both regionally and at large scales is unclear, highlighting an incomplete physical understanding of EDW. Here we expand on previous regional studies and use gridded observations, atmospheric reanalysis, and a range of climate model simulations to investigate EDW over the historical period across the tropics and subtropics (40° S to 40° N). Observations, reanalysis, and fully coupled models exhibit annual mean warming trends (1959–2014), binned by surface elevation, which are larger over elevated surfaces and broadly consistent across datasets. EDW varies by season, with stronger observed signals in local winter and autumn. Analysis of large ensembles of single-forcing simulations (1959–2005) suggests historical EDW is likely a forced response of the climate system rather than an artefact of internal variability and is primarily driven by increasing greenhouse gas concentrations. To gain quantitative insight into the mechanisms contributing to large-scale EDW, a forcing–feedback framework based on top-of-atmosphere energy balance is applied to the fully coupled models. This framework identifies the Planck and surface albedo feedbacks as being robust drivers of EDW (i.e. enhancing warming over elevated surfaces), with energy transport by the atmospheric circulation also playing an important role. In contrast, water vapour and cloud feedbacks along with weaker radiative forcing in elevated regions oppose EDW. Implications of the results for understanding future EDW are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2698-4016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2698-4016</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/wcd-5-763-2024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Copernicus Publications</publisher><ispartof>Weather and climate dynamics, 2024-05, Vol.5 (2), p.763-777</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-5c9a678a4a3afaac842955d1056b45cec38dd6e90f820a360f6d18f10439fe3f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9019-3915</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boos, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Shineng</creatorcontrib><title>Elevation-dependent warming: observations, models, and energetic mechanisms</title><title>Weather and climate dynamics</title><description>Observational data and numerical models suggest that, under climate change, elevated land surfaces warm faster than non-elevated ones. Proposed drivers of this “elevation-dependent warming” (EDW) include surface albedo and water vapour feedbacks, the temperature dependence of longwave emission, and aerosols. Yet the relative importance of each proposed mechanism both regionally and at large scales is unclear, highlighting an incomplete physical understanding of EDW. Here we expand on previous regional studies and use gridded observations, atmospheric reanalysis, and a range of climate model simulations to investigate EDW over the historical period across the tropics and subtropics (40° S to 40° N). Observations, reanalysis, and fully coupled models exhibit annual mean warming trends (1959–2014), binned by surface elevation, which are larger over elevated surfaces and broadly consistent across datasets. EDW varies by season, with stronger observed signals in local winter and autumn. Analysis of large ensembles of single-forcing simulations (1959–2005) suggests historical EDW is likely a forced response of the climate system rather than an artefact of internal variability and is primarily driven by increasing greenhouse gas concentrations. To gain quantitative insight into the mechanisms contributing to large-scale EDW, a forcing–feedback framework based on top-of-atmosphere energy balance is applied to the fully coupled models. This framework identifies the Planck and surface albedo feedbacks as being robust drivers of EDW (i.e. enhancing warming over elevated surfaces), with energy transport by the atmospheric circulation also playing an important role. In contrast, water vapour and cloud feedbacks along with weaker radiative forcing in elevated regions oppose EDW. Implications of the results for understanding future EDW are discussed.</description><issn>2698-4016</issn><issn>2698-4016</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGq3rucHmJrJaxJ3UuoDC250He4kN3XKPEoyWPz3Tq2Iq3M5Bz4uHyHXJVuq0srbgw9U0UoLyhmXZ2TGtTVUslKf_7svySLnHWOMm0pIbWbkZd3iJ4zN0NOAe-wD9mNxgNQ1_fauGOqM6TTnm6IbArZTQh8K7DFtcWx80aH_gL7JXb4iFxHajIvfnJP3h_Xb6oluXh-fV_cb6gVjI1Xegq4MSBAQAbyR3CoVSqZ0LZVHL0wIGi2LhjMQmkUdShNLJoWNKKKYk-cTNwywc_vUdJC-3ACN-ymGtHWQptdadAFt5BahNgolBl9XyGSoPNZTyTmfWMsTy6ch54Txj1cydzTrJrNOucmsO5oV3_HKbd8</recordid><startdate>20240522</startdate><enddate>20240522</enddate><creator>Byrne, Michael P.</creator><creator>Boos, William R.</creator><creator>Hu, Shineng</creator><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9019-3915</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240522</creationdate><title>Elevation-dependent warming: observations, models, and energetic mechanisms</title><author>Byrne, Michael P. ; Boos, William R. ; Hu, Shineng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-5c9a678a4a3afaac842955d1056b45cec38dd6e90f820a360f6d18f10439fe3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boos, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Shineng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Weather and climate dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Byrne, Michael P.</au><au>Boos, William R.</au><au>Hu, Shineng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Elevation-dependent warming: observations, models, and energetic mechanisms</atitle><jtitle>Weather and climate dynamics</jtitle><date>2024-05-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>763</spage><epage>777</epage><pages>763-777</pages><issn>2698-4016</issn><eissn>2698-4016</eissn><abstract>Observational data and numerical models suggest that, under climate change, elevated land surfaces warm faster than non-elevated ones. Proposed drivers of this “elevation-dependent warming” (EDW) include surface albedo and water vapour feedbacks, the temperature dependence of longwave emission, and aerosols. Yet the relative importance of each proposed mechanism both regionally and at large scales is unclear, highlighting an incomplete physical understanding of EDW. Here we expand on previous regional studies and use gridded observations, atmospheric reanalysis, and a range of climate model simulations to investigate EDW over the historical period across the tropics and subtropics (40° S to 40° N). Observations, reanalysis, and fully coupled models exhibit annual mean warming trends (1959–2014), binned by surface elevation, which are larger over elevated surfaces and broadly consistent across datasets. EDW varies by season, with stronger observed signals in local winter and autumn. Analysis of large ensembles of single-forcing simulations (1959–2005) suggests historical EDW is likely a forced response of the climate system rather than an artefact of internal variability and is primarily driven by increasing greenhouse gas concentrations. To gain quantitative insight into the mechanisms contributing to large-scale EDW, a forcing–feedback framework based on top-of-atmosphere energy balance is applied to the fully coupled models. This framework identifies the Planck and surface albedo feedbacks as being robust drivers of EDW (i.e. enhancing warming over elevated surfaces), with energy transport by the atmospheric circulation also playing an important role. In contrast, water vapour and cloud feedbacks along with weaker radiative forcing in elevated regions oppose EDW. Implications of the results for understanding future EDW are discussed.</abstract><pub>Copernicus Publications</pub><doi>10.5194/wcd-5-763-2024</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9019-3915</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2698-4016
ispartof Weather and climate dynamics, 2024-05, Vol.5 (2), p.763-777
issn 2698-4016
2698-4016
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_de9f29eab85e4edcb7e04d7ceb9ea222
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
title Elevation-dependent warming: observations, models, and energetic mechanisms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A28%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Elevation-dependent%20warming:%20observations,%20models,%20and%20energetic%20mechanisms&rft.jtitle=Weather%20and%20climate%20dynamics&rft.au=Byrne,%20Michael%20P.&rft.date=2024-05-22&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=763&rft.epage=777&rft.pages=763-777&rft.issn=2698-4016&rft.eissn=2698-4016&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/wcd-5-763-2024&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_de9f29eab85e4edcb7e04d7ceb9ea222%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-5c9a678a4a3afaac842955d1056b45cec38dd6e90f820a360f6d18f10439fe3f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true